Concomitant Meniscotibial Ligament Reconstruction Decreases Meniscal Extrusion Following Medial Meniscus Allograft Transplantation: A Cadaveric Analysis

A Recess Is Observed Between the Posterior Knee Capsule and the Meniscotibial Ligament Complex in Pediatric Specimens

Purpose

To define the surgical anatomy of the meniscotibial ligament complex of the pediatric medial and lateral menisci and their relation to the proximal tibial physis and posterior joint capsule.

Methods

Fourteen pediatric cadaveric knee specimens (aged 3 months to 11 years) were dissected to clarify the relation of the posterior knee capsule, the meniscus, and the meniscotibial ligament complex. Metallic markers were placed marking the meniscotibial ligament capsular attachment on the proximal tibia. Specimens underwent computed tomography scanning to evaluate pin placement and relation to the physis. A digital measurement tool was used to measure the distances between the proximal tibial physis and the pins (placed at 5 points on both the lateral and medial menisci).

Results

In each specimen, clear separation was noted between the posterior joint capsule from the meniscus and meniscotibial ligament complex in the medial and lateral compartments. There was an increase in the distance between the proximal tibial physis and the insertion points of the meniscotibial ligament complex with increasing specimen age. For both the medical and lateral menisci in group 1, the median meniscotibial ligament insertion points were often less than 7 mm (interquartile range, 0.00-7.8 mm) away from the physis. The median meniscotibial ligament insertion points in group 2 tended to be farther from the physis but always less than 20 mm (interquartile range, 2.5-17.5 mm)-and as close as less than 5 mm (lateral posterior root).

Conclusions

In this anatomic study of pediatric knees, we observed a distinct recess/cul-de-sac space between the posterior knee capsule and meniscal attachments in all specimens. This defines a distinct plane between the posterior knee capsule and the meniscotibial ligament complex, with a distance between the physis and meniscotibial ligament capsular attachments that increases with age.

Clinical Relevance

The anatomic parameters evaluated in our study should be considered as future meniscal repair and transplantation techniques aim to restore the meniscal anatomy, stability, and mobility provided by the meniscotibial ligament complex and capsule structures.

Editorial Commentary: Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Results in Both Pain Relief and Chondroprotection

Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) effectively alleviates symptoms of the meniscus deficiency. Thus, MAT is a widely accepted and recommended treatment for individuals with unicompartmental pain due to meniscus deficiency. Long-term follow-up studies have indicated that MAT yields favorable clinical outcomes, demonstrating high survivorship and low rates of serious complications. In addition, the ability of MAT to function akin to the native meniscus and shield the knee cartilage from osteoarthritis has been a subject of ongoing investigation, and recent direct magnetic resonance imaging evidence shows long-term chondroprotection following MAT. Cartilage lesions worsen during the meniscus deficiency period. Consequently, delaying MAT until patients become more symptomatic may lead to poor outcomes and low graft survivorship due to concomitant cartilage lesions. These findings prompt a reevaluation of the purpose and timing of MAT decisions for meniscectomy patients, suggesting a more proactive approach to recommending MAT, particularly for patients at high risk of postmeniscectomy syndrome and osteoarthritis progression.

Measuring Technique for Meniscal Extrusion Using Ultrasound in the Setting of Posterior Medial Meniscal Root Tears

Meniscal extrusion (ME) is a valuable, noninvasive diagnostic tool for meniscus pathology. In addition, ultrasound can allow for instant results in the office. However, ME is a fragile metric in the degree of millimeters. The inconsistent techniques used by different authors in the literature and the additional operator variability that ultrasound technology introduces make it important a systematic approach is used. The purpose of this study is to propose a reproducible technique. The current authors recommend having the patient in (1) 30° of knee flexion while weight-bearing, (2) capturing the image at the posterior border of the medial collateral ligament, (3) using a reference line parallel to the articular margin of the tibia, and (4) measuring ME at the coronal midpoint of the outermost edge of the meniscus.

Extrusion After Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Is Lower or Equal With Bony Compared With Soft-Tissue Root Fixation: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To provide an update on the incidence and extent of graft extrusion after meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) and to systematically review the literature to identify whether the type of root fixation or additional surgical techniques may reduce the risk of graft extrusion development.

METHODS

A systematic search, in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines, was conducted using the MEDLINE database, EMBASE database, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) database. Patients undergoing medial meniscal allograft transplantation (MMAT) or lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (LMAT) were included. The primary outcome measure was meniscal extrusion measured on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans taken more than 6 weeks after MAT. The following extrusion outcomes were investigated: absolute extrusion (AE), relative percentage of extrusion (RPE), and proportion of major extrusion (PME). Additional surgical techniques that reduced the risk of graft extrusion development in the included comparative studies were identified.

RESULTS

For MMAT, the pooled mean extrusion outcomes for soft-tissue versus bony fixation were as follows: AE of 3.2 mm versus 3.36 mm and RPE of 44.43% versus 33.18%. The pooled mean PME for MMAT with soft-tissue fixation was 51.62%. For LMAT, the pooled mean extrusion outcomes for soft-tissue versus bony fixation were as follows: AE of 3.72 mm versus 2.78 mm, RPE of 31.89% versus 29.47%, and PME of 64.37% versus 35.80%. Additional capsulodesis was identified as a technique to reduce LMAT extrusion.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights that graft extrusion is a common finding after MMAT and LMAT, independent of the root fixation technique. However, MAT extrusion with bony fixation was, depending on the outcome measurement, lower than or equal to that with soft-tissue fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I, III, and IV studies.

Current advances in engineering meniscal tissues: insights into 3D printing, injectable hydrogels and physical stimulation based strategies

The knee meniscus is the cushioning fibro-cartilage tissue present in between the femoral condyles and tibial plateau of the knee joint. It is largely avascular in nature and suffers from a wide range of tears and injuries caused by accidents, trauma, active lifestyle of the populace and old age of individuals. Healing of the meniscus is especially difficult due to its avascularity and hence requires invasive arthroscopic approaches such as surgical resection, suturing or implantation. Though various tissue engineering approaches are proposed for the treatment of meniscus tears, three-dimensional (3D) printing/bioprinting, injectable hydrogels and physical stimulation involving modalities are gaining forefront in the past decade. A plethora of new printing approaches such as direct light photopolymerization and volumetric printing, injectable biomaterials loaded with growth factors and physical stimulation such as low-intensity ultrasound approaches are being added to the treatment portfolio along with the contemporary tear mitigation measures. This review discusses on the necessary design considerations, approaches for 3D modeling and design practices for meniscal tear treatments within the scope of tissue engineering and regeneration. Also, the suitable materials, cell sources, growth factors, fixation and lubrication strategies, mechanical stimulation approaches, 3D printing strategies and injectable hydrogels for meniscal tear management have been elaborated. We have also summarized potential technologies and the potential framework that could be the herald of the future of meniscus tissue engineering and repair approaches.

Effect of Injury to the Lateral Meniscotibial Ligament and Meniscofibular Ligament on Meniscal Extrusion: Biomechanical Evaluation of the Capsulodesis and Centralization Techniques in a Porcine Knee Model

Background

Previous biomechanical studies of the meniscotibial ligament have determined that it contributes to meniscal stability. An injury to it can cause the meniscus to extrude, and reconstruction of that ligament significantly reduces extrusion.

Purpose

To assess the biomechanical effects of sectioning the lateral meniscotibial ligament (LMTL) and the meniscofibular ligament (MFL) with respect to the radial mobility of the lateral meniscus and to evaluate the biomechanical effects of the capsulodesis and centralization techniques.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

The lateral meniscus of 22 porcine knees was evaluated. They were mounted on a testing apparatus to apply muscle and ground-reaction forces. The meniscus was evaluated at 30° and 60° of knee flexion using 2 markers placed on the posterior cruciate ligament and the lateral meniscus after applying an axial compression of 200 N to the knee joint. Measurements were recorded under 5 conditions: intact lateral meniscus, injury of the LMTL, subsequent injury of the MFL, the use of the open capsulodesis technique, and the reconstruction of the LMTL and the MFL with the centralization technique.

Results

The distance between the 2 markers was significantly greater in the extrusion group (combined lesion of the LMTL and MFL) than in the intact or reconstruction groups (capsulodesis and centralization techniques; P < .001 in all cases). In the cases of load application, no significant differences were observed between the control group (intact meniscus) and the groups on which the reconstruction techniques were performed. There were also no differences when comparing the results obtained between both reconstruction techniques. In all settings, the distance between the 2 markers increased with the increase in the knee flexion angle.

Conclusion

In a porcine model, the LMTL and the MFL participated as restrictors of the radial mobility of the lateral meniscus during loading. Their injury caused a significant increase in lateral meniscal extrusion, and the centralization and the capsulodesis procedures were able to reduce extrusion.

Clinical Relevance

This study demonstrates the capacity of the LMTL and the MFL to restrict the radial mobility of the lateral meniscus during loading and how it is affected when they are injured.

Evaluation of meniscus extrusion during stair ambulation in healthy volunteers using dynamic ultrasonography: a feasibility study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of evaluating medial meniscus extrusion (MME) during stair ambulation.

METHODS

Twenty healthy young participants (mean age, 22.4 ± 0.9 years) were recruited for this cross-sectional study. Synchronization between the three-dimensional motion system and ultrasonography was used to quantify the extent of meniscal extrusion and knee angles during different tasks, including gait, stair ascent, and stair descent. In particular, ultrasonography was used to record the movements of both the middle and posterior segments of the meniscus to obtain detailed information about these movements in relation to the knee angle. The difference between the maximum MME and the MME at the initial contact (ΔMME) was evaluated during each task in the stance phase.

RESULTS

Visualization of the meniscus in the middle segment was limited with increasing knee flexion angle, whereas the posterior segments were visible during all tasks. ΔMME of the posterior segment during stair ascent and descent was higher than that during gait (gait: 0.68 ± 0.20 mm, ascent: 1.00 ± 0.39 mm, descent: 0.90 ± 0.27 mm, gait-ascent: p = 0.009, gait-descent: p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation that includes the posterior segment enables visualization of the medial meniscus and detection of its specific behavior during stair ambulation. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of evaluating meniscus dynamics during stair ambulation, and could contribute to a better understanding of these dynamics.

Biomechanical Analysis of Meniscotibial Ligament Tenodesis to Treat Meniscal Extrusion in the Setting of Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Repair

BACKGROUND

Meniscal extrusion often persists after a medial meniscus root repair. If the meniscus is extruded, the function of the meniscus as a load-sharing device and secondary knee stabilizer is compromised.

HYPOTHESIS

It was hypothesized that repairing the meniscotibial ligament (MTL) would decrease meniscal extrusion in the settings of both an isolated MTL tear and a repaired medial meniscus root while also improving medial compartment contact mechanics.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees (mean age, 50.5 years) were tested in 5 conditions: intact, MTL deficiency, MTL deficiency + posterior medial meniscus root deficiency, MTL deficiency + posterior medial meniscus root repair, and MTL tenodesis + posterior medial meniscus root repair. Specimens were mounted to a load frame that applied a 1000-N axial load. Joint contact pressures were measured using thin pressure sensors, and the peak and mean pressures were analyzed. Ultrasound was used to measure meniscal extrusion.

RESULTS

The MTL tear in isolation resulted in significant meniscal extrusion compared with the intact state (P = 0.035) without a detectable difference in medial compartment pressures. The addition of a root tear to the MTL tear state resulted in significantly more extrusion (P = 0.001) and significant increases in medial compartment pressure (P = .030) compared to the MTL tear state. Root repair alone restored extrusion, mean contact pressure, and peak contact pressure back to the intact state (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that MTL disruption led to increased meniscal extrusion in a cadaveric model. Unlike the root tear state, MTL disruption did not change contact mechanics. Furthermore, root repair alone was sufficient in restoring intact biomechanics and extrusion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study may help clinicians understand the origin of medial meniscus root tears and aid in the decision-making process for whether to add an MTL tenodesis in the setting of root repair.

The meniscotibial ligament role in meniscal extrusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The meniscotibial ligament (MTL) limits extrusion of the medial meniscus (MM). While meniscal extrusion may be detrimental to knee joint biomechanics, the role of the MTL in meniscal extrusion is debatable. We sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of the MTL and surgical techniques for MTL repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines we searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase for: (("Meniscotibial") OR ("Coronary") OR ("Ramp")) AND ("Extrusion"). After screening and applying eligibility criteria, data were extracted for MTL pathology types ("traumatic" ruptures or "induced" injuries) and meniscal extrusion. A meta-analysis evaluated the mean difference of extrusion between "intact" MTLs (native or repaired) and "injured" MTLs (induced or traumatic). We further performed a subgroup analysis between traumatic and induced MTL lesions.

RESULTS

This systematic review included six studies, which all evaluated MM extrusion. There were 74 knees with induced MTL injuries and 19 knees with traumatic MTL ruptures. Study designs were heterogenic and utilized three types of MTL repair procedures. The meta-analysis included 18 human knees and revealed that sectioning the MTL created a 2.92 mm [- 0.18 to 6.03] MM extrusion, while MTL repair decreased MM extrusion by - 2.11 mm [- 3.03 to - 1.21].

CONCLUSIONS

MTL injury may result in approximately 3 mm of MM extrusion, while repair of the MTL can decrease extrusion by 2 mm. Several novel surgical techniques exist to repair the MTL. However, studies reporting clinical outcomes of these various procedures are scarce.

Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair Reduces but Does Not Avoid Histologic Progression of Osteoarthritis: Randomized In Vivo Experimental Study in a Rabbit Model

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment option for meniscus root tears is still challenging, and whether the meniscus root repair ultimately can arrest or delay osteoarthritic changes is still a concern.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was 2-fold: (1) to describe and compare histopathologic findings of 3 different therapeutic options for medial meniscus posterior root tear: nonoperative management, partial meniscectomy, and meniscus root repair; and (2) to test the hypothesis that meniscus root tears treated nonoperatively predispose to a lower risk of osteoarthritic progression compared with partial meniscectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Posteromedial meniscus root tears were carried out in 39 New Zealand White rabbits. Animals were randomly assigned into 3 experimental groups: partial meniscectomy after root tear (PM; n = 13), root tears treated conservatively (CT; n = 13), and transtibial root repair (RR; n = 13). Contralateral limbs were used as healthy controls. The animals were euthanized at 16 weeks postoperatively; tissue samples of femoral and tibial articular cartilage were collected and processed for macro- and microscopic assessment to detect signs of early osteoarthritis (OA). Each sample was histopathologically assessed using the Osteoarthritis Research Society International grading and staging system.

RESULTS

Osteoarthritic changes were the hallmark in all 3 experimental groups. The RR group had the lowest scores for cartilage damage (mean, 2.5; range, 2-3), and the PM group exhibited higher and more severe signs of OA (mean, 16; range, 9-16) compared with the CT group (mean, 5; range, 4-6). The between-group comparison revealed significant differences, as the PM group showed a significantly higher rate of macro- and microscopic osteoarthritic changes compared with the RR (P < .001) and CT (P < .001) groups. The weightbearing area of the medial femoral condyle was the most severely affected, and tidemark disruption was evident in all tissue samples.

CONCLUSION

Meniscus root repair cannot completely arrest the histopathologic progression of knee OA but leads to significantly less severe degenerative changes than partial meniscectomy and nonoperative treatment. Partial meniscectomy leads to the most severe osteoarthritic progression, while stable radial tears left in situ have lower progression compared with partial meniscectomy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Histologic assessment is an essential tool and metric for guiding and understanding osteoarthritic features, providing insight into the disease development and progression. This study provides histopathologic evidence on osteoarthritic progression after medial meniscus posterior root repair. This knowledge can help to set more realistic expectations and can lead to the future development of augmented techniques.

Editorial Commentary: Restoring Native Meniscal Anatomy With Medial Meniscus Allograft Transplantation and Augmentation of the Meniscotibial Ligament May Decrease Meniscal Graft Extrusion

While studies have shown significant clinical improvement after medial meniscus allograft transplantation (MMAT) with good long-term graft survivorship, progression to osteoarthritis still occurs, even in the presence of intact grafts. Several factors can potentially explain the lack of chondroprotection despite graft survivorship, including meniscal degeneration, tearing, and remodeling after the initial procedure. A major factor contributing to progression of osteoarthritis is meniscal extrusion, which is seen in up to 60% of patients and seems to be more of an issue in medial meniscus transplantation compared to lateral and is present even immediately postoperatively. Grafts without extrusion provide protective effects similar to the native meniscus, while greater than 3 mm of extrusion leads to nearly complete loss of the protective effects. A reconstruction of the meniscotibial ligament, in addition to standard MMAT, may significantly decrease meniscal extrusion. Optimization of graft size, quality, and meniscal root positioning is best to prevent extrusion and restore native biomechanics.