Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic One-Tunnel Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Transosseous Suture Repair Are Not Diminished in Cases of Ulnar Styloid Process Fracture Nonunion

Effectiveness of suture anchor and transosseous suture technique in arthroscopic foveal repair of the triangular fibrocartilage complex: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Currently, there were two major surgical methods for arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) foveal repair: suture anchor (SA) and transosseous suture (TOS). The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the relevant outcome improvement and safety of SA and TOS technique.

METHODS

Literature review of electronic databases for studies investigating the effects of SA and TOS in patients undergoing arthroscopic TFCC foveal repair was performed. We compared the pre-operative and postoperative functional outcomes, clinical outcomes [pain, range of motion (ROM) and grip strength], and complications of two methods. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was used to determine clinically meaningful improvement.

RESULTS

There were 1263 distinct studies identified, with 26 (904 patients) meeting the inclusion criteria. The mean age of participants ranged from 21.4 to 41 years, and the mean follow-up time ranged from 6 to 106 months. Both SA and TOS groups reported significant improvement in the modified mayo wrist score, the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, quick DASH score, patient-reported wrist evaluation (PRWE) score, and the visual analog scale (VAS) score. According to MCID, all the studies from both groups reporting DASH, quick DASH, PRWE and VAS score achieved clinically meaningful improvement. (MCID: 10 for DASH, 14 for quick DASH, 14 for PRWE and 1.6-18 for VAS). The ROM changes in both groups varied from improvement to deterioration. Grip strength improved in both SA and TOS group. Most complications were self-limited. The reoperation rates in SA and TOS ranged from 0 to 20% and 0 to 27.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both SA and TOS technique for arthroscopic TFCC foveal repair could achieve improvement in postoperative functional outcomes, pain, and grip strength with low reoperation rate. However, the ROM improvement was still inconclusive.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

Systematic review of level III and IV studies.

Editorial Commentary: In Cases of Concurrent Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears and Ulnar Styloid Process Fracture Nonunions, We May Neither Need to Excise nor Repair the Ulnar Styloid Fracture Nonunion Fragment

The ulnar-sided wrist contains multiple potential pain generators that may present in isolation. Occasionally, however, wrist trauma results in multiple concurrent and overlapping injuries that make diagnosis and treatment of these conditions challenging. Deep/foveal tears of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) may occur in the setting of nonunited ulnar styloid process fractures. Treatment of these injuries has historically included open TFCC repair with fixation or excision of the ulnar styloid fracture nonunion fragment; however, recent literature suggests that addressing the ulnar styloid nonunion fragment may not be as important as we think. Recent research shows that we may not need to excise or repair the ulnar styloid fracture nonunion fragment, which in turn may help preserve the complex ligamentous architecture that stabilizes the ulnar-sided wrist. One thing we know for sure is that foveal tears of the deep fibers of the TFCC, with or without ulnar styloid fracture (Palmer 1B, Atzei class 2 or 3), can produce distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability and wrist dysfunction and should be addressed sooner rather than later to prevent long-term consequences, including DRUJ osteoarthritis. Whether you choose to approach the problem arthroscopically or open, the foveal TFCC tear should be repaired to prevent long-term sequalae.