Patients With Unhealed or Partially Healed Anterior Capsules After Hip Arthroscopy for Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hips Have Inferior Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Female Sex, Capsular Laxity, and Heightened Beighton Test Score, Femoral Torsion Angle, Neck-Shaft Angle Decrease Whereas Hip Inflammatory Disease and Capsular Repair Increase Hip Capsular Thickness: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To systematically review factors affecting hip capsule thickness.

METHODS

The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The terms "hip," "arthroscopy," "capsule," "capsular," and "thickness" were used to search the PubMed, Ovid [MEDLINE], Cochrane Database, and EMBASE databases from inception to January 15, 2024.

RESULTS

The initial search identified 1,735 studies. Twenty-three studies were included in the systematic review. Eight reported the relationship between sex and capsule thickness. Seven reported that capsule thickness was significantly lower in women. Of the 4 studies reporting the relationship between capsular laxity and capsule thickness or Beighton test score (BTS), 4 studies showed the association of lower capsule thickness in patients with capsular laxity or BTS ≥4. Of the 6 studies reporting the relationship between arthroscopic surgery and capsular thickness, 2 showed significantly greater capsule thickness after capsulotomy with repair and 2 found significantly decreased postoperative capsule thickness without repair. One study illustrated that anterior capsule thickness was significantly smaller in patients with femoral torsion angle >20°. One study showed that neck-shaft angle was negatively corelated with anterior capsule thickness. Of the 3 studies that examined lateral central edge angle, 2 reported that lower angle correlated with thinner capsule thickness; one study reported the opposite result. Hip inflammatory disease was associated with thicker hip capsule.

CONCLUSIONS

Female sex, capsular laxity, BTS ≥4, greater femoral torsion angle, and greater neck-shaft angle were associated with a thinner hip capsule. Hip inflammatory disease and capsule repair after arthroscopic surgery were associated with a thicker capsule.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.

A retrospective study of arthroscopic treatment for patients with bordline developmental dysplasia of the hip

PURPOSE

Hip arthroscopy is effective in treating bordline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH), but there are only a few clinical reports in China, and its postoperative failure rate is still a problem that cannot be ignored. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical effect of hip arthroscopy in BDDH treatment in China and to explore the risk factors influencing the efficacy of hip arthroscopy in BDDH treatment.

METHODS

All of 22 cases of BDDH treated with arthroscopy in our hospital from November March 2017 to February 2022 were analyzed retrospectively, including ten males and 12 females, with an average age of 34.7 ± 9.5 years (19-53 years). All patients underwent arthroscopic treatment with acetabular plasty, labral repair, femoral osteoplasty, and capsular plication. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score-activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) were measured before operation and at the follow-up, and statistical analysis was performed. The Minimum clinically significant difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) were also obtained.

RESULTS

22 patients were followed up, and the follow-up time was ≥ one year, with an average of 21.4 ± 8.2 months. The VAS score decreased from 5.27 ± 1.58 points before surgery to 1.96 ± 0.92 points at the follow-up, and the difference was statistically significant (t = 9.05,P < 0.001). The mHHS score increased from 64.84 ± 13.58 points before surgery to 90.4 ± 10.11 points at the follow-up, and the difference was statistically significant (t=-7.07, P < 0.001). The HOS-ADL score increased from 68.92 ± 11.76 points before surgery to 88.91 ± 9.51 points at the follow-up, and the difference was statistically significant (t=-8.15,P < 0.001). The iHOT-12 score increased from 49.32 ± 12.01 points before surgery to 79.61 ± 15.89 points at the follow-up, and the difference was statistically significant (t=-7.66,P < 0.001). The MCID (mHHS) and MCID (HOS-ADL) were 81.8% and 77.3% respectively, and the PASS (mHHS) and PASS (HOS-ADL) were 86.4% and 72.7% respectively at the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Hip arthroscopy can achieve good short-term outcomes in the treatment of BDDH.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV Therapeutic Study.

Cartilage Defects Are Negatively Associated With Long-Term Hip Survivorship Following Contemporary Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To identify the timing and risk factors associated with secondary surgery following primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) at 10-year minimum follow-up.

METHODS

A prospectively collected clinical repository was evaluated for cases of primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS between January 2012 and February 2013 with minimum 10-year follow-up. Patients who underwent secondary surgery were propensity matched 1:4 to patients who did not undergo secondary surgery, controlling for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). The groups were compared on demographics, radiographs, intraoperative findings, operative procedures, and patient-reported outcomes. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve was generated. Among the reoperation-free survivors, minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) achievement were recorded for Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific (HOS-SS) subscales, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), 12-item international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain).

RESULTS

Twenty-four reoperation patients (67% female; age 40.1 ± 14.3 years; BMI 27.2 ± 5.5) were matched to 96 reoperation-free patients (62% female; age 37.0 ± 10.8 years; BMI 25.2 ± 4.7, P ≥ .111). Mean follow-up was 10.3 ± 0.2 years. No preoperative demographic differences were found between groups. The reoperation group showed more high-grade cartilage defects on the acetabulum and femoral head (33% vs 8%, P = .004; 29% vs 7%, P = .007). A bimodal distribution of time to reoperation was evidenced independent of the secondary surgery performed. Among the reoperation-free survivors, MCID and PASS achievement was as follows: HOS-ADL (69.1%, 62.1%), HOS-SS (69.9%, 74.4%), mHHS (73.3%, 58.1%), iHOT-12 (n/a, 63.8%), and VAS-Pain (80.2%, 62.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients requiring reoperation following primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS demonstrated more severe cartilage defects and a bimodal distribution of time to reoperation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Noninterportal capsulotomy of hip arthroscopy showed improved outcomes in borderline hip dysplasia: A retrospective study with minimum 2-year follow-up

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes of hip arthroscopy using a noninterportal capsulotomy technique to address labral tears in patients with borderline hip dysplasia (BHD). Additionally, we also compared these outcomes with those of patients with BHD who underwent the standard repaired interportal capsulotomy (RIPC) arthroscopy.

METHODS

Data from patients with BHD were retrieved from a database of patients who underwent arthroscopic hip surgery with noninterportal capsulotomy or RIPC to treat labral tears between January 2014 and December 2020. Data collected included both pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients (noninterportal capsulotomy, n = 37; RIPC, n = 21) with a mean age of 30.9 ± 5.6 and 28.6 ± 5.5 years, respectively, met the inclusion criteria. All of the patients underwent a minimal 2-year follow-up. The mean lateral centre-edge angle was 23.3 ± 1.2° in the noninterportal capsulotomy group and 23.7 ± 1.0° in the RIPC group, with no significant difference. The PROs improved from the preoperative to the latest follow-up, with a p < 0.001. There were no differences between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Using strict patient selection criteria, hip arthroscopy with noninterportal capsulotomy demonstrated significant pre- to postoperative improvements in patients with BHD and achieved results comparable to those from hip arthroscopy with RIPC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Eighty-One Percent of Unrepaired Interportal Capsulotomies Showed Healed Capsules on Magnetic Resonance Imaging 5 Years After Primary Hip Arthroscopy

Purpose

To evaluate whether unrepaired interportal capsulotomy presents with capsular defect on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 5 years after primary hip arthroscopy and to determine its effect on functional results and findings of osteoarthritis on radiographs or MRI scans.

Methods

Patients with femoroacetabular impingement (without arthritis or dysplasia) were retrospectively reviewed after arthroscopic labral repair or debridement and femoroplasty through interportal capsulotomy without closure. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively using patient-reported outcomes (Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living scale, modified Harris Hip Score, and visual analog scale pain score), radiographic measures, and MRI scans.

Results

Forty patients (42 hips) were deemed eligible for the study and were evaluated. Of the hips, 81% had healed capsules, whereas 8 (19%) had capsular defects on the latest MRI scan. There were 3 hips with subchondral edema in the defect group compared with 1 in the healed-capsule group (P = .01) on the latest MRI scan, which was not present on preoperative MRI (still positive on multivariate analysis when the preoperative alpha angle was also taken into consideration). Functional results did not differ between the groups (P > .05).

Conclusions

In this study, 81% of interportal capsulotomies healed without repair at 5 years after primary hip arthroscopy.

Clinical Relevance

Understanding the prevalence and implications of unhealed capsulotomies could encourage surgeons to be meticulous in capsular closure.

Editorial Commentary: Arthroscopy With Labral Preservation or Reconstruction Plus Capsular Closure Shows Excellent Outcome in Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia and is Less Invasive Than Periacetabular Osteotomy

Borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH), or borderline hip dysplasia (BHD), traditionally characterized by a relatively low lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), presents a complex challenge in treatment due to its multifaceted etiology involving instability, femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), or a combination thereof. The optimal approach to managing adult BDDH remains a subject of significant debate. Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is considered the preferred treatment for addressing severe acetabular under-coverage, as it rectifies the underlying bony deficiency and promotes stability. However, the treatment of BDDH is less straightforward, particularly with the advancement of hip arthroscopy techniques, specifically labral preservation and capsular management. Given the minimally invasive and rapid postoperative rehabilitation advantage for arthroscopic procedures over open surgeries, numerous attempts have been undertaken in this context. Research has revealed favorable patient-reported outcomes (PROs), low failure rates, and a significant proportion of returning to sports (RTS) after arthroscopic management for patients with BDDH. Although we might in the right direction, Level I evidence studies are needed to comprehensively compare long-term PROs, failure rates, and rates of RTS between arthroscopy and PAO in the treatment of BDDH.

Hip Arthroscopic Surgery With Chondrolabral Refixation, Osteochondroplasty, and Routine Capsular Closure for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Clinical Outcomes at a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) has proven to be an effective surgical intervention, with high rates of return to sport and work as well as favorable outcomes at short- and midterm follow-up. However, limited data exist on outcomes at long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE

To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at a minimum 10-year follow-up after primary hip arthroscopic surgery including labral repair, femoral osteochondroplasty, acetabular osteochondroplasty, and capsular closure for FAIS.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS between June 2012 and January 2013 were identified. PROs were collected preoperatively and at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively, including the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction. Unique minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds were calculated, and their rates of achievement were analyzed. An alpha level of <.05 was used to determine statistical significance.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients (55 female; mean age, 34.3 ± 12.4 years) were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 10.1 ± 0.3 years (range, 10.0-10.7 years). Patients demonstrated significant 10-year improvement across all PRO measures (P < .001). MCID and PASS thresholds were calculated as follows: HOS-ADL (10.4 and 85.3, respectively), HOS-SS (14.6 and 60.2, respectively), mHHS (8.8 and 76.0, respectively), VAS pain (14.6 and 27.5, respectively), and iHOT-12 (PASS: 71.4). The majority of patients achieved the MCID and PASS for each PRO measure: HOS-ADL (73.4% and 70.9%, respectively), HOS-SS (78.5% and 77.2%, respectively), mHHS (81.0% and 70.9%, respectively), VAS pain (88.6% and 70.9%, respectively), and iHOT-12 (PASS: 73.4%). Overall, 9 patients (9.6%) underwent subsequent revision hip arthroscopic surgery at a mean 4.9 ± 3.7 years (range, 1.1-10.1 years) postoperatively, and 6 patients (6.4%) underwent conversion to total hip arthroplasty at a mean 4.1 ± 3.1 years (range, 0.9-9.3 years) postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS utilizing contemporary methods of labral repair, acetabular and/or femoral osteochondroplasty, and capsular closure commonly experienced sustained clinical improvement and reported high levels of satisfaction at a minimum 10-year follow-up with low rates of reoperation.

Editorial Commentary: Femoral Version and Capsular Thickness Analysis in Hip Preservation Surgery-Surgical Indications Are as Important as Surgical Technique

Optimal treatment of patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome requires both thoughtful decision-making and skillful operative technique. Traditional evidence-based literature and routine clinical practice overemphasize the role of the alpha angle on the femoral side and lateral center edge angle on the acetabular side. Femoral and acetabular version are critical values that influence outcomes and warrant measurement and consideration. Without version analysis, an uniformed, possibly poor, decision may be made. The literature and clinical practice also place dichotomous emphasis on labral (torn/intact) and capsular (torn/intact) integrity, with minimal appreciation of the morphological details of both. Not all capsules are created equal. "Normal" capsule thickness is a nebulous concept, with thinner anterior capsules more prone to anterior instability. Intuitively, it biomechanically stands to reason that excessive femoral anteversion (and excessive anterior cranial and central acetabular version) would place additional stress on the anterior capsule. Excessive femoral anteversion is associated with a thinner anterior capsule. Whether the latter is a reactive process (implies causation) or simply 2 concordant metrics (only correlation) has yet to be determined. In patients with nonarthritic hip pain, comprehensive quantitative consideration of both femoral and acetabular version and capsular thickness determines the optimal hip preservation procedure. Surgical indications are as important as surgical technique.

Femoral Anteversion Is Associated With a Thinner Anterior Capsule in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

PURPOSE

To measure femoral torsion on computed tomography images in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and explore whether femoral torsion was significantly correlated with anterior capsular thickness.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of surgical patients were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients aged 16 to 55 years who underwent primary hip surgery were included in this study. Patients with a history of revision hip surgery, previous knee surgery, hip dysplasia, hip synovitis, and/or incomplete radiographs and medical records were excluded from the study. Femoral torsion was measured via computed tomography imaging using transcondylar slices of the knee. Anterior capsular thickness was measured using oblique-sagittal sequences on a 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging system. The association between anterior capsular thickness and related variables, including femoral torsion, was assessed via multiple linear regression. The patients were then divided into 2 groups to further confirm the effect of femoral torsion on capsular thickness: Patients in the study group had hips with moderate (20°-25°) or severe (>25°) antetorsion, whereas patients in the control group had hips with normal torsion (5°-20°) or retrotorsion (<5°). Anterior capsular thickness was also compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients (89 female patients [57.1%] and 67 male patients [42.9%]) were finally included in the study. The mean age and body mass index of the included patients were 35.8 ± 11.2 years and 22.7 ± 3.5, respectively. The mean femoral torsion for the entire study population was 15.9° ± 8.9°. Multivariable regression analysis showed that femoral torsion (P < .001) and sex (P = .002) were significantly correlated with anterior capsular thickness. Propensity-score matching yielded 50 hips in the study group and 50 hips in the control group on femoral torsion subanalysis. The results showed that anterior capsular thickness was significantly smaller in the study group than in the control group (3.8 ± 0.5 mm vs 4.7 ± 0.7 mm, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral torsion is significantly inversely correlated with anterior capsular thickness.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Team Approach: Hip Preservation Surgery

The evaluation and treatment of adolescents and young adults with hip pain has seen tremendous growth over the past 20 years. Labral tears are well established as a common cause of hip pain but often occur because of underlying bony abnormalities. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and acetabular dysplasia are now well-established causes of hip osteoarthritis and are increasingly treated in the prearthritic stage in hopes of improving symptoms and prolonging the longevity of the native hip. Beyond FAI and acetabular dysplasia, this patient population can present with a complex and variable group of underlying conditions that need to be taken into account. Expertise in the conservative management of this population, including physical therapy, is valuable to maximize the success. Preoperative, surgical, and postoperative decision-making and care in this population is complex and evolving. A comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to the care of this patient population has been used for over 20 years by our institution with great success. The purpose of this article is to review the "team-based approach" necessary for successful management of the spectrum of adolescent and young adult hip disorders.

Editorial Commentary: Interportal Capsulotomy for Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia May Result in Inferior Outcomes: Periportal Capsulotomy May Reduce Hip Capsular Damage

Management of the hip capsule remains an ongoing discussion in the field of hip arthroscopy. Interportal and T-capsulotomies remain the most common approaches to gain access to the hip during surgery, and biomechanical and clinical research supports repair of these types of capsulotomies. Less is known, however, about the quality of the tissue that heals at these repair sites during the postoperative period, particularly in the setting of patients with borderline hip dysplasia. The capsular tissue provides important joint stability to these patients, and disruption to the capsule can result in significant functional impairments. There is also an association between borderline hip dysplasia and joint hypermobility, which increases the risk of insufficient healing after capsular repair. Patients with borderline hip dysplasia show poor capsular healing after arthroscopy followed by interportal hip capsule repair, and incomplete healing results in inferior patient-reported outcomes. Periportal capsulotomy may limit capsular violation and improve outcomes.