Application of non-invasive central aortic pressure assessment in clinical trials: Clinical experience and value

Estimating Central Pulse Pressure From Blood Flow by Identifying the Main Physical Determinants of Pulse Pressure Amplification

Several studies suggest that central (aortic) blood pressure (cBP) is a better marker of cardiovascular disease risk than peripheral blood pressure (pBP). The morphology of the pBP wave, usually assessed non-invasively in the arm, differs significantly from the cBP wave, whose direct measurement is highly invasive. In particular, pulse pressure, PP (the amplitude of the pressure wave), increases from central to peripheral arteries, leading to the so-called pulse pressure amplification (ΔPP). The main purpose of this study was to develop a methodology for estimating central PP (cPP) from non-invasive measurements of aortic flow and peripheral PP. Our novel approach is based on a comprehensive understanding of the main cardiovascular properties that determine ΔPP along the aortic-brachial arterial path, namely brachial flow wave morphology in late systole, and vessel radius and distance along this arterial path. This understanding was achieved by using a blood flow model which allows for workable analytical solutions in the frequency domain that can be decoupled and simplified for each arterial segment. Results show the ability of our methodology to (i) capture changes in cPP and ΔPP produced by variations in cardiovascular properties and (ii) estimate cPP with mean differences smaller than 3.3 ± 2.8 mmHg on in silico data for different age groups (25-75 years old) and 5.1 ± 6.9 mmHg on in vivo data for normotensive and hypertensive subjects. Our approach could improve cardiovascular function assessment in clinical cohorts for which aortic flow wave data is available.

Estimating central blood pressure from aortic flow: development and assessment of algorithms

Central blood pressure (cBP) is a highly prognostic cardiovascular (CV) risk factor whose accurate, invasive assessment is costly and carries risks to patients. We developed and assessed novel algorithms for estimating cBP from noninvasive aortic hemodynamic data and a peripheral blood pressure measurement. These algorithms were created using three blood flow models: the two- and three-element Windkessel (0-D) models and a one-dimensional (1-D) model of the thoracic aorta. We tested new and existing methods for estimating CV parameters (left ventricular ejection time, outflow BP, arterial resistance and compliance, pulse wave velocity, and characteristic impedance) required for the cBP algorithms, using virtual (simulated) subjects (n = 19,646) for which reference CV parameters were known exactly. We then tested the cBP algorithms using virtual subjects (n = 4,064), for which reference cBP were available free of measurement error, and clinical datasets containing invasive (n = 10) and noninvasive (n = 171) reference cBP waves across a wide range of CV conditions. The 1-D algorithm outperformed the 0-D algorithms when the aortic vascular geometry was available, achieving central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) errors≤2.1 ± 9.7mmHg and root-mean-square errors (RMSEs)≤6.4 ± 2.8mmHg against invasive reference cBP waves (n = 10). When the aortic geometry was unavailable, the three-element 0-D algorithm achieved cSBP errors ≤ 6.0 ± 4.7mmHg and RMSEs ≤ 5.9 ± 2.4mmHg against noninvasive reference cBP waves (n = 171), outperforming the two-element 0-D algorithm. All CV parameters were estimated with mean percentage errors ≤ 8.2%, except for the aortic characteristic impedance (≤13.4%), which affected the three-element 0-D algorithm’s performance. The freely available algorithms developed in this work enable fast and accurate calculation of the cBP wave and CV parameters in datasets containing noninvasive ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging data.