1
|
Mechanosensitive recruitment of stator units promotes binding of the response regulator CheY-P to the flagellar motor. Nat Commun 2021; 12:5442. [PMID: 34521846 PMCID: PMC8440544 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25774-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Reversible switching of the bacterial flagellar motor between clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW) rotation is necessary for chemotaxis, which enables cells to swim towards favorable chemical habitats. Increase in the viscous resistance to the rotation of the motor (mechanical load) inhibits switching. However, cells must maintain homeostasis in switching to navigate within environments of different viscosities. The mechanism by which the cell maintains optimal chemotactic function under varying loads is not understood. Here, we show that the flagellar motor allosterically controls the binding affinity of the chemotaxis response regulator, CheY-P, to the flagellar switch complex by modulating the mechanical forces acting on the rotor. Mechanosensitive CheY-P binding compensates for the load-induced loss of switching by precisely adapting the switch response to a mechanical stimulus. The interplay between mechanical forces and CheY-P binding tunes the chemotactic function to match the load. This adaptive response of the chemotaxis output to mechanical stimuli resembles the proprioceptive feedback in the neuromuscular systems of insects and vertebrates.
Collapse
|
2
|
Szczecinski NS, Dallmann CJ, Quinn RD, Zill SN. A computational model of insect campaniform sensilla predicts encoding of forces during walking. BIOINSPIRATION & BIOMIMETICS 2021; 16:065001. [PMID: 34384067 DOI: 10.1088/1748-3190/ac1ced] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Control of forces is essential in both animals and walking machines. Insects measure forces as strains in their exoskeletons via campaniform sensilla (CS). Deformations of cuticular caps embedded in the exoskeleton excite afferents that project to the central nervous system. CS afferent firing frequency (i.e. 'discharge') is highly dynamic, correlating with the rate of change of the force. Discharges adapt over time to tonic forces and exhibit hysteresis during cyclic loading.In this study we characterized a phenomenological model that predicts CS discharge, in which discharge is proportional to the instantaneous stimulus force relative to an adaptive variable. In contrast to previous studies of sensory adaptation, our model (1) is nonlinear and (2) reproduces the characteristic power-law adaptation with first order dynamics only (i.e. no 'fractional derivatives' are required to explain dynamics). We solve the response of the system analytically in multiple cases and use these solutions to derive the dynamics of the adaptive variable. We show that the model can reproduce responses of insect CS to many different force stimuli after being tuned to reproduce only one response, suggesting that the model captures the underlying dynamics of the system. We show that adaptation to tonic forces, rate-sensitivity, and hysteresis are different manifestations of the same underlying mechanism: the adaptive variable. We tune the model to replicate the dynamics of three different CS groups from two insects (cockroach and stick insect), demonstrating that it is generalizable. We also invert the model to estimate the stimulus force given the discharge recording from the animal. We discuss the adaptive neural and mechanical processes that the model may mimic and the model's use for understanding the role of load feedback in insect motor control. A preliminary model and results were previously published in the proceedings of the Conference on Biohybrid and Biomimetic Systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas S Szczecinski
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26505, United States of America
| | - Chris J Dallmann
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| | - Roger D Quinn
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States of America
| | - Sasha N Zill
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25755, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boudinot BE, Beutel RG, Gorb SN, Polilov AA. Functional diversity of attachment and grooming leg structures is retained in all but the smallest insects. J Zool (1987) 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- B. E. Boudinot
- Department of Entomology & Nematology University of California Davis CA USA
| | - R. G. Beutel
- Institut für Zoologie und Evolutionsforschung Friedrich‐Schiller‐Universität Jena Germany
- Economo Group Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST) Tancha Japan
| | - S. N. Gorb
- Department Functional Morphology and Biomechanics Zoological Institute of the University of Kiel Kiel Germany
| | - A. A. Polilov
- Department of Entomology Biological faculty Lomonosov Moscow State University Moscow Russia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Location and arrangement of campaniform sensilla in
Drosophila melanogaster. J Comp Neurol 2020; 529:905-925. [DOI: 10.1002/cne.24987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
5
|
Federle W, Labonte D. Dynamic biological adhesion: mechanisms for controlling attachment during locomotion. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2019; 374:20190199. [PMID: 31495309 PMCID: PMC6745483 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The rapid control of surface attachment is a key feature of natural adhesive systems used for locomotion, and a property highly desirable for man-made adhesives. Here, we describe the challenges of adhesion control and the timescales involved across diverse biological attachment systems and different adhesive mechanisms. The most widespread control principle for dynamic surface attachment in climbing animals is that adhesion is 'shear-sensitive' (directional): pulling adhesive pads towards the body results in strong attachment, whereas pushing them away from it leads to easy detachment, providing a rapid mechanical 'switch'. Shear-sensitivity is based on changes of contact area and adhesive strength, which in turn arise from non-adhesive default positions, the mechanics of peeling, pad sliding, and the targeted storage and controlled release of elastic strain energy. The control of adhesion via shear forces is deeply integrated with the climbing animals' anatomy and locomotion, and involves both active neuromuscular control, and rapid passive responses of sophisticated mechanical systems. The resulting dynamic adhesive systems are robust, reliable, versatile and nevertheless remarkably simple. This article is part of the theme issue 'Transdisciplinary approaches to the study of adhesion and adhesives in biological systems'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter Federle
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - David Labonte
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dürr V, Arena PP, Cruse H, Dallmann CJ, Drimus A, Hoinville T, Krause T, Mátéfi-Tempfli S, Paskarbeit J, Patanè L, Schäffersmann M, Schilling M, Schmitz J, Strauss R, Theunissen L, Vitanza A, Schneider A. Integrative Biomimetics of Autonomous Hexapedal Locomotion. Front Neurorobot 2019; 13:88. [PMID: 31708765 PMCID: PMC6819508 DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2019.00088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite substantial advances in many different fields of neurorobotics in general, and biomimetic robots in particular, a key challenge is the integration of concepts: to collate and combine research on disparate and conceptually disjunct research areas in the neurosciences and engineering sciences. We claim that the development of suitable robotic integration platforms is of particular relevance to make such integration of concepts work in practice. Here, we provide an example for a hexapod robotic integration platform for autonomous locomotion. In a sequence of six focus sections dealing with aspects of intelligent, embodied motor control in insects and multipedal robots—ranging from compliant actuation, distributed proprioception and control of multiple legs, the formation of internal representations to the use of an internal body model—we introduce the walking robot HECTOR as a research platform for integrative biomimetics of hexapedal locomotion. Owing to its 18 highly sensorized, compliant actuators, light-weight exoskeleton, distributed and expandable hardware architecture, and an appropriate dynamic simulation framework, HECTOR offers many opportunities to integrate research effort across biomimetics research on actuation, sensory-motor feedback, inter-leg coordination, and cognitive abilities such as motion planning and learning of its own body size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volker Dürr
- Department of Biological Cybernetics, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.,Cognitive Interaction Technology: Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Paolo P Arena
- DIEEI: Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica Elettronica e Informatica, Università degli Studi di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Holk Cruse
- Cognitive Interaction Technology: Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Chris J Dallmann
- Department of Biological Cybernetics, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.,Cognitive Interaction Technology: Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Alin Drimus
- Mads Clausen Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark
| | - Thierry Hoinville
- Department of Biological Cybernetics, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.,Cognitive Interaction Technology: Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Tammo Krause
- Institut für Entwicklungsbiologie und Neurobiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Jan Paskarbeit
- Cognitive Interaction Technology: Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Luca Patanè
- DIEEI: Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica Elettronica e Informatica, Università degli Studi di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Mattias Schäffersmann
- Cognitive Interaction Technology: Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Malte Schilling
- Cognitive Interaction Technology: Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Josef Schmitz
- Department of Biological Cybernetics, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.,Cognitive Interaction Technology: Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Roland Strauss
- Institut für Entwicklungsbiologie und Neurobiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, Germany
| | - Leslie Theunissen
- Department of Biological Cybernetics, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.,Cognitive Interaction Technology: Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Alessandra Vitanza
- DIEEI: Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica Elettronica e Informatica, Università degli Studi di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Axel Schneider
- Cognitive Interaction Technology: Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.,Institute of System Dynamics and Mechatronics, Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences, Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gorb SN, Pullwitt T, Kleinteich T, Busshardt P. The insect unguitractor plate in action: Force transmission and the micro CT visualizations of inner structures. JOURNAL OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY 2019; 117:103908. [PMID: 31265818 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2019.103908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2018] [Revised: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The unguitractor plate (UT) within insect tarsus was previously assumed to hold claws in a bent position with reduced muscular efforts due to the specific interlocking mechanism. In this study, the functional morphology of the unguitractor plate in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) was examined using force measurements and the micro CT visualization of the UT position at different straining states of the retractor unguis muscle tendon. Pulling forces were applied in a controlled manner to the tendon and forces elicited by the claws to the stiff substrate were simultaneously recorded, in order to understand the force transmission mechanism between the tendon and claws through the UT. After claw bending and entanglement with the substrate, the claws were not released, until the tendon was relaxed to an average of 22% of the original applied force. The time delay in the returning of the claws to their original position was observed due to the frictional mechanism between the UT and corresponding microstructures of the pretarsus. This mechanism provides energy saving, when claws are engaged with the substrate. However, physical contact between the UT and the inner pretarsal wall was not observed in preparations of prestrained tendons in the micro CT, presumably due to the deformations caused by fixation and drying procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanislav N Gorb
- Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Zoological Institute, Kiel University, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, D-24118 Kiel, Germany.
| | - Tom Pullwitt
- Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Zoological Institute, Kiel University, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
| | - Thomas Kleinteich
- Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Zoological Institute, Kiel University, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
| | - Philipp Busshardt
- Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Zoological Institute, Kiel University, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Haberkorn A, Gruhn M, Zill SN, Büschges A. Identification of the origin of force-feedback signals influencing motor neurons of the thoraco-coxal joint in an insect. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 2019; 205:253-270. [DOI: 10.1007/s00359-019-01334-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Revised: 03/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
9
|
Joel AC, Adamova H, Bräunig P. Mechanoreceptive sensillum fields at the tarsal tip of insect legs. J Morphol 2018; 279:1654-1664. [DOI: 10.1002/jmor.20898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Revised: 07/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Christin Joel
- Institute of Biology II, Unit of Developmental Biology and Morphology of Animals; RWTH Aachen University; Aachen Germany
| | - Hana Adamova
- Institute of Biology II, Unit of Developmental Biology and Morphology of Animals; RWTH Aachen University; Aachen Germany
| | - Peter Bräunig
- Institute of Biology II, Unit of Developmental Biology and Morphology of Animals; RWTH Aachen University; Aachen Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zill SN, Dallmann CJ, Büschges A, Chaudhry S, Schmitz J. Force dynamics and synergist muscle activation in stick insects: the effects of using joint torques as mechanical stimuli. J Neurophysiol 2018; 120:1807-1823. [PMID: 30020837 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00371.2018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Many sensory systems are tuned to specific parameters of behaviors and have effects that are task-specific. We have studied how force feedback contributes to activation of synergist muscles in serially homologous legs of stick insects. Forces were applied using conventional half-sine or ramp and hold functions. We also utilized waveforms of joint torques calculated from experiments in freely walking animals. In all legs, forces applied to either the tarsus (foot) or proximal leg segment (trochanter) activated synergist muscles that generate substrate grip and support, but coupling of the depressor muscle to tarsal forces was weak in the front legs. Activation of trochanteral receptors using ramp and hold functions generated positive feedback to the depressor muscle in all legs when animals were induced to seek substrate grip. However, discharges of the synergist flexor muscle showed adaptation at moderate force levels. In contrast, application of forces using torque waveforms, which do not have a static hold phase, produced sustained discharges in muscle synergies with little adaptation. Firing frequencies reflected the magnitude of ground reaction forces, were graded to changes in force amplitude, and could also be modulated by transient force perturbations added to the waveforms. Comparison of synergist activation by torques and ramp and hold functions revealed a strong influence of force dynamics (dF/d t). These studies support the idea that force receptors can act to tune muscle synergies synchronously to the range of force magnitudes and dynamics that occur in each leg according to their specific use in behavior. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The effects of force receptors (campaniform sensilla) on leg muscles and synergies were characterized in stick insects using both ramp and hold functions and waveforms of joint torques calculated by inverse dynamics. Motor responses were sustained and showed reduced adaptation to the more "natural" and nonlinear torque stimuli. Calculation of the first derivative (dF/d t) of the torque waveforms demonstrated that this difference was correlated with the dynamic sensitivities of the system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sasha N Zill
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia
| | - Chris J Dallmann
- Department of Biological Cybernetics, Bielefeld University , Bielefeld , Germany
| | - Ansgar Büschges
- Department of Animal Physiology, Institute of Zoology, Biocenter, University of Cologne , Cologne , Germany
| | - Sumaiya Chaudhry
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia
| | - Josef Schmitz
- Department of Biological Cybernetics, Bielefeld University , Bielefeld , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Büscher TH, Buckley TR, Grohmann C, Gorb SN, Bradler S. The Evolution of Tarsal Adhesive Microstructures in Stick and Leaf Insects (Phasmatodea). Front Ecol Evol 2018. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2018.00069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
|
12
|
Motor flexibility in insects: adaptive coordination of limbs in locomotion and near-range exploration. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s00265-017-2412-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
13
|
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to better understand how animals control locomotion. This knowledge can then be applied to neuromechanical design to produce more capable and adaptable robot locomotion. To test hypotheses about animal motor control, we model animals and their nervous systems with dynamical simulations, which we call synthetic nervous systems (SNS). However, one major challenge is picking parameter values that produce the intended dynamics. This paper presents a design process that solves this problem without the need for global optimization. We test this method by selecting parameter values for SimRoach2, a dynamical model of a cockroach. Each leg joint is actuated by an antagonistic pair of Hill muscles. A distributed SNS was designed based on pathways known to exist in insects, as well as hypothetical pathways that produced insect-like motion. Each joint’s controller was designed to function as a proportional-integral (PI) feedback loop and tuned with numerical optimization. Once tuned, SimRoach2 walks through a simulated environment, with several cockroach-like features. A model with such reliable low-level performance is necessary to investigate more sophisticated locomotion patterns in the future.
Collapse
|
14
|
Szczecinski NS, Getsy AP, Martin JP, Ritzmann RE, Quinn RD. Mantisbot is a robotic model of visually guided motion in the praying mantis. ARTHROPOD STRUCTURE & DEVELOPMENT 2017; 46:736-751. [PMID: 28302586 DOI: 10.1016/j.asd.2017.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2016] [Revised: 02/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/11/2017] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Insects use highly distributed nervous systems to process exteroception from head sensors, compare that information with state-based goals, and direct posture or locomotion toward those goals. To study how descending commands from brain centers produce coordinated, goal-directed motion in distributed nervous systems, we have constructed a conductance-based neural system for our robot MantisBot, a 29 degree-of-freedom, 13.3:1 scale praying mantis robot. Using the literature on mantis prey tracking and insect locomotion, we designed a hierarchical, distributed neural controller that establishes the goal, coordinates different joints, and executes prey-tracking motion. In our controller, brain networks perceive the location of prey and predict its future location, store this location in memory, and formulate descending commands for ballistic saccades like those seen in the animal. The descending commands are simple, indicating only 1) whether the robot should walk or stand still, and 2) the intended direction of motion. Each joint's controller uses the descending commands differently to alter sensory-motor interactions, changing the sensory pathways that coordinate the joints' central pattern generators into one cohesive motion. Experiments with one leg of MantisBot show that visual input produces simple descending commands that alter walking kinematics, change the walking direction in a predictable manner, enact reflex reversals when necessary, and can control both static posture and locomotion with the same network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas S Szczecinski
- Case Western Reserve University, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, USA.
| | - Andrew P Getsy
- Case Western Reserve University, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, USA
| | | | - Roy E Ritzmann
- Case Western Reserve University, Department of Biology, USA
| | - Roger D Quinn
- Case Western Reserve University, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zill SN, Neff D, Chaudhry S, Exter A, Schmitz J, Büschges A. Effects of force detecting sense organs on muscle synergies are correlated with their response properties. ARTHROPOD STRUCTURE & DEVELOPMENT 2017; 46:564-578. [PMID: 28552666 PMCID: PMC5817982 DOI: 10.1016/j.asd.2017.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2017] [Revised: 05/21/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Sense organs that monitor forces in legs can contribute to activation of muscles as synergist groups. Previous studies in cockroaches and stick insects showed that campaniform sensilla, receptors that encode forces via exoskeletal strains, enhance muscle synergies in substrate grip. However synergist activation was mediated by different groups of receptors in cockroaches (trochanteral sensilla) and stick insects (femoral sensilla). The factors underlying the differential effects are unclear as the responses of femoral campaniform sensilla have not previously been characterized. The present study characterized the structure and response properties (via extracellular recording) of the femoral sensilla in both insects. The cockroach trochantero-femoral (TrF) joint is mobile and the joint membrane acts as an elastic antagonist to the reductor muscle. Cockroach femoral campaniform sensilla show weak discharges to forces in the coxo-trochanteral (CTr) joint plane (in which forces are generated by coxal muscles) but instead encode forces directed posteriorly (TrF joint plane). In stick insects, the TrF joint is fused and femoral campaniform sensilla discharge both to forces directed posteriorly and forces in the CTr joint plane. These findings support the idea that receptors that enhance synergies encode forces in the plane of action of leg muscles used in support and propulsion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sasha N Zill
- Department of Anatomy and Pathology, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25704, USA.
| | - David Neff
- Department of Anatomy and Pathology, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25704, USA
| | - Sumaiya Chaudhry
- Department of Anatomy and Pathology, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25704, USA
| | - Annelie Exter
- Department of Biological Cybernetics, University of Bielefeld, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Josef Schmitz
- Department of Biological Cybernetics, University of Bielefeld, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Ansgar Büschges
- Department of Animal Physiology, Institute of Zoology, Biocenter Cologne, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
The ability of animals to flexibly navigate through complex environments depends on the integration of sensory information with motor commands. The sensory modality most tightly linked to motor control is mechanosensation. Adaptive motor control depends critically on an animal's ability to respond to mechanical forces generated both within and outside the body. The compact neural circuits of insects provide appealing systems to investigate how mechanical cues guide locomotion in rugged environments. Here, we review our current understanding of mechanosensation in insects and its role in adaptive motor control. We first examine the detection and encoding of mechanical forces by primary mechanoreceptor neurons. We then discuss how central circuits integrate and transform mechanosensory information to guide locomotion. Because most studies in this field have been performed in locusts, cockroaches, crickets, and stick insects, the examples we cite here are drawn mainly from these 'big insects'. However, we also pay particular attention to the tiny fruit fly, Drosophila, where new tools are creating new opportunities, particularly for understanding central circuits. Our aim is to show how studies of big insects have yielded fundamental insights relevant to mechanosensation in all animals, and also to point out how the Drosophila toolkit can contribute to future progress in understanding mechanosensory processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John C Tuthill
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
| | - Rachel I Wilson
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, 220 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Structure and function of the elastic organ in the tibia of a tenebrionid beetle. Naturwissenschaften 2016; 103:41. [PMID: 27118185 DOI: 10.1007/s00114-016-1363-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2015] [Revised: 03/30/2016] [Accepted: 04/04/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Many insects have a pair of claws on the tip of each foot (tarsus and pretarsus). The movement of the pretarsal claws is mediated by a long apodeme that originates from the claw retractor muscles in the femur. It is generally accepted that the pulling of the apodeme by the muscles flexes the claws to engage with a rough surface of a substrate, and the flexed claws return to their initial position by passive elastic forces within the tarso-pretarsal joint. We found that each tibia of the tenebrionid beetle Zophobas atratus had a chordal elastic organ that tied the apodeme to the distal end of the tibia and assisted the pulled apodeme to return smoothly. The elastic body of the elastic organ consists of a bundle of more than 1000 thin fibrils (0.3-1.5 μm in diameter) with a hairy yarn-shaped structure made by assemblies of intricately interwoven microfibers. Both ends of the fibrillar elastic body were supported by clusters of columnar cells. Ablation of the elastic organ often disturbed the rapid and smooth return of claws from a flexed position when the tarsal segments were forced to curve in order to increase the friction between the apodeme and surrounding tissues in the segments. The result suggests that rapid claw disengagement is an important step in each cycle of leg movements, and the elastic organ may have evolved to assist the reliable detachment of claws that engage tightly with the substrate when climbing or traversing inverted surfaces.
Collapse
|
18
|
Zill SN, Chaudhry S, Büschges A, Schmitz J. Force feedback reinforces muscle synergies in insect legs. ARTHROPOD STRUCTURE & DEVELOPMENT 2015; 44:541-553. [PMID: 26193626 DOI: 10.1016/j.asd.2015.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2015] [Accepted: 07/07/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
The nervous system solves complex biomechanical problems by activating muscles in modular, synergist groups. We have studied how force feedback in substrate grip is integrated with effects of sense organs that monitor support and propulsion in insects. Campaniform sensilla are mechanoreceptors that encode forces as cuticular strains. We tested the hypothesis that integration of force feedback from receptors of different leg segments during grip occurs through activation of specific muscle synergies. We characterized the effects of campaniform sensilla of the feet (tarsi) and proximal segments (trochanter and femur) on activities of leg muscles in stick insects and cockroaches. In both species, mechanical stimulation of tarsal sensilla activated the leg muscle that generates substrate grip (retractor unguis), as well as proximal leg muscles that produce inward pull (tibial flexor) and support/propulsion (trochanteral depressor). Stimulation of campaniform sensilla on proximal leg segments activated the same synergistic group of muscles. In stick insects, the effects of proximal receptors on distal leg muscles changed and were greatly enhanced when animals made active searching movements. In insects, the task-specific reinforcement of muscle synergies can ensure that substrate adhesion is rapidly established after substrate contact to provide a stable point for force generation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sasha N Zill
- Department of Anatomy and Pathology, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25704, USA.
| | - Sumaiya Chaudhry
- Department of Anatomy and Pathology, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25704, USA
| | - Ansgar Büschges
- Department of Animal Physiology, Zoological Institute, Biocenter Cologne, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany
| | - Josef Schmitz
- Department of Biological Cybernetics, University of Bielefeld, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Berg EM, Hooper SL, Schmidt J, Büschges A. A leg-local neural mechanism mediates the decision to search in stick insects. Curr Biol 2015; 25:2012-7. [PMID: 26190069 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2015] [Revised: 05/13/2015] [Accepted: 06/08/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
In many animals, individual legs can either function independently, as in behaviors such as scratching or searching, or be used in coordinated patterns with other legs, as in walking or climbing. While the control of walking has been extensively investigated, the mechanisms mediating the behavioral choice to activate individual legs independently are poorly understood. We examined this issue in stick insects, in which each leg can independently produce a rhythmic searching motor pattern if it doesn't find a foothold [1-4]. We show here that one non-spiking interneuron, I4, controls searching behavior in individual legs. One I4 is present in each hemi-segment of the three thoracic ganglia [5, 6]. Search-inducing sensory input depolarizes I4. I4 activity was necessary and sufficient to initiate and maintain searching movements. When substrate contact was provided, I4 depolarization no longer induced searching. I4 therefore both integrates search-inducing sensory input and is gated out by other sensory input (substrate contact). Searching thus occurs only when it is behaviorally appropriate. I4 depolarization never elicited stepping. These data show that individual, locally activated neurons can mediate the behavioral choice to use individual legs independently. This mechanism may be particularly important in insects' front legs, which can function independently like vertebrate arms and hands [7]. Similar local command mechanisms that selectively activate the pattern generators controlling repeated functional units such as legs or body segments may be present in other systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva M Berg
- Department of Animal Physiology, Institute of Zoology, Biocenter Cologne, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany.
| | - Scott L Hooper
- Department of Animal Physiology, Institute of Zoology, Biocenter Cologne, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany; Neurobiology Program, Department of Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Irvine Hall, Athens, OH 45701, USA
| | - Joachim Schmidt
- Department of Animal Physiology, Institute of Zoology, Biocenter Cologne, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany
| | - Ansgar Büschges
- Department of Animal Physiology, Institute of Zoology, Biocenter Cologne, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Schmitz J, Gruhn M, Büschges A. The role of leg touchdown for the control of locomotor activity in the walking stick insect. J Neurophysiol 2015; 113:2309-20. [PMID: 25652931 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00956.2014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2014] [Accepted: 01/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Much is known on how select sensory feedback contributes to the activation of different motoneuron pools in the locomotor control system of stick insects. However, even though activation of the stance phase muscles depressor trochanteris, retractor unguis, flexor tibiae and retractor coxae is correlated with the touchdown of the leg, the potential sensory basis of this correlation or its connection to burst intensity remains unknown. In our experiments, we are using a trap door setup to investigate how ground contact contributes to stance phase muscle activation and burst intensity in different stick insect species, and which afferent input is involved in the respective changes. While the magnitude of activation is changed in all of the above stance phase muscles, only the timing of the flexor tibiae muscle is changed if the animal unexpectedly steps into a hole. Individual and combined ablation of different force sensors on the leg demonstrated influence from femoral campaniform sensilla on flexor muscle timing, causing a significant increase in the latencies during control and air steps. Our results show that specific load feedback signals determine the timing of flexor tibiae activation at the swing-to-stance transition in stepping stick insects, but that additional feedback may also be involved in flexor muscle activation during stick insect locomotion. With respect to timing, all other investigated stance phase muscles appear to be under sensory control other than that elicited through touchdown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joscha Schmitz
- Department of Animal Physiology, Biocenter, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
| | - Matthias Gruhn
- Department of Animal Physiology, Biocenter, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
| | - Ansgar Büschges
- Department of Animal Physiology, Biocenter, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
| |
Collapse
|