Clinical experience of infective endocarditis complicated by acute cerebrovascular accidents

Clinical outcomes following reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke patients with infective endocarditis: a systematic review

Background

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a common and fatal complication of infective endocarditis (IE); however, there is a lack of understanding regarding treatment efficacy. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in IE patients experiencing AIS.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review investigating the outcomes of AIS in IE patients receiving IVT and/or EVT as a treatment method and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these methods of reperfusion therapy.

Design

A systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted.

Data Sources and Methods

The EMBASE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases were searched for literature published between 2005 and 2021 investigating outcomes of reperfusion therapy post-AIS in IE and non-IE patients. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the overall frequency of clinical outcomes, and groupwise comparisons were performed using Fisher’s exact test to assess the significance of groupwise differences.

Results

Three studies were finally included in the systematic review. A total of 13.5% of IE patients compared to 37% of non-IE patients achieved a good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score≤ 2) (P < .001). Furthermore, a larger percentage of the IE cohort achieved good functional outcomes after EVT (22.0%) compared to IVT (10.4%) (P = .013). The IE cohort also had a higher 3-month postreperfusion mortality rate (48.8%) compared to the non-IE cohort (24.9%) (P < .001). The rate of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) postreperfusion was also significantly higher in the IE cohort (23.5%) than in the non-IE cohort (6.5%) (P < .001).

Conclusion

AIS patients with IE, treated with IVT, EVT, or a combination of the two, experience worse clinical and safety outcomes than non-IE patients. EVT yielded better functional outcomes, albeit with higher postreperfusion ICH rates, than IVT.

Outcome for surgical treatment of infective endocarditis with periannular abscess

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of infective endocarditis (IE) with aortic periannular abscess (PA) is a challenging issue with high mortality and morbidity rate in the current era. The present study is to review the results of surgical treatment for IE-PA based on an anatomy-guided surgical procedure selection for either aortic valve replacement (AVR) or aortic root reconstruction (ARR).

METHODS

Patients with IE-PA received surgical treatment in National Taiwan University Hospital during the years 2001-2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The selection of surgical procedure was based on the intraoperative anatomical finding. The AVR group consisted of isolated AVR or AVR with patch repair if PA involved less than one cusp of the annulus. The ARR group included aortic root replacement if PA involved more than one cusp, causing commissural/sub-commissural destruction. In-hospital mortality and mid-term outcome and the risk factors were examined.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality was 13% in the AVR group (24 patients) and 25% in the ARR group (8 patients) (p = 0.578). The composite adverse events (cardiac death, valve reoperation, or paravalvular leak) rate was 31% in the AVR group and 40% in the ARR group at one year; 48% in the AVR group and 40% in the ARR group at five years; 55% in the AVR group and 40% in the ARR group at ten years.

CONCLUSION

Anatomy-guided surgical procedure selection for IE-PA is feasible. With the appropriate selection, ARR may be associated with fewer adverse events in mid-term follow-up. Careful intraoperative judgment and management and long-term follow-up are warranted for these patients.