Risk factors for intraoperative cyst rupture in partial nephrectomy for cystic renal masses

Surgical Outcomes of Hugo™ RAS Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Cystic Renal Masses: Technique and Initial Experience

Background: The Hugo™ Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS) system is a new cutting-edge robotic platform designed for clinical applications. Nevertheless, its application for cystic renal tumors has not yet been thoroughly investigated. In this context, we present an initial series of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) procedures carried out using the Hugo™ RAS system for cystic renal masses. Methods: Between October 2022 and January 2024, twenty-seven RAPN procedures for renal tumors were performed at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico. Our prospective board-approved dataset was queried for "cystic features" (n = 12). Perioperative data were collected. The eGFR was calculated according to the CKD-EPI formula. Post-operative complications were reported according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Computed tomography (CT) scans for follow-up were performed according to the EAU guidelines. Trifecta was defined as the coexistence of negative surgical margin status, no Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications, and eGFR decline ≤ 30%. Results: All the patients successfully underwent RAPN without the need for conversion or additional port placement. The median docking and console time were 5.5 (IQR, 4-6) and 79.5 min (IQR, 58-91 min), respectively. No intraoperative complications occurred, as well as clashes between instruments or with the bedside assistant. Two minor postoperative complications were recorded (Clavien-Dindo II). At discharge, serum creatinine and eGFR were comparable to preoperative values. Only one patient (8.4%) displayed positive surgical margins. The rate of trifecta achievement was 91.7%. Conclusions: RAPN for cystic renal masses using the novel Hugo™ RAS system can be safely and effectively performed. This robotic system provided satisfactory peri-operative outcomes, preserving renal function and displaying low postoperative complications and a high trifecta rate achievement.

Perioperative and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for cystic and solid renal masses: Evidence from controlled trials

To evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for solid and cystic renal tumors. We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases up to March 2023. Review Manager 5.4 performed a pooled analysis of the data for random effects. Besides, sensitivity and subgroup analyses to explore heterogeneity, Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and GRADE to evaluate study quality and level of evidence. Five observational studies comprising 1353 patients (Cystic tumor: 183; Solid tumor: 1083) were included in this study. Compared to solid masses, cystic masses were associated with fewer major complications (odds ratio [OR] = 2.2; 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.17 to 4.13; p = 0.01). Additionally, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of operative time, warm ischemia time, blood loss, hospital stay, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, transfusion rate, postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), eGFR preservation, positive surgical margin (PSM), recurrence, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and trifecta achievement. RAPN can be performed in cystic renal tumors with perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes like those achievable in solid tumors. However, our findings need further validation in a large-sample prospective randomized study.

Does tumor rupture during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy have an impact on mid-term tumor recurrences?

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative kidney tumor rupture (TR) can occur during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in daily clinical practice, but there are no solid guidelines on the management and implications of it. The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact of TR on tumor recurrences, what a surgeon should do if this adverse event occurs, and how to avoid it.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the first 100 patients who underwent RAPN at University Medical Centre Ljubljana, between 2018 and 2021. Patients were stratified into 2 groups (TR and no-TR) and were compared according to patient, tumor, pathologic, perioperative and postoperative characteristics and tumor recurrences, using the Mann-Whitney U test and chi-squared test.

RESULTS

Of the 100 patients, 14 had TR (14%); this occurred in tumors with higher RENAL nephrometry scores (P = 0.028) and mostly with papillary renal cell carcinomas (P = 0.043). Median warm ischemia time was longer for the TR group (22 vs. 15 min, P = 0.026). In terms of studied outcomes, there were no cases of local or distant recurrence after a median observation time of 39 months (interquartile range, 31-47 months) in both groups. We observed positive surgical margins on the final oncologic report in one case in the no-TR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor rupture during RAPN seems to be of no mid-term oncologic importance. According to presented results, we would recommend surgeons to proceed with tumor resection if this event occurs and abstain from conversion to radical nephrectomy or open partial nephrectomy. However, more similar cases should be studied to make more solid conclusions.

Comparison of partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for cystic renal cell carcinoma: a SEER-based and retrospective study

Cystic renal cell carcinoma (cRCC) is uncommon and surgical indication remains controversial. We compared radical nephrectomy (RN) with partial nephrectomy (PN) in patients with cRCC using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and a retrospective cohort including 106 cRCC patients hospitalized in Ruijin and Renji Hospitals from 2013 to 2022. The baseline characteristics between RN and PN groups in both cohorts were adjusted by propensity score-matching (PSM). A total of 640 patients were included in the SEER cohort. Before PSM, PN group in the SEER cohort had a lower level of T stage (p < 0.001) and comprised more Caucasians (p < 0.001). After PSM, RN was associated with worse overall survival (p < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (p = 0.006) in contrast to PN. In the Chinese cohort, 86 patients who underwent PN and 20 patients who underwent RN were finally included. The mean proportions of estimated glomerular filtration rate preserved after RN were worse than PN. Therefore, PN should be preferred in cRCC patients.

The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic microwave ablation-assisted partial nephrectomy: a new avenue for the treatment of cystic renal tumors

PURPOSE

Clinically, the management of cystic renal masses is tricky. The study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic microwave ablation-assisted partial nephrectomy (LMAPN) for cystic renal tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between November 2017 and January 2022, LMAPN was performed on 43 patients (29 men and 14 women; age range: 22-80 years; median age 54 years) with Bosniak category III (n = 15) or IV (n = 28) cystic renal tumors (size range: 1.2-5.0 cm; mean size 2.8 cm). The median follow-up period was 26 months (range: 7-56 months). Baseline and perioperative data, pathological features, renal function, postoperative complications and oncologic outcomes were collected and evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-three cystic renal tumors were successfully managed by LMAPN. The mean operating time was 79 min (range: 40-130 min). The mean time of renal pedicle clamping was 19 min (range: 12-25 min). Mean intraoperative blood loss was 28.4 mL (range: 10-80 mL). The mean postoperative hospitalization duration was 4 days (range: 2-6 days). Negative surgical margins were diagnosed in all cases. During the follow-up, no patient appeared with distant metastasis, wound or peritoneal cavity implantation. No major but minor complications of Clavien-Dindo grade I were encountered after the operation. The 1-, 3- and 4-year overall survival rate was 100%, 96.6% and 88.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study focusing on LMAPN for cystic renal tumors, demonstrating its favorable feasibility, safety and disease control. Long-term follow-up is necessary to draw conclusions on the preference and advantages of the new therapeutic approach.

Implication of cystic fluid cytology of renal cell carcinoma on surgical practice

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the incidence of positive cystic fluid cytology and its risk factors in cystic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) addressing its implication on the current surgical practice.

METHODS

All clinically diagnosed Bosniak III, IV cystic renal masses from March 2019 to August 2022 were studied prospectively. Database of patients' demographics and cystic tumor characteristics were recorded. Partial or radical nephrectomies were performed by either laparoscopic or robotic approach. Cystic fluid was collected right after specimen retrieval in the surgical field and examined by pathologist. Cytology results were compared to the demographic, perioperative variables using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients of histologically confirmed cystic RCC were included. Sixty seven patients underwent radical nephrectomy with laparoscopic or robotic approaches, while 3 patients underwent radical nephrectomy. There was no intraoperative cystic rupture or fluid spillage. Positive cystic fluid cytology findings were identified in 34 (48.6%) patients, while negative cystic fluid cytology were identified in 36 (51.4%) cases. Definite malignant cells were observed in 28 patients while the other six patients showed highly suspicious atypical cells. Histologically, 24 (70.8%) patients were proven clear cell RCC and 25 (73%) showed Fuhrman grade 1 or 2 in final histologic review in positive group. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis between positive and negative cytology groups showed that the presence of the malignant cells in cystic fluid was significantly associated with patients' age (> 55 years) and Bosniak grade of cystic tumor (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Definite malignant cells in cystic fluid cytology were observed through our study. Additionally, patients' age (> 55 years) and Bosniak grade were the significant risk factors of positive cytology in cystic RCC. Therefore, necessity of meticulous manipulation of cystic renal tumors, despite their clinical features, should not be underemphasized to avoid the least possible tumor cell seeding in case of cystic rupture when operating such high risk of positive cytology.

Surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for cystic renal cell carcinoma

To compare the surgical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) between patients with cystic renal cell carcinoma (cRCC) and those with solid RCC (sRCC). We retrospectively analyzed 1065 patients who underwent RAPN between 2013 and 2020 for a pathological diagnosis of RCC. Patients were divided into two groups: cRCC and sRCC. cRCC was diagnosed according to the Bosniak classification system. To minimize selection bias between the two groups, patient variables (patient characteristics) and tumor factors (such as size and complexity) were adjusted using 1:1 propensity score matching. Of the 1065 patients, 94 (9%) were diagnosed with cRCC. Bosniak categories of IIF, III, and IV were noted in 4 (4.2%), 31 (33%), and 59 (63%) patients, respectively. After matching, 83 patients each were assigned to the cRCC and sRCC groups. The operation time in cRCC tended to be longer than in sRCC but not significantly different (164 vs. 150 min, P = 0.0767). Other surgical outcomes, such as change in estimated glomerular filtration rate ( - 5.2 vs.  - 7.2%, P = 0.1577), perioperative complications (14.5 vs. 15.7%, P = 0.9225), estimated blood loss (62 vs. 58 mL, P = 0.5613), or negative surgical margin status (100 vs 99%, P = 0.236), were not significantly different between the two groups. During the follow-up period of about 2 years, one and two patients showed recurrence in the cRCC and sRCC groups, respectively. The surgical outcomes of RAPN were similar between cRCC and sRCC, demonstrating the feasibility of RAPN for cRCC.

Malignant ascites following radical nephrectomy for cystic renal cell carcinoma

A 69-year-old man with a history of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for papillary renal cell carcinoma presented with a 1-week history of generalised abdominal pain, distension and loss of appetite. Clinical examination and CT imaging demonstrated ascites associated with peritoneal nodules, raising the possibility of metastatic disease. Immunochemistry staining from ascites fluid cytology confirmed renal cell carcinoma. Following multidisciplinary discussions, the patient was commenced on a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Partial nephrectomy for a Bosniak IV cystic renal mass mimicking a simple renal cyst adjacent to a solid renal tumor

INTRODUCTION

Renal tumors are often associated with renal cysts. Meanwhile, in some cases there are challenging issues of how to diagnose renal cystic tumors and to decide surgical procedures.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 75-year-old man was referred to our department for a 21-mm tumor by his left kidney. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed an intense contrast uptake the tumor, which was adjacent to a 64-mm unilocular renal cyst with no contrasting effects. It was clinically diagnosed as renal cell carcinoma, stage T1aN0M0, and treated with robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, for both the solid tumor and the adjacent cyst. Pathological findings revealed a tumor cell clump within the cyst wall, concurrent with the renal cell carcinoma. The patient has remained free of disease at 1 year after surgery.

CONCLUSION

A partial nephrectomy that includes the entire cyst wall should be considered for renal tumor associated with unilocular renal cyst.