|
1
|
Ahuja M, Pandé R, Chugtai S, Brown RM, Cain O, Bartlett DC, Dasari BVM, Marudanayagam R, Roberts KJ, Isaac J, Sutcliffe RP, Chatzizacharias N. Vein Wall Invasion Is a More Reliable Predictor of Oncological Outcomes than Vein-Related Margins after Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Early Stages of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3465. [PMID: 37998601 PMCID: PMC10670022 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13223465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with vein resection is the only potentially curative option for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with venous involvement. The aim of our study was to assess the oncological prognostic significance of the different variables of venous involvement in patients undergoing PD for resectable and borderline-resectable with venous-only involvement (BR-V) PDAC. We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data over a 10-year period. Of the 372 patients included, 105 (28%) required vein resection and vein wall involvement was identified in 37% of those. A multivariable analysis failed to identify the vein-related resection margins as independent predictors for OS, DFS or LR. Vein wall tumour involvement was an independent predictor of OS (risk x1.7-2) and DFS (risk x1.9-2.2) in all models, while it replaced overall surgical margin positivity as the only parameter independently predicting LR during an analysis of separate resection margins (risk x2.4). Vein wall tumour invasion may be a more reliable predictor of oncological outcomes compared to traditionally reported parameters. Future studies should focus on possible pre-operative investigations that could identify these cases and management pathways that could yield a survival benefit, such as the use of neoadjuvant treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manish Ahuja
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
| | - Rupaly Pandé
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
| | - Shafiq Chugtai
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
| | - Rachel M. Brown
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (R.M.B.)
| | - Owen Cain
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (R.M.B.)
| | - David C. Bartlett
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
| | - Bobby V. M. Dasari
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
| | - Keith J. Roberts
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2SQ, UK
| | - John Isaac
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
| | - Robert P. Sutcliffe
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
| | - Nikolaos Chatzizacharias
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK; (M.A.); (R.P.); (S.C.); (D.C.B.); (B.V.M.D.); (R.M.); (K.J.R.); (J.I.); (R.P.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Ouyang G, Zhong X, Cai Z, Liu J, Zheng S, Hong D, Yin X, Yu J, Bai X, Liu Y, Liu J, Huang X, Xiong Y, Xu J, Cai Y, Jiang Z, Chen R, Peng B. The short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combining with different type of mesentericoportal vein resection and reconstruction for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: a Chinese multicenter retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-09901-2. [PMID: 36759356 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09901-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The results of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combining with mesentericoportal vein resection and reconstruction (LPD-MPVRs) for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma are rarely reported. The aim of present study was to explore the short- and long-term outcomes of different type of LPD-MPVRs. METHODS Patients who underwent LPD-MPVRs in 14 Chinese high-volume pancreatic centers between June 2014 and December 2020 were selected and compared. RESULTS In total, 142 patients were included and were divided into primary closure (n = 56), end-end anastomosis (n = 43), or interposition graft (n = 43). Median overall survival (OS) and median progress-free survival (PFS) between primary closure and end-end anastomosis had no difference (both P > 0.05). As compared to primary closure and end-end anastomosis, interposition graft had the worst median OS (12 months versus 19 months versus 17 months, P = 0.001) and the worst median PFS (6 months versus 15 months versus 12 months, P < 0.000). As compared to primary closure, interposition graft had almost double risk in major morbidity (16.3 percent versus 8.9 percent) and about triple risk (10 percent versus 3.6 percent) in 90-day mortality, while End-end anastomosis had only one fourth major morbidity (2.3 percent versus 8.9 percent). Multivariate analysis revealed postoperation hospital stay, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, number of positive lymph nodes had negative impact on OS, while R0, R1 surgical margin had protective effect on OS. Postoperative hospital stay had negative impact on PFS, while primary closure, end-end anastomosis, short-term vascular patency, and short-term vascular stenosis positively related to PFS. CONCLUSIONS In LPD-MPVRs, interposition graft had the worst OS, the worst PFS, the highest rate of major morbidity, and the highest rate of 90-day mortality. While there were no differences in OS and PFS between primary closure and end-end anastomosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guoqing Ouyang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaosheng Zhong
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhiwei Cai
- Department of Surgery, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianhua Liu
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, People's Republic of China
| | - Shangyou Zheng
- Department of Pancreas Center, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Defei Hong
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, The Medicine School of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xinmin Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The People's Hospital of Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian Yu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Xueli Bai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Yahui Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Liu
- Department of Live Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.,Department of Live Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaobing Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yong Xiong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Panzhihua Central Hospital, Panzhihua, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yunqiang Cai
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China.
| | - Zhongyi Jiang
- Department of Surgery, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
| | - Rufu Chen
- Department of Pancreas Center, Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. .,The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
| | - Bing Peng
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
GuDamu A, Wang Z, Zhou J, Jia L. The "Hand as Foot" teaching method in the pathogenesis of annular pancreas. Asian J Surg 2021; 45:473-474. [PMID: 34823993 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.11.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A GuDamu
- Inner Mongolia Medical University, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Huhehot North Street, Inner Mongolia, 010050, China.
| | - Zhaoyang Wang
- Inner Mongolia Medical University, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Huhehot North Street, Inner Mongolia, 010050, China.
| | - Jing Zhou
- Inner Mongolia Medical University,Huhehot Jinshan Street, Inner Mongolia, 010050, China
| | - Longlong Jia
- Inner Mongolia Medical University, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Huhehot North Street, Inner Mongolia, 010050, China
| |
Collapse
|