Evaluating different closed loop graft preparation technique for tibial suspensory fixation in ACL reconstruction using TightRope™

Number of intra-operative cyclic knee motion required to achieve stable graft tension in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; a prospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

Applying pretension by cyclic knee motion immediately before graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery decreases graft elongation during the postoperative course. However, the expected change in graft tension caused by cyclic knee motion remains unclear. We measured graft tension changes caused by cyclic knee motion during double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

We included 39 patients undergoing primary anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction with autologous hamstrings as graft sources, at multiple centers between February 2021 and August 2022. After securing the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundle grafts to the femoral cortex, they were initially tensioned to 40 N per bundle. After 10 cycles of knee extension and flexion motion, ranging from 0 to 90-110°, tension was re-measured and re-tensioned to 40 N if the graft tension had decreased. This was repeated thrice for 10 cycles on each graft. Every 10 cycles, we recorded graft tension changes (ΔGT) and compared the mean ΔGT in the AM and PL bundles. Furthermore, we assessed relationships between total ΔGT in each bundle, age, sex, and graft diameter.

RESULTS

Twenty-five women and 14 men with a mean age of 27.4 ± 12.4 years were included. The mean ΔGT in AM and PL bundles after every 10 cycles were 6.6 ± 3.7 N, 3.0 ± 2.3 N, 1.4 ± 1.5 N, and 9.9 ± 3.8 N, 4.9 ± 2.6 N, and 2.5 ± 1.9 N, respectively. There were significant differences in ΔGT in both bundles after every 10 cycles (p < 0.01). ΔGT in the AM bundle was significantly lower than in the PM bundle at the same number of cycles (p < 0.01). No correlation was observed between ΔGT in either bundle and age, sex, or graft diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

The initially applied graft tension decreased by intra-operative cyclic knee movement, and the changes in graft tension decreased after retention and repeated cycles. Three sets of 10 cycles knee motion may avoid initial tension loss of the hamstring autograft in the early phase after double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Comparative analysis of the results of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an autograft preparation by known and new methods

Background. To date, the problem of choosing the optimal graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and the methods for its formation is one of the main trends in the surgical treatment of patients with anterior knee joint instability.The aim. To compare the results of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the known method and the new proposed method for autograft formation.Materials and methods. The results of treatment of ACL injury in 44 patients were assessed. In the main group (19 patients), an original technique of ACL reconstruction from 1/2 of the width of m. peroneus longus tendon was used. In the control group (25 patients), ACL reconstruction was performed using a graft from the m. semitendinosus tendon prepared by the Lubowitz method.Results. The mean difference in the circumference of the distal third of the hip in the main group was 1.57 ± 1.162 cm and was statistically significantly better than in the control group, where the mean difference in the hip circumference was 4.74 ± 1.7207 cm.The range of motion of the knee joint in the main group 3 months after the surgery was 128.42 ± 9.287°, and in the control group mean flection was 109.6 ± 9.120°.The functional results in the main group were assessed by the Lisholm scale and were statistically significantly better than the results in the control group. The functional results by the AOFAS (American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society) scale in the main group were 100 points before the surgery and at all terms after the surgery: this indicates that the use of 1/2 of the width of m. peroneus longus tendon does not cause the its functional impairement.Conclusion. Anterior cruciate ligament plasty with use of 1/2 of the width of m. peroneus longus tendon prepared by the proposed method showed statistically significantly better results compared to the preparation of autograft from semitendinous muscle tendon using known method.

An Efficient Needleless Grasping Suture Technique for Graft Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Objective

Several needleless techniques have been developed to outcome the inherent disadvantages of the traditional needle stitching technique for graft preparation, such as tendon damage through the needle, time consumption, and the potential risk of needlestick injury. The purpose of the present study is to compare the graft preparation time and the biomechanical performance between an efficient needleless technique and the traditional needle stitching technique for graft preparation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Methods

The time required to perform a complete suture on 20 hamstring tendons during ACLRs was measured. The grafts from one side were prepared using the needle stitching technique. The grafts from the other side used the needleless grasping suture technique. For the second part of the study, 12 fresh-frozen porcine flexor tendons were divided into two groups using two techniques and were mounted in an electric tensile test system. Each group was pretensioned to 100 N to simulate the maximum initial graft tension. The suturing state of sutures and graft (intact and damaged) and the load-elongation curve were recorded for each group. A Student’s t-test was used to compare the means of the two groups.

Results

In operation, the needleless grasping suture technique group (19.8 ± 4.8, range: 13.5–32.9 s) was significantly faster (p &lt; 0.05) than the needle stitching technique group (52.7 ± 12.7, range: 36.0–87.5 s). The state of sutures in each group was intact. The mean elongation was 11.75 ± 1.38 (range: 9.47–12.99) mm and 10.59 ± 1.02 (range: 9.12–11.76) mm in the needleless stitching technique group and the needle grasping suture technique group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the elongation between the two groups (p &gt; 0.05).

Conclusion

The needleless grasping suture technique was a convenient and efficient method for graft preparation in ACLR.

Clinical outcomes of Tightrope system in the treatment of purely ligamentous Lisfranc injuries

Background

Purely ligamentous Lisfranc injuries are mainly caused by low energy damage and often require surgical treatment. There are several operative techniques for rigid fixation to solve this problem clinically. This study evaluated the effect of using the Tightrope system to reconstruct the Lisfranc ligament for elastic fixation.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 11 cases with purely ligamentous Lisfranc injuries treated with the Tightrope system from 2016 to 2019, including 8 male and 3 female. X-ray was performed regularly after operation to measure the distance between the first and second metatarsal joint and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate pain relief. American orthopedic foot & ankle society (AOFAS) and Maryland foot score were recorded at the last follow-up.

Results

The average follow-up time was 20.5 months (range, 17–24). There was statistically significant difference in the distance between the first and second metatarsal joint and VAS score at 3 months, 6 months, and the last follow-up when compared with preoperative values (P < 0.05).Mean of postoperative AOFAS mid-foot scale and Maryland foot score were 92.4 ± 4.3, 94.1 ± 3.5, respectively. The Tightrope system was not removed and the foot obtained better biomechanical stability. No complications occurred during the operation.

Conclusion

Tightrope system in the treatment of purely ligamentous Lisfranc injuries can stabilize the tarsometatarsal joint and achieve satisfactory effect.

Randomized comparative study of suspension femoral fixation device in graft position maintenance in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: EndoButton CL vs TightRope RT

Background

In double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), fixed-loop and adjustable-loop cortical suspensory devices are commonly used to fix the soft graft on the femoral side. However, few studies have compared in vivo elongation of the two devices. The purpose of this study was to determine whether EndoButton CL (EB) and TightRope RT (TR), the suspensory fixation devices used in ACLR, maintained their length in vivo from the time of surgery through the postoperative period in a randomized controlled trial.

Methods

This study prospectively incorporated 30 patients undergoing initial ACLR at a single center. Participants were divided into two groups using a stratified randomization method with age and sex as assignment adjustment factors. EB or TR was used for fixation of the soft graft on the femoral side. The primary endpoint was to compare the elongation distance of the suspensory device. MRIs were taken within seven days after ACLR and 3,6,12 months postoperatively and measured by a radiologist in a blinded fashion. Secondary endpoints included the side-to-side difference in anterior translation, one leg hop test (HOP index), Lachman test, lateral pivot shift test, and Lysholm score one year postoperatively.

Results

Twenty-eight patients (EB, n = 13; TR, n = 15) were followed for one year. There was no significant difference between EB and TR groups in elongation from the immediate postoperative period to 3, 6, 12 months after surgery. However, the non-inferiority of TR to EB (non-inferiority margin: 1.5 mm) was not proved by the difference in measured elongation between the two groups (TR – EB, lower 95% CI. AM: 1.80 mm; PL: 1.86 mm) at 6 months. There was no significant difference in anterior translation, HOP index, Lachman test, lateral pivot shift test, or Lysholm score.

Conclusion

EB and TR had similar graft retaining ability in vivo for 12 months, but the non-inferiority of TR against EB was not verified statistically.

A biomechanical comparison of all-inside cruciate ligament graft preparation techniques

Background

The all-inside cruciate ligament graft preparation technique has become popular due to its utility in sparing a growing physis, preserving a tendon in ACL surgery, and/or reduction of pain. However, few studies have compared graft preparation techniques to determine the ideal construct for cruciate ligament reconstruction. We sought to compare biomechanical properties of two quadrupled all-inside cruciate ligament graft preparation techniques and three alternative all-inside graft preparation techniques that may be used when the available tendon is too short to be quadrupled.

Methods

Fifty porcine extensor tendons were evenly divided into five groups (n = 10) representing all-inside graft preparation techniques, including two quadrupled (Quad-A, Quad-B) and three alternative methods (Tripled, Folded, Two-Doubled). Each graft construct underwent preconditioning (10 loading cycles from 20 to 50 N at 0.1 Hz), cyclic loading (500 loading cycles from 50 to 250 N at 1.0 Hz) and load-to-failure (tension applied at 20 mm/min).

Results

Quad-A and Quad-B demonstrated no significant differences in cyclic displacement (10.5 ± 0.3 vs 11.7 ± 0.4 mm; p = 0.915), cyclic stiffness (1086.2 ± 487.3 vs 460.4 ± 71.4 N/mm; p = 0.290), pullout stiffness (15.9 ± 4.3 vs 7.4 ± 4.4 N/mm; p = 0.443), ultimate failure load (641.2 ± 84.7 vs 405.9 ± 237.4 N; p = 0.672), or ultimate failure displacement (47.3 ± 6.7 vs 55.5 ± 0.7 mm; p = 0.778). The mean cyclic displacement of the Two-Doubled group was significantly greater than the Quad-A (29.7 ± 2.2 vs 10.5 ± 0.3 mm; p < 0.001), Quad-B (29.7 ± 2.2 vs 11.7 ± 0.4 mm; p < 0.001), Tripled (29.7 ± 2.2 vs 11.3 ± 0.2 mm; p < 0.001), and Folded group (29.7 ± 2.2 vs 13.3 ± 0.2 mm; p < 0.001). There were no other statistically significant differences between the three alternative all-inside graft preparation techniques.

Conclusion

The current study demonstrates the biomechanical properties of two quadrupled all-inside graft constructs, Quad-A and Quad-B, are not significantly different. When the available tendon is of insufficient length, the Two-Doubled group demonstrated more than twice the cyclic displacement of all other graft preparation techniques, and is therefore not recommended for use in all-inside cruciate ligament reconstruction.