Meniscal "Ramp" Lesions: Surgical Incidence and the Development of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnostic Criteria

How to repair medial meniscal ramp lesions: A systematic review of surgical techniques

Purpose

to provide a comprehensive overview of all the surgical techniques published in the literature for repairing meniscal ramp lesions focusing on the technical aspects and the pros and cons of every procedure. Such lesions can be managed using various approaches, each of this with its specific advantages and disadvantages.

Methods

Pubmed Central, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were systematically reviewed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines for studies on surgical techniques for repairing meniscal ramp lesions through May 2023. Overall, 32 articles matched the selection criteria and were included in the study.

Results

Debridement alone may be sufficient for small stable meniscal ramp lesions but, for tears in the menisco-capsular junction that affect the stability of the medial meniscus, it seems reasonable to repair it, even though the clinical results available in literature are contrasting. All-inside sutures through anterior portals seems to be an effective solution for meniscal ramp lesions with MTL tears. All-inside sutures through posteromedial portals are particularly useful for large meniscal ramp lesions, in which an inside-out suture can also be performed.

Conclusion

Meniscal ramp lesions can be managed using various approaches, each of this with its specific advantages and disadvantages. Further research is required to determine the optimal technique that can be considered as the gold standard and can provide the better results.

Level of Evidence

Level III, systematic review.

Evaluating the Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Identification of Meniscal Ramp Lesions in ACL-Deficient Knees: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite vigorous efforts to delineate the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of meniscal ramp lesions, there is still a great deal of uncertainty regarding its diagnostic performance. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the diagnostic performance of MRI for detecting ramp lesions in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase and included all articles, published before October 20, 2022, comparing the accuracy of MRI with that of arthroscopy as the gold standard for diagnosis of ramp lesions. We performed statistical analysis using Stata and Meta-DiSc software. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2) tool.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis evaluated 21 diagnostic performance comparisons from 19 original research articles (2,149 patients). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnosing a ramp lesion were 0.70 (95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.66 to 0.73), 0.88 (95% Cl, 0.86 to 0.89), 6.49 (95% Cl, 4.12 to 10.24), 0.36 (95% Cl, 0.28 to 0.46), 24.33 (95% Cl, 12.81 to 46.19), and 0.88, respectively. Meta-regression using different variables yielded the same results.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI exhibited a DOR of 24.33 and moderate sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosing ramp lesions in ACL-deficient knees. However, arthroscopy using a standard anterolateral portal with intercondylar viewing is recommended to confirm a diagnosis of a ramp lesion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Meniscal Ramp Lesions in Adolescent Patients Undergoing Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Significance of Imaging and Arthroscopic Findings

BACKGROUND

Meniscal ramp lesions are associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and may affect knee stability when left untreated. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify this meniscocapsular injury of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus remains poor, and the arthroscopic findings require vigilance.

PURPOSE

To determine the concordance of arthroscopic and MRI findings to better identify the presence of a ramp lesion in children and adolescent patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Patients aged <19 years who underwent primary ACL reconstruction at a single institution between 2020 and 2021 were included. Two cohorts were developed by the presence of a ramp lesion arthroscopically. Basic patient descriptive data, preoperative imaging (radiologist assessment and independent reviewer assessment), and concomitant arthroscopic findings at the time of ACL reconstruction were recorded.

RESULTS

An overall 201 adolescents met criteria with a mean age of 15.7 years (range, 6.9-18.2) at the time of injury. A ramp lesion was identified in 14% of patients (28 children). No differences were detected between cohorts with regard to age, sex, body mass index, weeks from injury to MRI, or weeks from injury to surgery (P > .15). The primary predictor of an intraoperative ramp lesion was the presence of medial femoral condylar striations, with an adjusted odds ratio of 722.2 (95% CI, 59.5-8768.2; P < .001); the presence of a ramp lesion on MRI had an adjusted odds ratio of 11.1 (95% CI, 2.2-54.8; P = .003). Patients with neither a ramp lesion on MRI nor medial femoral condylar striations had a 2% rate (2/131) of ramp lesion; those with either of the significant risk factors had a 24% rate (14/54). All patients with both risk factors (100%; n = 12) had a ramp lesion noted on intraoperative examination.

CONCLUSION

The concordance of medial femoral condylar chondromalacia, particularly striations, noted during arthroscopy and posteromedial tibial marrow edema on MRI with or without direct evidence of posterior meniscocapsular pathology should increase suspicion for the presence of a ramp lesion in adolescents undergoing ACL reconstruction.

Meniscal Ramp Lesions: Anatomy, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Injuries to the medial meniscus meniscocapsular junction, also known as ramp lesions, are common in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament injuries with a prevalence of 9% to 42%. Anatomically, ramp lesions involve disruption of the posterior meniscocapsular junction and meniscotibial ligaments. Biomechanically, ramp lesions are associated with an increase in anterior tibial translation and internal and external tibial rotation in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient cadaveric knees. Magnetic resonance imaging is useful in evaluating the meniscocapsular junction. Irregularity or increased signal near the posterior meniscocapsular junction and/or signal change indicative of posterior medial tibial plateau edema can suggest these injuries are present before surgical intervention. The current benchmark for diagnosis is arthroscopic visualization of the posterior medial meniscocapsular junction viewed through the intercondylar notch. Once a ramp lesion is identified, stability should be assessed by arthroscopic probing to determine the degree of anterior displacement. Optimal treatment has been debated in the literature, especially for stable ramp lesions, although good outcomes have been shown with and without repair. Repair is warranted for those lesions that are unstable to probing. Unfortunately, only limited literature available to guide clinicians on the optimal rehabilitation for ramp lesions.

Ramp lesion of the medial meniscus

Ramp lesion of the medial meniscus used to be completely disregarded in the past.

Ramp lesion has been now put under the spotlight by orthopaedic and sport medicine surgeons and requires attention.

It is closely associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury. Major risk factors include chronic laxity, lateral meniscal lesion, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction revision, anterolateral ligament tear concomitant with anterior cruciate ligament injury, time from injury, pre-operative side-to-side laxity > 6 mm, age < 30 years old, male sex, etc.

Radiologists attempt to create diagnostic criteria for ramp lesion using magnetic resonance imaging. However, the only definite method to diagnose ramp lesion is still arthroscopy. Various techniques exist, among which posteromedial approach is the most highly recommended.

Various treatment options are available. The success rate of ramp repair is very high. Major complications are uncommon.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:372-379. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200126