Tibial Tubercle-Midepicondyle Distance Can Be a Better Index to Predict the Outcome of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Than Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance

The diagnostic value of TT-TG and TT-ME distances in the assessment of patellofemoral instability

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the application value of the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG distance) and tibial tubercle-midepicondyle distance (TT-ME distance) on CT images in patellofemoral instability, and further investigate the association between knee joint rotation angles and patellofemoral instability.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed CT image data of 59 patients with patellar dislocation (case group) and 39 normal knee joints (control group). We measured the TT-TG distance, TT-ME distance, and knee joint rotation angle (KJRA) of both groups, and the related indicators were analyzed using single-factor/multi-factor binary logistic stepwise regression analysis. Two senior radiologists were assigned to assess the inter-rater reliability. Interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. Finally, we used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to compare the diagnostic efficiency of these indicators in patellofemoral instability.

RESULTS

The results found significant differences between both groups in terms of TT-TG distance, TT-ME distance, KJRA angle, age, location, and gender (P < 0.05). In terms of inter-rater reliability, TT-TG distance and TT-ME distance ratios showed an excellent correlation between observers (TT-TG inter-rater ICC 0.969, TT-ME inter-rater ICC 0.955). Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that except for location and gender, all other factors significantly affected patellofemoral instability (P < 0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the TT-ME distance, age, and KJRA angle were statistically significant factors related to patellofemoral instability, with TT-ME distance being a risk factor for patellofemoral instability (OR value 1.572, P value 0.000). Moreover, the ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the diagnostic capability of the TT-ME distance for detecting patellofemoral instability was higher than that of the TT-TG distance and KJRA (AUC were 0.912, 0.851, and 0.735, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The TT-ME distance, age, and knee joint rotation angle are factors that affect patellofemoral instability. The TT-ME distance has better diagnostic efficiency for patellofemoral instability compared to the TT-TG distance and knee joint rotation angle.

Reliability of Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance for Assessing Tibial Tubercle Lateralization: A Study Comparing Different Anatomic References

Background

The tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is a measurement used to quantitatively assess tibial tubercle lateralization (TTL), and it has important reference value for the treatment of patellar dislocation (PD). However, TT-TG distance accuracy has been questioned, so many new parameters have been proposed.

Purpose

To compare which of the TT-TG, tibial tubercle-midepicondyle (TT-ME), tibial tubercle-Roman arch (TT-RA), tibial tubercle-tibial intercondylar midpoint (TT-TIM), and tibial tubercle-mid inter-epicondyle trochlea intersection (TT-MIELTI) distances better reflect TTL in patients with PD.

Study Design

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 96 patients who had undergone surgery for PD and 96 patients without PD (controls) were included in the study. The patients had all undergone computed tomography examination. The TT-TG, TT-ME, TT-RA, TT-TIM, TT-MIELTI distances and the TTL distance were measured independently by 2 surgeons in a blinded and randomized fashion. The t test was used to detect whether the parameters were significantly different between the 2 groups. The TTL distance was used as a reference value for lateralization of tibial tubercle. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine correlations between the defined measurements.

Results

The intra- and interobserver reliability of the defined measurements was excellent. All parameters except for TT-TIM distance were significantly larger in the PD group than the control group (P < .01 for all). There was a moderate correlation (r = 0.601) between the TT-TG distance and TTL, and other parameters were less correlated with TTL.

Conclusion

Among 5 the parameters tested, the TT-TG distance still had the highest correlation with TTL and was able to reflect TTL better in patients with PD. The role of TT-TIM distance in the assessment of PD needs further study.

Does Tibial Tuberosity Osteotomy Improve Outcomes When Combined With Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in the Presence of Increased Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove Distance? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

There has been recent debate regarding the optimal surgical management strategy for recurrent patellofemoral instability in the presence of an increased tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance. In particular, performing a combined tibial tuberosity osteotomy (TTO) and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) for patients with a TT-TG >20 mm has been questioned, with the hypothesis that an isolated MPFLR (iMPFLR) would be just as effective.

Purpose

To pool and compare outcomes after MPFLR+TTO versus iMPFLR in patients with a TT-TG >20 mm.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

PubMed-MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central were searched, and a systematic review was performed. Included were studies that reported postoperative redislocation rates and/or functional outcome scores for patients with recurrent patellar instability and a TT-TG >20 mm who underwent either MPFLR+TTO or iMPFLR and had minimum 2-year follow-up data. Methodologic quality was assessed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS). A proportional meta-analysis comparing redislocation, subjective instability, and total complication rates was performed, and mean postoperative functional outcome scores were pooled using a random-effects model with a restricted maximum likelihood estimator.

Results

In total, 1548 studies were screened, from which 13 were included for analysis. Of the 386 included patients (406 knees), 276 underwent MPFLR+TTO and 110 underwent iMPFLR. The mean mCMS was 61.3 ± 10.5 (range, 48-77). The pooled postoperative redislocation rate was 1.22% (95% CI, 0.22%-7%), with no significant difference between the study groups (P = .9995). The pooled complication rate was 10.17% (95% CI, 6.2%-16.3%) with no difference between groups (P = .9275), although the MPFLR+TTO group had higher heterogeneity in complication rates (I2 = 79.4%) compared with iMPFLR (I2 = 0%). There was no group difference in the pooled postoperative Lysholm scores (P = .5177), but patients who underwent iMPFLR had significantly higher postoperative Kujala scores compared with those who underwent MPFLR+TTO (P = .0283).

Conclusion

Even in the presence of previously indicative anatomic factors (TT-TG >20 mm), TTO combined with MPFLR does not seem to confer additional benefit compared with iMPFLR. This finding could be advantageous in minimizing the burden of additional surgery with its associated risks. The study findings should, however, be interpreted with caution given the heterogeneity of the studies.

Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction results in similar postoperative outcomes as medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and tibial-tubercle osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) versus concomitant MPFLR and tibial-tubercle osteotomy (TTO) on patient-reported functional outcomes, rate of patellar redislocation, and rate of return to sport in skeletally mature patients with recurrent patellar instability and lateralization as defined by elevated tibial-tubercle trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance.

METHODS

Three databases MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to July 10th, 2022 for literature outlining the management of patients with TT-TG indices greater than 15 mm with either isolated MPFLR or concomitant MPFLR and TTO procedures. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on functional outcomes via the Kujala anterior knee pain score, redislocation rates, return to sport rates, and complications were recorded. The MINORS score was used for all studies to perform a quality assessment of included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies comprising 1405 patients (1452 knees) were included in this review. The mean Kujala score in 13 studies comprising 848 total patients in the isolated MPFLR group was 85.0 (range 80.9-97.5) compared to a score of 83.7 (range 77.2-94.0) in 14 studies comprising 459 patients in the concomitant group. The mean pooled redislocation rate in 19 studies examining isolated MPFLR procedures comprising 948 patients was 3.1% (95% CI 2.1-4.4%, I² = 7%) as opposed to 3.2% (95% CI 1.9-5.0%, I² = 0%) in 15 studies comprising 486 patients in the concomitant group. The mean pooled return to sport rate in seven studies with 472 total patients in the isolated MPFLR group was 82% (95% CI 78-86%, I² = 16%) compared to a score of 92% (95% CI 78-99%, I² = 58%) in four studies comprising 54 patients in the concomitant group. There were similar complication rates between both treatment groups, including range of motion deficits, fractures, infections, and graft failures.

CONCLUSION

Isolated MPFLR leads to similar anterior knee pain, similar redislocation rates and lower return to sport rates than concomitant MPFLR and TTO procedures in patients with TT-TG distances greater than 15 mm. Information from this review can aid surgeons in their decision to choose MPFLR versus concomitant procedures for this patient population, and can also guide future studies on this topic.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Insall proximal realignment with/without tibial tubercle osteotomy for recurrent patellar instability yields acceptable medium- to long-term results but risk of osteoarthritis progression is considerable

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiological results in patients operated for recurrent patellar instability with a surgical approach consisting of Insall proximal realignment with/without tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO).

METHODS

Patients that underwent surgery for recurrent patellar instability at one centre with a uniform technique between 2004 and 2020 were included. Eligible patients were assessed by clinical examination and the disease-specific Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0). Pre- and postoperative radiographs were analysed for patellofemoral osteoarthritis (OA) according to Iwano. Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and radiographs were analysed for anatomical risk factors for patellar instability. Student t-test, chi-square test and ANOVA-analyses were used to investigate whether anatomical risk factors and/or patient characteristics could predict an inferior outcome.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (47 knees) were included at a mean follow-up time of 6.6 years (SD 4.6; range 1-17). Mean BPII 2.0 score was 60.4 (SD 18.4; range 26-98), and 10.6% (n = 5) had suffered a postoperative redislocation. Progression to evident patellofemoral OA was seen in 15% of the patients (p < 0.05). The presence of pathoanatomic risk factors did not correlate with recurrent postoperative instability or inferior BPII 2.0 score at the final evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with the current approach reported acceptable medium- to long-term results, but the risk of patellofemoral OA progression is significant. These findings add to the knowledge of expected outcomes after procedures involving Insall proximal realignment, and can guide clinical decision making for surgeons using similar methods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.