Partial Rotator Cuff Repair for Massive Tears Rarely Require Revision Surgery

Risk factors influencing postoperative outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and construction of a nomogram prediction model

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk factors influencing the postoperative outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) and develop a nomogram prediction model.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 302 patients who underwent ARCR from January 2019 to August 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: a control group with 150 patients showing good recovery and an observation group with 152 patients exhibiting poor recovery. Relevant clinical data were collected and statistically analyzed. A nomogram model was constructed based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis. The model's accuracy, discrimination, and clinical utility were evaluated using calibration charts, AUC, c-index, and decision curve analysis. Internal validation was performed through self-random sampling.

RESULTS

Univariate and multivariate regression analysis identified having a frozen shoulder, large rotator cuff tear, increased intraoperative rivet use, diabetes, and traumatic tear as predictive risk factors for poor postoperative outcomes. These factors were utilized to develop a clinical predictive nomogram. The nomogram model demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy for poor postoperative outcomes, both internally and externally. The unadjusted concordance index (C-index) was 0.793 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.825-0.995]. The AUC for the nomogram was 0.788. Decision curve analysis revealed that the predictive model was clinically useful when the threshold probability ranged from 20 to 60%.

CONCLUSION

The presence of a frozen shoulder, large rotator cuff tear, increased intraoperative rivet use, diabetes, and traumatic tear elevate the risk of suboptimal outcomes following ARCR. Conversely, having a higher preoperative University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale score mitigates this risk. This study introduces a novel nomogram model, exhibiting relatively high accuracy, which enables clinicians to precisely assess the postoperative adverse risk among patients with rotator cuff injuries requiring arthroscopic repair at the outset of treatment.

Long head of the biceps tendon versatility in reconstructive shoulder surgery: a narrative review of arthroscopic techniques and their biomechanical principles with video presentation

The management of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) during shoulder arthroscopy has been a subject of controversy for many years, with evolving discussions and trends. Despite long-standing debate, the nature of the surgical indication regarding how to treat concomitent LHBT injuries has undergone changes in recent years. It now extends beyond the timing of tenotomy to encompass considerations of alternative methods for preserving the LHBT, along with an ongoing exploration of how it can be effectively utilized in reconstructive shoulder surgery. Recent techniques describe approaches to using LHBT in a wide range of procedures, from shoulder instability to rotator cuff tears. Additionally, LHBT-based reconstructive techniques have surfaced for addressing what were formerly denoted as irreparable rotator cuff tears. While current literature provides detailed anatomical descriptions of the LHBT and many reports of novel, advanced techniques, there is still much debate regarding the decision-making process in each case. Because of the growing number of emerging techniques and the escalating debate in the subsequent paper, a decision has been made to present the current literature review concerning the potential utilization of LHBT in shoulder arthroscopy. In a dedicated video, we demonstrate the main arthroscopic techniques employed by the authors in their daily practice.

Augmentation of Massive Rotator Cuff Repairs Using Biceps Transposition Without Tenotomy Improves Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes: The Biological Superior Capsular Reconstruction Technique

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of a consecutive series of patients after transposition of the biceps without tenotomy (biological superior capsular reconstruction [bio-SCR] technique) to augment massive rotator cuff repairs.

METHODS

Thirty massive rotator cuff tears repaired and augmented using the bio-SCR technique between June 2018 and July 2021 were identified and retrospectively reviewed. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, visual analog scale pain scores, supraspinatus and infraspinatus strength, and range of motion were collected preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

The average age of patients undergoing bio-SCR augmentation was 67.0 years (range, 28.4-81.9 years), and the mean clinical follow-up period was 2.9 years (range, 1.8-4.5 years). The average ASES score improved from 33.2 preoperatively to 80.8 at 6 months postoperatively, 92.0 at 1 year, and 87.0 at 2 years (P < .001). The minimal clinically important difference for the ASES score was exceeded at all postoperative intervals. Active forward flexion improved from 120.6° to 156.8° (P < .001). The pain score improved from 7.1 to 0.9 (P < .001). Postoperatively, 1 complication (3.3%) occurred: a proximal biceps rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating a transposed biceps tendon into the repair of a massive rotator cuff tear using the bio-SCR technique resulted in significant clinical improvements with a low complication rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

The Number of Surgeons Using Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Rotator Cuff Repair Is Declining

Purpose

To investigate surgeon preferences for graft use, including biologic augmentation and superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) associated with surgical treatment of rotator cuff repair (RCR).

Methods

A 26-question survey was completed by arthroscopic shoulder surgeons. Surgeon demographics were evaluated. Surgeons were queried about shoulder arthroscopic graft use and rationale then responses were analyzed based on demographics.

Results

In total, 260 surgeons completed the survey. Fifty-one percent of surgeons reported a decrease in the volume of SCR use in the past 5 years. Less than 3% of surgeons used SCR in >90% of irreparable RCR cases, compared with 38% using SCR in <10% of irreparable cases (P < .05). Surgeons performing >100 RCR annually (42%; P < .05) and those employed in the hospital setting (44%; P < .05) reported an overall increase in the use of SCR. More international surgeons (67%) decreased their use of SCR compared with U.S. surgeons (44%; P < .05). In contrast, bioinductive graft use is generally on the rise, with 48% of surgeons reporting increased use since first use, although used in <10% of cases by 54% of surgeons. Sixty-eight percent of surgeons performing >100 RCRs annually used bioinductive grafts (P < .05). Fewer international surgeons (30%) performed biologic augmentation (P < .05). Suboptimal published outcomes (40%) and no perceived patient benefit (40%) were most cited for decreased SCR use. Surgeons reporting increased use cited improved personal patient outcomes (72%).

Conclusions

Arthroscopic surgeons report decrease in volume of SCR use in the past 5 years. Surgeon's personal experience of patient outcome and suboptimal published results were the strongest factors impacting decision-making. In contrast, bioinductive graft use is increasing. However, most surgeons use these grafts in a relatively small percentage of cases.

Clinical Relevance

Evaluation of scientific data, personal experience, and influences on surgical practice will give a comprehensive understanding of current RCR practices.

[Arthroscopic augmentation techniques for superior capsule reconstruction]

OBJECTIVES

Reconstruction of the superior capsule for treatment of irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears.

INDICATIONS

Irreparable supraspinatus tendon tear; centered humeral head; largely intact cartilage; largely intact transversal "force-couple".

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Decentered humeral head; osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint/cuff tear arthropathy; irreparable anterosuperior and posterosuperior cuff tears.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) is performed in beach-chair position. At first the bone bed of the glenoid and the insertion of the supraspinatus tendon are prepared using a bone burr. Now, depending on the integrity of the long biceps tendon, two options are possible. Option 1: In the case of an existing long biceps tendon, a biceps tendon tenodesis to the greater tubercle is performed. Therefore, the long head of the biceps is fixed central to the former insertion of the supraspinatus tendon, using a suture anchor. Option 2: In the case of a nonexisting or degeneratively modified long biceps tendon, a PushLock® anchor (Arthrex, Inc. Naples, FL, USA) loaded with a FiberTape® (Arthrex, Inc. Naples, FL, USA) is placed centrally onto the glenoid. Now, the actual superior capsule reconstruction is completed. Two suture anchors are placed at the glenoid and two SwiveLock® anchors, each loaded with a FiberTape®, (Arthrex, Inc. Naples, FL, USA) are placed at the footprint of the supraspinatus tendon at the greater tubercle. The tapes are shuttled extra-articularly and the graft size is evaluated by measuring the distance between the anchors. The graft is customized to that size and armed with the tapes. Using the tapes of the glenoidal anchors, as tension ropes, the graft is placed intra-articularly. Medially the sutures are tied and laterally the graft is fixed in a knotless lateral row manner. The tails of the tape, of the glenoidal PushLock® (Arthrex, Inc. Naples, FL, USA) anchor are fixed within the lateral row and are tensioned above the graft. Afterwards side-to-side sutures to the infraspinatus and a subacromial decompression are completed.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

The arm is placed in a sling for 6 weeks, afterwards active physiotherapy begins. Passive-assisted physiotherapy is started on postoperative day 1.

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2019, 11 patients were treated with SCR. As the combined procedure is our new treatment algorithm, case studies will be presented. For this study, 9 patients treated with singular SCR, with a mean follow-up of 18 months, were recruited. A statistically significant reduction of pain (VAS 6.3 → VAS 2), a good postoperative forward flexion (mean 138°; 56 standard deviation [SD]), and external rotation (mean 37°; 21 SD) were measured. A mean ASES of 76.5 (18 SD) a mean DASH of 17.8 (14 SD) and a mean Constant score of 64.6 (25 SD) were achieved.

Treatment Options for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears present a significant challenge to the orthopedic surgeon. No single treatment, particularly among joint-preserving options, has been shown to be superior. The purpose of this review is to discuss recent advances in the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears, including partial repair with and without graft augmentation, interposition grafts, superior capsule reconstruction, subacromial balloon spacers, tendon transfer, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. We will also offer guidance on surgical indications based on our clinical experience.

RECENT FINDINGS

Partial repair may offer reasonable clinical improvement for patients with lower preoperative function despite high re-tear rates. Additionally, several types of interposition grafts have shown promising short-term results and may outperform repair alone. Subacromial balloon spacers may lead to clinical improvement, especially in patients without glenohumeral osteoarthritis or pseudoparalysis, and recently received FDA approval for use in the USA. Superior capsule reconstruction is a technically demanding procedure that appears to produce excellent short-term results particularly when performed at high volume, but long-term studies in heterogeneous study groups are needed. Tendon transfers improve function by restoring force coupling in the shoulder, offering a promising option for younger patients. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a reliable option for treatment of irreparable cuff tears in elderly patients with lower functional demands. Irreparable cuff tears remain a difficult condition to treat. Recommended treatment for younger patients without glenohumeral osteoarthritis is particularly controversial. For older patients with low-demand lifestyles and glenohumeral osteoarthritis, RTSA is an effective treatment option. For all discussed procedures, patient selection appears to play a critical role in clinical outcomes.