Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Results in Lower Two-Year Reoperation Rates Compared With Open Rotator Cuff Repair in a Large Cross-sectional Cohort

Impact of surgeon volume, experience, and training on outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a nationwide analysis of 1489 surgeons

Background

Given the complexity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) and increasing prevalence, there is a need for comprehensive, large-scale studies that investigate potential correlations between surgeon-specific factors and postoperative outcomes after ARCR. This study examines how surgeon-specific factors including case volume, career length, fellowship training, practice setting, and regional practice impact two-year reoperation rates, conversion to total shoulder arthroplasty (anatomic or reverse), and 90-day post-ARCR hospitalization.

Methods

The PearlDiver Mariner database was used to collect surgeon-specific variables and query patients who underwent ARCR from 2015 to 2018. Patient outcomes were tracked for two years, including reoperations, hospitalizations, and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes for revision rotator cuff repair (RCR) laterality. Hospitalizations were defined as any emergency department (ED) visit or hospital readmission within 90 days after primary ARCR. Surgeon-specific factors including surgeon case volume, career length, fellowship training, practice setting, and regional practice were analyzed in relation to postoperative outcomes using both univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

Results

94,150 patients underwent ARCR by 1489 surgeons. On multivariate analysis, high-volume surgeons demonstrated a higher risk for two-year total reoperation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.12, P = .03) and revision RCR (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12, P = .02) compared to low-volume surgeons. Early-career surgeons showed higher rates of 90-day ED visits (mid-career surgeons: OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.73-0.83, P < .001; late-career surgeons: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.68-0.78, P < .001) and hospital readmission (mid-career surgeons: OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63-0.87, P < .001; late-career surgeons: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.88, P = .006) compared to mid- and late-career surgeons. Sports medicine and/or shoulder and elbow fellowship-trained surgeons demonstrated lower two-year reoperation risk (OR = 0.95, CI: 0.91-0.99, P = .04) and fewer 90-day ED visits (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.88-0.98, P = .002). Academic surgeons experienced higher readmission rates compared to community surgeons (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.01-1.34, P = .03). Surgeons practicing in the Northeast demonstrated lower two-year reoperation (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.93, P < .001) and revision (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.94, P < .001) RCR risk compared to surgeons in the Southern United States.

Conclusion

High-volume surgeons exhibit higher two-year reoperation rates after ARCR compared to low-volume surgeons. Early-career surgeons demonstrate increased hospitalizations. Sports medicine or shoulder and elbow surgery fellowships correlate with reduced two-year reoperation rates and 90-day ED visits.

Care of the Pediatric Patient for Ambulatory Tonsillectomy With or Without Adenoidectomy: The Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia Position Statement

The landscape of ambulatory surgery is changing, and tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy is one of the most common pediatric surgical procedures performed nationally. The number of children undergoing tonsillectomy on an ambulatory basis continues to increase. The 2 most common indications for tonsillectomy are recurrent throat infections and obstructive sleep-disordered breathing. The most frequent early complications after tonsillectomy are hemorrhage and ventilatory compromise. In areas lacking a dedicated children's hospital, these cases are managed by a nonpediatric specialized anesthesiologist and general otolaryngology surgeon. In response to requests from our members without pediatric fellowship training and/or who care for pediatric patients infrequently, the Pediatric Committee of the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia (SAMBA) developed a position statement with recommendations for the safe perioperative care of pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy with and without adenoidectomy in freestanding ambulatory surgical facilities. This statement identifies children that are more likely to experience complications and to require additional dedicated provider time that is not conducive to the rapid pace and staffing ratios of many freestanding ambulatory centers with mixed adult and pediatric practices. The aim is to provide health care professionals with practical criteria and suggestions based on the best available evidence. When high-quality evidence is unavailable, we relied on group consensus from pediatric ambulatory specialists in the SAMBA Pediatric Committee. Consensus recommendations were presented to the Pediatric Committee of SAMBA.

Primary Arthroscopic Repair for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Results in Good Shoulder Function, Low Pain, and Satisfactory Outcomes at 2-Year Minimum Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes of patients who underwent primary arthroscopic repair for massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs).

METHODS

Patients with MRCTs (full-thickness tear of 2 or more tendons or full-thickness tear ≥5 cm) who underwent arthroscopic repair with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were retrospectively reviewed (n = 51). All patients had preoperative magnetic resonance imaging used to characterize pattern of tear, degree of fatty degeneration (Goutallier classification), and degree of rotator cuff arthropathy (Hamada classification). Outcomes were determined by American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and Penn Shoulder Scores (PSS).

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients with a minimum 2.3-year follow-up (mean, 5.4 years; range, 2.3-9.7 years) were included in this study. Mean ASES score was 46.1 ± 7.8 (95% CI, 43.9-48.3) for pain and 39.4 ± 12.1 (95% CI, 36.0-42.8) for function. Total ASES score averaged 85.5 ± 18.4 (95% CI, 80.4-90.7). PSS had a mean pain score of 26.8 ± 4.4 (95% CI, 25.4-28.1), a mean satisfaction score of 7.9 ± 2.9 (95% CI, 7.0-8.2), and a mean function score of 48.5 ± 13.5 (95% CI, 44.7-52.3). Total PSS averaged 83.2 ± 19.6 (95% CI, 77.7-87.7). No correlation was found between Goutallier grade and ASES/PSS scores or between Hamada grade and ASES/PSS scores. Three patients underwent reoperation after primary arthroscopic repair of an MRCT (5.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MRCTs who undergo primary arthroscopic repair have postoperative outcome scores indicative of good shoulder function, low pain, and high satisfaction. The rate of reoperation for individuals who underwent primary arthroscopic repair with MRCTs was low at 6%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Two-year outcomes with a bioinductive collagen implant used in augmentation of arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: final results of a prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Full-thickness rotator cuff tears (FTRCTs) represent a common shoulder injury that, if untreated, can progress in size, become increasingly painful, and inhibit function. These lesions are often surgically repaired, with double-row arthroscopic repair often preferred for larger tears. Biological augmentation technologies have been developed to improve rates of postoperative radiographic retear and enhance patient-reported outcomes after surgical FTRCT repair. This study sought to confirm that augmented repair with a bioinductive bovine collagen implant results in favorable retear rates and patient outcomes with follow-up to 2 years.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter cohort study was undertaken to determine the efficacy and safety of augmenting single- or double-row arthroscopic repair of FTRCTs with a bioinductive bovine collagen implant. Of 115 adult patients participating, 66 (57.4%) had medium (1-3-cm) tears and 49 (42.6%) had large (3-5-cm) tears. Magnetic resonance imaging and patient-reported outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form [ASES] and Constant-Murley Score [CMS]) were performed and recorded at baseline, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years.

RESULTS

Mean duration of follow-up was 2.1 years (range, 1.5-2.9 years). Between baseline and 2-year follow-up, mean total thickness of the supraspinatus tendon increased by 12.5% for medium tears and by 17.1% for large tears. Radiographic retear was noted in 7 of 61 available patients (11.5%) with medium tears, and in 14 of 40 patients (35.0%) with large tears. In both groups, these tears primarily occurred before the 3-month follow-up visit (13 of 21 [61.9%]). Radiographic retear with the supplemented double-row (DR) repair technique was 13.2% overall (12 of 91 DR patients; 11.3% for medium tears and 15.8% for large tears). The minimal clinically important difference was achieved by >90% of patients with both medium and large tears for both ASES and CMS. There were 2 serious adverse events classified by the treating surgeon as being possibly related to the device and/or procedure (1 case of swelling/drainage and 1 case of intermittent pain). Nine patients (7.8%; 4 medium tears and 5 large tears) required reoperation of the index rotator cuff surgery.

CONCLUSION

Final 2-year data from this study confirm that using this implant in augmentation of arthroscopic double-row repair of FTRCTs provides favorable rates of radiographic retear and substantial functional recovery. The relative safety of the device is also further supported.

Patients with Dual Shoulder-Spine Disease: Does Operative Order Affect Clinical Outcomes?

OBJECTIVE

1) To analyze the effect of operative sequence (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion [ACDF] first or rotator cuff repair [RCR] first) on surgical outcomes after both procedures for patients with dual shoulder-spine injuries and 2) to determine how operative sequence affects patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after surgery.

METHODS

Patients >18 years of age who underwent primary ACDF and primary RCR at our institution were retrospectively identified. Only patients with overlapping symptoms before the first procedure were included. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts (ACDF first or RCR first). Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and PROMs were compared between groups. Multivariate linear regression models were developed to determine if operative order was predictive of improvements in PROM scores at the 1-year postoperative point after the second procedure. Alpha was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 85 patients included, 44 patients (51.8%) underwent ACDF first, whereas 41 patients (48.2%) underwent RCR first. There were no significant differences in the rate of 90-day readmission, spine reoperations, and rotator cuff reoperations between groups (all, P > 0.05). Multivariate linear regression showed that undergoing an ACDF first was not a significant predictor of Δ Mental Component Score of the Short-Form 12 (β = -2.78; P = 0.626) and Δ Physical Component Score of the Short-Form 12 (β = 7.74; P = 0.077) at the 1-year postoperative point after the second procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with dual shoulder-spine injuries who are appropriate surgical candidates, undergoing ACDF first compared with RCR first does not result in significant differences in clinical surgical or patient-reported outcomes.