The transplant recipient for nontransplant surgery

Clinical Considerations and Outcomes for Spine Surgery Patients with a History of Transplant: A Systematic Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the perioperative management and outcomes of patients with a prior history of successful transplantation undergoing spine surgery.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for matching reports in July 2021. We included case reports, cohort studies, and retrospective analyses, including terms for various transplant types and an exhaustive list of key words for various forms of spine surgery.

RESULTS

We included 45 studies consisting of 34 case reports (published 1982-2021), 3 cohort analyses (published 2005-2006), and 8 retrospective analyses (published 2006-2020). The total number of patients included in the case reports, cohort studies, and retrospective analysis was 35, 48, and 9695, respectively. The mean 1-year mortality rate from retrospective analyses was 4.6% ± 1.93%, while the prevalence of perioperative complications was 24%. Cohort studies demonstrated an 8.5% ± 12.03% 30-day readmission rate. The most common procedure performed was laminectomy (38.9%) among the case reports. Mortality after spine surgery was noted for 4 of 35 case report patients (11.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first systematic scoping review examining the population of transplant patients with subsequent unrelated spine surgery. There is significant heterogeneity in the outcomes of post-transplant spine surgery patients. Given the inherent complexity of managing this group and elevated mortality and complications compared to the general spine surgery population, further investigation into their clinical care is warranted.

[Anesthesia for organ transplant patients]

Organ transplant patients who must undergo nontransplant surgical interventions can be challenging for the anesthesiologists in charge. On the one hand, it is important to carefully monitor the graft function in the perioperative period with respect to the occurrence of a possible rejection reaction. On the other hand, the ongoing immunosuppression may have to be adapted to the perioperative requirements in terms of the active substance and the route of administration, the resulting increased risk of infection and possible side effects (e.g., myelosuppression, nephrotoxicity and impairment of wound healing) must be included in the perioperative treatment concept. Furthermore, possible persistent comorbidities of the underlying disease and physiological peculiarities as a result of the organ transplantation must be taken into account. Support can be obtained from the expertise of the respective transplantation center.

Solid Organ Transplant Is Associated With Increased Morbidity and Mortality in Patients Undergoing One or Two-level Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database review OBJECTIVE.: The aim of this study was to analyze the implications of solid organ transplant (SOT) on postoperative outcomes following elective one or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although SOTs have been associated with increased morbidity, postoperative outcomes in SOT recipients undergoing cervical spinal surgery are not well studied.

METHODS

A retrospective database review of Medicare patients younger than 85 years who underwent an elective one to two-level ACDF from 2006-2013 was conducted. Following our exclusion criteria, patients were then divided into the following groups: those with a prior history of kidney, liver, heart or lung transplant (SOT group) and non-SOT patients. Both groups were compared for hospital length of stay, 90-day major medical complications, 90-day hospital readmission, 1-year surgical site infection (SSI), 1-year revision ACDF, and 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 992 (0.5%) SOT recipients (1,144 organs) were identified out of 199,288 ACDF patients. SOT recipients had a significantly longer length of stay (2.32 vs. 5.22 days, p<0.001), higher rate of major medical complications (8.2% vs. 4.5%; OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.45-2.33, p<0.001) and hospital readmission (19.5% vs. 7.5%, OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.74-2.41, p<0.001). In addition, SOT patients had increased mortality within one year of surgery (5.8% vs. 1.3%; OR 3.01, 95% CI 2.26-3.94, p<0.001) compared to non-SOT patients. SOT was not independently associated with SSI (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.85-1.75, p=0.230), and there was no significant difference in revision rate (0.9% vs. 0.5%; OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.73-2.82, p=0.202) between both groups.

CONCLUSION

SOT is independently associated with longer hospital stay, increased rate of major medical complications, hospital readmission and mortality. Spine surgeons should be aware of the higher rates of morbidity and mortality in these patients and take it into consideration when developing patient-specific treatment plans.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Retrospective evaluation of anesthetic techniques in pregnant women with renal transplantation

Background/aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate anesthesia management in cesarean operation of pregnant women who underwent renal transplantation and the effects on postoperative renal function, retrospectively.

Materials and methods

After obtaining the approval of the ethics committee of our hospital, the records of pregnant women who underwent kidney transplantation and cesarean section between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients’ demographic data, concomitant disease history, the treatment received, and type of anesthesia were retrospectively evaluated and recorded in the follow-up form.

Results

It was found that a total of 47 women who underwent renal transplantation had 47 live births by cesarean section. The mean age of the pregnant women was 30 ± 5.34 years. The mean time between renal transplantation and conception was 95.34 ± 55.02 months. It was found that 14 (29%) of a total of 47 patients had their first pregnancy. The number of patients with a gravidity of 4 and above was 9 (19%). A total of 21 (44.7%) pregnant women had spontaneous miscarriage. Five (10.6%) patients were treated with curettage for therapeutic purposes. Twenty-two (46%) of the patients whose immunosuppressive therapy was continuing were treated with azathioprine, tacrolimus, and prednisolone. The mean gestational age of delivery was 36.5 ± 1.59 weeks. The rate of prepregnancy hypertension diagnosis was 25.5% (n = 12), while the rate of developing gestational hypertension was 21.3% (n = 10). Spinal anesthesia was administered to 42 (91%) of 47 patients who underwent cesarean section. In the preoperative period, the mean value of serum blood urea nitrogen was 62.88 ± 41.97 mg/dL and the mean serum creatinine level was 3.21 ± 6.17 mg/dL. In the postoperative period, these values were 44.4 ± 29.9 mg/dL and 1.91 ± 1.63 mg/dL, respectively. When the pre- and postoperative serum urea and creatinine levels were compared, they were found to be lower in the postoperative period. However, there was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). The mean weight of the newborns was determined as 2707.3 ± 501.5 g. While the number of newborns with a low birth weight (<2500 g) was 18 (38%), among them 3 (0.6%) were below 2000 g. It was found that 36.2% (n = 17) of the newborns required intensive care. None of the patients developed graft rejection.

Conclusion

If there is no contraindication, regional anesthesia may be preferred in the first place for pregnant women with renal transplantation. We suggest that this method of anesthesia has some advantages in terms of maintaining postoperative renal function and higher Apgar scores in newborns with low birth weight.

Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Is Associated With Increased Medical Complications and Mortality

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database review.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the outcomes of solid organ transplant (SOT) patients after one- or two-level lumbar fusion surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Over the past decade advances in SOT patients have improved graft survival. As such, this patient population is increasingly eligible for elective surgery such as lumbar fusion procedures to improve mobility and quality of life. However, the outcomes of spine surgery in this population are not well defined.

METHODS

Data from the full 100% Medicare sample between 2005 and 2014 were used for the study. Patients were included if they had an elective one- or two-level lumbar spine fusion and previous history of renal, heart, liver, or lung SOT patients during this period. SOT patients were compared to non-SOT patients with respect to baseline characteristics, 90-day medical complications, 1-year rate of revision surgery, and 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

There were 961 patients in the transplant cohort and 258,342 in the non-SOT cohort. Seventy-seven percent of the SOT patients had prior renal transplant. SOT patients had a longer length of stay (P < 0.001), and a higher 30-day readmission rate compared to non-SOT patients (P =  < 0.001). In addition, SOT patients experienced a 23.8% rate of 90-day postoperative major medical complications and 3.0%, 1-year mortality, significantly larger than respective rates in the control population (P < 0.001). One-year infection, revision surgery rates, and wound dehiscence were not significantly different between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Spine surgery is associated with significant medical complications and 1-year mortality in the SOT population. Although there may be a substantial benefit from lumbar fusion in the SOT population, judicious patient selection is of paramount importance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

National Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients With Solid Organ Transplant Undergoing Spinal Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of population-based national hospital discharge data collected for the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the demographics and in-hospital outcomes of patients with solid organ transplant (SOT) undergoing spinal fusion on a national level.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Solid organ transplantation has become more common in recent years and some of these patients undergo spinal fusion surgery. There is, however, little information regarding the trends and outcomes in such patients.

METHODS

Clinical data were derived from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2000 and 2009. Patients with or without SOT who underwent spinal fusion were identified. Data regarding, patient- and healthcare system-related characteristics, comorbidities, in-hospital complications, and mortality were retrieved and analyzed. In-hospital outcomes were compared between patients with or without SOT and analyzed with the use of multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 5984 patients with SOT underwent spinal fusion in the United States during the last decade. From 2000 to 2009, population growth-adjusted incidence of patients with SOT who underwent spinal fusion has increased more than two fold (0.102 in 2000 to 0.236 in 2009, per 100,000, P < 0.001). Comparison between patients with or without SOT showed that patients with SOT had significantly higher overall in-hospital complication rate (22.4% vs. 9.5%) and in-hospital mortality rate (1.3% vs. 0.3%). Graft versus host disease occurred in 0.7% of patients with SOT undergoing spinal fusion. Patients with SOT had a significant higher risk of urinary and renal complications and overall in-hospital complications.

CONCLUSION

During the last decade, the incidence of patients with SOT undergoing spinal fusion has increased in the United States. In-hospital outcomes of patients with SOT undergoing spinal fusion were inferior to those of patients without SOT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Spinal surgery following organ transplantation

Object

Organ transplantation for renal, liver, cardiac, and pulmonary failure has become more common in recent years, and patients are living longer as a result of improved organ preservation methods, immunosuppressive regimens, and general posttransplant care. Some of these patients undergo spine fusion surgery following organ transplantation, and there is little available information concerning outcomes. The authors report on their experience with and the outcomes of spine fusion in this rare and unique immunosuppressed patient group.

Methods

Using the Current Procedural Terminology and ICD-9 codes for solid organ transplants, bone marrow transplantations (BMTs), and spine fusion surgeries, the authors searched their patient database between 1997 and 2008. Data points of interest included primary diagnosis, type of organ transplant, immunosuppressant drug therapy, complications from spine surgery, and radiographic analysis of spine fusion. Spine fusion was assessed with CT or radiography at the latest follow-up.

Results

The database search results revealed 5999 patients who underwent heart, lung, liver, kidney, pancreas, intestine, or bone marrow transplant between 1997 and 2008. Eighteen of the 5999 patients underwent a spine fusion surgery while receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Organ transplants included kidney, liver, heart, pancreas, and allogenic BMT. There were 3 deaths unrelated to spine fusion within 1 year of the surgery and 1 death immediately after spine surgery. Graft-versus-host disease developed in 1 patient when prednisone was stopped prior to the spine surgery. Thirteen patients underwent follow-up radiographic imaging at an average of 25 months after spine surgery; 12 demonstrated radiographic fusion.

Conclusions

The results suggest that spine fusion rates are adequate despite immunosuppressive therapy in patients undergoing spinal fusion after transplant procedures. The data also illustrate the high morbidity and mortality rates found in the organ transplant patient population.

Preoperative assessment of the patient with liver disease

Patients with liver disease are at appreciable risk when undergoing anesthesia and surgery. Attempts to quantify this risk have been thwarted by the diversity of disease states and illness severity that such patients bring to the operating theater and the myriad of procedures they may undergo. This review discusses the indications and contraindications for surgery in patients with liver disease and attempts to give specific recommendations for optimizing the clinical status of a patient with hepatic dysfunction prior to operative intervention.