Variability of residual platelet function despite clopidogrel treatment in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease

High on-treatment platelet reactivity in peripheral arterial disease: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To highlight current evidence pertaining to the measurement methods and prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in patients with PAD, as well as to evaluate the relationship between HTPR and recurrent adverse cardiovascular and limb events in PAD patients.

METHODS

A systematic review of English-language literature on HTPR in patients with PAD. An electronic literature search of PubMed and Medline was performed in May 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies with a total number of 11,201 patients with PAD were identified. HTPR during clopidogrel treatment ranges from 9.8 to 77%, and during aspirin treatment ranges from 4.1 to 50% of PAD patients. HTPR was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The need for limb revascularisation was higher in patients with HTPR during clopidogrel use. Similarly, HTPR during aspirin use in the PAD population was predictive of adverse cardiovascular events (HR 3.73; 95% CI, 1.43-9.81; p = .007). A wide range of techniques were applied to measure platelet resistance, without consensus on cut-off values. Furthermore, differing patient populations, a variety of antiplatelet regimens, and differing clinical endpoints highlight the high degree of heterogeneity in the studies included in this review.

CONCLUSION

No consensus on technique or cut-off values for HTPR testing has been reached. Patients with HTPR are potentially at a greater risk of adverse limb-related and cardiovascular events than patients sensitive to antiplatelet therapy illustrating the need for clinical implementation of HTPR testing. Future research must aim for consistent methodology. Adaptation of antiplatelet therapy based on HTPR results requires further exploration.

Impact of high on-treatment platelet reactivity after angioplasty in patients with peripheral arterial disease

Objective: High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) predicts adverse events in coronary artery disease patients. In peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients, data concerning the clinical impact of HTPR are limited. Therefore, we evaluated the incidence of (i) HTPR to DAPT and (ii) its impact on 6 months outcome after angioplasty.Methods and results: In this prospective single center analysis, we investigated 102 consecutive patients with PAD from 2016 to 2017. All patients underwent peripheral endovascular treatment due to intermittent claudication (Fontaine IIb). Clopidogrel effects were measured using vasodilator-stimulated protein phosphorylation (VASP) assay, aspirin effects by light-transmission aggregometry (LTA). Major adverse limb events (MALE), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and BARC bleeding (bleeding academic research consortium classification) within 6 months were assessed. HTPR to clopidogrel (n = 37, 36%), to aspirin (n = 11, 11%) and to both (n = 11, 11%) were frequent. Compared to sufficient platelet inhibition by aspirin and clopidogrel (n = 43, 42%), patients with dual HTPR showed a higher risk of MALE at 6 months (27% vs. 7%; hazard ratio [HR]: 4.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1 to 67.8; p = .03). This was independent of diabetes, creatinine, body mass index, and age as well as of procedural details in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. MACCE (n = 2) and BARC bleeding rates (n = 2) were low.Conclusion: In this small exploratory study, HTPR was frequent in PAD patients. Furthermore, the results are suggestive that MALE might be associated with dual HTPR. This leads to the hypothesis that optimized antithrombotic regimens post percutaneous transluminal angioplasty should be tested in clinical trials.

On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity is a Predictor of Adverse Events in Peripheral Artery Disease Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Angioplasty

OBJECTIVES

Few data are available on the association between a different entity of platelet inhibition on antiplatelet treatment and clinical outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of on-treatment platelet reactivity, and its association with ischaemic and haemorrhagic adverse events at follow up in PAD patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).

METHODS

In this observational, prospective, single centre study, 177 consecutive patients with PAD undergoing PTA were enrolled, and treated with dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor. Platelet function was assessed on blood samples obtained within 24 h from PTA by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) using arachidonic acid (AA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) as agonists of platelet aggregation. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined by LTA ≥ 20% if induced by AA, and LTA ≥ 70% if induced by ADP. Follow up was performed to record outcomes (death, major amputation, target vessel re-intervention, acute myocardial infarction and/or myocardial revascularisation, stroke/TIA, and bleeding).

RESULTS

HPR by AA and HPR by ADP were found in 45% and 32% of patients, respectively. During follow up (median duration 23 months) 23 deaths (13%) were recorded; 27 patients (17.5%) underwent target limb revascularisation (TLR), two (1.3%) amputation, and six (3.9%) myocardial revascularisation. Twenty-four patients (15.6%) experienced minor bleeding. On multivariable analysis, HPR by AA and HPR by ADP were independent predictors of death [HR 3.8 (1.2-11.7), p = .023 and HR 4.8 (1.6-14.5), p = .006, respectively]. The median value of LTA by ADP was significantly lower in patients with bleeding complications than in those without [26.5% (22-39.2) vs. 62% (44.5-74), p < .001). LTA by ADP ≤ 41% was independently associated with bleeding HR 14.6 (2.6-24.0), p = .001] on multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study a high prevalence of on-clopidogrel and aspirin high platelet reactivity was found, which was significantly associated with the risk of death. Conversely, a low on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity was associated with a higher risk of bleeding. These results document that the entity of platelet inhibition is associated with both thrombotic and bleeding complications in PAD patients.

Antithrombotic therapy in peripheral artery disease

Antiplatelet agents are recommended for the reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events among all patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease. However, the optimal antiplatelet regimen and duration of therapy in peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains unclear, largely due to limited and conflicting data in this patient population. This article reviews current data on antithrombotic therapy in PAD and discusses the implications of this data for current practice and future research.

Antiplatelet Therapy for Peripheral Arterial Disease and Critical Limb Ischemia

Antiplatelet therapy is invariably prescribed for patients with peripheral arterial disease and critical limb ischemia, and numerous major society guidelines espouse their use, but high-quality data in this high-risk and challenging patient population are often lacking. This article summarizes the major guidelines for antiplatelet therapy, reviews the major studies of antiplatelet therapy in peripheral arterial disease (including data for aspirin, clopidogrel, dipyridamole, cilostazol, and prostanoids), and offers perspective on the potential benefits of ticagrelor, vorapaxar, and rivaroxaban. The review concludes with a discussion of the relative lack of efficacy that antiplatelet therapy has shown in regard to peripheral vascular outcomes.

Prevalence of nonresponsiveness to aspirin in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease using true point of care testing

PURPOSE

This study was designed to determine the prevalence of platelet nonresponsiveness to aspirin using point of care testing in a population with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

METHODS

This was an observational, single-centre study including all patients with symptomatic PAD receiving aspirin. In patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with additional clopidogrel, platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel also was tested. Platelet responsiveness was assessed with the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. Patients with residual aspirin reaction units ≥550 and platelet reactivity units ≥234 were considered nonresponders. The study's primary endpoint was to determine the prevalence of nonresponsiveness to aspirin; secondary endpoints included the prevalence of dual nonresponsiveness.

RESULTS

In total, 145 consecutive patients (mean age 67 ± 9 years) receiving aspirin 100 mg were tested, whereas 128 of 145 (88.3 %) were under dual antiplatelet therapy with additional clopidogrel 75 mg. The prevalence of nonresponsiveness to aspirin was 20.7 % (30/145). Among the 128 patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy, 65 (50.8 %) demonstrated nonresponsiveness to clopidogrel and 16 (11.7 %) dual nonresponsiveness to both aspirin and clopidogrel. Aspirin nonresponsiveness was not significantly different in patients suffering from diabetes, renal disease, critical limb ischemia (CLI) or those receiving statin, antihypertensive or proton-pump inhibitors therapy. Clopidogrel nonresponsiveness was significantly higher in older patients (p = 0.01) and those suffering from CLI (p = 0.03) and renal disease (p = 0.001) and significantly lower in smokers (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of platelet nonresponsiveness to aspirin detected using the VerifyNow point of care testing in symptomatic PAD patients was 20.7 % and the clinical impact of the phenomenon merits further investigation.

Management of peripheral arterial interventions with mono or dual antiplatelet therapy--the MIRROR study: a randomised and double-blinded clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the influence of dual antiplatelet therapy vs. aspirin alone on local platelet activation and clinical endpoints in patients with PAD treated with endovascular therapy.

METHODS

Patients received either 500 mg aspirin and 300 mg clopidogrel before intervention followed by a daily dose of 100 mg aspirin and 75 mg clopidogrel for 6 months, or the same doses of aspirin plus placebo instead of clopidogrel. Primary endpoints were local concentrations of platelet activation markers β-thromboglobulin and CD40L, and the rate of patient's resistant to clopidogrel. Secondary endpoints included the clinical development 6 months after the intervention.

RESULTS

Eighty patients, 40 in each group, were enrolled. The median peri-interventional concentration of β-TG was 224.5 vs. 365.5 (P = 0.03) in the clopidogrel and placebo group. The concentration of CD40L was 127 and 206.5 (P = 0.05). Thirty per cent of patients who had received clopidogrel were resistant. Two clopidogrel and eight placebo patients required TLR (P = 0.04). The clopidogrel patients who needed revascularisation were both resistant to clopidogrel. Minor bleeding complications occurred in one clopidogrel and two placebo patients.

CONCLUSION

Dual antiplatetet therapy reduces peri-interventional platelet activation and improves functional outcome without higher bleeding complications. An individual tailored dual antiplatelet therapy seems desirable for endovascularly treated patients with PAD.

Antiplatelet resistance in stroke

Although the exact prevalence of antiplatelet resistance in ischemic stroke is not known, estimates about the two most widely used antiplatelet agents - aspirin and clopidogrel - suggest that the resistance rate is high, irrespective of the definition used and parameters measured. Inadequate antiplatelet responsiveness correlates with an increased risk of recurrent ischemic vascular events in patients with stroke and acute coronary syndrome. It is not currently known whether tailoring antiplatelet therapy based on platelet function test results translates into a more effective strategy to prevent secondary vascular events after stroke. Large-scale clinical trials using a universally accepted definition and standardized measurement techniques for antiplatelet resistance are needed to demonstrate whether a 'platelet-function test-guided antiplatelet treatment' strategy translates into improved stroke care. This article gives an overview of the clinical importance of laboratory antiplatelet resistance, describes the challenges for platelet-function test-guided antiplatelet treatment and discusses practical issues about the management of patients with aspirin and/or clopidogrel resistance.