Cardiac involvement in myotonic dystrophy: The role of troponins and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide

An overview of heart rhythm disorders and management in myotonic dystrophy type 1

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is the most common adult form of muscular dystrophy, presenting with a constellation of systemic findings secondary to a CTG triplet expansion of the noncoding region of the DMPK gene. Cardiac involvement is frequent, with conduction disease and supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias being the most prevalent cardiac manifestations, often developing from a young age. The development of cardiac arrhythmias has been linked to increased morbidity and mortality, with sudden cardiac death well described. Strategies to mitigate risk of arrhythmic death have been developed. In this review, we outline the current knowledge on the pathophysiology of rhythm abnormalities in patients with myotonic dystrophy and summarize available knowledge on arrhythmic risk stratification. We also review management strategies from an electrophysiological perspective, attempting to underline the substantial unmet need to address residual arrhythmic risks for this population.

Cardiac Pathology in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), the most common muscular dystrophy affecting adults and children, is a multi-systemic disorder affecting skeletal, cardiac, and smooth muscles as well as neurologic, endocrine and other systems. This review is on the cardiac pathology associated with DM1. The heart is one of the primary organs affected in DM1. Cardiac conduction defects are seen in up to 75% of adult DM1 cases and sudden death due to cardiac arrhythmias is one of the most common causes of death in DM1. Unfortunately, the pathogenesis of cardiac manifestations in DM1 is ill defined. In this review, we provide an overview of the history of cardiac studies in DM1, clinical manifestations, and pathology of the heart in DM1. This is followed by a discussion of emerging data about the utility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) as a biomarker for cardiac disease in DM1, and ends with a discussion on models of cardiac RNA toxicity in DM1 and recent clinical guidelines for cardiologic management of individuals with DM1.

Inherited Neuromuscular Disorders: Which Role for Serum Biomarkers?

Inherited neuromuscular disorders (INMD) are a heterogeneous group of rare diseases that involve muscles, motor neurons, peripheral nerves or the neuromuscular junction. Several different lab abnormalities have been linked to INMD: sometimes they are typical of the disorder, but they usually appear to be less specific. Sometimes serum biomarkers can point out abnormalities in presymtomatic or otherwise asymptomatic patients (e.g., carriers). More often a biomarker of INMD is evaluated by multiple clinicians other than expert in NMD before the diagnosis, because of the multisystemic involvement in INMD. The authors performed a literature search on biomarkers in inherited neuromuscular disorders to provide a practical approach to the diagnosis and the correct management of INMD. A considerable number of biomarkers have been reported that support the diagnosis of INMD, but the role of an expert clinician is crucial. Hence, the complete knowledge of such abnormalities can accelerate the diagnostic workup supporting the referral to specialists in neuromuscular disorders.

Cardiac involvement in inflammatory myopathies and inherited muscle diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine recent developments relating to cardiac involvement in the adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) and those inherited muscle diseases which may present in adulthood and mimic IIM.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cardiac involvement is a common feature of IIM and inherited muscle diseases. Frequency according to disease subtype varies, with serotype having particular influence in IIM, and genotype in the inherited muscle diseases. Innovative techniques for examining cardiac function have been investigated further, including speckle-tracking echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance tomography. The present work has highlighted a likely underestimate of the burden of cardiac disease to date. The complex relationship between IIM, atherosclerosis, and traditional cardiovascular risk factors has been further elucidated. Consensus recommendations for managing patients with inherited muscle diseases and prominent cardiac involvement have been recently published. In addition to supportive care, disease modifying treatments are increasingly becoming available for inherited muscle diseases which may also improve cardiac outcomes.

SUMMARY

Cardiac involvement is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We suggest having a low threshold for considering the possibility of cardiac involvement in all patients with muscle disease.

SERUM cardiac-specific biomarkers and atrial fibrillation in myotonic dystrophy type I

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I, N terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), creatine kinase-MB mass concentration (CK-MB mass) and copeptin (CP) in predicting incident atrial fibrillation (AF) in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study enrolled 60 consecutive DM1 patients (age 50.3 ± 7.3 years, 34 male) who underwent pacemaker (PM) implantation for cardiac rhythm abnormalities and 60 PM recipients whose age and sex matched served as control group. All DM1 patients underwent a 12-lead electrocardiogram, 2D color Doppler echocardiogram, biomarkers measurements and device interrogation at implantation, 1 month after and every 6 months thereafter for a minimum of 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The study population was divided into two groups according to the presence of AF (AF group vs non-AF group). The AF group was older (47.3 ± 8 vs 38.6 ± 7 years, P = .03) and showed higher serum levels of NT-proBNP (151 ± 38.4 vs 107.3 ± 24.2 pg/mL, P < .001) and CP (18.9 ± 4.5 vs 7 ± 2.3 P < .001) than non-AF Group. NT-proBNP (P < .001) and CP (P < .001) were found to be an independent predictor of AF. Based on the receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis, the cut-off value for NT-proBNP that best predicted AF event in DM1 patients was 123 pg/ml (sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 86.5%); the cut-off value for CP that best predicted AF event in DM1 patients was 9 pmol/L (sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 87%).

CONCLUSION

NT-proBNP and CP represent two independent predictors of AF onset in DM1 population with conduction disturbances underwent PM implantation.

TNNT2 Missplicing in Skeletal Muscle as a Cardiac Biomarker in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 but Not in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2

Cardiac involvement is one of the most important manifestations of the multisystemic phenotype of patients affected by myotonic dystrophy (DM) and represents the second cause of premature death. Molecular mechanisms responsible for DM cardiac defects are still unclear; however, missplicing of the cardiac isoform of troponin T (TNNT2) and of the cardiac sodium channel (SCN5A) genes might contribute to the reduced myocardial function and conduction abnormalities seen in DM patients. Since, in DM skeletal muscle, the TNNT2 gene shows the same aberrant splicing pattern observed in cardiac muscle, the principal aim of this work was to verify if the TNNT2 aberrant fetal isoform expression could be secondary to myopathic changes or could reflect the DM cardiac phenotype. Analysis of alternative splicing of TNNT2 and of several genes involved in DM pathology has been performed on muscle biopsies from patients affected by DM type 1 (DM1) or type 2 (DM2) with or without cardiac involvement. Our analysis shows that missplicing of muscle-specific genes is higher in DM1 and DM2 than in regenerating control muscles, indicating that these missplicing could be effectively important in DM skeletal muscle pathology. When considering the TNNT2 gene, missplicing appears to be more evident in DM1 than in DM2 muscles since, in DM2, the TNNT2 fetal isoform appears to be less expressed than the adult isoform. This evidence does not seem to be related to less severe muscle histopathological alterations that appear to be similar in DM1 and DM2 muscles. These results seem to indicate that the more severe TNNT2 missplicing observed in DM1 could not be related only to myopathic changes but could reflect the more severe general phenotype compared to DM2, including cardiac problems that appear to be more severe and frequent in DM1 than in DM2 patients. Moreover, TNNT2 missplicing significantly correlates with the QRS cardiac parameter in DM1 but not in DM2 patients, indicating that this splicing event has good potential to function as a biomarker of DM1 severity and it should be considered in pharmacological clinical trials to monitor the possible effects of different therapeutic approaches on skeletal muscle tissues.