Clinical outcomes after ticagrelor and clopidogrel in Chinese post-stented patients

Outcomes of Ticagrelor Versus High-dose Clopidogrel in CYP2C19 Intermediate Metabolizer Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes

ABSTRACT

Guidelines on antiplatelet recommendation for CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizer (IM) have not come to an agreement. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefit of ticagrelor when compared with high-dose clopidogrel in CYP2C19 IM after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes. Patients were enrolled according to CYP2C19 genotype and individual antiplatelet therapy. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were collected through electronic medical record system. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), namely a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, and stent thrombosis within 12 months. The secondary outcome was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium scale bleeding events within 12 months. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed, with inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) adjusting for potential confounders. A total of 532 CYP2C19 IM were enrolled in this retrospective single-center study. No statistically significant difference in incidence rate of MACCE was found between patients receiving ticagrelor versus clopidogrel (7.01 vs. 9.52 per 100 patient-years; IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval: 0.32-1.58; adjusted log-rank P = 0.396), but the incidence rate of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding events was statistically higher in the loss of function-ticagrelor group than in the loss of function-clopidogrel group (13.53 vs. 6.16 per 100 patient-years; IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio: 2.29; 95% confidence interval: 1.10-4.78; adjusted log-rank P = 0.027). Ticagrelor treatment in CYP2C19 IM resulted in a statistically higher risk of bleeding compared with high-dose clopidogrel, whereas a clear association between treatments and MACCE warrants further investigations.

Net clinical benefit of clopidogrel versus ticagrelor in elderly patients carrying CYP2C19 loss-of-function variants with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) tend to choose clopidogrel over potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitor such as ticagrelor after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in China considering higher risks of bleeding. CYP2C19 genotype is regarded as a major factor influencing the efficacy of clopidogrel. The present study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor relative to clopidogrel in elderly ACS patients after PCI in China with reduced CYP2C19 metabolism.

METHODS

Between January 2016 and March 2019, 2751 ACS patients over 65 years old with CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) variants after PCI were enrolled. All patients were treated with aspirin and P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, among whom 2056 received clopidogrel and 695 received ticagrelor. Net adverse clinical events (NACE), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, target vessel revascularization and clinically relevant bleeding including Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 2, 3, 5 bleeding, were compared between the two groups at 12 months after PCI. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to balance the baseline characteristics between the two groups.

RESULTS

Before and after PSM, NACE was significantly increased in ticagrelor group compared with clopidogrel group at 12 months post PCI (Before PSM, 15.18% vs. 25.61% p<0.001; After PSM, 11.66% vs. 26.01% p<0.001). MACE was comparable between the two groups (Before PSM, 5.45% vs. 5.32% p>0.999; After PSM, 3.59% vs. 5.38% p=0.146). BARC types 2, 3, 5 bleeding events were significantly increased in patients treated with ticagrelor relative to clopidogrel (Before PSM, 10.31% vs. 21.01% p<0.001; After PSM, 8.22% vs. 21.38% p<0.001), which was mainly attributed to a higher incidence of BARC type 2 bleeding events in ticagrelor group (Before PSM, 8.12% vs. 18.56% p<0.001; After PSM, 6.43% vs. 18.83% p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present real-world study, selection of ticagrelor over clopidogrel showed a significant increase in NACE with a higher incidence of bleeding and similar ischemic events in elderly ACS patients carrying CYP2C19 LOF variants after PCI.

Transcriptome-wide map of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) profiling in coronary artery disease (CAD) with clopidogrel resistance

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel resistance profoundly increases the risk of major cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Here, we comprehensively analyse global m6A modification alterations in clopidogrel-resistant (CR) and non-CR patients.

METHODS

After RNA isolation, the RNA transcriptome expression (lncRNA, circRNA, and mRNA) was analysed via RNA-seq, and m6A peaks were identified by MeRIP-seq. The altered m6A methylation sites on mRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs were identified, and then, GO and KEGG pathway analyses were performed. Through joint analysis with RNA-seq and MeRIP-seq data, differentially expressed mRNAs harbouring differentially methylated sites were identified. The changes in m6A regulator levels and the abundance of differentially methylated sites were measured by RT-PCR. The identification of m6A-modified RNAs was verified by m6A-IP-qPCR.

RESULTS

The expression of 2919 hypermethylated and 2519 hypomethylated mRNAs, 192 hypermethylated and 391 hypomethylated lncRNAs, and 375 hypermethylated and 546 hypomethylated circRNAs was shown to be altered in CR patients. The m6A peaks related to CR indicated lower mark density at the CDS region. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that inflammatory pathways and insulin signalling pathways might be involved in the pathological processes underlying CR. The expression of mRNAs (ST5, KDM6B, GLB1L2, and LSM14B), lncRNAs (MSTRG.13776.1 and ENST00000627981.1), and circRNAs (hsa_circ_0070675_CBC1, hsa-circRNA13011-5_CBC1, and hsa-circRNA6406-3_CBC1) was upregulated in CR patients, while the expression of mRNAs (RPS16 and CREG1), lncRNAs (MSTRG.9215.1), and circRNAs (hsa_circ_0082972_CBC1) was downregulated in CR patients. Moreover, m6A regulators (FTO, YTHDF3, and WTAP) were also differentially expressed. An additional combined analysis of gene expression and m6A peaks revealed that the expression of mRNAs (such as ST5, LYPD2, and RPS16 mRNAs) was significantly altered in the CR patients.

CONCLUSION

The expression of m6A regulators, the RNA transcriptome, and the m6A landscape was altered in CR patients. These findings reveal epitranscriptomic regulation in CR patients, which might be novel therapeutic targets in future.

Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel as Antiplatelet Agents in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The worldwide prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has significantly increased in the past decades. Scientific reports have shown CKD to be an enhancing risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD), which is the leading cause of premature death in patients with CKD. Clinical practice guidelines are ambiguous in view of the use of antiplatelet drugs in patients with CKD because patients with moderate-to-severe CKD were often excluded from clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. In this analysis, we aimed to systematically assess the adverse cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes that were observed with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel use in patients with CKD and cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

Electronic databases including Web of Science, Google Scholar, http://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov , Cochrane database, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were carefully searched for English-based articles comparing ticagrelor with clopidogrel in patients with CKD. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding events were the endpoints in this study. The latest version of the RevMan software (version 5.4) was used to analyze the data. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the data post analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 15,664 participants were included in this analysis, whereby 2456 CKD participants were assigned to ticagrelor and 13,208 CKD participants were assigned to clopidogrel. Our current analysis showed that major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.71-1.03; P = 0.09), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.57- 1.18; P = 0.29), cardiovascular death (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.56-1.23; P = 0.35), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.70-1.07; P = 0.19), ischemic stroke (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.58-1.11; P = 0.18), and hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.38-2.99; P = 0.91) were not significantly different in CKD patients who were treated with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI)-defined minor (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.52-1.53; P = 0.68) and TIMI major bleeding (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.69-1.76; P = 0.67) were also not significantly different. However, bleeding defined according to the academic research consortium (BARC) bleeding type 1 or 2 (RR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.13-3.37; P = 0.02) and BARC bleeding type 3 or 5 (RR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.17-2.48; P = 0.006) were significantly higher with ticagrelor.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with clopidogrel, even though ticagrelor was not associated with higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in these patients with CKD, it was associated with significantly higher BARC bleeding. Therefore, the safety outcomes of ticagrelor still require further evaluation in patients with CKD. Nevertheless, this hypothesis should only be confirmed with more powerful results that could usually only be achieved using large-scale randomized trials.

Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor in East Asian patients aged 75 years or older with acute coronary syndrome: observations from the GF-APT registry

The benefits of potent antithrombotic therapy usually come at the expense of a higher risk of bleeding. The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in elderly East Asian populations remains debated due to the concerns about the imbalance of ischemic and bleeding risks. This study aimed to compare the impact of clopidogrel with ticagrelor on clinical outcomes in East Asian patients aged ≥75 years with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) using data from an institutional registry. We assessed the treatment effect of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel based on propensity scores and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. A total of 2775 ACS patients were included, of which 235 (8.5%) were treated with ticagrelor. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 11.9% of patients treated with ticagrelor versus 8.8% treated with clopidogrel. There was no significant association between treatment with ticagrelor and a lower risk of the primary efficacy outcome (p = .156). However, the incidences of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 2.79) and major bleeding (adjusted HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.06 to 4.56) were significantly higher in patients treated with ticagrelor than clopidogrel. In elderly patients with ACS from East Asia, the efficacy of clopidogrel was comparable to ticagrelor, while ticagrelor is associated with an increased risk of mortality and major bleeding.

Platelet Function and Genotype after DES Implantation in East Asian Patients: Rationale and Characteristics of the PTRG-DES Consortium

PURPOSE

Platelet function test (PFT) results and genotype hold unique prognostic implications in East Asian patients. The aim of the PTRG-DES (Platelet function and genoType-Related long-term proGnosis in Drug-Eluting Stent-treated Patients with coronary artery disease) consortium is to assess the clinical impact thereof on long-term clinical outcomes in Korean patients with coronary artery disease during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) including clopidogrel.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Searching publications on the PubMed, we reviewed clopidogrel treatment studies with PFT and/or genotype data for potential inclusion in this study. Lead investigators were invited to share PFT/genotype results, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes to evaluate relationships among them.

RESULTS

Nine registries from 32 academic centers participated in the PTRG-DES consortium, contributing individual patient data from 13160 patients who underwent DES implantation between July 2003 and August 2018. The PTRG-PFT cohort was composed of 11714 patients with available VerifyNow assay results. Platelet reactivity levels reached 218±79 P2Y12 reaction units (PRU), and high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity based on a consensus-recommended cutoff (PRU >208) was observed in 55.9%. The PTRG-Genotype cohort consisted of 8163 patients with candidate genotypes related with clopidogrel responsiveness. Of those with cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotype, frequencies of carrying one and two loss-of-function allele (s) (^*2 or ^*3) were 47.9% (intermediate metabolizers) and 14.2% (poor metabolizers), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The PTRG-DES consortium highlights unique values for on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity and CYP2C19 phenotype that may be important to developing optimal antiplatelet regimens in East Asian patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04734028.

Impact of Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Risk Stratification With the CHA2DS2-VASc Score

Backgrounds

The clinical benefit of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in unselected patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial in the real world. This study was aimed to investigate the impact of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in subjects with ACS without atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) after PCI based on risk stratification using the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score.

Methods

In 2016–2019, patients who underwent PCI with at least one stent implanted in the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command were classified as low- or high-risk groups according to the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score. Incidences of 12-month ischemia [cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke], all-cause death, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2,3,5 bleeding, BARC 3,5 bleeding, and net adverse clinical events (NACEs) (all-cause death, MI, stroke, or BARC 3, 5 bleeding) with aspirin plus different P2Y₁₂ inhibitors (clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were appraised among different risk groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox multivariate analysis were used to balance the groups.

Results

A total of consecutive 17,037 patients with ACS were enrolled. The optimal cut-off value of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score for ischemic events by the Youden test was 3 points. Among patients with high risk (CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≥ 3, n = 6,151), ticagrelor was associated with slightly lower risks of ischemic events (2.29% vs. 3.54%, P = 0.02) and stroke (0.39% vs. 1.08%, P = 0.01) without excessive risk of BARC 3, 5 bleeding events (2.16% vs. 2.11%, P = 0.92) compared to clopidogrel within 12 months after PCI. For patients with low risk (CHA₂DS₂-VASc < 3, n = 10,886), a statistically significant difference was seen in the incidence of overall 12-month BARC 2, 3, 5 bleeding events by P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitor (4.00% vs. 3.26%) with a similar incidence of the ischemic events (1.40% vs. 1.52%). Results in the PSM cohort and the adjustment with Cox multivariate analysis were consistent with the main outcomes.

Conclusion

Higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores were associated with a higher incidence of 1-year ischemic events for the patients with ACS after PCI. Compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor was associated with lower ischemic events within 12 months after PCI without excessive risk of bleeding in high-risk patients but shows poor safety with excess bleeding in low-risk patients.

Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin in Chinese Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A TWILIGHT China Substudy

BACKGROUND

The risk/benefit tradeoff of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention may vary in East Asian patients as compared with their non-East Asian counterparts.

METHODS

The double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized TWILIGHT trial (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention) enrolled patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. After 3 months of treatment with ticagrelor plus aspirin, event-free and adherent patients remained on ticagrelor and were randomly assigned to receive aspirin or placebo for 1 year. The primary end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding; the key secondary end point was the first occurrence of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke.

RESULTS

Of 9006 enrolled and 7119 randomized patients in TWILIGHT, 1169 patients (13.0%) were enrolled at 27 Chinese sites in this prespecified substudy, of whom 1028 (14.4%) patients were randomized after 3 months. The incidence of the primary end point was 6.2% in the ticagrelor+aspirin group versus 3.5% in the ticagrelor+placebo group between randomization and 1 year (hazard ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.31-0.99]; P=0.048). The key secondary end point occurred in 3.4% of patients in the ticagrelor+aspirin group versus 2.4% in the ticagrelor+placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.33-1.46]; P=0.34). There was no interaction between the region of randomization (China versus the rest of the world) and randomized treatment assignment in terms of the primary or key secondary end points.

CONCLUSIONS

Ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced clinically relevant bleeding without increasing ischemic events as compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin in Chinese patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT02270242.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

Background

Ticagrelor is currently recommended for patients with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, recent studies have yielded controversial results.

Objective

To compare the clinical outcomes between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with ACS.

Methods

Three electronic databases were queried until April 25, 2021. We defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) as the primary efficacy endpoint. The secondary efficacy endpoints included stroke, stent thrombosis, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and myocardial infarction. The safety endpoints were (major and minor) bleeding. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated to represent the estimated effect sizes.

Results

A total of 270,937 patients with ACS from 10 clinical trials and 18 observational studies were included. No significant difference was detected in MACE (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.60–1.08, p = 0.15, I2 = 64.83%). However, ticagrelor introduced a higher risk of bleeding (1.46, 1.17–1.83, 0.00, 61.66%) and minor bleeding (1.71, 1.33–2.21, 0.00, 4.65%) in clinical trials. The results of secondary efficacy endpoints differed in the clinical trials and observational studies. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that ticagrelor showed better therapeutic effects in patients who underwent the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (0.38, 0.23–0.63, 0.00, 0) than those intended for PCI (1.03, 0.76–1.38, 0.87, 64.26%). Meanwhile, ticagrelor showed different therapeutic effects on patients with ACS of different ethnicities and different countries.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrated that ticagrelor is not superior to clopidogrel in MACE but is associated with a higher risk of bleeding in patients with ACS. Different PCI strategies, ethnicities, and countries may be the factors that contribute to different therapeutic effects of ticagrelor.

Systematic Review Registration

This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021251212).

Predictors and long-term outcomes of in-hospital switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor among patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

This study evaluated clinical outcomes of switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The clinical benefit of in-hospital switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor in these patients remains unclear. Among patients with ACS initially receiving clopidogrel, logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of switching to ticagrelor. Multivariable Cox regression was used to compare efficacy and safety between switching to ticagrelor and continuing clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACEs) at 12 months, a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2/3/5 bleeding. Among 10,519 patients initially receiving clopidogrel, 1405 (13.4%) were switched to ticagrelor at discharge. Stent number, left main artery lesions, diabetes, male sex, age, estimated glomerular filtration rate of <45 ml/min/1.73 m² , and history of PCI or stroke were identified as independent predictors of switching to ticagrelor. The rate of NACE (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-1.91) or BARC type 2/3/5 bleeding (HR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.52-2.66) was significantly higher in patients switching to ticagrelor than in those continuing clopidogrel. The risk of MACE was comparable between both the groups (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.41-1.22). In real-world practice, in-hospital switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor was independently associated with several clinical factors. Patients switching to ticagrelor had a higher rate of NACE or BARC type 2/3/5 bleeding than those continuing clopidogrel, without any reduction in the MACE rate.

Real-World Use of Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor in Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries: Patient Characteristics and Long-Term Outcomes

Background: Current guidelines recommend ticagrelor as the preferred P₂Y₁₂ inhibitor on top of aspirin in patients after an acute coronary syndrome. Yet, the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) remain uncertain. Methods: A total of 1,091 patients with MINOCA who received dual antiplatelet therapy were enrolled and divided into the clopidogrel (n = 878) and ticagrelor (n = 213) groups. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, nonfatal MI, stroke, revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure. The safety endpoint referred to bleeding events. The Kaplan-Meier, propensity score matching (PSM), and Cox regression analyses were performed. Results: The incidence of MACE was similar for clopidogrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients over the median follow-up of 41.7 months (14.3 vs. 15.0%; p = 0.802). The use of ticagrelor was not associated with a reduced risk of MACE compared with clopidogrel after multivariable adjustment in overall (HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 0.84-1.86, p = 0.262) and in subgroups of MINOCA patients. Further, there was no significant difference in the risk of bleeding between two groups (HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 0.83-3.36, p = 0.149). After PSM, 206 matched pairs were identified, and the differences between clopidogrel and ticagrelor for ischemic endpoints and bleeding events remained nonsignificant (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: In this observational analysis of MINOCA patients, ticagrelor was not superior to clopidogrel in reducing ischemic events and did not cause a significant increase in bleeding, indicating a similar efficacy and safety between clopidogrel and ticagrelor. A randomized study of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in this specific population is needed.

Polymorphisms in the GCK gene increase the risk of clopidogrel resistance in stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) patients

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus is a major factor in clopidogrel resistance (CR), and the glucokinase (GCK) gene plays a pivotal role in glucose homeostasis. This study investigated the contribution of GCK polymorphisms to CR risk.

METHODS

Two hundred SCAD patients were recruited, and their platelet functions were detected by the Verify-Now P2Y12 assay. The polymorphisms of GCK were tested based on the methods of polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). We investigated the associations of GCK polymorphisms and CR. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyse the correlations between GCK polymorphisms and clinical values.

RESULTS

Our study found that the SNPs rs4607517 and rs6975024 were associated with CR. Additionally, patients with the G allele of rs4607517had a greater CR risk, but the C allele of rs6975024 might be a protective factor. Finally, logistic regression revealed that CC + TC (rs6975024) as well as the values of albumin were correlated with a decreased risk of CR, and higher levels of uric acid (UA) may be positively associated with CR.

CONCLUSION

The GCK gene polymorphisms might increase the CR risk in SCAD patients. Meanwhile, higher albumin levels and lower UA values might decrease the risk.

Bleeding avoidance strategies and percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes: A 10-year observation from a Japanese Multicenter Registry

BACKGROUND

Bleeding avoidance strategies (BASs) are increasingly adopted for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to bleeding complications. However, their association with bleeding events outside of Western countries remains unclear. In collaboration with the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI registry, we aimed to assess the time trend and impact of BAS utilization among Japanese patients.

METHODS

Our study included 19,656 consecutive PCI patients registered over 10 years. These patients were divided into 4-time frame groups (T1: 2008-2011, T2: 2012-2013, T3: 2014-2015, and T4: 2016-2018). BAS was defined as the use of transradial approach or vascular closure device (VCD) use after transfemoral approach (TFA). Model performance of the NCDR CathPCI bleeding model was evaluated. The degree of bleeding reduction associated with BAS adoption was estimated via multilevel mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The NCDR CathPCI bleeding risk score demonstrated good discrimination in the Japanese population (C-statistics 0.79-0.81). The BAS adoption rate increased from 43% (T1) to 91% (T4), whereas the crude CathPCI-defined bleeding rate decreased from 10% (T1) to 7% (T4). Adjusted odds ratios for bleeding events were 0.25 (95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.45, P< .001) for those undergoing TFA with VCD in T4 and 0.26 (95% confidence interval 0.20-0.35, P< .001) for transradial approach in T4 compared to patients that received TFA without VCD in T1.

CONCLUSIONS

BAS use over the studied time frames was associated with lower risk of bleeding complications among Japanese. Nonetheless, observed bleeding rates remained higher compared to the US population.

Safety and efficacy of low-dose ticagrelor in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

It remains unclear whether low-dose ticagrelor offers better safety and similar efficacy for Asian patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of low-dose ticagrelor vs standard-dose ticagrelor in Chinese patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this observational cohort study, a total of 2110 ACS patients who were event-free at 3 months after the index PCI were divided into standard-dose ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily) (n = 1830) or low-dose ticagrelor (45 mg twice daily) (n = 280) on a background of aspirin 100 mg once daily for at least another 9 months. The primary end point was type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria over a 1-year follow-up period post-PCI. Predictors of the primary end point were identified. Both Cox regression and propensity score matching analyses were used. The cumulative incidence of BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding was lower in the low-dose ticagrelor group vs the standard-dose group either before (adjusted HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.07-0.77; p = .016) or after matching (HR 0.25; 95% CI 0.08-0.85; p = .026). A composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was not significantly different between the two groups (0.4% vs 0.9%, respectively). By multivariate analysis, only low-dose ticagrelor was a protected predictor of BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding either before (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.89) or after matching (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.82). A low-dose regimen of ticagrelor might provide better safety than standard-dose ticagrelor in Chinese patients with ACS undergoing PCI.

Ethnic Difference of Thrombogenicity in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: a Pandora Box to Explain Prognostic Differences

Arterial and venous atherothrombotic events are finely regulated processes involving a complex interplay between vulnerable blood, vulnerable vessel, and blood stasis. Vulnerable blood ('thrombogenicity') comprises complex interactions between cellular components and plasma factors (inflammatory, procoagulant, anticoagulant, and fibrinolytic factors). The extent of thrombogenicity may determine the progression of atheroma and the clinical manifestation of atherothrombotic events, with the highest thrombogenicity in African Americans and lowest in East Asians. Inherent thrombogenicity may influence clinical efficacy and safety of specific antithrombotic treatments in high-risk patients, which may in part explain the observation that East Asian patients have reduced anti-ischemic benefits and elevated bleeding risk with antithrombotic therapy compared to Caucasian patients. In this review, we discuss available evidence regarding the racial differences in thrombogenicity and its impact on clinical outcomes among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

The East Asian Paradox: An Updated Position Statement on the Challenges to the Current Antithrombotic Strategy in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease

East Asian patients have reduced anti-ischemic benefits and increased bleeding risk during antithrombotic therapies compared with Caucasian patients. As potent P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors (e.g., ticagrelor and prasugrel) and direct oral anticoagulants are commonly used in current daily practice, the unique risk-benefit trade-off in East Asians has been a topic of emerging interest. In this article, we propose updated evidence and future directions of antithrombotic treatment in East Asian patients.

Antithrombotic Strategy for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Perspective from East Asia

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention has become the standard of care, particularly in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Current clinical guidelines recommend novel P2Y12 inhibitors (e.g., prasugrel or ticagrelor) in addition to aspirin based on the results of representative randomized controlled trials conducted predominantly in Western countries. These agents were superior to clopidogrel in reducing the composite ischemic events, with a trade-off of the increased bleeding events. However, multiple differences exist between East Asian and Western patients, especially with respect to their physique, thrombogenicity, hemorrhagic diathesis, and on-treatment platelet reactivity. Recent studies from East Asian countries (e.g., Japan or South Korea) have consistently demonstrated that use of novel P2Y12 inhibitors is associated with a higher risk of bleeding events than use of clopidogrel, despite borderline statistical difference in the incidence of composite ischemic events. Additionally, multiple studies have shown that the optimal duration of DAPT may be shorter in East Asian than Western patients. This review summarizes clinical studies of antithrombotic strategies in East Asian patients with ACS. Understanding these differences in antithrombotic strategies including DAPT and their impacts on clinical outcomes will aid in selection of the optimal tailored antithrombotic therapy for patients with ACS.