Hybrid Coronary Revascularization in the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents

Is hybrid coronary revascularization really beneficial in the long term?

 

OBJECTIVES

This analysis aimed to compare both short- and long-term outcomes of hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) with different techniques and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

Twenty-three studies were included, covering 10 468 different patients, among whom 2403 patients underwent HCR with either simultaneous or staged method and 8065 patients underwent CABG.

RESULTS

Compared with CABG, HCR had a statistically significant lower risk of stroke [odds ratio (OR) = 0.55, P = 0.049], major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (OR = 0.69, P = 0.024) and blood transfusion (BT) (OR = 0.39, P < 0.001), whereas no significant differences were detected in mortality, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization. A network meta-analysis showed that simultaneous HCR had significantly better outcomes in stroke (OR = 0.24, P = 0.01) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (OR = 0.29, P < 0.001), and staged HCR had a significantly better outcome in BT (OR = 0.31, P < 0.001). According to the frequentist statistic results, simultaneous HCR had the highest probability of being the best treatment in terms of mortality (84%), stroke (97%), myocardial infarction (88%) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (99%), whereas staged HCR had the highest probability of being the best in postoperative repeat revascularization (59%) and BT (83%). However, long-term results showed no significant difference between the HCR and CABG techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

HCR appears to be a feasible option for multivessel coronary artery disease patients. Compared to traditional CABG, HCR had lower risk of adverse events in the short term, but in the long term, survival rate and freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events rate were similar between groups.

Left thoracotomy approach for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: 15 years of experience in 2500 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to describe the experience at 2 centres with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting using a left thoracotomy.

METHODS

From January 2002 to December 2017, a total of 2528 consecutive patients (578 women, mean age 62.3 ± 9.1 years) were operated on using this technique. Data were collected prospectively and analysed retrospectively.

RESULTS

There were no conversions to median sternotomy and 6 patients (0.2%) were converted to on-pump CABG. The mean number of grafts per patient was 2.8 ± 0. 9. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.0% (25 patients). Most patients were extubated in the operating theatre (97.3%), and 47 patients (1.9%) needed re-exploration for bleeding. Seven patients (0.3%) experienced a cerebrovascular event; 4 (0.3%) had a postoperative myocardial infarction; and 84 (3.4%) had new-onset atrial fibrillation. A total of 1510 patients (61.1%) were discharged from the hospital in the first 48 h after surgery. Long-term survival rates were 98.8%, 93.6% and 69.1% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively (central image). During the follow-up period, 60 patients (2.9%) were re-examined for recurrence of angina with a new coronary angiogram; of those, 24 (1.2%) required percutaneous coronary intervention and 11 (0.5%) had redo surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

A left thoracotomy is a safe alternative to a median sternotomy for coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart, with low early complications and good mid- and long-term results.

Long-Term Outcome of Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to investigate the long-term survival of patients who underwent single-vessel coronary revascularization with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery with or without hybrid revascularization. The secondary outcome measures were repeat revascularization either by coronary artery bypass grafting or by percutaneous coronary intervention and the incidence of myocardial infarction or recurrent angina.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass procedure in our center between January 2001 and December 2015. Procedures were performed either through small left anterolateral thoracotomy or lower midline sternotomy.

RESULTS

A total of 182 patients were identified: 100 underwent minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass to the left anterior descending artery and 82 underwent hybrid revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention to coronary arteries other than the left anterior descending artery along with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass to the left anterior descending artery). The mean ± SD age was 62 ± 10.1 years. Preoperatively 82% were male, and 72.5% patients had good left ventricular function. The median follow-up period was 10.9 years. There was no in-hospital or 30-day mortality. The 10-year actuarial survival was 84.8%. Freedom from repeat revascularization was 98.9% at 1 year and 89.9% at 10 years. At follow-up, freedom from myocardial infarction was 96.7% whereas freedom from angina was 92.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations imposed by retrospective analyses, our study demonstrates excellent long-term outcome in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass with or without hybrid revascularization. For isolated left anterior descending artery disease minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass should be considered, whereas hybrid revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass) should be considered for multivessel disease.

Is the Future of Coronary Arterial Revascularization a Hybrid Approach?

Objective

Hybrid coronary revascularization offers and combines the advantages of both surgical and percutaneous revascularization and eliminates at the same time the disadvantages of both procedures. The objective of this study was to assess graft and stent patency at 6 months, rate of bleeding, intensive care unit and hospital stay, rate of reintervention, and long-term clinical follow-up.

Methods

From March 2004 to November 2015, a total of 203 patients underwent robotic-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft of the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending artery and PCI of a non-left anterior descending vessel in a single or two stage, at three different centers. Patients underwent 6-month angiographic follow-up. The mean ± SD clinical follow-up was 77.82 ±41.4 months.

Results

Successful hybrid coronary revascularization occurred in 196 of the 203 patients. One hundred forty-six patients underwent simultaneous surgical and percutaneous intervention. Nineteen patients underwent PCI before surgery, and 38 patient underwent PCI after surgery. No in-hospital mortality occurred. The mean ± SD ICU stay was 1 ± 1 days and the mean ± SD hospital stay was 5 ± 2 days. Only 13.3% of the patients required a blood transfusion. Six-month angiographic follow-up has been performed in the 95 patients, and it demonstrated a left internal thoracic artery anastomotic patency of 97.9% and stent patency of 92.6%. A total of 77.8 ± 41.4-month clinical follow-up demonstrated 95.1% survival, 92.6% freedom from angina, and 90.7% freedom from any form of coronary revascularization.

Conclusions

Hybrid coronary revascularization seems to be a promising and safe revascularization strategy. It provides selected patients with an alternative, functionally complete revascularization with minimal surgical trauma and good long-term clinical outcomes.

Short-term clinical outcomes after hybrid coronary revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass for the treatment of multivessel or left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis

Background

Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) are both feasible, less invasive techniques for coronary revascularization. Although both techniques utilize the left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery graft, HCR uses drug-eluting stents instead of saphenous vein bypass. It remains unclear whether HCR is equal to, better or worse than OPCABG.

Methods and results

A meta-analysis was carried out using a random-effects model. Seven observational studies were included. There was no significant difference either in in-hospital mortality [relative risk (RR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13–2.59, P=0.47] or in the MACCE rate (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.24–1.64, P=0.34) between the HCR group and the OPCABG group. A significant difference was observed between the two groups in the length of hospitalization (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.13–0.97, P=0.01), length of ICU stay (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.10–0.80, P<0.05), intubation time (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.13–0.84, P<0.01), need for red blood transfusion (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.56–0.82, P<0.001), and total in-hospital costs (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.39–1.42, P<0.01).

Conclusion

Compared with OPCABG, HCR did not improve early survival but decreased the length of hospitalization, length of ICU stay, intubation time, and need for red blood transfusion, and increased total in-hospitalcosts.

Outcomes of cardiac surgery in the elderly

The elderly represent a rapidly growing and substantially under-treated sector in industrialized countries, with coronary artery disease and degenerative aortic stenosis rampant. The proportion of elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery is rising steadily and outcomes continue to improve with the refinement of operative techniques and perioperative care. Advanced risk stratification models, such as the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation now offer validated prediction of operative mortality in these high-risk patients. Current trends towards off-pump coronary artery surgery, hybrid revascularization and mitral repair may have advantages in the elderly, who often have more diffuse cardiovascular disease and a lower tolerance to intervention. Recent advances may also provide surgical options for the emerging epidemics of cardiovascular disease affecting the elderly, atrial fibrillation and heart failure.

Update on drug-eluting coronary stents

The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) to interventional cardiology practice has resulted in a significant improvement in the long-term efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions. DES successfully combine mechanical benefits of bare-metal stents and stabilizing the lumen, with direct delivery and the controlled elution of a pharmacologic agent to the injured vessel wall to suppress further neointimal proliferation. The dramatic reduction in restenosis has resulted in the implementation of DES in clinical practice, and has rapidly expanded the whole spectrum of successfully treatable coronary conditions, particularly in high-risk patients and complex lesions. In this review the authors present current data on DES. Currently, two types of DES are available in the USA: sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) CYPHER (Cordis Corp., FL, USA) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) TAXUS (Boston Scientific, MA, USA), and many more are on the way to approval. In addition to sirolimus and paclitaxel, several other drugs have been successfully used in DES. Everolimus and ABT-578 are both analogs of sirolimus that also have immunosuppressive and antiproliferative properties. Another approach in the development of DES is to use drugs that can accelerate re-endothelialization and restore normal endothelial function following vascular injury. Recent advances in vascular gene transfer have also demonstrated potential new treatment modalities for cardiovascular disease, particularly in the treatment of vascular restenosis.

Effect of one-stop hybrid coronary revascularization on postoperative renal function and bleeding: a comparison study with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery

OBJECTIVES

Although 1-stop hybrid coronary revascularization offers potential benefits for selected patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, the exposure to contrast dye and potent antiplatelet drugs could increase the risk of postoperative acute kidney injury and coagulopathy. The goal of the present study was to compare the measures of renal function, postoperative bleeding, and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing hybrid revascularization compared with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data from 141 consecutive patients who had undergone 1-stop hybrid coronary revascularization from June 2007 to January 2011. Propensity score matching with 141 off-pump CABG patients from our surgical database was performed for comparison. The change in renal function, cumulative chest tube drainage, and clinical outcome parameters were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Compared with off-pump CABG, patients undergoing hybrid revascularization had significantly less chest tube drainage at 12 hours after surgery (P = .04) and for the total amount during the postoperative period (P < .001) and required fewer blood transfusions (P = .001). The hybrid group had a higher incidence of acute kidney injury, but this did not reach statistical significance (25.2% vs 17.6%, P = .13). The hybrid group required less inotropic and vasoactive support, had fewer respiratory complications, required a shorter time of mechanical support, and had a decreased length of intensive care unit stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with off-pump CABG, 1-stop hybrid coronary revascularization was associated with benefits such as less postoperative bleeding and blood transfusion requirements without significantly increasing the additional risk of acute kidney injury.

Planned Simultaneous Beating-heart Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass (TECAB) and Percutaneous Intervention in a Single Operative Setting

BACKGROUND

: Staged hybrid revascularization integrated with minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and arrested heart totally endoscopic CABG has been reported. We report the first case of planned simultaneous hybrid coronary revascularization, integrating beating-heart TECAB, and percutaneous intervention (PCI) in the same operative setting.

METHODS

: A 73-year-old woman with symptoms of angina and a history of diabetes was found to have 2-vessel coronary artery disease involving the left anterior descending (LAD) and the right coronary artery (RCA). Left internal thoracic artery (LITA) to the LAD grafting was done on a beating heart in a totally endoscopic manner using the da Vinci robotic system through 4 ports. Immediately after LITA to LAD TECAB, percutaneous angioplasty and stent placement was done through the right femoral artery using the OEC 9800 mobile C-arm in the operating room.

RESULTS

: There was no stenosis noted in the RCA after the intervention. LITA angiography showed a completely patent anastomosis. The total operative time for both procedures was 165 minutes. Occlusion and anastomotic times were 14 and 8 minutes, respectively. Total PCI and fluoroscopy times were 10 and 3 minutes, respectively. The patient received clopidogrel (Plavix) and aspirin in the immediate postoperative period and was discharged home on the second postoperative day.

CONCLUSION

: This planned hybrid approach involving a beating-heart single-vessel TECAB and simultaneous angioplasty-stent in a single operative setting achieved complete coronary artery revascularization in a less invasive way.

Hybrid revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive hybrid revascularization (MIHR) by means of the left mammary artery on the left anterior descending artery [minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB)] combined with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) stenting may be an alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting through sternotomy or multiple PCI. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the long-term outcomes of this strategy.

METHODS

Since May 1997 up to January 2011, 810 MIDCAB have been performed as isolated revascularization in 644 patients. Since 2004, MIDCAB, as a part of hybrid revascularization, was associated with PCI in 166 patients.

RESULTS

In the MIDCAB group, mean age was 64.6 ± 12.0, with 83.8% males. Two-vessel disease was 62.4%, three-vessel disease 37.6%. Overall mortality was 0.24%, perioperative acute myocardial infarction-1.6%, early reoperation-0.74%, reopening for bleeding-1.2%, case rate of haemotrasfusion-3.1%, with a mean hospital postoperative stay of 4 ± 2.5 days. Postoperative angiographic control prior to PCI and in symptomatic patients showed patent left internal mammary artery in 100% of cases. PCI was performed in 166 patients, 64.2% before MIDCAB and 35.8% after surgery (interval 2.2 ± 1.3 months). The mean follow-up in the MIDCAB group was 8.4 ± 3.2 years. In the MIHR group, at the mean follow-up of 4.5 ± 2.3 years, freedom from related cardiac death was 93% with freedom from cardiac reintervention of 83%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our 13-year experience with MIDCAB demonstrates that the operation is safe and associated with a very low incidence of early and late complications. The hybrid approach provided excellent long-term outcome in terms of freedom from cardiac death and reoperation. Accurate patient selection, as well the timing of the hybrid procedure, is mandatory to optimize surgical and PCI results.

Clinical outcomes after hybrid coronary revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass: a prospective evaluation

OBJECTIVE

: Hybrid coronary revascularization is offered as an alternative strategy for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). We present our experience and provide a comparative analysis to off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB).

METHODS

: Ninety-one patients with multivessel CAD underwent minimally invasive left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending grafting in combination with percutaneous coronary intervention of nonleft anterior descending targets (HYBRID). The primary end point of this study was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as death, stroke, and nonfatal myocardial infarction. MACCE in the HYBRID group were compared with 4175 contemporaneously performed OPCAB operations by logistic (30-day outcomes) and Cox proportional hazards (long-term survival) regression methods. Propensity scoring was used to adjust for potential selection bias.

RESULTS

: The 30-day MACCE (death/stroke/nonfatal myocardial infarction) rate was 1.1% for the HYBRID group (0%/0%/1.1%) and 3.0% for the OPCAB group (1.8%/1.1%/0.5%) (odds ratio = 0.47, P = 0.48). Angiographic left internal mammary artery evaluation was obtained in 95.6% of patients (87 of 91) revealing FitzGibbon A patency in 98.0% (96 of 98). The reintervention rate at 1 year for the HYBRID group was 5.5% (5 of 91) and was limited to repeat percutaneous coronary intervention. Three-year survival was statistically similar for the two groups (hazard ratio = 0.44, P = 0.18, see Kaplan-Meier figure).

CONCLUSIONS

: Hybrid coronary revascularization may be noninferior to OPCAB with respect to early MACCE and 3-year survival in the treatment of multivessel CAD.

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization for the Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in High-Risk Patients

<p><b>Objective:</b> Hybrid coronary revascularization is an alternative for treatment for high-risk patients with coronary artery disease. We evaluated the efficacy of staged hybrid coronary revascularization for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in high-risk patients.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Patients with left main or proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis who are not good candidates for percutaneous coronary intervention and who had suitable lesions in the right coronary and circumflex arteries were considered for staged hybrid therapy if they had poor left ventricular functions (ejection fraction <0.40) and comorbid illnesses. From January 2008 through December 2010, 11 patients (8 men, 3 women; mean age: 66.1 � 9.1 years) were treated with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting combined with staged percutaneous coronary intervention. Nine patients had left main coronary artery stenosis together with circumflex or right coronary artery stenosis, and 2 patients had proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis and right coronary artery stenosis.</p><p><b>Results:</b> After off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, procedure-related complications did not occur, and there was no in-hospital death. Coronary re-angiography after a median of 16 days revealed patent and functioning left internal mammarian artery grafts in all patients. Applying subsequent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and occasional stenting (n = 14), a total of 14 lesions were treated successfully. Procedure related complications did not occur. All patients remained angina-free, and no stress electrocardiographic changes were recorded.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Our preliminary results indicate that a "staged hybrid" approach to the treatment of left main coronary artery disease in high-risk patients is safe and effective. Hybrid coronary revascularization enables complete revascularization and may be an alternative method of treating left main coronary artery disease in selected high-risk patients.</p>

The golden age of minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery: current and future perspectives

Over the past decade, minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery (MICS) has grown in popularity. This growth has been driven, in part, by a desire to translate many of the observed benefits of minimal access surgery, such as decreased pain and reduced surgical trauma, to the cardiac surgical arena. Initial enthusiasm for MICS was tempered by concerns over reduced surgical exposure in highly complex operations and the potential for prolonged operative times and patient safety. With innovations in perfusion techniques, refinement of transthoracic echocardiography and the development of specialized surgical instruments and robotic technology, cardiac surgery was provided with the necessary tools to progress to less invasive approaches. However, much of the early literature on MICS focused on technical reports or small case series. The safety and feasibility of MICS have been demonstrated, yet questions remain regarding the relative efficacy of MICS over traditional sternotomy approaches. Recently, there has been a growth in the body of published literature on MICS long-term outcomes, with most reports suggesting that major cardiac operations that have traditionally been performed through a median sternotomy can be performed through a variety of minimally invasive approaches with equivalent safety and durability. In this article, we examine the technological advancements that have made MICS possible and provide an update on the major areas of cardiac surgery where MICS has demonstrated the most growth, with consideration of current and future directions.

Trends in percutaneous coronary interventions in new South Wales, Australia

This is the first detailed study on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Hospital data for PCIs carried out between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 2002 are analysed. The study explores trends in PCI rates by selected socio-demographic factors, the utilisation of angioplasties vis-a-vis stents, emergency admissions, and selected coexisting conditions which determine the disease status of PCI patients. Logistic regression models are used to study the medical conditions that require both PCI and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). The PCI rate has grown rapidly at 12.1% per annum, with a particularly rapid increase for persons aged 75+. The rate of multiple stent utilisation increased at 4.6% per annum. Pacific-born and Middle-Eastern-born patients are more than twice as likely as the Australian-born to have diabetes. Factors affecting failure of PCI requiring CABG include perforation and multi-vessel disease. PCI services in public hospitals need to be increased to facilitate the availability of these procedures to all segments of the population, as do targeted community-level programmes to educate high-risk groups in the control of heart diseases.

Comparison of economic and patient outcomes with minimally invasive versus traditional off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting techniques

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (miniCABG) decreases in-hospital morbidity versus traditional sternotomy CABG. We performed a prospective cohort study (NCT00481806) to assess the impact of miniCABG on costs and metrics that influence quality of life after hospital discharge.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive miniCABG cases performed using internal mammary artery (IMA) grafting +/- coronary stenting were compared with a matched group of 100 sternotomy CABG patients using IMA and saphenous veins, both treating equivalent number of target coronaries (2.7 vs. 2.9), off-pump. We compared perioperative costs, time to return to work/normal activity, and risk of major adverse cardiac/cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1 year: myocardial infarction (elevated troponin or EKG changes), target vessel occlusion (CT angiography at 1 year), stroke, or death.

RESULTS

For miniCABG, robotic instruments and stents increased intraoperative costs; postoperative costs were decreased from significantly less intubation time (4.80 +/- 6.35 vs. 12.24 +/- 6.24 hours), hospital stay (3.77 +/- 1.51 vs. 6.38 +/- 2.23 days), and transfusion (0.16 +/- 0.37 vs. 1.37 +/- 1.35 U) leading to no significant differences in total costs. Undergoing miniCABG independently predicted earlier return to work after adjusting for confounders (t = -2.15; P = 0.04), whereas sternotomy CABG increased MACCE (HR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.4-7.6), largely from lower target-vessel patency.

CONCLUSIONS

MiniCABG shortens patient recovery time, minimizes MACCE risk at 1 year, and showed superior quality and outcome metrics versus standard-of-care CABG. These findings occurred without increasing costs and with superior target vessel graft patency.

Initial Impact of Drug-Eluting Stents on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

The impact of drug-eluting stents (DES) on the characteristics and operative results of patients referred for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was studied. We reviewed data from isolated CABG patients 24 months before (group A, n = 134) and 24 months after (group B, n = 98) the introduction of DES for clinical use at Teikyo University Hospital in Tokyo. Group B patients were significantly older than those of group A (66 +/- 9 versus 69 +/- 9 years old). The number of diseased vessels was significantly larger in group B (2.5 +/- 0.6 versus 2.7 +/- 0.5) and left main trunk disease decreased in group B (27% versus 17%). Preoperative IABP support was more frequent in group B (9% versus 17%) and beating heart surgery was significantly more frequent in group B (26% versus 59%). The number of grafts was similar in the 2 groups (3.2 +/- 1.4 versus 3.0 +/- 1.1). The operative mortality rates were 0.7% and 4.1% in group A and B, respectively. Incomplete revascularization followed by postoperative percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in 11% and 12%, respectively, and all the patients survived surgery. The operative mortality rates for arrested heart and beating heart surgery were 2% and 2%, respectively. In conclusion, after the introduction of DES, more clinically ill patients were referred to CABG. Combination therapy consisting of CABG and PCI (Hybrid) may be a treatment of choice in critical patients.

Integrated coronary revascularization with drug-eluting stents: Immediate and seven-month outcome

OBJECTIVE

We sought to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of an integrated coronary revascularization strategy that combines minimally invasive left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending coronary artery anastomosis with drug-eluting stent implantation to non-left anterior descending coronary artery lesions.

METHODS

Over 18 months, 47 consecutive patients with multivessel coronary artery disease underwent thoracoscopic harvesting of the left internal thoracic artery to graft the left anterior descending coronary artery. Anastomoses were constructed by hand, off-pump, and under direct vision through a 4-cm non-rib-spreading, muscle-sparing chest incision. Non-left anterior descending coronary artery lesions were then treated percutaneously using sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents. Angiographic follow-up was performed in all patients.

RESULTS

Within the first 90 days of hospitalizations, there were no deaths, myocardial infarctions, neurologic events, or wound complications. Forty patients underwent left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending coronary artery grafting, and 7 patients underwent left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending coronary artery/diagonal sequential grafting for a total of 54 anastomoses. Angiographic patency scores were FitzGibbon A 96.2% (52/54) and FitzGibbon A + B 100% (54/54). A total of 65 drug-eluting stents were implanted in 61 non-left anterior descending coronary artery coronary lesions of which 49.1% (30/61) were type B2 or C lesions, including 5 left main lesions. Diabetes was present in 53.2% of patients (25/47). At a mean follow-up time of 7.0 +/- 4.8 months, the target lesion or vessel repeat revascularization rate was 6.6% (4/61) for drug-eluting stents and 1.9% (1/54) for left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending coronary artery grafting. One anastomosis required balloon dilation, but no patients have required repeat coronary artery bypass grafting.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrated coronary revascularization using drug-eluting stents is feasible and safe. There are sufficient data to justify a randomized comparison of integrated coronary revascularization with standard coronary artery bypass grafting.