Long-Term Effectiveness of Total Arch Replacement for Type A Aortic Dissection

Risk factors for proximal and distal aortic events after type A acute aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES

Type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) is a life-threatening condition often requiring emergency surgery, with approximately 30% of patients needing reoperation. This study aimed to identify predictors of long-term aortic events from early postoperative computed tomography (CT) examinations.

METHODS

A total of 336 cases underwent TAAAD surgery at two institutions between 2002 and 2018. Of these, 302 patients received CT examinations immediately after initial TAAAD surgery. Predictors of aortic events were evaluated from these early postoperative CT exams. Aortic events were defined as any events involving aortic-related death, open surgery, reoperation, endovascular stenting, or thoracic aorta diameter enlargement to ≥ 55 mm.

RESULTS

Excluding 34 in-hospital deaths (10.1%; 34/336), the 1-, 5-, and 10-year actuarial survival rates after primary TAAAD surgery were 98.2%, 88.6%, and 81.7%, respectively. Over a mean follow-up period of 7.4 ± 5.1 years, 67 aortic events (proximal: 19, distal: 45, both: 3) were observed. Freedom from proximal aortic events was 98.6%, 93.9%, and 85.2% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Proximal anastomosis new entry was identified as a significant risk factor for aortic events, with a 92% vs. 42% incidence at 10 years (p < 0.001). Freedom from distal aortic events was 99.6%, 84.5%, and 67.2% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. A false/true area ratio greater than 1 and distal anastomosis new entry were significant risk factors for aortic events (low-risk group: 83.3% vs. high-risk group: 42.3% at 10 years, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Detailed analysis of early postoperative CT scans following primary TAAAD surgery may help identify predictors of subsequent aortic events, potentially improving long-term patient management and outcomes.

Computed Tomography Imaging Measurements as a Surrogate for Clinical Outcomes After Surgical Management of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Postoperative computed tomography imaging surveillance is an essential component of care after acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair. Prognostic imaging factors after ATAAD repair have not been systematically reviewed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a systematic review to summarize postoperative computed tomography measurements including aortic diameter, cross-sectional area, volume, growth rate, and false lumen thrombosis in addition mid- to long-term clinical outcomes after ATAAD repair. Searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL in October 2022. Studies were included if they reported clinical outcomes such as mortality or aortic reintervention after 1 year and included aforementioned computed tomography findings. Studies of chronic aortic dissection and studies of exclusive patient populations such as those with connective tissue diseases were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Searches retrieved 6999 articles. Sixty-eight studies met inclusion criteria (7885 patients). Extended repairs were associated with improved false lumen thrombosis, decreased aortic growth rate, and decreased rates of reintervention but not improved survival. Growth rates of the aorta post-ATAAD repair were highest in the descending thoracic aorta. The most frequent prognostic imaging factors reported were a patent/partially thrombosed false lumen and postoperative aortic diameter >40 to 45 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Established measurements of positive aortic remodeling, including complete false lumen thrombosis and stabilization of postoperative aortic diameter and growth are the most studied prognostic indicators for improved clinical outcomes after ATAAD repair. Growth rate of the aorta remains significant after ATAAD repair. Future studies should prospectively evaluate and compare prognostic factors for improved surveillance and management.

Fate of the Patent False Lumen of the Descending Aorta After Surgical Treatment for Acute Type 1 Aortic Dissection

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate the factors affecting false lumen patency in the descending thoracic aorta among patients who underwent surgery for acute type 1 aortic dissection.

METHODS

A total of 112 patients with acute type 1 aortic dissection, with the flap below the diaphragm level, underwent surgery between January 2010 and September 2019. Of these, 60 patients who were followed up for ≥ 12 months and whose computed tomography scans were available were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: group I, consists of patent false lumen (n=36), and group II, consists of thrombosed false lumen (n=24). Demographic data, operative techniques, postoperative descending aortic diameters, reintervention, and late mortality were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period of all patients was 37.6±26.1 months (range: 12-104). The diameter increase in the proximal and distal descending aorta was significantly higher in the patent false lumen group (5.3±3.7 mm vs. 3.25±2.34 mm; P=0.015; 3.1±2.52 mm vs. 1.9±1.55 mm; P=0.038, respectively). No significant difference in terms of hypertension was found between the two groups during the follow-up period (21 patients, 58.3% vs. 8 patients, 33.3%; P=0.058). A total of 29 patients (48.3%) were found to be hypertensive in the postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

After surgical treatment for acute type 1 aortic dissection, patients should be monitored closely, regardless of whether the false lumen is patent or thrombosed. Mortality and reintervention can be seen in patients with patent false lumen during follow-up.

Surgical outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection in septuagenarians and octogenarians

BACKGROUND

We studied surgical outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection and compared early and late outcomes between septuagenarians and octogenarians.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2019, we evaluated 254 consecutive patients with acute type A aortic dissection. We performed emergent operations within 48 h of symptom onset for 188 patients, including 59 septuagenarians and 32 octogenarians.

RESULTS

The overall 30-day mortality rate was 8.5% in septuagenarians and 9.4% in octogenarians (p = 1.0). The hospital mortality rate was 10.2% in septuagenarians and 12.5% in octogenarians (p = 0.74). Multivariate analysis identified prolonged ventilation (≥ 72 h) as a significant risk factor for hospital mortality. Being an octogenarian was not significantly associated with hospital mortality. The actuarial survival rate at 5 years was 80.1% in septuagenarians and 58.5% in octogenarians (log-rank p = 0.09). The freedom from aortic event rate at 5 years was 91.0% in septuagenarians and 100% in octogenarians (log-rank p = 0.23).

CONCLUSION

The two groups showed no significant differences in hospital mortality or morbidity. Our tear-oriented strategies might be appropriate for both septuagenarians and octogenarians. Prolonged ventilation (≥ 72 h) was a significant risk predictor for hospital mortality.

Long-term outcomes of treatment with different stent grafts in acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

We developed an integrated triple-branched stent to treat acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection (AD) and modified it to enhance its adaptability. However, whether the patients treated by the modified stent would achieve better long-term prognosis is unknown.

METHODS

This study enrolled 147 patients with acute DeBakey type I AD. The original integrated triple-branched stents were used in 57 patients (Group A) between July 2012 and August 2013, and the modified stents in 90 patients (Group B) between September 2013 and March 2015. Clinical characteristics, surgical data, postoperative complications, mortality, and follow-up data of the two groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

The two groups presented comparable early death rates (Group A = 7.0%, Group B = 5.9%; p = .719). The incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) was lower in Group B (10.0%) versus Group A (24.6%) (p = .018). Compared with the original integrated triple-branched stent graft, the modified stent could reduce the risk of early postoperative AKI (OR [95% CI] = 0.36 [0.14, 0.94]). Early endoleak rates were significantly lower in Group B (1.0%) compared to Group A (9.4%) (p = .004). During follow-up, there were five deaths in Group A (9.4%) and six deaths in Group B (7.2%) (p = .646). Chronic kidney injury (7.5% vs. 3.6%; p = .311), delayed endoleak (11.3% vs. 4.8%; p = .157), and late reinterventions (7.5% vs. 2.4%; p = .155) in the two groups were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute DeBakey type I AD, the modified stent showed feasible and safe treatment outcomes and reduced early endoleak rates. However, the long-term effects were similar to the original treatment.

The fate of the downstream aorta after open aortic repair for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection: total arch replacement with elephant trunk technique versus non-total arch replacement†

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the fate of the downstream aorta following open aortic repair for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection comparing total arch replacement (TAR) with the elephant trunk (ET) technique versus non-total arch replacement (non-TAR).

METHODS

From October 1999 to December 2016, 267 patients underwent open repair for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection. A tear-oriented strategy was mainly used to determine the extent of graft replacement. Hospital mortality was 10.0% (12/120 patients) in the TAR group and 17.0% (25/147 patients) in the non-TAR group (P = 0.070). Late outcomes were compared in 230 hospital survivors (TAR: n = 108 and non-TAR: n = 122). Mean follow-up was 6.5 ± 4.6 years. The aortic diameters were measured at 4 levels, across 6 time points using computed tomography.

RESULTS

Freedom from additional aortic surgery for distal dilation was significantly better in the TAR group than the non-TAR group (TAR: 97.5 ± 1.8% at 5 years and non-TAR: 88.2 ± 3.4% at 5 years, P = 0.045). Freedom from a distal aortic event was also significantly better in the TAR group compared with the non-TAR group (TAR: 97.2 ± 1.6% at 5 years and non-TAR: 80.7 ± 4.2% at 5 years, P = 0.013). In the non-TAR group, the aortic arch diameter significantly increased (P < 0.001). Significant aortic remodelling occurred at the proximal descending aorta in the TAR with ET group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The TAR with ET reduced the need for additional distal aortic repair compared to non-TAR. TAR with ET prevented unfavourable aortic growth in both the aortic arch and the proximal descending aorta.

What is the optimal surgical strategy for Stanford Type A acute aortic dissection in patients with a patent false lumen at the descending aorta?

OBJECTIVES

Aggressive total arch replacement (TAR) to obtain thrombosis of the distal false lumen (FL) in patients with Stanford Type A acute aortic dissection, particularly with a patent FL at the descending aorta, is discussed. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of our strategy.

METHODS

In the last 20 years, we retrospectively reviewed the records of 518 patients with Type A acute aortic dissection who underwent an emergent surgery. Among them, 290 patients with a preoperative patent FL at the descending aorta were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided in 2 groups: the non-TAR group (n = 124; 68 ± 14 years) and the TAR group (n = 166; 61 ± 13 years).

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality was 11% (32/290) without significant difference between the 2 groups (the non-TAR group 13% vs the TAR group 10%, P = 0.45). The rates of FL thrombosis of the entire descending aorta were detected at 32% in the non-TAR group and 41% in the TAR group (P = 0.16). Freedom from distal aortic dilatation ≥50 mm was significantly higher in the TAR group (P = 0.03) than in the non-TAR group. Independent predictors of distal aortic dilatation >50 mm were patients in the non-TAR group (P = 0.01; hazard ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.28-8.05) and unachieved primary entry tear resection (P = 0.002; hazard ratio 6.2, 95% confidence interval 1.38-8.66).

CONCLUSIONS

Our surgical strategy with an aggressive entry resection with higher rate of TAR was acceptable. In patients with a patent FL at the descending aorta, TAR should be considered to prevent the future growth of the distal aorta.

Combined surgical and endovascular treatment with arch preservation of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

DeBakey type I aortic dissection is a catastrophic event that presents a formidable challenge to cardiovascular surgeon. Here, we evaluate a new combined surgical and endovascular technique for acute condition.

METHODS

Between December 2011 and December 2015, 12 patients with type I aortic dissection concomitant involving supra-aortic vessels underwent ascending aortic replacement and simultaneous stent grafts inserted into the descending aorta, left subclavian, and left carotid arteries, and into the innominate artery when possible, without arch replacement. The stent grafts, Gore TAG thoracic endoprosthesis and Viabahn, were deployed under visual guidance through opened aortic arch into the true lumen, with the techniques of circulatory arrest, moderate hypothermia, and bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion.

RESULTS

Operation was performed smoothly in all patients. There was one death, and the other 11 recovered without any neurological deficits. Follow-up computed tomography scans showed that the true lumen expanded and false lumen regressed in both arch and descending aortic segments in 1 year. The diameter did not increase in either arch or descending aortic segments.

CONCLUSION

Ascending aortic replacement and stent graft for supra-aortic arteries and the descending aorta without arch replacement are feasible options for type I aortic dissection with satisfactory short-term aortic remodeling.

Hybrid and frozen elephant trunk for total arch replacement in DeBakey type I dissection

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to determine whether hybrid aortic repair yields superior outcomes compared with the conventional surgical approach for DeBakey type I aortic dissection.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with DeBakey type I dissection admitted to Fuwai Hospital between January 2010 and December 2016 showed that 815 patients (86.9%) underwent open total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (frozen elephant trunk group) and 122 (13.1%) underwent hybrid aortic arch repair without deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (hybrid group). We selected 109 pairs of patients for propensity score matching. Outcomes included early postoperative death, a composite of complications, dissected aorta remodeling, long-term survival, and freedom from reoperation.

RESULTS

Early mortality and complication rates were lower in the hybrid group, but the difference was not statistically significant (9.2% vs 17.4%, P = .073; 15.6% vs 25.7%, P = .066). The rates of postoperative renal insufficiency was significantly lower in the hybrid group than in the frozen elephant trunk group (22.9% vs 38.5%, P = .013); liver insufficiency and paraplegia were significantly lower in the hybrid group than in the frozen elephant trunk group (20.2% vs 33.9%, P = .022; 0% vs 6.4%, P = .014). After matched, the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survivals were 87.6%, 86.3%, and 82.2%, respectively, in the hybrid group and 80.7%, 76.5%, and 74.6% (P = .071), respectively, in the frozen elephant trunk group.

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid aortic arch repair is a viable alternative treatment for patients with DeBakey type I aortic dissection, which improves outcomes and promotes remodeling of the dissected thoracic aorta.

An innovative arch-first surgical procedure under moderate hypothermia for acute type A aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that the arch-first procedure without extra devices under moderate-to-mild systemic hypothermia during acute type A aortic dissection is safe and efficient and will improve patient outcome compared with the standard total arch replacement technique.

METHODS

From December 2014 to February 2017, 89 patients were enrolled in this study, 52 of whom underwent conventional deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA, 24.2±0.71 °C) using the antegrade cerebral perfusion surgical procedure (Group A) and 37 of whom underwent the "arch-first" technique with moderate (27.4±1.1 °C) systemic hypothermia during antegrade cerebral perfusion (Group B). The clinical data, surgical and postoperative data, complications, and mortality of the two groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

The cardiopulmonary bypass (171.3±40.0 min) and awakening time (7.0 hours) was significantly decreased in Group B. Two patients died 30 d after surgery (5.4%, two of 37) in Group B. The incidence of transient neurologic deficit (2.7%) and distal organ complications (5.4%) was lower in Group B.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute type A aortic dissection involving the arch, the innovative arch-first surgical procedure could provide feasible and safe treatment outcomes, which brings us closer to the goal of performing surgery with moderate-to-mild systemic hypothermia with better cerebral, distal organ, and survival outcomes.

Selective Aortic Arch and Root Replacement in Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the optimal extent of repair for type A aortic dissection. Our approach is to replace the ascending aorta, and only replace the aortic root or arch when intimal tears are present in those areas. We examined intermediate outcomes with this approach to acute type A aortic dissection repair.

METHODS

Between March 2005 and October 2016, 195 patients underwent repair of acute type A aortic dissection. Repair was categorized by site of proximal and distal anastomosis and extent of repair. Mean follow-up was 31.0 ± 30.9 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess survival. Multiple variable Cox proportional hazards modeling was utilized to identify factors associated with overall mortality.

RESULTS

Overall survival was 85.1%, 83.9%, 79.1%, and 74.4% at 6, 12, 36, and 60 months, respectively. Eight patients required reintervention. The cumulative incidence of aortic reintervention at 1 year with death as a competing outcome was 3.95%. Multiple variable regression analysis identified factors such as age, preoperative renal failure, concomitant thoracic endograft, postoperative myocardial infarction and sepsis, and need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as predictive of overall mortality. Neither proximal or distal extent of repair, nor need for reintervention affected overall survival (proximal: hazard ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.75 to 3.51, p = 0.22; distal: hazard ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval: 0.43 to 2.97, p = 0.81; reintervention: hazard ratio 0.03, 95% confidence interval: 0.002 to 0.490, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A selective approach to root and arch repair in acute type A aortic dissection is safe. If aortic reintervention is needed, survival does not appear to be affected.

Classification and outcomes of extended arch repair for acute Type A aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

Distal extent of repair in patients undergoing surgery for acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is controversial. Emerging hybrid techniques involving open and endovascular surgery have been reported in small numbers by select individual centres. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the outcomes following extended arch repair for ATAAD. A classification system is proposed of the different techniques to facilitate discussion and further investigation.

Methods

Using Ovid MEDLINE, 38 studies were identified reporting outcomes for 2140 patients. Studies were categorized into four groups on the basis of extent of surgical aortic resection and the method of descending thoracic aortic stent graft deployment; during circulatory arrest (frozen stented elephant trunk) or with normothermic perfusion and use of fluoroscopy (warm stent graft): (I) surgical total arch replacement, (II) total arch and frozen stented elephant trunk, (III) hemiarch and frozen stented elephant trunk and (IV) total arch and warm stent graft. Perioperative event rates were obtained for each of the four groups and the entire cohort using pooled summary estimates. Linearized rates of late mortality and reoperation were calculated.

Results

Overall pooled hospital mortality for extended arch techniques was 8.6% (95% CI 7.2-10.0). Pooled data categorized by surgical technique resulted in hospital mortality of 11.9% for total arch, 8.6% total arch and frozen stented elephant trunk, 6.3% hemiarch and frozen stented elephant trunk and 5.5% total arch and 'warm stent graft'. Overall incidence of stroke for the entire cohort was 5.7% (95% CI 3.6-8.2). Rate of spinal cord ischaemia was 2.0% (95% CI 1.2-3.0). Pooled linearized rate of late mortality was 1.66%/pt-yr (95% CI 1.34-2.07) with linearized rate of re-operation of 1.62%/pt-yr (95% CI 1.24-2.05).

Conclusions

Perioperative results of extended arch procedures are encouraging. Further follow-up is required to see if long-term complications are reduced with these emerging techniques. The proposed classification system will facilitate future comparison of short- and long-term results of different techniques of extended arch repair for ATAAD.

When and how to replace the aortic arch for type A dissection

Acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) remains one of the most challenging diseases in cardiothoracic surgery and despite numerous innovations in medical and surgical management, early mortality remains high. The standard treatment of AAAD requires emergency surgery of the proximal aorta, preventing rupture and consequent cardiac tamponade. Resection of the primary intimal tear and repair of the aortic root and aortic valve are well-established surgical principles. However, the dissection in the aortic arch and descending untreated aorta remains. This injury is associated with the risk of subsequent false lumen dilatation potentially progressing to rupture, true lumen compression and distal malperfusion. Additionally, the dilatation of the aortic arch, the presence of a tear and retrograde dissection can all be considered indication for a total arch replacement in AAAD. In such cases a more aggressive strategy may be used, from the classic aortic arch operation to a single stage frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique or a two-stage approach such as the classical elephant trunk (ET) or the recent Lupiae technique. Although these are all feasible solutions, they are also complex and time demanding techniques requiring experience and expertise, with an in the length of cardiopulmonary bypass and both myocardial and visceral ischemia. Effective methods of cerebral, myocardial as well visceral protection are necessary to obtain acceptable results in terms of hospital mortality and morbidity. Moreover, a correct assessment of the anatomy of the dissection, through the preoperative angio CT scan, in addition to the clinical condition of the patients, remain the decision points for the best arch repair strategy to use in AAAD.

Total arch repair for acute type A aortic dissection with open placement of a modified triple-branched stent graft and the arch open technique

Background

In total arch repair with open placement of a triple-branched stent graft for acute type A aortic dissection, the diameters of the native arch vessels and the distances between 2 neighboring arch vessels did not always match the available sizes of the triple-branched stent grafts, and insertion of the triple-branched stent graft through the distal ascending aortic incision was not easy in some cases. To reduce those two problems, we modified the triple-branched stent graft and developed the arch open technique.

Methods and results

Total arch repair with open placement of a modified triple-branched stent graft and the arch open technique was performed in 25 consecutive patients with acute type A aortic dissection. There was 1 surgical death. Most survivors had an uneventful postoperative course. All implanted stents were in a good position and wide expansion, there was no space or blood flow surrounding the stent graft. Complete thrombus obliteration of the false lumen was found around the modified triple-branched stent graft in all survivors and at the diaphragmatic level in 20 of 24 patients.

Conclusions

The modified triple-branched stent graft could provide a good match with the different diameters of the native arch vessels and the various distances between 2 neighboring arch vessels, and it’s placement could become much easier by the arch open technique. Consequently, placement of a modified triple-branched stent graft could be easily used in most patients with acute type A aortic dissection for effective total arch repair.

Total arch repair with open triple-branched stent graft placement for acute type A aortic dissection: experience with 122 patients

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the clinical experiences and midterm follow-up results of total arch repair with open triple-branched stent graft placement for acute type A aortic dissection.

METHODS

From June 2008 to March 2013, 122 patients (95 men and 27 women; mean age, 50.9 ± 10.4 years) with acute type A aortic dissection underwent total arch repair with open placement of a triple-branched stent graft under hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass and selective cerebral perfusion. During the follow-up period, enhanced computed tomography and echocardiography were performed at 3 months postoperatively and annually thereafter.

RESULTS

Placement of the triple-branched stent graft into the true lumen of the descending aorta, arch, and 3 arch vessels was technically successful in 121 patients. The cardiopulmonary bypass time was 186.50 ± 38.23 minutes, and the selective antegrade cerebral perfusion time was 31.97 ± 10.08 minutes. The in-hospital mortality was 4.93%. No permanent neurologic dysfunction or paraplegia was observed. Three patients were lost to follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 30.24 ± 12.35 months. After hospital discharge, 3 patients died. On the 3-month postoperative scans, complete thrombus formation around the triple-branched stent graft was observed in 89.38% of the patients. Endoleaks were detected in 12 patients; 8 patients refused any management for the endoleaks, but they maintained a good quality of life. The other 4 patients were successfully treated by additional surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Total arch repair with open triple-branched stent graft placement is an effective technique with satisfactory early and midterm results. This technique could be an attractive alternative to conventional total arch replacement.

Outcomes of aortic arch replacement surgery after previous cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Aortic arch replacement is a potentially high-risk operation and in the re-operative setting has been found to be a risk factor for poor outcome, yet there is a dearth of published data specifically on this topic. The aim of the study was to review our unit's outcomes in this re-operative setting.

METHOD

Data were collated for all patients who underwent aortic arch replacement surgery after previous cardiac surgery from January 1988 to November 2011. The patients were divided based primarily on elective versus non-elective and also early (≤2005) and late (≥2006) series.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven eligible patients (22 male; median age: 53.0 years; elective: 14, non-elective: 13) were identified. There was a mean period of 14.5 years between the first operation and the subsequent aortic arch replacement. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 22.2% - 0% elective and 46.2% non-elective (P = 0.004). Overall permanent neurological dysfunction was 21.7% - 28.6% elective and 11.1% non-elective (P = 0.463). There were 11 early-series patients and 16 late-series patients. For early-series patients, 90.9% were non-elective versus 18.8% in the late-series patients. The 30-day mortality rate was 54.5% early series versus 0% late series.

CONCLUSION

Aortic arch replacement is high risk in the re-operative setting. These risks are even greater for non-elective procedures. This highlights the need for aggressive first-time surgery to reduce re-operative procedures and good long-term follow-up programmes to allow elective procedures if required.

Early and Mid-term Changes of the Distal Aorta after Total Arch Replacement for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Background

Total arch replacement (TAR) is being more widely performed due to recent advances in operative techniques and cerebral protective strategies. In this study, the authors reviewed the relationship between TAR and early- and mid-term changes of the false lumen after TAR in acute type A aortic dissection.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-six patients (aged, 54.7±13.3 years) who underwent TAR for acute type A dissection between June 2004 and February 2012 were reviewed. The relationship between the percentage change in the aortic diameter and the false lumen patency status was assessed by examining the early and late postoperative computed tomography imaging studies.

Results

There were two in-hospital mortalities, one late death, and three follow-up loses. The mean follow-up duration for the final 21 patients studied was 54±19.0 months (range, 20 to 82 months). The incidence of false lumen thrombosis within 2 weeks of surgery in the proximal, middle, and distal thoracic aorta, and the suprarenal and infrarenal abdominal aorta were 67%, 38%, 38%, 48%, and 33%, respectively, and 57%, 67%, 52%, 33%, and 33% for those examined at a mean of 49±18 months after surgery, respectively. The false lumen regressed in 11 patients (42.3%). The aortic diameters were larger in the patients with a patent false lumen than those with a thrombosed false lumen at all levels of the descending aorta (p<0.05).

Conclusion

TAR and a more complete primary tear-resection can be accomplished with a relatively low-risk of morbidity and mortality. Enlargement of the distal aorta significantly correlated with the false lumen patency status.

Evidence, lack of evidence, controversy, and debate in the provision and performance of the surgery of acute type A aortic dissection

Acute type A aortic dissection is a lethal condition requiring emergency surgery. It has diverse presentations, and the diagnosis can be missed or delayed. Once diagnosed, decisions with regard to initial management, transfer, appropriateness of surgery, timing of operation, and intervention for malperfusion complications are necessary. The goals of surgery are to save life by prevention of pericardial tamponade or intra-pericardial aortic rupture, to resect the primary entry tear, to correct or prevent any malperfusion and aortic valve regurgitation, and if possible to prevent late dissection-related complications in the proximal and downstream aorta. No randomized trials of treatment or techniques have ever been performed, and novel therapies-particularly with regard to extent of surgery-are being devised and implemented, but their role needs to be defined. Overall, except in highly specialized centers, surgical outcomes might be static, and there is abundant room for improvement. By highlighting difficulties and controversies in diagnosis, patient selection, and surgical therapy, our over-arching goal should be to enfranchise more patients for treatment and improve surgical outcomes.

Total Arch Repair for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection With 2 Modified Techniques: Open Single-Branched Stent Graft Placement and Reinforcement of the Dissected Arch Vessel Stump With Stent Graft

Background—

In total arch replacement for patients with acute type A aortic dissection, anastomoses of the graft to the left subclavian artery and descending aorta are often difficult, and the arch vessel anastomosis is frequently performed at the site of dissection. To make this procedure easier and safer, we developed 2 modified techniques: open single-branched stent graft placement into the left subclavian artery and the descending aorta and reinforcement of the dissected arch vessel stump with a stent graft neointima. The feasibility and initial clinical results of these 2 new techniques are reported.

Methods and Results—

Total arch repair with the 2 new techniques was performed in 26 patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection. Most patients had an uneventful postoperative course, and there were no surgical deaths. All implanted stent grafts were fully opened and not kinked, and there was no space or blood flow surrounding any of the stent grafts. The false lumen of the descending thoracic aorta closed with thrombus formation in 22 of 26 patients. Disappearance of the false lumen and recovery of the true lumen was observed in all of the dissected arch vessels.

Conclusions—

Open single-branched stent graft placement into the left subclavian artery and the descending aorta and reinforcement of the dissected arch vessel stump with a stent graft neointima are 2 simple and effective techniques that should make total arch repair an easier and safer procedure for acute type A aortic dissection.

Midterm results of aortic arch replacement in a stanford type a aortic dissection with an intimal tear in the aortic arch

Background and Objectives

Stanford type A aortic dissection is a potentially catastrophic event that requires surgical repair, on an emergency basis. The extent of arch repair that should be carried out during emergency surgery of this type is controversial. This study was designed to evaluate the results of arch replacement carried out during acute type A dissection.

Subjects and Methods

28 patients with Stanford type A dissection and who underwent arch replacement between 1995 and 2006 were reviewed.

Results

Hospital mortality was 3.6% (1 patient), and transient neurocognitive dysfunction was observed in 5 patients. During the follow-up period (mean 26±20 months; range 1 to 66 months), 3 patients underwent reoperation due to descending thoracic or abdominal aortic aneurysm. There was no late death. Follow up computed tomography was performed in 15 patients and false lumen disappeared totally or partially in 10 patients (66.7%).

Conclusion

Arch replacement for acute Stanford type A dissection may decrease the risk of late complications related to false lumen and lead to an excellent midterm survival rate.

Long-term predictors of descending aorta aneurysmal change in patients with aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES

We sought to demonstrate the long-term natural course of descending aorta dilation after acute aortic dissection (AD) and identify early predictors for late aneurysmal change.

BACKGROUND

Aneurysmal dilation of the aorta is a critical late complication in AD patients.

METHODS

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) was performed during the acute phase in 100 AD patients, comprising 51 type 1 who underwent ascending aorta surgery and 49 type 3 AD patients. Clinical observation was conducted for 53 +/- 26 months, and CT was repeated for 31 +/- 27 months.

RESULTS

Aneurysm (diameter > or =60 mm) occurred in 14.4%, 8.2%, 4.1%, and 3.1% of patients at the upper descending thoracic aorta (UT), mid descending thoracic aorta (MT), lower descending thoracic aorta (LT) and abdominal aorta (AA), respectively. Of 53 patients in whom CT was repeated for > or =2 years, the rates of aorta diameter enlargement at the UT, MT, LT, and AA levels were 3.43 +/- 3.66 mm/year, 3.21 +/- 2.70 mm/year, 2.62 +/- 2.19 mm/year, and 1.93 +/- 3.13 mm/year, respectively (p < 0.01), and aneurysm developed in 15 (28%). The initial false lumen diameter at the UT, the aorta diameter at the MT, and Marfan syndrome were independent predictors of late aneurysm. A > or =22-mm initial false lumen diameter at the UT predicted late aneurysm with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 76%. The patients with initial UT false lumen diameter > or =22-mm (n = 42) showed higher event rate (aneurysm or death) than others (n = 58) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The UT is the major site of late aneurysmal dilation. A large UT false lumen diameter on the initial CT portends late aneurysm and adverse outcome warranting early intervention.