Aortic surgery using total miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass

A Meta-Analysis of Miniaturized Versus Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation in Valve Surgery

The effects of miniaturized extracorporeal circulation in patients operated on for heart valve surgery are still inconsistent. We performed a meta-analysis of eight studies involving 1,011 patients to evaluate the comprehensive effects of miniaturized extracorporeal circulation. The results suggested its application significantly reduced the length of stay in the intensive care unit and total hospital stay after heart valve surgery, but no significant effects on reducing postoperative morbidity and mortality were observed. Further studies with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm our results.

Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery: a clinical update

INTRODUCTION

Cardiopulmonary bypass has undoubtedly been the cornerstone in the rapid development of cardiac surgery, allowing even the performance of procedures beyond the scope of cardiothoracic surgery. Its use however, is associated with significant complications that arise from the mechanical effects of the circuit on circulating blood components as well as the contact of blood with non-endothelial surfaces. Miniature cardiopulmonary bypass systems have been developed in an attempt to minimize these complications. Areas covered: Herein clinical outcomes from the most recent studies in adult cardiac surgery are discussed. The main benefits of miniaturisation as well as potential areas of further application are described. Expert commentary: Data is critically appraised in the context of current guidelines. Finally the need for further basic science in addition to large multi-centre randomized controlled trial data is highlighted.

Technical Approach Determines Inflammatory Response after Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the periprocedural inflammatory response in patients with isolated aortic valve stenosis undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with different technical approaches.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients were prospectively allocated to one of the following treatments: SAVR using conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC, n = 47) or minimized extracorporeal circulation (MECC, n = 15), or TAVI using either transapical (TA, n = 15) or transfemoral (TF, n = 24) access. Exclusion criteria included infection, pre-procedural immunosuppressive or antibiotic drug therapy and emergency indications. We investigated interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, human leukocyte antigen (HLA-DR), white blood cell count, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and soluble L-selectin (sCD62L) levels before the procedure and at 4, 24, and 48 h after aortic valve replacement. Data are presented for group interaction (p-values for inter-group comparison) as determined by the Greenhouse-Geisser correction.

RESULTS

SAVR on CECC was associated with the highest levels of IL-8 and hs-CRP (p<0.017, and 0.007, respectively). SAVR on MECC showed the highest descent in levels of HLA-DR and sCD62L (both p<0.001) in the perioperative period. TA-TAVI showed increased intraprocedural concentration and the highest peak of IL-6 (p = 0.017). Significantly smaller changes in the inflammatory markers were observed in TF-TAVI.

CONCLUSION

Surgical and interventional approaches to aortic valve replacement result in inflammatory modulation which differs according to the invasiveness of the procedure. As expected, extracorporeal circulation is associated with the most marked pro-inflammatory activation, whereas TF-TAVI emerges as the approach with the most attenuated inflammatory response. Factors such as the pre-treatment patient condition and the extent of myocardial injury also significantly affect inflammatory biomarker patterns. Accordingly, TA-TAVI is to be classified not as an interventional but a true surgical procedure, with inflammatory biomarker profiles comparable to those found after SAVR. Our study could not establish an obvious link between the extent of the periprocedural inflammatory response and clinical outcome parameters.

Versatile minimized system--a step towards safe perfusion

A growing body of evidence indicates the superiority of minimized cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) systems compared to conventional systems in terms of inflammatory reactions and transfusion requirements. Evident benefits of minimized CPB systems, however, do not come without consequences. Kinetic-assisted drainage, as used in these circuits, can result in severe fluctuations of venous line pressures and, consequently, fluctuation of the blood flow delivered to the patient. Furthermore, subatmospheric venous line pressures can cause gaseous microemboli. Another limitation is the absence of cardiotomy suction, which can lead to excessive blood loss via a cell saver. The most serious limitation of minimized circuits is that these circuits are very constrained in the case of complications or changing of the surgery plan. We developed a versatile minimized system (VMS) with a priming volume of about 600 ml. A compliance chamber in the venous line decreases peaks of pressure fluctuations. This chamber also acts as a bubble trap. Additionally, the open venous reservoir is connected parallel to the venous line and excluded from the circulation during an uncomplicated CPB. This reservoir can be included in the circulation via a roller pump and be used as a cardiotomy reservoir. The amount and rate of returned blood in the circulation is regulated by a movable level detector. Further, the circuit can easily be converted to an open system with vacuum-assisted venous drainage in the case of unexpected complications. The VMS combines the benefits of minimized circuits with the versatility and safety of a conventional CPB system. Perfusionists familiar with this system can secure an adequate and timely response at expected and unexpected intraoperative complications.

Feasibility and safety of minimized cardiopulmonary bypass in major aortic surgery

OBJECTIVES

Conventional cardiopulmonary bypass causes haemodilution and is a trigger of systemic inflammatory reactions, coagulopathy and organ failure. Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass has been proposed as a way to reduce these deleterious effects of conventional cardiopulmonary bypass and to promote a more physiological state. The use of miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass has been reported in low-risk patients undergoing valve and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. However, little is known about its application in major aortic surgery.

METHODS

From February 2007 to September 2010, 49 patients underwent major aortic surgery using the Hammersmith miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass (ECCO, Sorin). Data were extracted from medical records to characterize preoperative comorbidities (EuroSCORE), perioperative complications and the use of blood products. The same data were collected and described for 328 consecutive patients having similar surgery with conventional cardiopulmonary bypass at the Bristol Heart Institute, our twinned centre, during the same period.

RESULTS

The miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass group had a median EuroSCORE of 8 [inter-quartile range (IQR): 5-11], 13% had preoperative renal dysfunction and 20% of operations were classified as emergency or salvage. Thirty-day mortalities were 6.4; and 69, 67 and 74% had ≥ 1 unit of red cells, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelets transfused, respectively. Eight percent of patients experienced a renal complication, and 8% a neurological complication. The conventional cardiopulmonary bypass group was similar, with a EuroSCORE of 8 (IQR: 6-10); 30-day mortalities were 9.4; and 68, 62 and 74% had ≥ 1 unit of red cells, FFP and platelets transfused, respectively. The proportions experiencing renal and neurological complications were 14 and 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience suggests that miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass is safe and feasible for use in major aortic cardiac surgery. A randomized trial is needed to evaluate miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass formally.

Incompatible ABO-plasma exchange and its impact on patient selection in paediatric cardiac transplantation

OBJECTIVES

A decade ago, the first series of ABO-incompatible heart transplants was published, with surprising and extremely promising results; drastically reduced waiting list mortalities of infants listed for heart transplantation. Essential to the procedure was the process of plasma exchange transfusion, required to reduce isohaemagglutinin titres and facilitate the crossing of ABO blood group boundaries. Since then, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London has offered ABO-incompatible heart transplants to infants who potentially would die waiting for a suitable organ. We report the results of a decade of evolving plasma exchange experience and its impact upon patient selection.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was undertaken of all elective ABO-incompatible heart transplants at Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital from January 2001 until January 2011. Data were sought on underlying conditions and demographics of the patients, the isohaemagglutinin titre before and after plasma exchange and survival figures to date.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients underwent ABO-incompatible heart transplantation, ranging from 3 to 44 months, with preoperative isohaemagglutinin titres ranging from 0 to 1:32. All patients underwent a "3 times" plasma exchange before transplantation, requiring exchange volumes of up to 3209 mL. Postoperative isohaemagglutinin titres ranged from 0 to 1:16. One patient died of causes unrelated to organ rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed that eight patients (38.1%) were older than the previously suggested 12-month cut-off age. Using a combination of adult reservoir/paediatric oxygenator and extracorporeal circuit, ABO-incompatible plasma exchange transfusions can be undertaken safely using a simplified '3 times' method, reducing the circulating levels of isohaemagglutinins whilst providing minimal circuit size. This allows ABO-incompatible heart transplantation in a broader patient population than previously reported.

Feasibility of mitral valve surgery using minimal extracorporeal circulation

AIM

Using minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement has been proven to be safe, feasible and superior compared to standard cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in terms of postoperative complications, total hospital stay and blood product transfusions. This feasibility study evaluates the clinical outcomes of mitral valve surgery performed with MECC.

METHODS

From March 2006 to January 2011, seventy-five patients who underwent mitral valve surgery performed with MECC (n=75) in our institution were retrospectively evaluated. Demographic characteristics, operative data and clinical outcomes were collected in a prospectively designed database.

RESULTS

The mean age was 68.8 ± 10.2 years with a EuroSCORE of 7.0 ± 2.3. Thirty-seven patients had a moderate left ventricular function (with a range of 30-40%). All patients except two had severe mitral valve incompetence (MI). Surgery was successful in all procedures. The mean duration of surgery was 210 ± 44 min (range 118-356 min). The mean CPB time was 128 ± 30 (range 67-249) min. The cross-clamp time was 99 ± 26 (range 48-205) min. There were no intraoperative perfusion problems or airlocks reported. The mean intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay was two days. Subsequent analysis showed a first postoperative haemoglobin value of 9.4 g/dL ± 1.7. There were no peroperative neurological complications. One patient developed an ischaemic cerebrovascular accident (CVA) on the forth postoperative day due to inadequate anticoagulation. Other postoperative complications included eight patients with pneumonia, one superficial wound infection, temporary renal insufficiency in two patients and four patients needed re-exploration for excessive postoperative leakage. Overall in-hospital mortality was four percent.

CONCLUSION

Our results show, for the first time, that isolated or combined mitral valve surgery using MECC is feasible and safe.

Can minimized cardiopulmonary bypass systems be safer?

Although a growing body of evidence indicates superiority of minimized cardiopulmonary bypass (mCPB) systems over conventional CPB systems, limited venous return can result in severe fluctuations of venous line pressure which can result in gaseous emboli. In this study, we investigated the influence of sub-atmospheric pressures and volume buffer capacity added to the venous line on the generation of gaseous emboli in the mCPB circuit.

Two different mCPB systems (MEC - Maquet, n=7 and ECC.O - Sorin, n=8) and a conventional closed cardiopulmonary bypass (cCPB) system (n=12) were clinically evaluated. In the search for a way to increase volume buffer capacity of mCPB systems, we additionally evaluated the ‘Better Bladder’ (BB) in a mock circulation by simulating, repeatedly, decreased venous return while measuring pressure and gaseous embolic activity.

Arterial gaseous emboli activity during clinical perfusion with a cCPB system was the lowest in comparison to the mCPB systems (312±465 versus 311±421 with MEC and 1,966±1,782 with ECC.O, counts per 10 minute time interval, respectively; p=0.03). The average volume per bubble in the arterial line was the highest in cases with cCPB (12.5±8.3 nL versus 8.0±4.2 nL with MEC and 4.6±4.8 nL with ECC.O; p=0.04 for both). Significant cross-correlation was obtained at various time offsets from 0 to +35 s between sub-atmospheric pressure in the venous line and gaseous emboli activity in both the venous and arterial lines. The in vitro data showed that incorporation of the BB dampens fluctuations of venous line pressure by approximately 30% and decreases gaseous emboli by up to 85%.

In conclusion, fluctuations of sub-atmospheric venous line pressure during kinetic-assisted drainage are related to gaseous emboli. Volume buffer capacity added to the venous line can effectively dampen pressure fluctuations resulting from abrupt changes in venous return and, therefore, can help to increase the safety of minimized cardiopulmonary bypass by reducing gaseous microemboli formation resulting from degassing.

Comparison of the use of minimized cardiopulmonary bypass with conventional techniques on the incidence of retinal microemboli during aortic valve replacement surgery

OBJECTIVES

Minimized cardiopulmonary bypass (MCPB) circuits have been shown to reduce cerebral and retinal microembolisation during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery compared to conventional CPB (CCPB) circuits. Our aim was to evaluate whether the reduction of microembolisation is sustained in aortic valve surgery, as well as to evaluate the effects of MCPB on inflammatory, endothelial, and platelet activation markers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients were randomized to undergo aortic valve replacement (AVR), with or without CABG, with MPCB (n=20) or CCPB (n=20). After anaesthesia induction and termination of CPB, standardized digital retinal fluorescein angiography images were obtained on both eyes and analyzed in a blinded fashion. Blood samples were collected at eight time points until the third postoperative day.

RESULTS

Fewer patients in the MCPB group showed evidence of microembolic perfusion defects on postperfusion retinal fluorescein angiographs compared to the CCPB group (37% vs. 63%, absolute difference 26%, 95% CI -5% -51%, P = 0.194). Polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) elastase and von Willebrand factor release were statistically significantly reduced in the MCPB group, but there were no significant differences in other markers of inflammation, coagulation or endothelial activation. A significantly higher three-fold increase in the amount of shed blood was collected to the cell saver with a higher rate of intraoperative platelet transfusion in the MCPB group compared to CCPB.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of MCPB was associated statistically insignificantly with less retinal microemboli compared to CCPB. MCPB was complicated by excess bleeding and need for transfusion. The feasibility of MCPB techniques in valve surgery requires further studies.

Beneficial effects of modern perfusion concepts in aortic valve and aortic root surgery

Minimized perfusion circuits (MPC) were found to reduce side effects of standard extracorporeal circulation (ECC). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the ROCsafe™ MPC for aortic valve and aortic root surgery. One hundred and seventy patients were randomized for surgery using either MPC [n = 85, 30 female/55 male, mean age: 69.8 ± 11.8 years; aortic valve replacement (AVR): n = 40; AVR + coronary artery bypass graft (CABG): n = 31; David operation: n = 3; aortic root replacement (ARR): n = 11] or ECC [n = 85, 29 female/56 male, mean age: 67.7 ± 9.5 years; AVR: n = 39; AVR+CABG: n = 35, David operation: n = 2; ARR: n = 9]. Neurological status, length of ICU stay, C-reactive protein (CRP), blood count, transfusion requirements and bleeding volume were analyzed. The MPC system provided ultrasound-controlled de-airing. A small roller pump and a flexible reservoir were used for left ventricular venting. As a control, we used a standard ECC with cardiotomy suction and hard-shell reservoir. Cross-clamp time (MPC: 76.5 ± 29.5; ECC: 79.0 ± 34.0 min) and bypass time (MPC: 103.0 ± 37.9; ECC: 106.9 ± 44.9 min) were comparable between groups. Transfusion requirements (red blood cells: MPC: 1.5 ± 1.5 vs. ECC: 2.2 ± 2.1 units [p = 0.05], frozen plasma: MPC: 1.2 ± 1.8 vs. ECC: 1.9 ± 2.4 units [p = 0.03]), postoperative bleeding (MPC: 521 ± 283 vs. ECC: 615 ± 326 ml/24 h, p = 0.09) were lower using MPC. ICU stay was shorter with MPC (1.6 ± 1.6 days) compared to ECC (2.4 ± 2.8 days, p = 0.001). One stroke occurred in each group. The ROCsafe™ MPC provides safe circulatory support for a wide range of aortic valve surgeries. Transfusion requirements, postoperative bleeding and length of ICU stay were markedly reduced compared to standard extracorporeal perfusion.