Arterial Switch Operation, Aortic Root Dilation, and Long-Term Aortic Valve Competence

Maladaptive aortic properties after the Norwood procedure: An angiographic analysis of the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial

OBJECTIVES

Aortic arch reconstruction in children with single ventricle lesions may predispose to circulatory inefficiency and maladaptive physiology leading to increased myocardial workload. We sought to describe neoaortic anatomy and physiology, risk factors for abnormalities, and impact on right ventricular function in patients with single right ventricle lesions after arch reconstruction.

METHODS

Prestage II aortic angiograms from the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction trial were analyzed to define arch geometry (Romanesque [normal], crenel [elongated], or gothic [angular]), indexed neoaortic dimensions, and distensibility. Comparisons were made with 50 single-ventricle controls without prior arch reconstruction. Factors associated with ascending neoaortic dilation, reduced distensibility, and decreased ventricular function on the 14-month echocardiogram were evaluated using univariate and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Interpretable angiograms were available for 326 of 389 subjects (84%). Compared with controls, study subjects more often demonstrated abnormal arch geometry (67% vs 22%, P < .01) and had increased ascending neoaortic dilation (Z score 3.8 ± 2.2 vs 2.6 ± 2.0, P < .01) and reduced distensibility index (2.2 ± 1.9 vs 8.0 ± 3.8, P < .01). Adjusted odds of neoaortic dilation were increased in subjects with gothic arch geometry (odds ratio [OR], 3.2 vs crenel geometry, P < .01) and a right ventricle-pulmonary artery shunt (OR, 3.4 vs Blalock-Taussig shunt, P < .01) but were decreased in subjects with aortic atresia (OR, 0.7 vs stenosis, P < .01) and those with recoarctation (OR, 0.3 vs no recoarctation, P = .04). No demographic, anatomic, or surgical factors predicted reduced distensibility. Neither dilation nor distensibility predicted reduced right ventricular function.

CONCLUSIONS

After Norwood surgery, the reconstructed neoaorta demonstrates abnormal anatomy and physiology. Further study is needed to evaluate the longer-term impact of these features.

Neoaortic Valve Function 10 to 18 Years After Arterial Switch Operation

Anatomical correction is a procedure of choice for transposition of the great arteries (TGA) in neonates. During surgery, the aorta and pulmonary artery are switched—the native pulmonary valve becomes the neoaortic valve. The fate of this valve remains uncertain. Many reports suggest that its ability to function worsens with time after surgery. Of 519 patients with TGA operated on between 1991 and 2008, 161 met inclusion criteria for this retrospective study and were followed 10 years or more to assess neoaortic valve regurgitation (NeoAR) occurrence and development and to estimate potential risk factors. The subjects were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (simple TGA) and group 2 (TGA + ventricle septal defect). Within the analyzed group, the frequency of significant regurgitation increased from 9% 1 year after the operation to 47% at the most recent follow-up. No severe regurgitation necessitating reoperation was observed. Analysis of potential risk factors revealed that pulmonary/aortic valve diameter discrepancy and nonfacing commissures were associated with increased risk of development of neoaortic insufficiency. NeoAR arises and develops over time after correction of the defect. No hemodynamic repercussions necessitating cardiac surgical interventions were observed. The majority of insufficiencies are detected between 2 and 6 years after surgery. The degree of incompetence is usually mild and increases during follow-up by about 0.5 or 1 degree. The risk factors for NeoAR appearance are pulmonary artery/aortic annulus discrepancy and nonfacing commissures.