Meta-Analysis of On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Arterial Revascularization

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with clampless aortic anastomosis devices: Aortic sealing devices versus automated anastomosis punching

Objectives

Clampless aortic anastomosis devices aim to lower stroke risk in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Two main strategies for clampless anastomosis devices emerged with automated anastomosis punching and aortic sealing devices, prompting the question of perioperative outcome differences.

Methods

All consecutive patients undergoing elective off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with a clampless aortic anastomosis device between September 2014 and December 2021 in 2 centers were retrospectively included. Cohorts were divided by the use of an automated anastomosis punching device or an aortic sealing device to achieve proximal anastomosis on the ascending aorta. To reach group comparability propensity score matching was performed. The primary end point was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke and rethoracotomy. Secondary end points were perioperative outcome parameters.

Results

A total of 3703 patients were enrolled of whom 575 and 3128 were included in the automated anastomosis punching and the aortic sealing device group, respectively. By propensity score matching a total of 1150 patients were included with 575 in each group. The primary composite endpoint showed no significant difference with 6.3% versus 5.9% events (odds ratio, 0.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.53, P = .81). All-cause mortality (P = .36), stroke (P = .81), and rethoracotomy (P = .89) also exhibit no disparity. Operation time was significantly longer in the aortic sealing device cohort with 220.0 ± 50.8 minutes and 204.6 ± 53.8 minutes (P < .01).

Conclusions

Clampless aortic anastomosis strategies aortic sealing device and automated anastomosis punching did not differ in perioperative outcome parameters, whereas the implementation of aortic sealing devices were associated with a prolonged operation time without inducing any inferior clinical outcome.

Guidelines on enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations for enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERACS) based on a multimodal perioperative medicine approach in adult cardiac surgery patients with the aim of improving patient satisfaction, reducing postoperative mortality and morbidity, and reducing the length of hospital stay.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 20 experts from the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation, SFAR) and the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (Société française de chirurgie thoracique et cardio-vasculaire, SFCTCV) was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guideline process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide the assessment of the quality of evidence.

METHODS

Six fields were defined: (1) selection of the patient pathway and its information; (2) preoperative management and rehabilitation; (3) anaesthesia and analgesia for cardiac surgery; (4) surgical strategy for cardiac surgery and bypass management; (5) patient blood management; and (6) postoperative enhanced recovery. For each field, the objective of the recommendations was to answer questions formulated according to the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome). Based on these questions, an extensive bibliographic search was carried out and analyses were performed using the GRADE approach. The recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE methodology and then voted on by all the experts according to the GRADE grid method.

RESULTS

The SFAR/SFCTCV guideline panel provided 33 recommendations on the management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump. After three rounds of voting and several amendments, a strong agreement was reached for the 33 recommendations. Of these recommendations, 10 have a high level of evidence (7 GRADE 1+ and 3 GRADE 1-); 19 have a moderate level of evidence (15 GRADE 2+ and 4 GRADE 2-); and 4 are expert opinions. Finally, no recommendations were provided for 3 questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong agreement existed among the experts to provide recommendations to optimise the complete perioperative management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting; is it Still Relevant?

Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (OPCAB) experienced a resurgence in the 1980s -2000s and developed steadily with improvement of the instrumentation and techniques. However questions about graft patency and long-term survival of OPCAB patients still exist. This review attempts to explore the current relevance of OPCAB.

Off-pump Techniques of Surgical Myocardial Revascularization

BACKGROUND

Before the advent of CABG, standardized in the late '60s by Favaloro and Effler, patients with myocardial ischemia underwent indirect and heterogeneous off-pump methods of myocardial revascularization.

METHODS & RESULTS

Indirect revascularization, such as periaortic nerve plexus interruption, Vineberg operation, Sen procedure and, less remotely, TMR Laser and stem cell transplantation, represented some of the ways to achieve myocardial revascularization. Nowadays, direct coronary revascularization is the only established technique and may be performed either on-pump or off-pump.

CONCLUSION

The comparison of off-pump and on-pump myocardial revascularization paved the way to an endless debate between the advantages and disadvantages of each technique. In this article, we review the old and current off-pump approaches of surgical myocardial revascularization.

Early outcomes in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Background

In spite of general decline worldwide, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery is performed in more than 60% of patients undergoing CABG in India; mainly because of shorter operative time and reduced procedure cost. However, paucity of data exists in literature about early outcomes following off-pump CABG from India.

Methodology

We conducted a prospective observational study of 800 consecutive cases that underwent off-pump CABG (OPCAB) from August 2015 to October 2017. Primary end point of the study was the 30-day/in-hospital mortality from any cause.

Results

On multivariate analysis, emergency surgery (OR 9.72; CI 1.96-48.21, p value 0.005), severe left ventricular dysfunction (OR 2.28; CI 1.25-4.76, p value 0.026), postoperative atrial fibrillation (OR 9.95; CI 3.12-32.01, p value 0.05), and dialysis-dependent renal failure (OR 29.7, CI 10.02-87.99, p value 0.006) were the factors associated with mortality. The observed mortality was 1.6%, and the expected mortality by EuroSCORE II was 2.6%. The median EuroSCORE II of expired patients was 3.03 and of entire cohort was 1.54 (p value 0.001). Stroke rate was 0.9%. Deep sternal wound infection occurred in 0.9%, and 3.8% patients were readmitted to the hospital after discharge.

Conclusion

Early outcome of off-pump CABG was excellent in this study. Increased incidence of deep sternal wound infection remains a concern. Multicenter study with a larger sample size is required for a dependable evaluation of the efficacy of off-pump CABG in Indian population.

Meta-Analysis of Repeat Revascularization of Off-Pump and On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing debate focusing on clinical outcomes after off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCABG) and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (ONCABG). The objective of the present meta-analysis is to update and compare repeat revascularization rates between OPCABG and ONCABG procedures.

METHODS

Data sources including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched between 1966 and October 2017. Studies considered for inclusion should conform to the following criteria: prospective randomized clinical trials comparing OPCABG and ONCABG. Outcome should include repeat revascularization rate at the time of 1-month, 1-year, or 5-year follow-up.

RESULTS

A literature search yielded 11 randomized controlled trials, and a total of 11,246 patients were randomly allocated to OPCABG or ONCABG procedures. Pooled analysis demonstrated a statistically significant 53% increase in repeat revascularization rate at 1-year follow-up with OPCABG relative to ONCABG in the fixed effects model (odds ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval: 1.17 to 2.00, p = 0.002), whereas there was no significant difference in repeat revascularization rate at 5-year follow-up between OPCABG and ONCABG in the fixed effects model (OR 1.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.95 to 1.41, p = 0.14). In general, exclusion of any single trial did not affect repeat revascularization rate at 1-year and 5-year follow-up. There was no evidence of significant publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The result of our meta-analysis suggests that compared with ONCABG, OPCABG increases repeat revascularization rate at 1-year follow-up, but does not affect that of 5-year follow-up.

Use of cardiopulmonary pump support during coronary artery bypass grafting in the high-risk: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Data from randomized trials evaluating the efficacy of on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting remain inconclusive, particularly in high-risk populations.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes associated with on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting among high-risk patients.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized control trials comparing on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, focusing on high-risk populations. Studies focusing on "high-risk" features: European System of Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) ≥ 5, age > 70 years, preexisting renal insufficiency, history of stroke(s), and the presence of left ventricular dysfunction were included. MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase were searched for all publications between January 1, 2000 and August 1, 2016, using the following terms: on-pump, off-pump, coronary artery bypass, high-risk, left ventricular dysfunction, elderly, aged, and renal insufficiency. Endpoints included cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, need for revascularization, renal failure, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Nine studies incorporating 11,374 patients with a mean age of 70 years were selected. There was no statistical difference in cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and renal failure between the two groups. There was a decrease in further revascularization at 1 year with on-pump (OR 0.67 (0.50-0.89)). However, there was an increase in length of hospital stay by 2.24 days (p = 0.03) among the on-pump group with no difference in stroke (OR 1.34 (1.00-1.80)).

CONCLUSIONS

On-pump is associated with a decreased risk of additional revascularization by 1 year. However, this appears to be a cost of longer hospitalization.

Myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation; Why hasn't it convinced yet?

Extracorporeal circulation has led to a great development in cardiovascular surgery during the last five decades. Its time-proven efficacy and safety have made on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) the gold standard method of surgical revascularization. However, coronary revascularization on cardiopulmonary bypass and the accompanying aortic manipulation are related to plenty of deleterious complications. Therefore, off-pump CABG surgery was established to avoid complications. Nevertheless, despite the initial enthusiasm on this technique, only 20% of myocardial revascularization procedures worldwide are performed off-pump. Not only are off-pump cardiac procedures more technically difficult but also they do not provide better results in terms of graft patency, completeness of revascularization, repeat revascularization requirement, cost, and quality of life. Completeness of revascularization and anastomotic quality should not be compromised to avoid cardiopulmonary bypass.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in octogenarians

Enhanced life expectancy has confronted cardiac surgery with a rapidly growing population of octogenarians needing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Octogenarians are deemed a high-risk patient population with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality following conventional CABG using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In such patients reducing the invasiveness of the surgical procedure by avoiding CPB may be tried in an attempt to improve outcomes. The increasing performance of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting within certain centers reflects surgeon preference to avoid the inherent risks of CPB and cardioplegic arrest including hemodilution, nonpulsatile arterial flow, global myocardial ischemia, atherosclerotic embolization from aortic manipulation, and systemic inflammatory response. Although OPCAB grafting is a well-established surgical myocardial revascularization strategy, its actual benefits in terms of morbidity and mortality remain questionable in the general population. In the higher risk octogenarian patients, however, there is a potential for more tangible clinical benefits when CPB is avoided. This review article provides an overview of the impact of OPCAB grafting on postoperative mortality and morbidity in octogenarians.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass: past, present and future of a controversial technology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will examine the current role of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB) surgery for the revascularization of ischemic myocardium.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have confirmed earlier findings that OPCAB is associated with less grafts per patient and less complete revascularization, and increased incidence of recurrent angina and need for repeat revascularization procedures, and more frequent rehospitalization for cardiac-related issues. OPCAB does not prevent postoperative renal dysfunction and is associated with worse long-term outcomes. Hospital costs are not reduced and are increased in those OPCAB patients who require intraoperative conversion to ONCAB procedures; however, when multiple arterial grafts are used and a complete revascularization is performed, OPCAB outcomes are equivalent to those of ONCAB procedures.

SUMMARY

OPCAB should only be performed by surgeons experienced in this technique in patients in whom a complete revascularization can be achieved; preferably with multiple arterial grafts.

Is off-pump technique a safer procedure for coronary revascularization? A propensity score analysis of 20 years of experience

OBJECTIVES

We aim to describe our experience in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with or without cardiopulmonary bypass by comparing intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

From January 1993 to June 2013, 3097 patients underwent consecutive emergency and scheduled CABG surgery. A total of 1770 patients underwent on-pump CABG (ONCABG) and 1327 off-pump CABG (OPCABG). A propensity score matching was performed to identify appropriate matched-pair patients; univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess significant predictors of hospital and 30-day morbidity and mortality composite end-points. Morbidity composite end-point was defined as any renal, pulmonary, cardiovascular and neurological complication that occurred during hospital stay. We collected all-cause mortality data during the study period.

RESULTS

We identified 1004 patients in each group. There were no significant differences in thirty day mortality, 2.8 vs 3.8%, in OPCABG and ONCABG, respectively (P = 0.21). Cardiovascular, neurological, respiratory and renal complications were more frequent in the ONCABG group: 13.9 vs 8.7% (P < 0.001), 3.9 vs 2.2% (P = 0.03), 13.5 vs 7.5% (P < 0.001), 7.1 vs 5.3% (P = 0.095), respectively. The long-term all-cause mortality rate was 12.3 vs 12.9% in the OPCABG versus ONCABG group (P = 0.42), respectively. In both uni- and multivariable analysis preoperative renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and ONCABG were independent predictors of mortality and morbidity composite end-points.

CONCLUSIONS

OPCABG is associated with less postoperative morbimortality and shorter hospital and intensive care unit length of stay. ONCABG resulted as an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality composite end-point. No statistically significant differences were observed in long-term all-cause mortality between groups.

Current randomized control trials, observational studies and meta analysis in off-pump coronary surgery

The off-pump literature is divided into three eras: the “early phase” with results favouring off-pump surgery supported with randomized control trials (RCTs) mainly from Bristol, UK; an “intermediate phase” dominated by the results of the ROOBY trial and finally a more “contemporary phase” whereby the off/on-pump argument is unsettled. Although the literature has failed to project an overall superiority of off-pump versus on-pump surgery, nevertheless, small randomized control trials and large meta-analysis studies are concluding that the incidence of a stroke is less than 1 % when an aortic off-pump techniques (especially the non-touch technique) are advocated in patients with diseased ascending aorta. Furthermore, off-pump combined with hybrid procedures may lead to a reduction of adverse outcome in the aged high-risk population with concomitant poor left ventricular function and co-morbidities.

The current review attempts to bring an insight onto the last ten years knowledge on the on/off-pump debate, with an aim to draw some clear conclusions in order to allow practitioners to reflect on the subject.

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with triple-vessel disease and enlarged ventricles

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) is a popular treatment for patients with ischemic heart disease, especially for high-risk patients. However, whether OPCAB can lead to better clinical outcomes than on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCAB) in patients with enlarged ventricles remains controversial. This prospective randomized study was designed to characterize comparison of early clinical outcome and mid-term follow-up following ONCAB versus OPCAB in patients with triple-vessel disease and enlarged ventricles.

DESIGN AND SETTINGS

Prospective randomized trial of patients treated at The First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, over a 3-year period (2007-2010).

METHODS

A total of 102 patients with triple-vessel disease and enlarged ventricles (end-diastolic dimension >=6.0 cm) were randomized to OPCAB or ONCAB between July 2007 and December 2010. The in-hospital out.comes were analyzed. The study included a mid-term follow-up, with a mean follow-up time of 49.40 (12.88 months).

RESULTS

No significant differences were recorded in the baseline clinical characteristics of ONCAB and OPCAB groups. A statistical difference was found between the two groups at the time of extubation, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, blood requirements, incidence of intra-aortic balloon pump support, pulmonary complications, stroke, reoperation for bleeding, and inotropic requirements > 24 hours (P < .05). The number of anastomoses performed per patient, the incidence of postoperative ventricular arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, new-onset atrial fibrillation, hemodialysis, infective complications, recurrent angina, and percutaneous reintervention were similar between the 2 groups (P > .05). The left ventricular end-diastolic dimension was significantly smaller at 6 months' follow-up in the 2 groups than it was before operation ( < .05). No differences in hospital mortality and mid-term mortality between OPCAB and ONCAB groups were found. During the follow-up, no patient in either group had undergone repeat coronary artery bypass grafting.

CONCLUSION

No differences in early and mid-term mortality were found between OPCAB and ONCAB in patients with triple-vessel disease and enlarged ventricles. However, OPCAB seems to have a beneficial effect on postoperative complications.

Improved Short-Term Outcomes with Off-Pump Reoperative Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Objective

Reoperative coronary surgery patients are usually sicker and older, and the procedure is more technically demanding. Comparisons between coronary surgery with (coronary artery bypass [CAB] surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass [CPB]) and without (off-pump CAB [OPCAB]) the pump have been conducted; however, few studies showed results in reoperative cases. We investigate the potential superiority of one technique over the other in redo coronary surgeries.

Methods

Our institutional Society of Thoracic Surgery database was used to gather the data for 266 isolated reoperative coronary artery surgeries from January 2004 to July 2011. These were divided into the CAB surgery in CPB group (n = 204) and the OPCAB group (n = 62).

Results

Baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar, except for a significantly higher prevalence of cerebrovascular disease among the off-pump group ( P = 0.01). There was also a trend toward fewer vessels bypassed among the same group ( P = 0.07). Risk adjustment was done using multivariable analyses for detection of independent effects. The use of CPB was an independent predictor of increased rates of postoperative events (odds ratio, 3.9; P = 0.004) and atrial fibrillation (odds ratio, 5.9; P < 0.005) and longer intensive care unit (0.006) and hospital stay (0.004).

Conclusions

Redo OPCAB seems to offer favorable short-term outcomes compared with redo CAB. Our results suggest a reduced rate of overall postoperative events, decreased new postoperative atrial fibrillation, reduced hours stayed in the intensive care unit, and fewer days stayed from surgery to discharge. This was not associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality. A randomized study with a larger number of patients and with a longer follow-up is needed.

Carotid Artery Stenosis Associated with Increased Mortality in Patients who Underwent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Vascular disease resulting from arteriosclerosis is a severe worldwide health risk. Early diagnosis and intervention is important to control adverse cerebral and cardiovascular events. The aim of this study was to assess the potential predictors of mortality in patients submitted to coronary bypass surgery.

METHODS

Cohort study included asymptomatic cerebrovascular disease patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting admitted to the cardiology reference center. All patients were submitted to carotid artery ultrasound assessment prior to surgery and were followed up during the entire in-hospital postoperative period. Carotid artery stenosis was considered clinically significant when cross sectional area ≥50%. Significance was set at p <0.05. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of mortality.

RESULTS

Of 455 patients with a mean age of 62.2 years 65.6% were males. The prevalence of carotid artery stenosis was 18.7%. It was absent in 3.6% of the patients, below 50% in 77.8%, between 50 and 69% in 11.6%, and between 70 and 99% in 6.9%. The carotid artery was occluded in 0.2% of the sample. An overall mortality of 12%, affecting 35 men (P=0.001) with stenosis ≥50%. After logistic regression analysis, carotid artery stenosis ≥50% was confirmed as being an independent predictor of mortality (P=0.005).

CONCLUSION

In this series carotid artery stenosis showed a high prevalence in the sample assessed and was an independent predictor of mortality.

A meta-analysis of randomized trials for repeat revascularization following off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

To determine whether repeat revascularization rates are increased following off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of off-pump vs on-pump CABG. Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through March 2013 using web-based search engines (PubMed, OVID). Studies considered for inclusion met the following criteria: the design was a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial; the study population was patients undergoing CABG; patients were randomly assigned to off-pump vs on-pump CABG and outcomes included repeat revascularization rates at ≥1 year. Our exhaustive search identified 12 prospective randomized controlled trials of off-pump vs on-pump CABG. Pooled analysis demonstrated a statistically significant 38% increase in repeat revascularization rates with off-pump relative to on-pump CABG in the fixed-effects model (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.76; P = 0.008). In general, exclusion of any single trial from the analysis did not substantively alter the overall result of our analysis. There was no evidence of significant publication bias. The results of our analysis suggest that off-pump CABG may increase repeat revascularization rates by 38% over on-pump CABG.

Less invasive coronary artery revascularization with a minimized extracorporeal circulation system: preliminary results of a comparative study with off-pump-procedures

BACKGROUND

Coronary-artery-bypass-grafting (CABG) with conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC) is associated with adverse effects such as systemic inflammatory response leading to a decrease in systemic vascular resistance and hemodynamic instability. Modern "less invasive" procedures have been established recently which potentially avoid negative side effects of CECC. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcome following coronary revascularization using either a minimized extracorporeal circuit (Mini-HLM) or off-pump technique (OPCAB).

METHODS

In this prospective ethics-approved trial, 120 patients referred for CABG were randomly assigned either to off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) or to a Mini-HLM procedure. Patient demographics, preoperative characteristics and extensive postoperative outcome were analyzed for both groups. Hemodynamic data were measured at seven time points perioperatively.

RESULTS

Operation-time was longer in the Mini-HLM group (178,3 ± 32,9 min) compared to OPCAB (133,2 ± 32,7 min, p < 0,001) with higher graft numbers in Mini-HLM group (3,11 ± 0,7 vs. 1,78 ± 0,7, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in perioperative hemodynamic criteria, catecholaminergic support, hospital (p = 0,534) and intensive care unit stay (p = 0,880), ventilation time (p = 0,113), blood loss (p = 0,570), transfusion requirements, postoperative atrial fibrillation rate (p = 0,706) and neurocognitive disturbance (p = 0,297). No deaths and no myocardial infarctions were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary revascularisation with Mini-HLM represents a suitable and "less invasive" procedure which achieves all benefits of OPCAB but may allow for less demanding revascularisation than OPCAB in special patients with complex coronary anatomy and can therefore be used both on a routine basis and in all "conversion" cases of OPCAB.

Management of combined severe carotid and coronary artery disease

Patients with severe carotid and coronary disease-especially if they require coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)-are at high risk of cardiac events and stroke. Carotid revascularization should be considered for patients with symptomatic carotid disease and bilateral severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis. In patients with unilateral asymptomatic carotid stenosis, decision to proceed to revascularization should be based more on a perspective of long-term stroke prevention than of perioperative stroke reduction. Compared with endarterectomy, carotid artery stenting is associated with a lower incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction, an event linked to long-term mortality. This observation may be particularly relevant for patients with advanced coronary artery disease such as those undergoing CABG. Irrespective of the carotid revascularization strategy, a broad disease management approach based on lifestyle modification and pharmacologic cardiovascular prevention is more likely to affect both the quality and duration of life than revascularization itself.

Off-pump coronary surgery may reduce stroke, respiratory failure, and mortality in octogenarians

BACKGROUND

Octogenarians are a challenging group of patients referred for cardiac surgery. The aim of this study is to assess early outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed in the elderly population.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of all published observational studies comparing early results of conventional CABG surgery and off-pump CABG surgery in patients aged 80 years or older. The outcomes of interest were mortality, stroke, respiratory failure, renal failure, incidence of support with intraaortic balloon pump, and incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation. The random effects model was used.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were analyzed. The total number of included subjects was 4,991, of whom 3,113 underwent conventional CABG surgery (62.4%), and 1,878 (37.6%) underwent off-pump CABG surgery. The rates of mortality, stroke, and respiratory failure were significantly higher in the conventional CABG surgery group.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that off-pump CABG surgery remains a valuable option of surgical myocardial revascularization, and may optimize the outcome in senior patients.

Improving results for coronary artery bypass graft surgery in the elderly

OBJECTIVES

The proportion of elderly patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery has steadily increased. We have evaluated temporal trends in hospital outcomes of patients who were 75 years and older undergoing CABG (1990-2010) at our institution.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively for 3483 consecutive patients who were 75 years and older (median 78 years; range 75-94) undergoing isolated CABG at our institution over three time cohorts: 1990-96 (n = 817), 1997-2003 (n = 1534) and 2004-10 (n = 1132).

RESULTS

Overall mortality declined from 6.0% (49/817) in the earliest era (1990-96) to 1.9% (22/1132) in the most recent era (2003-10; P < 0.001). Mortality in low-risk patients (elective, primary surgery with the ejection fraction >40%) was 5.9% (13/220), 0.8% (4/514) and 0% (0/411) in the first, second and third eras, respectively (P < 0.001). Despite the overall increase in comorbidities in our elderly patients, the prevalences of certain risk factors such as poor LV function, urgency of surgery and reoperation have all declined with time. The independent risk factors for mortality in our population were congestive heart failure, left main disease, earlier year of operation, reoperation, preoperative myocardial infarction, cardiopulmonary bypass time, emergent/urgent surgery and peripheral vascular disease. Of these, earlier year of operation (OR: 3.0; 95% CI: 1.8-5.2) was the most significant predictor. Also, age >80 did not predict mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The principle finding from this analysis is a contemporary low operative mortality for CABG in an elderly patient cohort. Risk of death is particularly low in a low-risk subset of elderly patients with reasonable LV function undergoing elective, primary CABG.

Off-pump or minimized on-pump coronary surgery--initial experience with Circulating Endothelial Cells (CEC) as a supersensitive marker of tissue damage

BACKGROUND

Off-pump-coronary-artery-bypass-grafting (OPCAB) and minimized-extracorporeal-circulation (Mini-HLM) have been proposed to avoid harmful effects of cardiopulmonary-bypass (CPB). Controversies exist whether OPCAB is still superior in perioperative outcome. Circulating endothelial cells (CEC) are sensitive markers of endothelial damage and are significantly elevated in conventional-CPB-procedures as compared to Mini-HLM-revascularisation. Therefore, CEC might be of specific value in evaluating effectiveness of Mini-HLM and OPCAB as currently applied less-invasive coronary procedures.

METHODS

76 coronary patients were randomly assigned either to OPCAB (n = 34) or to Mini-HLM (ROCsafe™, Terumo Inc., n = 42) procedures. Perioperative data, clinical and serological outcome and measurements of CEC-release and parameters of endothelial function (v.Willebrand-Factor, soluble-thrombomodulin) perioperatively (pre-operative-baseline, post-Mini-HLM/release of OPCAB-stabilizer, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 5 days postoperatively) were obtained and compared by ANOVA models including repeated-measures-analysis.

RESULTS

Mean graft-number was 3.06 ± 0.72 in Mini-HLM-patients and 1.89 ± 0.74 in OPCAB-patients (p < 0.001). However, ventilation-, ICU- and total-hospital duration were comparable between groups as well as chest-tube-drainage, transfusion requirements, hemodynamics and catecholaminergic support (p > 0.05). CEC-release did not differ between groups (p = 0.274) and was generally within normal limits, Troponin-T levels where not significanty different (p = 0.108). No myocardial infarctions, strokes or deaths occurred, neuron specific enolase (NSE) did not show any differences between groups (p = 0.194).

CONCLUSION

Conceptional advantages of minimized CPB systems (ROCsafe™) result in morbidity and mortality comparable with OPCAB procedures. Mini-HLM therefore minimizes CPB-related systemic and organ injury as demonstrated by low CEC-values which indicates intact endothelial integrity. Furthermore, Mini-HLM combines OPCAB-benefits with low morbidity in high-risk patients while facilitating more complete revascularization in complex patients.

Patient preference for coronary artery bypass graft surgery performed on the arrested or beating heart: a questionnaire study

OBJECTIVE

Patient choice is now a major facet of health-care policy within the National Health Service. Our objective was to determine whether the patient would like to choose if the 'beating heart' technique or the 'arrested heart' technique is employed for their coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

METHODS

We undertook a cross-sectional, self-reported questionnaire survey of patients referred to a regional cardiac surgical unit for elective coronary artery surgery between October 2008 and July 2009. The questionnaire was split into five sections as follows: (1) the patients' awareness of 'beating heart' and 'arrested heart' techniques for CABG surgery, (2) an information sheet detailing both techniques, (3) patients' preference of technique to be used for CABG surgery, (4) whether the patient would like to choose their surgeon according to the surgeons' preferred technique and (5) demographics, including age, sex, and educational qualifications. Data are expressed as counts (percentages).

RESULTS

The questionnaire was sent to 120 people; 88 returned a completed questionnaire, representing a response rate of 73%. Awareness of 'beating heart' and 'arrested heart' techniques for CABG surgery was reported by 35 respondents (40%). Of these, 74% respondents had no preference of technique used for CABG surgery. After reading the information sheet, 78 (89%) respondents reported no preference of technique used for CABG surgery. As many as 71 (81%) respondents reported that they did not want to be given an opportunity to choose the technique used for CABG surgery, and all respondents preferred to let the surgeon decide the appropriate technique. A binary logistic regression analysis showed that gender, age and level of education were not significant predictors of whether patients wanted to choose the technique to be used for their CABG surgery.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac surgical patients prefer to allow the surgeon to determine the technique to be used for their coronary artery operation and do not want to be offered the chance to choose their surgeon according to the surgeons' preferred technique. Involvement of the patient in determining the operative technique is not always desired.

Neurologic complications after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with and without aortic manipulation: meta-analysis of 11,398 cases from 8 studies

OBJECTIVE

Neurologic complications after coronary artery bypass grafting remain a concern. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting is a surgical strategy proposed to decrease this risk. Use of an off-pump anaortic technique, which leaves the ascending aorta untouched, may result in further reductions. This systematic review of all published evidence compares neurologic complications after anaortic off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus that with aortic manipulation.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched up to August 2008. Experts were contacted, and reference lists of retrieved articles were hand searched. The search process was not limited to English-language sources. Observational studies comparing standard off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting technique with anaortic technique were eligible for inclusion if they reported neurologic complications (stroke and transient ischemic attack). Meta-analysis was conducted to assess differences between groups with regard to neurologic complications.

RESULTS

Electronic search identified 1428 abstracts, which resulted in retrieval and detailed review of 331 full-text articles. Eight observational studies reported neurologic complications in 5619 anaortic off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting cases and 5779 cases with aortic manipulation. Postsurgical neurologic complications were significantly lower in anaortic off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting cases (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.72; I(2) = 0.8%; P = .0008).

CONCLUSIONS

Avoidance of aortic manipulation during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases neurologic complications relative to standard technique in which the ascending aorta is manipulated. In patients at high risk for stroke or transient ischemic attack, we recommend avoidance of aortic manipulation during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Two Different Minimized versus Conventional Cardiopulmonary Bypass Systems

Objective

Conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CCPB) is a major trigger of inflammatory response. We aimed to assess the impact of two different minimized cardiopulmonary bypass systems (mini-CPB) with and without Bioline-coating compared with CCPB regarding organ function, inflammatory response, and early clinical outcome.

Methods

In a prospective, randomized study, 120 patients underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting and were randomized into three groups: mini-CPB using a Bioline-coated (group A, n = 40) or an uncoated (group B, n = 40) circuit, or CCPB (group C, n = 40). Cytokines (interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha), myocardial markers (creatine kinase [CK], CK-MB, and troponin-T), hematocrit, and platelet counts were measured up to 48 hours postoperatively. Early clinical outcome was assessed at 3 months postoperatively.

Results

Demographics, number of distal anastomoses, ventilation time, blood loss, intensive care unit, and hospital stay were comparable (P = not significant). Extracorporeal circulation and cross-clamp time were significantly longer in group A and B versus C (P < 0.005). No significant differences could be found in the release of interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha among groups. Myocardial markers were significantly reduced in group A and B versus group C (P < 0.001). Hematocrit and platelet counts did not differ among the groups. No differences could be found in early clinical outcome up to 3 months.

Conclusions

This study showed significant better myocardial preservation with lower CK-MB and troponin-T levels in both mini-CPB groups. No significant differences could be found in terms of inflammation, hematologic effects, and early clinical outcome.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass may increase late mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Although a lot of randomized trials of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus on-pump CABG were conducted, the majority of them reported only early outcomes. Previous meta-analyses of a few randomized trials found no differences for 1-year to 2-year mortality.

METHODS

We focused late (> or = 1 year) all-cause mortality and performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of off-pump versus on-pump CABG. The MEDLINE, the EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched using PubMed and OVID. For each study, data regarding all-cause mortality in both the off-pump and on-pump groups were used to generate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals. Study-specific estimates were combined using inverse variance-weighted averages of logarithmic RRs in both fixed-effects and random-effects models.

RESULTS

Our search identified 11 results of 12 randomized trials (4,326 patients) of off-pump versus on-pump CABG. Pooled analysis demonstrated a statistically significant increase in midterm all-cause mortality by a factor of 1.37 with off-pump relative to on-pump CABG (RR, 1.373; 95% confidence interval, 1.043 to 1.808). Exclusion of any single result, except for the largest (>2,000 patients) trial, from the analysis did not substantively alter the overall result of our analysis. Eliminating the largest trial demonstrated a statistically nonsignificant benefit of on-pump over off-pump CABG for midterm all-cause mortality (RR, 1.344; 95% confidence interval, 0.952 to 1.896).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our analysis suggest that off-pump CABG may increase late all-cause mortality by a factor of 1.37 over on-pump CABG. Longer term mortality from randomized trials of off-pump versus on-pump CABG is needed.

Off-pump coronary artery revascularization in octogenarians: is it better?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Octogenarians are the fastest growing stratum of the population and have the highest prevalence of coronary artery disease. In the past, physicians have been reluctant to provide these patients with optimal care. Seniors are frequently excluded from large randomized trials and generally not included in published guidelines. The purpose of this review is to revisit the demography and epidemiology of coronary artery disease in this population as well as therapeutic strategies used.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent publications have shown significant advancement in medical and invasive treatment of coronary artery disease in elderly, with special focus on the potential benefit of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery.

SUMMARY

Although OPCAB surgery has gained popularity over the past 15 years, its benefit regarding operative mortality and major complications has not been clearly defined in the general population. There is a body of literature supporting its benefit in the elderly population. OPCAB surgery has the potential of decreasing operative mortality and major postoperative complications such as stroke, delirium, atrial fibrillation, and decline in neurocognitive functions in these patients. Off-pump surgery is technically more demanding and has been blamed for providing less complete revascularization and lower graft patency rate, especially in less experienced hands. However, with the upcoming demographic explosion of senior citizens in western societies, OPCAB surgery has definitely to be a part of the armamentarium of modern cardiac surgeons.

Have improvements in myocardial protection influenced a surgeon's choice of coronary artery bypass surgery?

The aim of this study is to determine whether improvements in myocardial protection strategy have influenced the surgeon's choice of coronary artery bypass surgery. Between February 2002 and April 2009, a total of 662 patients underwent coronary artery bypass surgery under the provision of a single consultant surgeon. Operative mortality was defined as in-hospital death and comparison was made based on both the observed and expected mortalities as derived from the logistic EuroSCORE. Of the 662 patients who underwent cardiac surgery, 155 had off-pump whilst 507 had conventional coronary artery bypass surgery. The observed mortalities improved over the years in line with the improvements in myocardial protection strategy despite the increasing risk as predicted by the logistic EuroSCORE, with a reduction in the ratio of observed to expected mortalities of 1.2 in the off-pump group to 0.4 in the conventional group who had better myocardial protection. This has lead to a change in practice being predominantly off-pump at the beginning to that of conventional surgery in the later part of the study. As the case mix of patients gets worse with the increasing severity of multi-vessel disease and poor ventricular function, myocardial protection becomes crucial to the surgeon's preoperative assessment.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass: techniques, pitfalls, and results

In an attempt to advance the surgical treatment of coronary artery disease, surgeons sought a way to offer the proven benefits of coronary revascularization and avoid the side effects of cardiopulmonary bypass by performing revascularization in the beating heart (off-pump coronary artery bypass). This review will describe the development and refinement of the technique, pitfalls to its widespread adoption, and an up-to-date assessment of current results.