Early outcomes using the Florida sleeve repair for correction of aortic insufficiency due to root aneurysms

[Long-term result of aortic root remodeling using the Florida sleeve technique in a patient with connective tissue dysplasia and aortic root aneurysm without aortic insufficiency]

Aortic root remodeling using the Florida sleeve technique was proposed as a simpler alternative to classical reconstructive interventions in patients with aortic root aneurysm without aortic insufficiency. We present a 10-year result of valve-sparing surgical treatment using the Florida sleeve technique in a patient with connective tissue dysplasia and aortic root aneurysm.

Florida sleeve is a safe and effective technique for valve salvage in acute stanford type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

Valve-sparing root replacement is commonly used for management of aortic root aneurysms in elective setting, but its technical complexity hinders its broader adoption for acute type-A aortic dissection (ATAAD). The Florida sleeve (FS) procedure is a simplified form of valve sparing aortic root reconstruction that does not require coronary reimplantation. Here, we present our outcomes of the FS repair in patients with dilated roots in the setting of an ATAAD.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 24 consecutive patients (2002-2018) treated with FS procedure for ATAAD. Demographic, operative, and postoperative outcomes were queried from our institutional database. Long term follow-up was obtained from clinic visits for local patients, and with telephone and telehealth measures otherwise.

RESULTS

Mean age was 49 ± 14 years with 19 (79%) males. Marfan syndrome was present in 4 (16.7%) patients and 14 (58.3) had ≥2+ aortic insufficiency (AI). Nine (37.2%) had preoperative mal-perfusion or shock. The FS was combined with hemi-arch replacement in 15 (62.5%) patients and a zone-2 arch replacement in 9 (37.5%) patients. There were 2 (8.3%) early postoperative mortalities. Median follow-up period was 46 months (range, 0.3-146). The median survival of the entire cohort was 143.4 months. One patient (4.2%) required redo aortic valve replacement for unrelated aortic valve endocarditis at 30 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

FS is simplified and reproducible valve-sparing root repair. In appropriate patients, it can be applied safely in acute Stanford type-A aortic dissection with excellent early and long-term results.

Leaflet kinematics after the Yacoub and Florida-sleeve operations: results of an in vitro study

OBJECTIVES

The Florida-sleeve is a valve-sparing technique that causes minimal interference to leaflet kinematics and aortic root dynamism. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of the Florida-sleeve and Yacoub techniques on aortic leaflet kinematics.

METHODS

Two groups of 6 whole porcine hearts were treated with either the Florida-sleeve technique or the Yacoub technique and tested in a pulsatile loop. Valve fluid dynamics, coronary flow analysis and valve echocardiograms were performed both before and after the procedures.

RESULTS

Both procedures showed no difference in rapid valve opening time as compared with their respective baseline values. The Florida-sleeve procedure showed a shorter slow closing time (192 ± 19 ms vs baseline 244 ± 14 ms, P = 0.016) and increased slow closing velocity (-1.5 ± 0.4 cm/s vs baseline -0.8 ± 0.4 cm/s, P = 0.038). In the rapid valve closing phase, the Yacoub procedure showed a trend towards slower closing valve velocity (-16 ± 9 cm/s vs baseline -25 ± 9 cm/s, P = 0.07). The Yacoub procedure showed larger leaflet displacement at the end of the slow valve closing time that was 2.0 ± 0.5 cm vs baseline 1.5 ± 0.3 cm, P = 0.044. When comparing the Florida-sleeve and Yacoub procedures, the former showed statistically significant shorter slow valve closing time (P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the Florida-sleeve technique alters the slow closing phase of the aortic valve leaflet kinematics when compared with both the normal baseline and Yacoub procedure, while the latter showed a larger leaflet displacement before the rapid closing valve phase.

[Operation in DeBakey type I acute aortic dissection according to the Florida Sleeve technique]

Despite the fact that recent decades have witnessed significant advances in treatment of patients with DeBakey type I acute aortic dissection, it still remains difficult to restore the aortic root when the dissection extends to the Valsalva's sinuses. Thinned aortic walls are vulnerable to traumatization on applying a vascular suture. We used in patients with this pathology the Florida sleeve technique in order to reinforce the weakened aortic root. After mobilization of the aortic root and coronary arteries, the transplant 'wraps' the sinuses from the outside, like the neoadventitia, in order to strengthen the weakened aortic wall. The graft's diameter should be selected with due regard for tight enwrapment of coronary sinuses in their maximal dilatation and, if necessary, preserving the possibility of narrowing the fibrous ring. This technique is simple and effective. First, it allows strengthening the weakened root, secondly helping to prevent haemorrhage. Besides, it may prove alternative, should preservation or correction of the geometry of the aortic root be required.

Remote results of Florida Sleeve technique in patients with ascending aortic aneurysms and aortic insufficiency

AIM

The aim of our investigation was to assess the remote results of valve-sparing aortic root reimplantation into the graft (Florida Sleeve technique) compared with reimplantation of the aortic valve into the graft (David technique) during surgical correction of ascending aortic aneurysms accompanied by concomitant aortic insufficiency.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our single-centre, blind, prospective, randomized study carried out from 2011 to 2015 included a total of 64 patients with ascending aortic aneurysms and aortic insufficiency. The patients were randomized into 2 groups: group I - aortic root reimplantation according to the Florida Sleeve technique (FS group) and group II - reimplantation of the aortic valve according to the T. David technique in David I modification (D group). The groups did not statistically differ by the baseline clinical profile.

RESULTS

The overall 7-year survival for the FS group and D group amounted to 83% and 85.6%, respectively (p=0.98). Assessing the competing risks of mortality related to cardiovascular or other causes revealed no differences. Freedom from prosthetic repair of the aortic valve in the remote follow-up period amounted to 92.8% and 85.8% for the FS group and D group, respectively (p=0.4). According to the obtained findings, the technique of a valve-sparing operation is not a predictor of either lethality (RR 0.98 (95% CI 0.23-4.15), p=0.98) or prosthetic repair of the aortic valve (RR 2.03 (95% CI 0.40-14.63), p=0.40) in the remote period of follow up.

RCONCLUSION

Aortic root reimplantation inside the prosthesis according to the Florida Sleeve technique makes it possible to simplify and accelerate the procedure of aortic root reconstruction in patients with aortic root aneurysms and concomitant aortic insufficiency, demonstrating long-term results comparable with those of the David technique.

Outcomes of Florida Sleeve Procedure in Patients with Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve

OBJECTIVE

Outcomes of the Florida Sleeve (FS) procedure in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) have not been reported before. We compared outcomes of the FS procedure between patients with BAV and those with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV).

METHODS

From May 1, 2002 to January 1, 2016, 177 patients including 18 BAV and 159 TAV underwent the FS procedure. Baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and echocardiographic measurements were compared between the 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier and life-table analyses were used to evaluate survival and freedom from reintervention rates.

RESULTS

Mean ± standard deviation age and aortic root diameter were comparable in BAV and TAV groups, 47.83 ± 11.19 versus 49.59 ± 15.79 years (P = 0.55) and 56.57 ± 6.18 versus 55.17 ± 8.84 mm (P = 0.46), respectively. The 30-day mortality and stroke rates were zero in the BAV group and 1.88% (n = 3) in the TAV group (P = 1.00). One patient (5.55%) in the BAV group and 8 (5.03%) patients in the TAV group needed permanent pacemaker implantation (P = 0.62). Freedom from reoperation was 93% in the BAV group and 99% in the TAV group at 8 years (P = 0.041). Patient survival rate was 100% in the BAV group and 91% in the TAV group at 8 years (P = 0.42). Freedom from aortic insufficiency greater than mild was 93% in the BAV group and 96.5% in the TAV group at 5 years (P = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study reporting outcomes of the FS procedure in patients with BAV. This technique is feasible, and the results appear to be durable when compared to patients with TAV.

The Florida Sleeve Procedure Is Durable and Improves Aortic Valve Function

Background  The Florida (FL) Sleeve procedure was introduced as a simplified approach for valve-sparing correction of functional Type I aortic insufficiency (AI) associated with aortic root aneurysms. In this study, short- and long-term outcomes after the FL Sleeve procedure were investigated.

Methods  From May 2002 to January 2016, 177 patients underwent the FL Sleeve procedure. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction, and degree of AI (none = 0, minimal = 1, mild = 2, moderate = 3, severe = 4) were evaluated by echocardiography.

Results  Mean ± standard deviation of age was 49.41 ± 15.37 years. Survival rate was 98% at 1 year, 97% at 5 years, and 93% at 8 years. Freedom from reoperation was 99% at 1 year and 98% at 2 to 8 years. Three patients (1.69%) died during hospitalization. Three patients (1.69%) developed periprocedural stroke. Postoperative follow-up echocardiography was available in 140 patients at 30 days, and 31 patients at 5 years. AI grade significantly improved from baseline at 30 days (2.18 ± 1.26 vs. 1.1 ± 0.93, p  < 0.001) and at 5 years (2.0 ± 1.23 vs. 1.45 ± 0.88, p  = 0.04). Preoperative mean LVEDD significantly decreased from 52.20 ± 6.73 to 46.87 ± 8.40 ( p  < 0.001) at 30 days, and from 53.22 ± 7.07 to 46.61 ± 10.51 ( p  = 0.01) at 5 years.

Conclusions  The FL Sleeve procedure is a safe, effective, and durable treatment of aortic root aneurysm and Type I AI. Long-term survival and freedom from reoperation rates are encouraging.

Florida sleeve technique for a right sinus of Valsalva aneurysm: a case report

BACKGROUND

Florida sleeve technique was reported by Hess et al. as a new technique of valve sparing aortic root replacement without the requirement of entire aortic root wall resection and coronary artery reconstruction. We present a rare case of an unruptured aneurysm of the right sinus of Valsalva that was successfully treated with resection of the aneurysm and the Florida sleeve technique.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 72-year-old man was admitted for the treatment of an unruptured aneurysm of the right sinus of Valsalva. Computed tomography showed an aneurysm of the right sinus of Valsalva measuring > 40 mm and protruding into the right ventricular outflow tract. The aneurysm dilated up to 5 mm per year, and the left sinus of Valsalva and non-coronary sinus of Valsalva also showed dilation, and he underwent resection of only the right sinus of Valsalva aneurysm and valve sparing aortic root replacement with the Florida sleeve technique.

CONCLUSIONS

We performed valve-sparing aortic root replacement with the Florida sleeve technique. It could reduce surgical risks and prevent a dilatation of the residual sinus of Valsalva through coverage with a graft for a long term.

Aortic Root Dynamics in Sleeve Aortic Sparing Procedure: Echocardiographic and Computational Studies

In Sleeve procedure, the leaflets-sinus unit is maintained. We hypothesized that this feature partially preserves aortic root (AR) dynamics and leaflets kinematics and limits tensions in the leaflets. We tested our hypothesis based on in vivo and computational assessment of leaflets and AR dynamics. AR and aortic leaflet kinematics was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography in 10 patients treated with the Sleeve procedure and in 10 healthy patients. Numerical calculations with the Finite Element Method were performed to support the analysis of the clinical results and provide a better understanding of the behavior of the AR treated via the Sleeve procedure. Echocardiographic evidence showed that AR expansion in the Sleeve group was partially preserved as compared to the Control group (2.9 ± 2.5% vs 7.7 ± 6.3%, P = 0.038) and of the sinotubular junction (2.9 ± 1.5% vs 7.3 ± 3.8%, P = 0.003), and significantly preserved at the Valsalva sinuses level (6.7 ± 2.6% vs 9.5 ± 4.3%) with not statistically significant differences (P = 0.11). In none of the cardiac phases, differences in aortic valve leaflets kinematics were measured between the 2 groups; computational results were rather consistent with this evidence. Computational results well matched echocardiographic evidences, allowing for their mechanistic interpretation. Near-normal opening and closing characteristics can be accomplished by a technique that preserves the shape and the dynamics of the Valsalva sinuses. Whether the substantial preservation of the AR distensibility and leaflets kinematics observed in this study will favorably affect long-term valve durability it remains to be ascertained.

Modified sizing technique with newly designed tools to facilitate the valve sparing aortic root replacement "David" procedure with mid-term results

BACKGROUND

Valve sparing root replacement differs in specific points. The main target remains to achieve a perfect intraoperative result and long-term stability. We aimed in this study to present our modified sizing technique for valve-sparing "David" procedure and its mid-term results.

METHODS

We present a retrospective single-center study. A newly designed sizing ring in addition to triple-armed forceps (Trifeet®) was used to measure the proper size of the Valsalva® prosthesis for patients undergoing David-procedure. Primary endpoints are intraoperative aortic regurgitation (AR) and early postoperative outcomes. Secondary endpoints included freedom from aortic regurgitation or reoperation and overall mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 63 consecutive patients who underwent David procedure between 09/2012 and 12/2016 were evaluated. Mean age was 52±15 years and 76.2% were male. Moderate to severe aortic regurgitation was reported in 60 (95.2%) patients. Four (6.3%) patients presented with type-A aortic dissection, 20 (31.7%) patients had bicuspid and 3 (4.8%) had a unicuspid aortic valve, 2 (3.2%) patients had a prior aortic valve repair. Intraoperative echocardiography revealed no 34 (54%), trace 26 (41.2%) or moderate 3 (4.8%) AR. Stroke, myocardial infarction, and 30-day mortality occurred in 1 patient (1.6%). During follow-up 5 (7.9%) patients needed reoperation due to recurrent AR within a mean of 35±18 months. One could be re-repaired, and the other four underwent aortic valve replacement. A second patient died in the late follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our modified sizing technique simplifies the "David-procedure" and allows to achieve a good intraoperative and mid-term results. However, these results have to be confirmed in a larger cohort with a long-term follow-up.

Florida Sleeve Procedure Is Durable and Improves Aortic Valve Function in Marfan Syndrome Patients

BACKGROUND

The Florida sleeve (FS) procedure was developed as a simplified approach for repair of functional type I aortic insufficiency secondary to aortic root aneurysm. We evaluated postoperative aortic valve function, long-term survival, and freedom from reoperation in Marfan syndrome patients who underwent the FS procedure at our center.

METHODS

All Marfan syndrome patients undergoing FS procedure from May 2002 to December 2014 were included. Echocardiography assessment included left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), ejection fraction, and degree of aortic insufficiency (none = 0, minimal = 1, mild = 2, moderate = 3, severe = 4). Social Security Death Index and primary care physicians' report were used for long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven Marfan syndrome patients, 21 (56.8%) men and 16 (43%) women with mean age of 35.08 ± 13.45 years underwent FL repair at our center. There was no in-hospital or 30-day death or stroke. Two patients required reoperation due to bleeding. Patients' survival rate was 94% at 1 to 8 years. Freedom from reoperation was 100% at 8 years. Twenty-five patients had postoperative follow-up echocardiography at 1 week. Aortic insufficiency grade significantly decreased after the procedure (preoperative mean ± SD: 1.76 ± 1.2 versus 1-week postoperative mean ± SD: 0.48 ± 0.71, p < 0.001), and mean LVEDD decreased from 52.23 ± 5.29 mm to 47.53 ± 8.89 mm (p = 0.086). Changes in LVESD (35.33 ± 9.97 mm to 36.58 ± 9.82 mm, p = 0.58) and ejection fraction (57.65% ± 6.22% to 55% ± 10.83%, p = 0.31) were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The FS procedure can be performed safely in Marfan syndrome patients with immediate improvement in aortic valve function. Long-term survival and freedom from reoperation rates are encouraging.

Cardiovascular operations for Loeys-Dietz syndrome: Intermediate-term results

OBJECTIVES

Early experience with Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) suggested an aggressive aortopathy with high risk of aneurysm dissection and rupture at young ages and at smaller aortic diameters than in other connective tissue disorders. We reviewed our experience with LDS to re-examine our indications and outcomes of surgical management.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients with a diagnosis of LDS who underwent cardiovascular surgery at our institution. The primary endpoint was mortality, and secondary endpoints included postoperative complications and need for reintervention.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine operated patients with LDS were identified. Mean age at first operation was 25 years, 39 (49%) were female, and 38 (48%) were children (age <18 years). Six (8%) patients presented with acute dissection. Five (6%) patients had a bicuspid aortic valve, and all presented with an ascending aortic aneurysm with a mean root diameter of 3.5cm. Twenty (25%) patients had a previous sternotomy. Sixty-five (82%) patients underwent aortic root replacement, of whom 52 underwent a valve-sparing operation and 4 had concomitant arch replacement. Mean aortic root diameter in this group was 4.2 cm. Nine (11%) patients underwent aortic arch replacement, 2 (3%) had isolated ascending aorta replacement, and 3 (4%) underwent open thoracoabdominal repair. There were 2 (3%) operative and 8 late deaths. Nineteen patients underwent subsequent operations for late aneurysm and/or dissection. Mean follow-up was 6 years (range 0-24 years). Kaplan-Meier survival was 88% at 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Growing experience with LDS has confirmed early impressions of its aggressive nature and proclivity toward aortic catastrophe. Surgical outcomes are favorable, but reintervention rates are high. Meticulous follow-up with cardiovascular surveillance imaging remain important for management, particularly as clinical LDS subtypes are characterized and more tailored treatment is developed.

Cusp repair during aortic valve-sparing operation: technical aspects and impact on results

AIMS

Aortic valve-sparing operations are nowadays considered safe and reliable procedures in terms of mid-term and long-term results. Although surgical techniques regarding the modality of grafts' implantation have been properly addressed, the modality of cusp repair, when needed, is still open to debate. We sought to review the literature to try to shed light on when the cusp repair is required and how it should be performed.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed database using the keywords aortic valve-sparing operation, aortic valve-sparing reimplantation, valve-sparing aortic root replacement, aortic valve repair, and aortic cusp repair. Only studies that included and described in detail the technique of cusp repairs in adjunct to aortic valve-sparing operation were considered.

RESULTS

Bicuspid aortic valve more often requires correction when compared with tricuspid valve. The range of the techniques varies from the 'simple' free margin plication to the more complex triangular resection with patch repair. Results in the literature seem to be encouraging, showing that, in most of the cases, cusp repair does not affect valve competence in the mid-term and long-term.

CONCLUSION

Correction of the cusp is a delicate balance between undercorrection that could lead to residual prolapse and overcorrection that could lead to cusp restriction. Although complex repair of the aortic valve in addition to root replacement provided satisfactory results, it should be reserved for experienced centers with a large volume of patients.

Valve-sparing repair of aortic root aneurysms: an update on the Florida sleeve

Aortic valve-sparing reimplantation remains an effective technique for repair of aortic root aneurysms. Studies indicate that the Florida Sleeve procedure is dimensionally stable and durable in the early postoperative period; however, our technique has evolved. We describe a 10-year institutional experience and the technical update of the Florida Sleeve repair for root aneurysms.

Florida sleeve repair for aortic root aneurysm

A 74-year-old man was diagnosed with aortic root aneurysm and two-vessel coronary disease. Echocardiographic assessment revealed an enlarged sinus of Valsalva 60 mm in diameter with mild aortic regurgitation. Florida sleeve repair was performed using a vascular graft combined with coronary artery bypass grafting. The postoperative course was uncomplicated and follow-up echocardiographic evaluations showed an aortic root diameter of 38 mm without aortic insufficiency up to 1 year after surgery.

A modified root reinforcement technique for acute aortic dissection with a weakened aortic root: a modified Florida sleeve technique and two cases report

Despite marvelous advances in repair for acute type A aortic dissection over past decades, it remains challenging to repair the aortic root when aortic dissection extended to the sinuses causes the fragile root because of its thinner layers, which are susceptible to suture trauma. Here, we describe a modified Florida sleeve technique to strengthen the weakened aortic root. After mobilization of the aortic root and the coronary arteries, a designed Dacron tube graft was wrapped outside the sinuses as neo-adventitia to reinforce the dissected weakened wall. During surgery for aortic dissection, our technique is easy and effective to reinforce a weakened root and avoid bleeding. Furthermore, this might be an alternative technique to restore and maintain the geometry of the aortic root.

Reverse graft placement in the Florida sleeve procedure for aortic root aneurysm

Since August 2009, 22 patients with aortic root aneurysm have been successfully operated on with our new aortic remodeling technique as follows: after placement of the Gelweave (Vascutek, Ltd., Inchinnan, UK) Valsalva vascular graft in the reverse manner to the Florida sleeve procedure, the aortic annulus was fixed with the collar of this prosthesis at the level of the basal ring and the aortic root was wrapped with the prosthesis. Furthermore, the aortic valve commissures were resuspended. The distal end of the graft and the transected aortic wall were sutured together with running sutures when they were anastomosed to the stump of the distal ascending aorta.

Aortic valve sparing operations: a review

Aortic valve sparing operations were developed to preserve the native aortic valve during surgery for aortic root aneurysm as well as surgery for ascending aortic aneurysms with associated aortic insufficiency. There are basically two types of aortic valve sparing oprations: remodeling of the aortic root and reimplantation of the aortic valve. These operations have been performed for over two decades and the clinical outcomes have been excellent in experienced hands. Although remodeling of the aortic root is physiologically superior to reimplantation of the aortic valve, long-term follow-up suggests that the latter is associated with lower risk of developing aortic insufficiency. Failure of remodeling of the aortic root is often due to dilatation of the aortic annulus. Thus, this type of aortic valve sparing should be reserved for older patients with ascending aortic aneurysm and normal aortic annulus whereas reimplantation of the aortic valve is more appropriate for young patients with inherited disorders that cause aortic root aneurysms. This article summarizes the published experience with these two operations. They are no longer experimental procedures and should be part of the surgical armamentarium to treat patients with aortic root aneurysm and ascending aortic aneurysms with associated aortic insufficiency.

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement

The aortic root has a unique 3-dimensional configuration and the distinctive function of supporting the aortic valve and blood vessels. The sinuses of Valsalva are crucial to create appropriate eddy currents that are important in initiating and coordinating aortic valve closure and promoting coronary artery blood flow. Most aneurysms in the aortic root are associated with degenerative changes in the elastic media rather than atherosclerosis. Valve-sparing root repair has become widely accepted, although the Bentall procedure remains the gold standard. Because reimplantation using the Valsalva graft allows root geometry to be retained and theoretically and practically prevents recurrent aortic valve regurgitation, it is considered the most reliable and preferred technique among various valve-sparing aortic root repair procedures.

Aortic root aneurysm: principles of repair and long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to examine clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of aortic valve-sparing operations to treat aortic root aneurysms.

METHODS

From May 1988 to December 2007, a total of 228 patients underwent reimplantation of the aortic valve, and 61 underwent remodeling of the aortic root. Patients were followed up prospectively and had echocardiographic evaluation of valve function. Mean follow-up was 7.28 ± 4.33 years.

RESULTS

There were 5 operative and 26 late deaths. Survival at 12 years was 82.9 ± 3.7% and similar between types of operations. Age and aortic dissection were independent predictors of mortality. Seven patients have had reoperations on the aortic valve: 6 for aortic insufficiency and 1 for endocarditis. Five of these patients had undergone remodeling of the aortic root. Freedoms from reoperation at 12 years were 94.3% ± 2.6% among all patients, 90.4% ± 4.7% after remodeling, and 97.4% ± 2.2% after reimplantation (P = .09). Postoperatively, moderate aortic insufficiency developed in 14 patients (8 remodeling and 6 reimplantation) and severe aortic insufficiency in 5 (3 remodeling and 2 reimplantation). The remaining patients had mild, trace, or no aortic insufficiency. Freedoms from moderate or severe aortic insufficiency at 12 years were 86.8% ± 3.8% among all patients, 82.6% ± 6.2% after remodeling, and 91.0% ± 3.8% after reimplantation (P = .035). Only age-by 5-year increments-was an independent predictor of postoperative aortic insufficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic valve-sparing operations provide excellent patient survival and stable aortic valve function, particularly after reimplantation of the aortic valve.

New aortic root remodeling surgery in aortic root aneurysm

PURPOSE

We have introduced a new surgical technique for aortic root remodeling in aortic root aneurysm, comprised of aortic annuloplasty, reduction of sinus of Valsalva, and wrapping of the aortic root.

DESCRIPTION

At the level of the basal ring, the aortic annulus is fixed with the collar of a Gelweave Valsalva vascular graft (Vascutek, Ltd, Inchinnan, UK). After plication of the dilated sinuses of Valsalva from outside the aorta, the aortic root is wrapped with this prosthesis. The distal end of the graft and the transected aortic wall are sutured together with running sutures.

EVALUATION

Since September 2006, 10 patients suffering from aortic root aneurysm were successfully operated on using this technique. After a median follow-up of 20.7 months, there were no early deaths and no reoperations due to failure of remodeling surgery. Median diameter of the sinus of Valsalva was reduced from 49.5 mm to 34.0 mm. All patients showed aortic regurgitation of grade 0 or grade 1 at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term follow-up is necessary to prove the durability of this operation.

Snake venom thrombin-like enzymes: from reptilase to now

The snake venom thrombin-like enzymes (SVTLEs) comprise a number of serine proteases functionally and structurally related to thrombin. Until recently, only nine complete sequences of this subgroup of the serine protease family were known. Over the past 5 years, the primary structure of several SVTLEs has been characterized, and now this family includes several members. Of particular interest is their possible use in pathologies such as thrombosis. The aim of the present review is to summarize the state of the art concerning the evolutionary, structural and biological features of the SVTLEs.