Midterm Results of Ross Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single-Institution Experience

Autograft reoperations after the Ross procedure

OBJECTIVES

After a Ross procedure, autograft failure can occur. At reoperation, repair of the autograft preserves the advantages of the Ross procedure. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess mid-term results after reoperation of a failed autograft.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2022, 30 consecutive patients (83% male; age 41 ± 11 years) underwent autograft reintervention between 60 days and 24 years (median 10 years) after a Ross procedure. The initial technique varied, full-root replacement (n = 25) being the most frequent. The indication for reoperation was isolated autograft regurgitation (n = 7), root dilatation (>43 mm) with (n = 17) or without (n = 2) autograft regurgitation, mixed dysfunction (n = 2) and endocarditis (n = 2). In 4 instances, the valve was replaced by valve (n = 1) or combined valve and root replacement (n = 3). Valve-sparing procedures consisted of isolated valve repair (n = 7) or root replacement (n = 19), and tubular aortic replacement. Cusp repair was performed in all but 2. Mean follow-up was 5.4 ± 6 years (35 days to 24 years).

RESULTS

Mean cross-clamp and perfusion times were 74 ± 26 and 132 ± 64 min. There were 2 perioperative deaths (7%; both valve replacement) and 2 patients died late (32 days to 1.2 years postoperatively). Freedom from cardiac death at 10 years was 96% after valve repair and 50% after replacement. Two patients required reoperation (1.68 and 16 years) following repair. One underwent valve replacement for cusp perforation, the other, root remodelling for dilatation. Freedom from autograft reintervention at 15 years was 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

Autograft reoperations after the Ross procedure can be performed as valve-sparing operations in the majority of cases. With valve-sparing, long-term survival and freedom from reoperation are excellent.

Perioperative and long-term outcomes of Ross versus mechanical aortic valve replacement

Background

The ideal aortic valve replacement strategy in young‐ and middle‐aged adults remains up for debate. Clinical practice guidelines recommend mechanical prostheses for most patients less than 50 years of age undergoing aortic valve replacement. However, risks of major hemorrhage and thromboembolism associated with long‐term anticoagulation may make the pulmonary autograft technique, or Ross procedure, a preferred approach in select patients.

Methods

Data were retrospectively collected for patients 18–50 years of age who underwent either the Ross procedure or mechanical aortic valve replacement (mAVR) between January 2000 and December 2016 at a single institution. Propensity score matching was performed and yielded 32 well‐matched pairs from a total of 216 eligible patients.

Results

Demographic and preoperative characteristics were similar between the two groups. Median follow‐up was 7.3 and 6.9 years for Ross and mAVR, respectively. There were no early mortalities in either group and no statistically significant differences were observed with respect to perioperative outcomes or complications. Major hemorrhage and stroke events were significantly more frequent in the mAVR population (p < .01). Overall survival (p = .93), freedom from reintervention and valve dysfunction free survival (p = .91) were equivalent.

Conclusions

In this mid‐term propensity score‐matched analysis, the Ross procedure offers similar perioperative outcomes, freedom from reintervention or valve dysfunction as well as overall survival compared to traditional mAVR but without the morbidity associated with long‐term anticoagulation. At specialized centers with sufficient expertize, the Ross procedure should be strongly considered in select patients requiring aortic valve replacement.

Ross Operation with Autologous External Autograft Stabilization - Long-term Results

BACKGROUND

We have proposed an external stabilization technique to minimize autograft dilatation after the Ross operation. The aim of this study was to analyze autograft function and root dimensions following root replacement with and without external root support.

METHODS

Between 10/1995 and 02/2021, 185 adult patients (73% male; age 38±9 years) underwent a Ross operation as full-root replacement with (n=136) or without support (n=49). Autograft function and root dimensions were determined echocardiographically. Median follow-up was 3.4[1.13-14.74] years; it was 95% complete. Survival and freedom from reoperation were calculated; changes in autograft root dimensions were analyzed using mixed-effect models.

RESULTS

Survival (95%) and freedom from autograft reoperation (94%) at 15 years were higher with than without support (p=0.003 or p=0.004). In the first five years, patients with support showed an indexed root size progression of 0.712mm/(year*m)(p=0.003) compared to 1.554mm/(year*m)(p=0.001) without. Progression rates were higher for patients without stabilization (p=0.045). After five years, progression rates were similar in both groups (0.248mm/(year*m)(p<0.001) with persistent difference between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ross procedure as full-root replacement is associated with a relevant rate of autograft dilatation and reoperation. The use of external root stabilization may reduce autograft dilatation and is associated with improved survival and durability.

Ross operation after failure of aortic valve repair

Background

Repair failure remains one of the most important complications of aortic valve reconstruction. Young patients might benefit from a Ross procedure in such a scenario, provided it can be performed safely and with adequate durability. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and clinical outcomes of a Ross operation following a failed repair.

Methods

Between 1996 and 2019, 80 patients (male, 76%; mean age, 31±13 years) underwent a Ross procedure after a median of 6.6 (1.7-15.9) years following an initial aortic valve repair. The previous valve repair was performed for unicuspid (53%), bicuspid (39%), tricuspid (7%), and quadricuspid morphology (1%). Median follow-up after the Ross operation was 2.8 (0.964-13.25) years, mean 5±5 years (92% complete).

Results

Median cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 144 [106-154] minutes and 98 [79-113] minutes, respectively. Thirty-two patients (40%) required a concomitant procedure, most commonly, an ascending aortic replacement (n=23). There were no peri-operative deaths, myocardial infarctions, or neurological complications. There was one late death from a non-cardiac cause. At 10 years, overall survival was 99%±1%, similar to that of an age- and gender-matched population. Nine patients required re-intervention after their Ross procedure (five on the autograft and four on the pulmonary conduit). The autograft re-interventions were valve-sparing procedures in all patients. The cumulative incidence of re-intervention on the autograft at 8 years was 5.1%±3.1%.

Conclusions

The stepwise strategy of an initial valve repair followed by Ross operation represents a safe and valid option for failed aortic valve repair. It is associated with low peri-operative morbidity. Mid-term survival is excellent, similar to that of a matched general population. The probability of re-intervention after the Ross procedure appears similar to that of a primary Ross operation, deeming it a warranted consideration in cases of failed aortic valve repair.

Aortic valve neocuspidization with autologous pericardium in adult patients: UK experience and meta-analytic comparison with other aortic valve substitutes

OBJECTIVES

We sought to provide further evidence on the safety and efficacy of aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) using autologous pericardium in adult patients with aortic valve disease by reporting clinical and echocardiographic results from the first UK experience and performing a meta-analytic comparison with other biological valve substitutes.

METHODS

We reported clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of 55 patients (mean age 58 ± 15 years) undergoing AVNeo with autologous pericardium in 2 UK centres from 2018 to 2020. These results were included in a meta-analytic comparison between series on AVNeo (7 studies, 1205 patients, mean weighted follow-up 3.6 years) versus Trifecta (10 studies, 8705 patients, 3.8 years), Magna Ease (3 studies, 3137 patients, 4.1 years), Freedom Solo (4 studies, 1869 patients, 4.4 years), Freestyle (4 studies, 4307 patients, 7 years), Mitroflow (4 studies, 4760 patients, 4.1 years) and autograft aortic valve (7 papers, 3839 patients, 9.1 years).

RESULTS

In the present series no patients required intraoperative conversion. After mean follow-up of 12.5 ± 0.9 months, 3 patients presented with endocarditis and 1 required reintervention. The remaining patients had absent or mild aortic valve insufficiency with very low peak and mean transvalvular gradients (16 ± 3.7 and 9 ± 2.2 mmHg, respectively). Meta-analytic estimates showed non-significant difference between AVNeo and all but Magna Ease valves with regards to structural valve degeneration, reintervention and endocarditis. When compared Magna Ease valve, AVNeo and other valve substitutes showed an excess of valve-related events.

CONCLUSIONS

AVNeo is safe, associated with excellent haemodynamic profile. Its midterm risk of valve-related events is comparable to most biological valve substitutes. Magna Ease is potentially the best biological choice as far as risk of reintervention is concerned.

Surgical Valvuloplasty Versus Balloon Dilation for Congenital Aortic Stenosis in Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND

For children with congenital aortic stenosis (AS) who are candidates for biventricular repair, valvuloplasty can be achieved by surgical aortic valvuloplasty (SAV) or by transcatheter balloon aortic dilation (BAD). We aimed to evaluate the longer term outcomes of SAV versus BAD at our institution.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 2 months to 18 years old patients who underwent SAV or BAD at our institution between January 1990 and July 2018. Baseline and follow-up characteristics were assessed by echocardiography. Long-term survival, freedom from reintervention, freedom from aortic valve replacement (AVR), and aortic regurgitation were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 212 patients met inclusion criteria (SAV = 123; BAD = 89). Age, sex, aortic insufficiency (AI), and aortic valve gradient were similar between the groups. At 10 years, 27.9% (19/68) of SAV patients and 58.3% (28/48) of BAD patients had moderate or worse AI (P = .001), and reintervention occurred in 39.2% (29/74) of SAV patients and 78.6% (44/56) of BAD patients (P < .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed overall survival was 96.8% (119/123) for SAV and 95.5% (85/89) for SAV (P = .87). At 10 years, 35% (23/66) of SAV patients and 54% (23/43) of BAD patients underwent AVR (P = .213).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical aortic valvuloplasty demonstrated greater gradient reduction, less postoperative and long-term AI, and a lower reintervention rate at 10 years than BAD. There was no difference in survival or AVR reintervention rate. Surgical aortic valvuloplasty is a durable and efficacious intervention and should continue to be considered a favorable choice for palliation of valvular AS.

Finite Element Analysis Investigate Pulmonary Autograft Root and Leaflet Stresses to Understand Late Durability of Ross Operation

Ross operation might be a valid option for congenital and acquired left ventricular outflow tract disease in selected cases. As the pulmonary autograft is a living substitute for the aortic root that bioinspired the Ross operation, we have created an experimental animal model in which the vital capacity of the pulmonary autograft (PA) has been studied during physiological growth. The present study aims to determine any increased stresses in PA root and leaflet compared to the similar components of the native aorta. An animal model and a mathematical analysis using finite element analysis have been used for the purpose of this manuscript. The results of this study advance our understanding of the relative benefits of pulmonary autograft for the management of severe aortic valve disease. However, it launches a warning about the importance of the choice of the length of the conduits as mechanical deformation, and, therefore, potential failure, increases with the length of the segment subjected to stress. Understanding PA root and leaflet stresses is the first step toward understanding PA durability and the regions prone to dilatation, ultimately to refine the best implant technique.

The Ross procedure in adults presenting with bicuspid aortic valve and pure aortic regurgitation: 85% freedom from reoperation at 20 years

OBJECTIVES

The Ross procedure has demonstrated excellent results when performed in patients with aortic stenosis or mixed aortic valve disease [aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation (AR)]. However, due to its reported risk of late reoperation, it is not recommended under current guidelines for patients presenting with bicuspid aortic valve and pure AR. We have analysed our own results in light of this recommendation.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2016, 129 consecutive patients with a mean age of 34.7 ± 10.6 years (range 16-64 years) presented with bicuspid aortic valve and pure AR and underwent the Ross procedure. Patients were reviewed annually and had 2nd yearly transthoracic echocardiograms during follow-up. The unit had a liberal reoperation policy where reoperation was performed if patients developed recurrent moderate or greater AR during follow-up.

RESULTS

There was 1 inpatient death, and 3 late deaths over a mean follow-up duration of 9.6 ± 6.8 years. Late survival at 10 and 20 years post-surgery were 99% [95% confidence interval (CI) 94-100] and 95% (95% CI 85-99), respectively. Eleven patients underwent redo aortic valve replacement (AVR) and 4 patients had redo pulmonary valve replacement. Freedom from reoperation for AVR and more-than-mild AR at 10 and 20 years post-surgery were 89% (95% CI 81-94) and 85% (95% CI 74-92), respectively. Having longer aortic cross-clamp (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06; P = 0.05) and cardiopulmonary bypass times (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.05; P = 0.05), and having a larger preoperative sinotubular junction diameter (hazard ratio 1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.30; P = 0.02) were significant predictors of having redo AVR or significant AR at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

With a 20-year freedom from redo AVR and greater-than-mild residual AR of 85%, the utilization of the Ross procedure in bicuspid aortic valve patients with pure AR should be considered.

Simulating the ideal geometrical and biomechanical parameters of the pulmonary autograft to prevent failure in the Ross operation

OBJECTIVES

Reinforcements for the pulmonary autograft (PA) in the Ross operation have been introduced to avoid the drawback of conduit expansion and failure. With the aid of an in silico simulation, the biomechanical boundaries applied to a healthy PA during the operation were studied to tailor the best implant technique to prevent reoperation.

METHODS

Follow-up echocardiograms of 66 Ross procedures were reviewed. Changes in the dimensions and geometry of reinforced and non-reinforced PAs were evaluated. Miniroot and subcoronary implantation techniques were used in this series. Mechanical stress tests were performed on 36 human pulmonary and aortic roots explanted from donor hearts. Finite element analysis was applied to obtain high-fidelity simulation under static and dynamic conditions of the biomechanical properties and applied stresses on the PA root and leaflet and the similar components of the native aorta.

RESULTS

The non-reinforced group showed increases in the percentages of the mean diameter that were significantly higher than those in the reinforced group at the level of the Valsalva sinuses (3.9%) and the annulus (12.1%). The mechanical simulation confirmed geometrical and dimensional changes detected by clinical imaging and demonstrated the non-linear biomechanical behaviour of the PA anastomosed to the aorta, a stiffer behaviour of the aortic root in relation to the PA and similar qualitative and quantitative behaviours of leaflets of the 2 tissues. The annulus was the most significant constraint to dilation and affected the distribution of stress and strain within the entire complex, with particular strain on the sutured regions. The PA was able to evenly absorb mechanical stresses but was less adaptable to circumferential stresses, potentially explaining its known dilatation tendency over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of reinforcement leads to a more marked increase in the diameter of the PA. Preservation of the native geometry of the PA root is crucial; the miniroot technique with external reinforcement is the most suitable strategy in this context.

Pulmonary homograft stenosis in the Ross procedure: Incidence, clinical impact and predictors in long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

The Ross procedure is used in the treatment of selected patients with aortic valve disease. Pulmonary graft stenosis can appear in the long-term follow-up after the Ross intervention, but the factors involved and its clinical implications are not fully known.

AIM

To describe the incidence, clinical impact and predictors of homograft stenosis and reintervention after the Ross procedure in a prospective series in a tertiary referral hospital.

METHODS

From 1997 to 2009, 107 patients underwent the Ross procedure (mean age: 30±11 years; 69% men; 21 aged<18 years), and were followed for echocardiographic homograft stenosis (peak gradient>36mmHg) and surgical or percutaneous homograft reintervention.

RESULTS

After 15 years of follow-up (median: 11 years), echocardiographic and clinical data were available in 91 (85%) and 104 (98%) patients, respectively: 26/91 (29%) patients developed homograft stenosis; 10/104 (10%) patients underwent 13 homograft reintervention procedures (three patients underwent surgical replacement, three received a percutaneous pulmonary valve and one needed stent implantation). The other three patients underwent two consecutive procedures in follow-up; one died because of a procedure-related myocardial infarction. Rates of survival free from homograft stenosis and reintervention at 1, 5 and 10 years were 96%, 82% and 75% and 99%, 94% and 91%, respectively. Paediatric patients had worse survival free from homograft stenosis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56-7.90; P=0.002), although there were no significant differences regarding reintervention (HR: 2.01, 95% CI: 0.52-7.78; P=0.31). Younger age of homograft donor was also a stenosis predictor (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94-0.99; P=0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

The probabilities of homograft stenosis and reintervention 10 years after the Ross procedure were 29% and 10%, respectively; only one patient had a reintervention-related death. Younger donor and recipient age were associated with a higher rate of stenosis.

Dilatation and Dysfunction of the Neo-aortic Root and in 76 Patients After the Ross Procedure

Pulmonary autograft replacement (Ross procedure) is used as an alternative to prosthetic aortic valve replacement patients with aortic valve disease. There are limited data on incidence and risk factors for dilatation and dysfunction of the neo-aortic after the Ross procedure. Ross procedure was performed in 100 patients at our institution between 1993 and 2011. In 76 patients, complete follow-up data were available. Their median age at surgery was 16 (0.4-58) years (76 % males; 95 % with congenital aortic valve disease). Median follow-up duration was 5.2 years (0.3-16.0 years). We analyzed their clinical and echocardiographic follow-up to identify possible risk factors for neo-aortic root dilatation and dysfunction. Ross procedure included reduction plasty of the native ascending aorta in 25 % of patients. During follow-up, 21 patients (28 %) developed neo-aortic root dilatation, 38 patients (50 %) dilatation oft the native ascending aorta and 7 patients (9 %) at least moderate neo-aortic regurgitation. Univariate risk factors for neo-aortic root dilatation were preoperative aortic regurgitation (p = 0.04), concomitant reduction plasty of the ascending aorta (p = 0.009) and a longer duration of follow-up (p = 0.005). Younger age at surgery was associated with dilatation of the ascending aorta (p = 0.03). Reoperation on the neo-aortic root because of severe dilatation was necessary in 6 patients (8 %), where 2 patients had at least moderate neo-aortic root regurgitation. Neo-aortic root and aortic dilatation are common after the Ross procedure. This is often combined with neo-aortic valve dysfunction. Close follow-up of these patients is mandatory.

Systemic Semilunar Valve Replacement in Pediatric Patients Using a Porcine, Full-Root Bioprosthesis

BACKGROUND

Management of systemic semilunar valve disease in growing, young patients is challenging. When replacement is necessary, use of a pulmonary autograft is sometimes not possible for anatomic, pathologic, or technical reasons or due to parental or patient preference. We employed a stentless, porcine, full-root bioprosthesis in this setting and report our outcomes.

METHODS

Over 9 years (2005 to 2013), 24 patients of mean age 13.1 years (range, 3 months to 20.3 years) underwent operation for mixed stenosis and insufficiency in 16 of 24 (67%), pure insufficiency in 7 of 24 (29%), and pure stenosis in 1 of 24 (4%). Twenty patients had previous interventions of repair or replacement, valvuloplasty, or multiple operations. Survival, follow-up echocardiographic findings, and outcomes were documented. All patients were maintained on daily aspirin.

RESULTS

There were no hospital deaths and no early or late deaths over a mean follow-up for 23 patients of 46.1 months (range, 14 months to 9.2 years). One patient moved abroad and was lost to follow-up. Echocardiographic follow-up (mean 34.0 months) demonstrated that no patient developed more than mild insufficiency or moderate stenosis. In total, 20 of 24 (83%) showed no insufficiency and 11 of 24 patients (46%) showed no stenosis. Near or complete normalization of left ventricular mass and dimension was demonstrated. There were no explants and no thromboembolic or bleeding events.

CONCLUSIONS

When use of a pulmonary autograft is not an option, the porcine full-root bioprosthesis appears favorable for systemic semilunar valve replacement in the pediatric and young adult population. Of note, when prosthetic degeneration does occur, stenosis predominates rather than insufficiency. Longer term studies are warranted.

An experimental model of the Ross operation: Development of resorbable reinforcements for pulmonary autografts

OBJECTIVES

To circumvent the issue of pulmonary autograft (PA) dilation after the Ross procedure, surgical reinforcement strategies have been suggested in clinical or anecdotal series. However, no preclinical large-animal model of the Ross procedure is available, which is needed to enable full comprehension of the pathologic mechanisms and the effectiveness of reinforcement techniques during growth. Our aim was to develop a large-animal model of the Ross operation, to reproduce the clinical scenario in which this procedure might be applied, and allow for development and testing of various devices and techniques to improve PA performance. In addition, we aimed to test the effectiveness of a bioresorbable mesh for PA reinforcement.

METHODS

An experimental model of transposition of the pulmonary trunk as an autograft in the aortic position has been developed and performed under cardiopulmonary bypass in 20 growing lambs, aged 3 months. The experimental design included: a control group that underwent PA transposition; a group in which the PA was reinforced with an external, synthetic, nonresorbable, polypropylene grid; and a group that received various combinations of resorbable meshes. Animals were followed up during growth for 6 months by angiography and echocardiography and eventually killed for pathologic analysis.

RESULTS

All animals survived the procedure with no complications. The model was easy and reproducible. Resorbable meshes prevented PA dilation and preserved its progressive growth process, aiding histologic remodelling.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed an easy and reproducible model of the Ross procedure, allowing for a reliable simulation of the clinical scenario. Resorbable PA reinforcement may represent an interesting option in this context.

The Ross procedure: total root technique

We describe our technique for the Ross procedure using a total root technique without any foreign material for autograft support. We insist on technical principles, based on the surgical anatomy of the aortic and pulmonary root, aimed at optimizing aortic root dynamics while ensuring long-term stability of the autograft root.

Aortic Valve Insufficiency in the Teenager and Young Adult

The contents of this article were presented in the session “Aortic insufficiency in the teenager” at the congenital parallel symposium of the 2013 Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) annual meeting. The accompanying articles detail the approaches of aortic valve repair and the Ross procedure.1,2 The current article focuses on prosthetic valve replacement. For many young patients requiring aortic valve surgery, either aortic valve repair or a Ross procedure provides a good option. The advantages include avoidance of anticoagulation and potential for growth. In other patients, a prosthetic valve is an appropriate alternative. This article discusses the current state of knowledge regarding mechanical and bioprosthetic valve prostheses and their specific advantages relative to valve repair or a Ross procedure. In current practice, young patients requiring aortic valve surgery frequently undergo valve replacement with a prosthetic valve. In STS adult cardiac database, among patients ≤30 years of age undergoing aortic valve surgery, 34% had placement of a mechanical valve, 51% had placement of a bioprosthetic valve, 9% had aortic valve repair, and 2% had a Ross procedure. In the STS congenital database, among patients 12 to 30 years of age undergoing aortic valve surgery, 21% had placement of a mechanical valve, 18% had placement of a bioprosthetic valve, 30% had aortic valve repair, and 24% had a Ross procedure. In the future, the balance among these options may be altered by design improvements in prosthetic valves, alternatives to warfarin, the development of new patch materials for valve repair, and techniques to avoid Ross autograft failure.

Inclusion cylinder method for aortic valve replacement utilising the Ross operation in adults with predominant aortic stenosis - 99% freedom from re-operation on the aortic valve at 15 years

BACKGROUND

To report our experience with the Ross operation in patients with predominant aortic stenosis (AS) using an inclusion cylinder (IC) method.

METHODS

Out of 324 adults undergoing a Ross operation, 204 patients of mean age of 41.3 years (limits 16-62) underwent this procedure for either AS or mixed AS and regurgitation (AS/AR) between October, 1992 and February, 2012, implanting the PA with an IC method. Clinical follow up and serial echo data for this group is 97% complete with late mortality follow up 99% complete.

RESULTS

There has been zero (0%) early mortality, and late survival at 15 years is 98% (96%, 100%). Only one re-operation on the aortic valve for progressive aortic regurgitation (AR) has been required with freedom from re-operation on the aortic valve at 15 years being 99% (96%, 100%). The freedom from all re-operations on the aortic and pulmonary valves at 15 years is 97% (94%, 100%). Echo analysis at the most recent study shows that 98% have nil, trivial or mild AR. Aortic root size has remained stable, shown by long-term (15 year) echo follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

In an experience spanning 19 years, the Ross operation used for predominant AS using the IC method described, results in 99% freedom from re-operation on the aortic valve at 15 years, better than any other tissue or mechanical valve. For adults under 65 years without significant co-morbidities who present with predominant AS, the pulmonary autograft inserted with this technique gives excellent results.

Surgical valvuloplasty versus balloon aortic dilation for congenital aortic stenosis: are evidence-based outcomes relevant?

BACKGROUND

For children with congenital aortic stenosis (AS) who are selected for biventricular repair, valvuloplasty can be achieved by surgical aortic valvuloplasty (SAV) or by transcatheter balloon aortic dilation (BAD). A retrospective study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of BAD versus SAV, evaluating the long-term survival, incidence of aortic valve restenosis or aortic insufficiency (AI) or both, and freedom from reoperation for repeated valve repair or replacement. Neonates less than 2 months of age were excluded from this comparison.

METHODS

We reviewed the outcomes of children undergoing repair by SAV (n = 89) and BAD (n = 69) at our institution during a recent 20-year period. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up were analyzed. The patient groups were compared with regard to the persistence or recurrence of postoperative aortic gradients and valve insufficiency and valve-related reintervention, including aortic valve replacement (AVR).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to mean age, body surface area, valve anatomy, sex, and preoperative gradients. Our data demonstrate that gradient reduction, AI, and the need for reintervention were worse for BAD. Aortic gradients at last follow-up were similar in both cohorts, but return of a significant gradient occurred sooner for patients who had BAD. Aortic gradient at discharge was significantly better for the patients who underwent SAV. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that at 10 years, comparison of SAV and BAD was as follows: freedom from reintervention, 72% versus 53% (p = 0.02) and freedom from AVR, 80% versus 75% (p = 0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

BAD yields less gradient reduction, more postprocedural AI, and a shorter interval between initial and subsequent reintervention than does SAV. Our results demonstrate that SAV is safe and effective and that residual gradients and degree of AI are low. After SAV, the need for AVR can usually be delayed until the child is significantly older. The long-term functional stability after SAV is excellent. BAD in comparison is associated with an increased frequency and severity of AI and the need for earlier reintervention and valve replacement. SAV should be offered to all patients beyond the newborn period because it gives superior and longer lasting palliation.

Single-centre experience of 101 paediatric and adult Ross procedures: mid-term results

We aimed to determine outcomes for the Ross procedure in paediatric and adult patients, with particular emphasis on survival, complication and reintervention rates. A retrospective review of 101 patients who had the Ross procedure in a congenital cardiac surgical centre serving a population of approximately 2.5 million was performed. There were 69 adults and 32 children with a mean age of 24.8 ± 13.9 years. Indications for surgery were aortic stenosis (48), regurgitation (10), mixed disease (35) and complex left outflow tract obstruction (8). The mean follow-up duration was 4.7 ± 3.7 years. The mini-inclusion technique was used to incorporate the autograft, and in all cases, pulmonary homografts were placed in the right ventricular outflow tract. Sub-aortic resection was also performed in six and Ross-Konno operations in eight patients. There were no early deaths and there was one late death secondary to endocarditis. Freedom from reintervention was 92% at 5 years and 77% at 10 years. Children were significantly more likely to require reintervention (16%, 5 of 32 versus 4%, 3 of 69, P = 0.05). The Ross procedure carries low early and mid-term mortality, and reintervention rates appear acceptable. The Ross procedure should be considered a feasible alternative to prosthetic valves in patients who require aortic valve replacement.

Managing arrhythmias before and after aortic valve surgery in children

The proximity of the coronary arteries and the bundle of His to the aortic valve may contribute to the pathogenesis of arrhythmias in patients with aortic valve disease. Severe aortic valve disease may also adversely alter left ventricular hemodynamics (end-diastolic dimensions and wall stress) and thus create a substrate for ventricular arrhythmias before any intervention is performed. The severity of these arrhythmias depends on the severity of the underlying substrate (or the specific problem, such as aortic stenosis or aortic regurgitation), the age at which the aortic valve intervention was performed, the type of intervention (i.e. transcatheter aortic valve interventions or open aortic valve replacement or repair), and the reversibility of the altered hemodynamics after surgery. Both bradyarrhythmias and tachyarrhythmias are known complications of aortic valve interventions. Although data are scant, this review summarizes the incidence of arrhythmias before and after aortic valve interventions from a pediatric perspective.

Reoperation after the Ross procedure: incidence, management, and survival

BACKGROUND

The risk of reoperation on the autograft and homograft is the major long-term drawback of the Ross procedure. The incidence and clinical implications of reoperations after the Ross procedure are reported.

METHODS

Between March 1992 and February 2010, 336 consecutive patients had a Ross procedure (mean follow-up, 6.2±4.9 years). Autograft implant technique was freestanding root replacement in 269 patients, subcoronary implantation in 52 patients and a modified root replacement with the autograft included in a Valsalva tube graft in 15.

RESULTS

Subsequently, 38 patients (11.3%) underwent reoperations, for autograft dilatation in 23 and a significant autograft insufficiency in 9, at 9.6±3.7 years and 2.6±3.9 years, respectively. Aortic and pulmonary infective endocarditis occurred in 3 patients. Three patients underwent a non valve-related cardiac reoperation. Three patients received a transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation after 12.2±1.7 years. At 15 years, freedoms for autograft and homograft explantation (with 95% confidence interval) were 83.3% (77.4%- to 9.2%) and 92.8% (87.6% to 97.9%), respectively. Native aortic valve regurgitation, indexed aortic annulus diameter exceeding 1.35 cm/m2 and autograft diameter were risk factors for dilated autograft reoperation (hazard ratio, 3.23 [95% confidence interval, 1.19 to 8.81], p=0.02; 3.83 [0.9 to 16.33], p=0.07 and 1.2 per mm [1.01 to 1.41], p=0.03), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Autograft dilatation was the leading cause of reoperation in patients who underwent root replacement. Long-term follow-up is mandatory to determine whether modifications of the operative technique could limit autograft dilatation.