Atherosclerotic Arch Aneurysm Operations With Perfusion Toward the Aortic Valve

Directing a dispersion cannula tip toward the aortic root during thoracic aortic arch surgery does not adversely affect cardiac function

INTRODUCTION

Neurologic complications of open thoracic aortic surgery are devastating problems in patients with severely diseased aortas. This study aimed to clarify whether directing the aortic cannula tip toward the aortic root affects the postoperative cardiac function in patients undergoing open thoracic aortic surgery.

METHODS

A total of 16 patients who underwent total or partial arch replacement between January 2014 and April 2019 were enrolled and divided into two groups. Ascending aorta perfusion was performed by placing the cannula tip toward the aortic root (reversed direction group, seven patients) or toward the aortic arch (standard direction group, nine patients). Intraoperative and perioperative data, including mortality, morbidity, and postoperative cardiac function, were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

There were no hospital deaths or stroke events in either group. The aortic cross-clamping time was 102.4 ± 20.3 minutes in the reversed direction group and 87.1 ± 9.9 minutes in the standard direction group (p = 0.049). Furthermore, the intubation time was 28.4 ± 12.9 hours in the reversed direction group and 12.4 ± 6.8 hours in the standard direction group (p = 0.022). Both times were significantly longer in the reverse direction group. Postoperative serum creatine kinase-MB levels were significantly lower in the reversed direction group (6.2 ± 3.3 U/L vs 13.3 ± 4.8 U/L, respectively, p = 0.006). The cardiac output and cardiac index did not significantly differ.

CONCLUSIONS

Directing the aortic cannula tip toward the aortic root does not adversely affect the postoperative cardiac function after aortic arch surgery.

Clinical evaluation of a new dispersive aortic cannula

INTRODUCTION

Cerebral injury is a serious complication in open-heart surgery. Once it occurs, it causes significant disability and death. We developed a novel dispersive aortic cannula named the Stealth Flow cannula and used it as a standard aortic cannula in cardiopulmonary bypass. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of this aortic cannula.

METHODS

A total of 182 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass were studied. The patients were divided into two groups: the Soft-Flow cannula group (n = 89) and the Stealth Flow cannula group (n = 93). Patients with a shaggy aortic arch were excluded from this study because the cannulae were inserted at the ascending aorta with a cannula tip directed toward the aortic root in these cases. Patients with multiple arterial perfusion sites were also excluded. Complications including early mortality, perioperative stroke, and intraoperative aortic injury were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Age, operative procedure, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and the Japan SCORE were not significantly different between the groups. In comparisons between the Stealth Flow and Soft-Flow groups, the incidences of early mortality, perioperative stroke, intraoperative aortic dissection, and all complications were 1.08% versus 1.12% (p = 0.98), 1.1% versus 2.2% (p = 0.53), 0% versus 1.1% (p = 0.33), and 1.1% versus 3.4% (p = 0.29), respectively. The incidence of major cardiovascular events, including early death, perioperative stroke, and aortic dissection, was not different.

CONCLUSIONS

The Stealth Flow cannula, which was designed based on our previous experimental study, contributed to reducing cerebral and aortic events as much as the Soft-Flow cannula in the present clinical study.