Computed tomographic modeling before and after treatment for posttraumatic empyema: early decortication is superior to catheter drainage

[Evaluation of the performance of a minimally invasive thoracic drainage tube in a rabbit model of hemothorax]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the performance of a minimally invasive thoracic drainage tube (14 F) made of polyurethane (PU) in a rabbit model of hemothorax in comparison with the conventional 28 F chest tube (CCT).

METHODS

Thirty New Zealand rabbits were divided into experimental chest tube (ECT) group (n=9), CCT group (n=6), and blood provider group (n=15). Blood samples (20 mL) collected from the blood providing rabbits were injected into the chest cavity of the rabbits in the other two groups, and the time taken for closed drainage of the thoracic cavity was recorded. The rabbits in ECT and CCT groups were subjected to blood injections (20 mL for each injection) into the chest cavity every 20 min for 5 times, and the volumes of blood drained by ECT and CCT were measured. Two hours later, the rabbits were sacrificed and the residual blood and blood clots in the chest cavities were observed.

RESULTS

Compared with CCT, the use of ECT significantly shortened the operation time (P < 0.05) and produced more effective blood drainage at 20 min and 40 min after the placement of the drainage tube (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the total blood volume drained between ECT and CCT groups, but the volume of residual blood in the thoracic cavity was significantly smaller in ECT group than in CCT group. No post-operative complications were found in the rabbits in ECT group while all the rabbits in CCT group had abutment pressure to the lung.

CONCLUSION

Compared to CCT, ECT is less invasive and allows more effective thoracic drainage with more convenient operation and reduced postoperative complications, suggesting its potential for use in closed thoracic drainage in single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or in pediatric patients.

Computed tomography-guided catheter drainage with urokinase and ozone in management of empyema

AIM

To retrospectively compare the outcomes of catheter drainage, urokinase and ozone in management of empyema.

METHODS

Retrospective study included 209 patients (111 males and 98 females; age range 19 to 72 years) who were diagnosed with empyema. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on the therapy instituted: catheter drainage only (group I); catheter drainage and urokinase (group II); catheter drainage, urokinase and ozone (group III). Drainage was considered successful if empyema was resolved with closure of cavity, clinical symptoms were resolved, and need for any further surgical procedure was avoided. Success rate, length of stay (LOS), need for further surgery and hospital costs were compared between the three groups using the Kruskall-Wallis nonparametric test, with P < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Of the 209 patients with empyema, all catheters were placed successfully under CT guidance. Sixty-three patients were treated with catheters alone (group I), 64 with catheters and urokinase (group II), and 82 with catheters, urokinase and ozone (group III). Group I, group II and group III had success rates of 62%, 83% and 95% respectively (P < 0.05). Group I and group II had statistically longer LOS (P < 0.05) and higher hospital costs (P < 0.05) compared to group III. There were statistically significant differences between the three groups when comparing patients who converted into further surgery.

CONCLUSION

The combination of chest tube drainage, urokinase and ozone is a safe and effective therapeutic modality in thoracic empyema.