1
|
Freeman K, Caris E, Schultz AH, Tressel W, Kronmal R, Buddhe S. Predictors of post-operative left atrioventricular valve regurgitation in pediatric patients with complete atrioventricular canal defects. Echocardiography 2024; 41:e15832. [PMID: 38796741 DOI: 10.1111/echo.15832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In infants with complete atrioventricular canal (CAVC) defects, post-operative left atrioventricular valve regurgitation (LAVVR) is a known major cause of morbidity and mortality and a common indication for re-operation. However, there is scarce data to identify risk factors for poor outcomes. Our study aims to find echocardiographic characteristics that predict post-operative LAVVR at discharge and 1-year follow-up. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of patients with initial CAVC repair at our hospital who were followed for 1 year between 2013 and 2022. Patients with major co-morbid conditions were excluded. Serial echocardiograms were reviewed. Anatomic details, quantitative and qualitative measure of LAVVR including the number of regurgitant jets, regurgitant jet length and vena contracta width, and ventricular function were collected. The time points measured include pre-operative transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), post-operative transesophageal echocardiogram (PO-TEE), routine protocol based post-operative day 1 (POD1) TTE, discharge TTE and 1-year post-operative (1yPO) TTE. Paired t-tests, chi-square analysis, and linear regression analysis were performed comparing measured variables to LAVVR outcomes. RESULTS Fifty-two patients were included; 92% had Trisomy 21. The majority were classified as Rastelli A (71%), others Rastelli C (29%). Only two patients had moderate or greater LAVVR pre-operatively. The mean age at repair was 125 ± 44 days. Pre-operative LAVVR was the only significant predictor of LAVVR severity at 1 year after backward stepwise regression. Of those with < moderate LAVVR on PO-TEE, 20% had worsening to ≥ moderate at discharge, but only 9% remained that way at 1 year. Of those with ≥ moderate LAVVR on PO-TEE, 40% improved to < moderate by 1 year. Two patients who worsened at 1 year, both secondary to likely cleft suture dehiscence. Only one patient required reoperation in the immediate post-operative period secondary to severe LAVVR due to suture dehiscence. Routine protocol-based POD1 echo did not have any association with altered outcomes. CONCLUSION Pre-operative LAVVR was the only significant predictor of LAVVR severity at 1 year. A significant percentage (40%) of patient with ≥ moderate LAVVR on PO-TEE improved to < moderate by 1 year. Furthermore, routine protocol-based POD1 echo did not have any association with altered outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn Freeman
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Elizabeth Caris
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Amy H Schultz
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - William Tressel
- Department of Biostatistics, Collaborative Health Studies Coordinating Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Richard Kronmal
- Department of Biostatistics, Collaborative Health Studies Coordinating Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sujatha Buddhe
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gellis L, McGeoghegan P, Lu M, Feins E, Sleeper L, Emani S, Friedman K, Baird C. Left atrioventricular valve repair after primary atrioventricular canal surgery: Predictors of durability. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 166:1168-1177. [PMID: 37160215 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Acute outcomes after atrioventricular canal defects (AVCD) surgery in the current era are excellent; yet despite surgical advances, ∼15% of patients require future left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) repair. Among patients with AVC who undergo LAVV repair after primary AVC surgery, we sought to characterize the durability of these repairs. Specifically, we aimed to determine predictors for reintervention following an LAVV repair in patients with repaired AVCD, with a focus on postoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). METHODS We reviewed all patients undergoing LAVV repair (after a primary AVCD surgery) at Boston Children's Hospital between 2010 and 2020. Competing risk analysis was performed to evaluate cumulative incidence of LAVV reinterventions. Predictors of LAVV reintervention were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS A total of 137 LAVV repairs following primary AVCD surgery were performed in 113 patients. Median age and weight at LAVV repair were 25 months (interquartile range, 12-76 months) and 11.1 kg (interquartile range, 7.8-19.4 kg). Original anatomy was complete AVCD in 87 (63%), transitional AVCD in 27 (20%), and partial AVCD in 23 (17%) cases. Over a median follow-up of 12 months (interquartile range, 1.3 months-4 years), 47 (34%) of the LAVV repairs required LAVV reintervention. Reinterventions included a total of 27 LAVV re-repairs and 20 LAVV replacements. In multivariable analysis, age at LAVV repair younger than 72 months, partial AVCD anatomy, left ventricle dysfunction, mean LAVV stenosis gradient ≥5 mm Hg, and multiple jets of regurgitation on postoperative LAVV repair TEE were associated with LAVV reintervention. Grade of LAVV regurgitation on postoperative TEE was not an independent risk factor, but reintervention rates were high when residual LAVV stenosis gradient was ≥5 mm Hg and residual mild LAVV regurgitation was present on postoperative TEE (47%) and even higher when residual LAVV stenosis gradient was ≥5 mm Hg and LAVV regurgitation was greater than mild (73%). CONCLUSIONS Reintervention rates remain high for LAVV repairs that occur after primary AVCD surgery, particularly for patients with LAVV stenosis gradient ≥5 mm Hg and mild or greater LAVV regurgitation on postoperative TEE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Gellis
- Department of Cardiology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Mass.
| | | | - Minmin Lu
- Department of Cardiology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Mass
| | - Eric Feins
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Mass
| | - Lynn Sleeper
- Department of Cardiology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Mass
| | - Sitaram Emani
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Mass
| | - Kevin Friedman
- Department of Cardiology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Mass
| | - Christopher Baird
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Mass
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ghosh S, Halder V, Mittal A, Mishra A, Haranal M, Aggarwal P, Singh H, Barwad P, Naganur S, Thingnam SKS. Surgical outcomes of double-orifice mitral valve repair in patients with atrioventricular canal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiol Young 2023; 33:1506-1516. [PMID: 37518865 DOI: 10.1017/s1047951123002664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Double-orifice mitral valve or left atrioventricular valve is a rare congenital cardiac anomaly that may be associated with an atrioventricular septal defect. The surgical management of double-orifice mitral valve/double-orifice left atrioventricular valve with atrioventricular septal defect is highly challenging with acceptable clinical outcomes. This meta-analysis is aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of double-orifice mitral valve/double-orifice left atrioventricular valve repair in patients with atrioventricular septal defect. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of eight studies were retrieved from the literature by searching through PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Using Bayesian hierarchical models, we estimated the pooled proportion of incidence of double-orifice mitral valve/double-orifice left atrioventricular valve with atrioventricular septal defect as 4.88% in patients who underwent surgical repair (7 studies; 3295 patients; 95% credible interval [CI] 4.2-5.7%). As compared to pre-operative regurgitation, the pooled proportions of post-operative regurgitation were significantly low in patients with moderate status: 5.1 versus 26.39% and severe status: 5.7 versus 29.38% [8 studies; 171 patients]. Moreover, the heterogeneity test revealed consistency in the data (p < 0.05). Lastly, the pooled estimated proportions of early and late mortality following surgical interventions were low, that is, 5 and 7.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION The surgical management of moderate to severe regurgitation showed corrective benefits post-operatively and was associated with low incidence of early mortality and re-operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Amit Mishra
- Department of CTVS, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kobayashi Y, Kasahara S, Sano S, Kotani Y. Modified single-patch repair for atrioventricular septal defects results in good functional outcomes in the absence of deep ventricular septal defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 165:411-421. [PMID: 36115701 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.07.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We compared 2-patch repair (TP) with modified single-patch repair (MSP) for complete atrioventricular septal defects and evaluated their effect on the left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) competence. We also identified risk factors for unfavorable functional outcomes. METHODS This retrospective study included 118 patients with complete atrioventricular septal defects who underwent intracardiac repair from 1998 to 2020 (MSP: 69; TP: 49). The median follow-up period was 10.4 years. The functional outcome of freedom from moderate or greater LAVV regurgitation (LAVVR) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The hospital mortality was 1.7% (2/118) and late mortality was 0.8% (1/118). Eight patients required LAVV-related reoperation (MSP: 4; TP: 4) and none required left ventricular outflow tract-related reoperation. In the MSP group without LAVV anomaly, the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the ventricular septal defect (VSD) depth was strongly associated with moderate or greater postoperative LAVVR, with the best cutoff at 10.9 mm. When stratified according to the combination of intracardiac repair type and VSD depth, the MSP-deep VSD (VSD depth >11 mm) group showed the worst LAVV competence among the 4 groups (P = .002). According to multivariate analysis, weight <4.0 kg, LAVV anomaly, and moderate or greater preoperative LAVVR were independent risk factors for moderate or greater postoperative LAVVR, whereas MSP was not a risk factor. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative LAVVR remains an obstacle to improved functional outcomes. MSP provides LAVV competence similar to TP unless deep VSD is present. The surgical approach should be selected on the basis of anatomical variations, specifically VSD depth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuyuki Kobayashi
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shingo Kasahara
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shunji Sano
- Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif
| | - Yasuhiro Kotani
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ohuchi H, Kawata M, Uemura H, Akagi T, Yao A, Senzaki H, Kasahara S, Ichikawa H, Motoki H, Syoda M, Sugiyama H, Tsutsui H, Inai K, Suzuki T, Sakamoto K, Tatebe S, Ishizu T, Shiina Y, Tateno S, Miyazaki A, Toh N, Sakamoto I, Izumi C, Mizuno Y, Kato A, Sagawa K, Ochiai R, Ichida F, Kimura T, Matsuda H, Niwa K. JCS 2022 Guideline on Management and Re-Interventional Therapy in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease Long-Term After Initial Repair. Circ J 2022; 86:1591-1690. [DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-22-0134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hideo Ohuchi
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Adult Congenital Heart Disease, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Masaaki Kawata
- Division of Pediatric and Congenital Cardiovascular Surgery, Jichi Children’s Medical Center Tochigi
| | - Hideki Uemura
- Congenital Heart Disease Center, Nara Medical University
| | - Teiji Akagi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
| | - Atsushi Yao
- Division for Health Service Promotion, University of Tokyo
| | - Hideaki Senzaki
- Department of Pediatrics, International University of Health and Welfare
| | - Shingo Kasahara
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
| | - Hajime Ichikawa
- Department of Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Hirohiko Motoki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine
| | - Morio Syoda
- Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University
| | - Hisashi Sugiyama
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital
| | - Hiroyuki Tsutsui
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
| | - Kei Inai
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Adult Congenital Cardiology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University
| | - Takaaki Suzuki
- Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Saitama Medical University
| | | | - Syunsuke Tatebe
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Tomoko Ishizu
- Cardiovascular Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba
| | - Yumi Shiina
- Cardiovascular Center, St. Luke’s International Hospital
| | - Shigeru Tateno
- Department of Pediatrics, Chiba Kaihin Municipal Hospital
| | - Aya Miyazaki
- Division of Congenital Heart Disease, Department of Transition Medicine, Shizuoka General Hospital
| | - Norihisa Toh
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
| | - Ichiro Sakamoto
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
| | - Chisato Izumi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Yoshiko Mizuno
- Faculty of Nursing, Tokyo University of Information Sciences
| | - Atsuko Kato
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Koichi Sagawa
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Fukuoka Children’s Hospital
| | - Ryota Ochiai
- Department of Adult Nursing, Yokohama City University
| | - Fukiko Ichida
- Department of Pediatrics, International University of Health and Welfare
| | - Takeshi Kimura
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine
| | | | - Koichiro Niwa
- Department of Cardiology, St. Luke’s International Hospital
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Marelli A, Beauchesne L, Colman J, Ducas R, Grewal J, Keir M, Khairy P, Oechslin E, Therrien J, Vonder Muhll IF, Wald RM, Silversides C, Barron DJ, Benson L, Bernier PL, Horlick E, Ibrahim R, Martucci G, Nair K, Poirier NC, Ross HJ, Baumgartner H, Daniels CJ, Gurvitz M, Roos-Hesselink JW, Kovacs AH, McLeod CJ, Mulder BJ, Warnes CA, Webb GD. Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2022 Guidelines for Cardiovascular Interventions in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease. Can J Cardiol 2022; 38:862-896. [PMID: 35460862 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Interventions in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) focus on surgical and percutaneous interventions in light of rapidly evolving ACHD clinical practice. To bring rigour to our process and amplify the cumulative nature of evidence ACHD care we used the ADAPTE process; we systematically adjudicated, updated, and adapted existing guidelines by Canadian, American, and European cardiac societies from 2010 to 2020. We applied this to interventions related to right and left ventricular outflow obstruction, tetralogy of Fallot, coarctation, aortopathy associated with bicuspid aortic valve, atrioventricular canal defects, Ebstein anomaly, complete and congenitally corrected transposition, and patients with the Fontan operation. In addition to tables indexed to evidence, clinical flow diagrams are included for each lesion to facilitate a practical approach to clinical decision-making. Excluded are recommendations for pacemakers, defibrillators, and arrhythmia-directed interventions covered in separate designated documents. Similarly, where overlap occurs with other guidelines for valvular interventions, reference is made to parallel publications. There is a paucity of high-level quality of evidence in the form of randomized clinical trials to support guidelines in ACHD. We accounted for this in the wording of the strength of recommendations put forth by our national and international experts. As data grow on long-term follow-up, we expect that the evidence driving clinical practice will become increasingly granular. These recommendations are meant to be used to guide dialogue between clinicians, interventional cardiologists, surgeons, and patients making complex decisions relative to ACHD interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane Marelli
- McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Luc Beauchesne
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jack Colman
- Toronto Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program, Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robin Ducas
- St. Boniface General Hospital, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Jasmine Grewal
- St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Paul Khairy
- Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Erwin Oechslin
- Toronto Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program, Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Judith Therrien
- Jewish General Hospital, MAUDE Unit, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Rachel M Wald
- Toronto Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program, Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Candice Silversides
- Toronto Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program, Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Lee Benson
- The Hospital for Sick Children, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pierre-Luc Bernier
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Eric Horlick
- Toronto Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program, Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Réda Ibrahim
- Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Krishnakumar Nair
- Toronto Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program, Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy C Poirier
- Université de Montréal, CHU-ME Ste-Justine, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Heather J Ross
- Toronto Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program, Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Helmut Baumgartner
- Department of Cardiology III: Adult Congenital and Valvular Heart Disease, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Curt J Daniels
- The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Michelle Gurvitz
- Boston Adult Congenital Heart Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Adrienne H Kovacs
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | | | | | - Gary D Webb
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Heart Institute, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ramgren JJ, Nozohoor S, Zindovic I, Gustafsson R, Hakacova N, Sjögren J. Reoperations After Repair for Atrioventricular Septal Defects: >25 Years Experience at a Single Center. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 35:530-538. [PMID: 35738495 DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Our aim was to evaluate the total burden of reoperations after previous repair for atrioventricular septal defects, including long-term survival and identify risk factors for reoperation. All patients with surgical correction for atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) 1993- 2020 underwent a follow-up in October 2020. Clinical data were obtained by retrospective review and evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and competing risk analysis. Of 477 patients who underwent initial repair, 53 patients (11.1%) underwent a total of 82 reoperations. The perioperative mortality at reoperation was 3.8% (2/53). There were no late deaths (0/51) during follow-up. In patients requiring reoperation for left atrioventricular valve regurgitation, a re-repair was performed in 90% (26/29) at first attempt. Estimated overall survival was 96.2 ± 2.6% (95% CI 91.2-100) in the Any reoperation group and 96.7 ± 0.9% (95% CI 94.9-98.5) in the No reoperation group at 20 years (P = 0.80). The cumulative incidence function of Any reoperation (with death as competing risk) was 13.0% (95% CI 9.4-16.5) at 20 years. Independent risk factors for Any reoperation included severe mitral regurgitation after primary repair (HR 40.7; 95% CI 14.9-111; P < 0.001). The risk of perioperative mortality in AVSD patients undergoing reoperation was low in the present study. Long-term survival was very good and not significantly different when compared to patients who did not need reoperation. Re-repair for left atrioventricular valve regurgitation was possible in most cases and showed long-term durability. Our data suggest that reoperations after primary repair of AVSD have very good long-term outcomes when performed at a high-volume pediatric cardiac surgery center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Johansson Ramgren
- Section for Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Department of Pediatrics, Lund University and Childrens Hospital, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Shahab Nozohoor
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Lund University and Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Igor Zindovic
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Lund University and Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ronny Gustafsson
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Lund University and Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Nina Hakacova
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Lund University and Childrens Hospital, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Johan Sjögren
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Lund University and Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
García-Vieites M, Velasco-García-De-Sierra C, González-Rocafort A, Sánchez-Pérez R, Aroca-Peinado A, Cuenca-Castillo JJ. Reparación valvular en el canal auriculoventricular parcial: la importancia del «cleft». CIRUGIA CARDIOVASCULAR 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.circv.2021.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
9
|
Ramgren JJ, Zindovic I, Nozohoor S, Gustafsson R, Hakacova N, Sjögren J. Impact of concomitant complex cardiac anatomy in nonsyndromic patients with complete atrioventricular septal defect. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 163:1437-1444. [PMID: 34503843 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.08.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We studied a cohort of patients with nonsyndromic complete atrioventricular septal defect with and without concomitant complex cardiac anatomy and compared the outcomes after surgical repair. METHODS Between 1993 and 2018, 62 nonsyndromic patients underwent complete atrioventricular septal defect repair. Sixteen patients (26%) had complex complete atrioventricular septal defect with variables representing concomitant cardiac anatomic complexity: tetralogy of Fallot, double outlet right ventricle, total anomalous pulmonary venous return, concomitant aortic arch reconstruction, multiple ventricular septal defects, staged repair of coarctation of the aorta, and a persisting left superior vena cava. The mean follow-up was 12.7 ± 7.9 years. Baseline variables were retrospectively evaluated and analyzed using univariable logistic regression. Survival was studied using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and group comparisons were performed using the log-rank test. A competing-risk analysis estimated the risk of reoperation with death as the competing event. A Gray's test was used to test equality of the cumulative incidence curves between groups. RESULTS The perioperative mortality was 3.2% (2/62). Actuarial survival was 100% versus 66.7% ± 14.9% at 10 years in the noncomplex and complex groups, respectively (P < .01). There was no significant difference in the overall reoperation rate between the noncomplex group (7/46; 15%) and the complex group (4/16; 25%) (odds ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-7.45; P = .30). The competing-risk analysis demonstrated no significant difference in reoperation between the groups (P = .28). CONCLUSIONS Our data show that nonsyndromic patients without complex cardiac anatomy have a good long-term survival and an acceptable risk of reoperation similar to contemporary outcomes for patients with complete atrioventricular septal defect with trisomy 21. However, the corresponding group of nonsyndromic patients with concomitant complex cardiac lesions are still a high-risk population, especially regarding mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Johansson Ramgren
- Section for Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Department of Pediatrics, Lund University and Children's Hospital, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Igor Zindovic
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Lund University and Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Shahab Nozohoor
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Lund University and Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ronny Gustafsson
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Lund University and Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Nina Hakacova
- Department of Pediatrics, Lund University and Children's Hospital, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Johan Sjögren
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Lund University and Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Atrioventricular Septal Defects: Pathology, Imaging, and Treatment Options. Curr Cardiol Rep 2021; 23:93. [PMID: 34196822 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-021-01523-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Atrioventricular septal defects (AVSD) represent a broad spectrum of congenital anomalies from simple to the most complex heart defects including some distinct types. Clinical presentation and timing of intervention differ by morphological subset and functional anatomy. Herein, we review morphological variations and characteristics that determine appropriate intervention and provide insights into functional anatomy based on detailed three-dimensional (3D) assessment of AVSDs. RECENT FINDINGS The understanding of functional morphology of AVSDs has improved significantly with detailed 3D echocardiographic evaluation of the atrioventricular junction and valve morphology. As prenatal detection of AVSDs has increased significantly, it has become the most common fetal cardiac diagnosis enabling antenatal counseling and delivery planning. Advances in diagnosis and perioperative care have resulted in optimal outcomes. The diagnosis and management of AVSDs have improved over the years with enhanced understanding of anatomy and perioperative care resulting in optimal short and long-term outcomes.
Collapse
|
11
|
Schleiger A, Kramer P, Schafstedde M, Yigitbasi M, Danne F, Murin P, Cho MY, Photiadis J, Berger F, Ovroutski S. Can Left Atrioventricular Valve Reduction Index (LAVRI) Predict the Surgical Strategy for Repair of Atrioventricular Septal Defect? Pediatr Cardiol 2021; 42:898-905. [PMID: 33580286 PMCID: PMC8110484 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-021-02558-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Despite improved survival, surgical treatment of atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) remains challenging. The optimal technique for primary left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) repair and prediction of suitability for biventricular approach in unbalanced AVSD are still controversial. We evaluated the ability of our recently developed echocardiographic left atrioventricular valve reduction index (LAVRI) in predicting LAVV reoperation rate and surgical strategy for unbalanced AVSD. Retrospective echocardiographic analysis was available in 352 of 790 patients with AVSD treated in our institution and included modified atrioventricular valve index (mAVVI), ventricular cavity ratio (VCR), and right ventricle/left ventricle (RV/LV) inflow angle. LAVRI estimates LAVV area after complete cleft closure and was analyzed with regard to surgical strategy in primary LAVV repair and unbalanced AVSD. Of the entire cohort, 284/352 (80.68%) patients underwent biventricular repair and 68/352 (19.31%) patients underwent univentricular palliation. LAVV reoperation was performed in 25/284 (8.80%) patients after surgical correction of AVSD. LAVRI was significantly lower in patients requiring LAVV reoperation (1.92 cm2/m2 [IQR 1.31] vs. 2.89 cm2/m2 [IQR 1.37], p = 0.002) and significantly differed between patients receiving complete and no/partial cleft closure (2.89 cm2/m2 [IQR 1.35] vs. 2.07 cm2/m2 [IQR 1.69]; p = 0.002). Of 82 patients diagnosed with unbalanced AVSD, 14 were suitable for biventricular repair (17.07%). mAVVI, LAVRI, VCR, and RV/LV inflow angle accurately distinguished between balanced and unbalanced AVSD and predicted surgical strategy (all p < 0.001). LAVRI may predict surgical strategy in primary LAVV repair, LAVV reoperation risk, and suitability for biventricular approach in unbalanced AVSD anatomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Schleiger
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Peter Kramer
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marie Schafstedde
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mustafa Yigitbasi
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Friederike Danne
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Murin
- Department of Congenital Heart Surgery/Pediatric Heart Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mi-Young Cho
- Department of Congenital Heart Surgery/Pediatric Heart Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joachim Photiadis
- Department of Congenital Heart Surgery/Pediatric Heart Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Berger
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stanislav Ovroutski
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stout KK, Daniels CJ, Aboulhosn JA, Bozkurt B, Broberg CS, Colman JM, Crumb SR, Dearani JA, Fuller S, Gurvitz M, Khairy P, Landzberg MJ, Saidi A, Valente AM, Van Hare GF. 2018 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2020; 139:e637-e697. [PMID: 30586768 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Karen K Stout
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative. §§Former Task Force member; current member during the writing effort
| | - Curt J Daniels
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative. §§Former Task Force member; current member during the writing effort
| | - Jamil A Aboulhosn
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative. §§Former Task Force member; current member during the writing effort
| | - Biykem Bozkurt
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative. §§Former Task Force member; current member during the writing effort
| | - Craig S Broberg
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative. §§Former Task Force member; current member during the writing effort
| | - Jack M Colman
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative. §§Former Task Force member; current member during the writing effort
| | - Stephen R Crumb
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative. §§Former Task Force member; current member during the writing effort
| | - Joseph A Dearani
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative. §§Former Task Force member; current member during the writing effort
| | - Stephanie Fuller
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative. §§Former Task Force member; current member during the writing effort
| | - Michelle Gurvitz
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative. §§Former Task Force member; current member during the writing effort
| | - Paul Khairy
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative. §§Former Task Force member; current member during the writing effort
| | - Michael J Landzberg
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative. §§Former Task Force member; current member during the writing effort
| | - Arwa Saidi
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative. §§Former Task Force member; current member during the writing effort
| | - Anne Marie Valente
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative. §§Former Task Force member; current member during the writing effort
| | - George F Van Hare
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative. §§Former Task Force member; current member during the writing effort
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stout KK, Daniels CJ, Aboulhosn JA, Bozkurt B, Broberg CS, Colman JM, Crumb SR, Dearani JA, Fuller S, Gurvitz M, Khairy P, Landzberg MJ, Saidi A, Valente AM, Van Hare GF. 2018 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2020; 139:e698-e800. [PMID: 30586767 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 230] [Impact Index Per Article: 57.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Karen K Stout
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative
| | - Curt J Daniels
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative
| | - Jamil A Aboulhosn
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative
| | - Biykem Bozkurt
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative
| | - Craig S Broberg
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative
| | - Jack M Colman
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative
| | - Stephen R Crumb
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative
| | - Joseph A Dearani
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative
| | - Stephanie Fuller
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative
| | - Michelle Gurvitz
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative
| | - Paul Khairy
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative
| | - Michael J Landzberg
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative
| | - Arwa Saidi
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative
| | - Anne Marie Valente
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative
| | - George F Van Hare
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. †ACC/AHA Representative. ‡International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease Representative. §Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Representative. ‖ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. ¶Society of Thoracic Surgeons Representative. #American Association for Thoracic Surgery Representative. **ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ††American Society of Echocardiography Representative. ‡‡Heart Rhythm Society Representative
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schleiger A, Miera O, Peters B, Schmitt KRL, Kramer P, Buracionok J, Murin P, Cho MY, Photiadis J, Berger F, Ovroutski S. Long-term results after surgical repair of atrioventricular septal defect. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2018; 28:789-796. [DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivy334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2018] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Schleiger
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Miera
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Björn Peters
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katharina R L Schmitt
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Kramer
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jelena Buracionok
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Murin
- Department of Congenital Heart Surgery/Pediatric Heart Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mi-Young Cho
- Department of Congenital Heart Surgery/Pediatric Heart Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joachim Photiadis
- Department of Congenital Heart Surgery/Pediatric Heart Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Berger
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Center of Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stanislav Ovroutski
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mery CM, Zea-Vera R, Chacon-Portillo MA, Zhu H, Kyle WB, Adachi I, Heinle JS, Fraser CD. Contemporary Outcomes After Repair of Isolated and Complex Complete Atrioventricular Septal Defect. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 106:1429-1437. [PMID: 30009807 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Revised: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contemporary outcomes of complete atrioventricular septal defect (CAVSD) repair, particularly for defects with associated abnormalities, is unclear. The goal of this study is to report an all-inclusive experience of CAVSD repair using a consistent surgical approach. METHODS All patients undergoing CAVSD repair between 1995 and 2016 at our institution were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: isolated and complex (tetralogy of Fallot, aortic arch repair, double outlet right ventricle, and total anomalous pulmonary venous return). Survival and reoperation were analyzed using log-rank test and Gray's test, respectively. Multivariable analysis was performed with Cox regression. RESULTS Overall, 406 patients underwent repair: 350 (86%) isolated and 56 (14%) complex CAVSD (tetralogy of Fallot: 34, double outlet right ventricle: 7, aortic arch repair: 12, total anomalous pulmonary venous return: 3). Median age at repair was 5 months (range, 10 days to 16 years); 339 (84%) had trisomy 21. A 2-patch repair was used in 395 (97%) and the zone of apposition was completely closed in 305 (75%). Perioperative mortality was 2% and 4% in the isolated and complex groups, respectively. Perioperative mortality since 2006 was 0.9%. Median follow-up was 7 years. Overall 10-year survival and incidence of any reoperation were 92% and 11%, respectively. Complex anatomy was not a risk factor for mortality (p = 0.35), but it was for reoperation (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.6; p < 0.01). Risk factors for left atrioventricular valve reoperation were a second bypass run (HR: 2.7) and preoperative moderate or worse regurgitation (HR: 2.3). CONCLUSIONS Mortality after CAVSD repair is low, yet reoperation remains a significant problem. Repair of complex CAVSD can be performed with similar mortality rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos M Mery
- Division of Congenital Heart Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
| | - Rodrigo Zea-Vera
- Division of Congenital Heart Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Martin A Chacon-Portillo
- Division of Congenital Heart Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Huirong Zhu
- Outcomes and Impact Service, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - William B Kyle
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Texas Children's Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Iki Adachi
- Division of Congenital Heart Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey S Heinle
- Division of Congenital Heart Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Charles D Fraser
- Division of Congenital Heart Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In the last 40 years, with a better understanding of cardiac defects, and with the improved results of cardiac surgery, the life expectancy of persons with Down syndrome has significantly increased. This review article reports on advances in knowledge of cardiac defects and cardiovascular system of persons with trisomy 21. RECENT FINDINGS New insights into the genetics of this syndrome have improved our understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms of cardiac defects. Recent changes in neonatal prevalence of Down syndrome suggest a growing number of children with cardiac malformations, in particular with simple types of defects. Ethnic and sex differences of the prevalence of specific types of congenital heart disease (CHD) have also been underlined. A recent study confirmed that subclinical morphologic anomalies are present in children with trisomy 21, also in the absence of cardiac defects, representing an internal stigma of Down syndrome. The results of cardiac surgery are significantly improved in terms of immediate and long-term outcomes, but specific treatments are indicated in relation to pulmonary hypertension. Particular aspects of the cardiovascular system have been described, clarifying a reduced sympathetic response to stress but also a 'protection' from atherosclerosis and arterial hypertension in these patients. SUMMARY Continuing dedication to clinical and basic research studies is essential to further improve survival and the quality of life from childhood to adulthood of patients with trisomy 21.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Maria C Digilio
- Genetics and Rare Diseases Research Division, Bambino Gesù Pediatric Hospital and Research Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Marino
- Department of Pediatrics, Sapienza University of Rome
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stout KK, Daniels CJ, Aboulhosn JA, Bozkurt B, Broberg CS, Colman JM, Crumb SR, Dearani JA, Fuller S, Gurvitz M, Khairy P, Landzberg MJ, Saidi A, Valente AM, Van Hare GF. 2018 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 73:e81-e192. [PMID: 30121239 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 484] [Impact Index Per Article: 80.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
18
|
2018 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 73:1494-1563. [PMID: 30121240 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 312] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
19
|
Generali T, El Sayed S, Rao V, Pardo C, Congiu S, Jaber O, van Doorn C. Reoperation for left atrioventricular valve failure in repaired atrioventricular septal defect: Can more valves be preserved in the current era? J Card Surg 2018; 33:458-465. [DOI: 10.1111/jocs.13766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso Generali
- Department of Congenital Cardiac Surgery; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust; Leeds UK
| | - Shady El Sayed
- Department of Congenital Cardiac Surgery; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust; Leeds UK
| | - Vinay Rao
- Department of Congenital Cardiac Surgery; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust; Leeds UK
| | - Carlos Pardo
- Department of Congenital Cardiac Surgery; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust; Leeds UK
| | - Stefano Congiu
- Department of Congenital Cardiac Surgery; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust; Leeds UK
| | - Osama Jaber
- Department of Congenital Cardiac Surgery; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust; Leeds UK
| | - Carin van Doorn
- Department of Congenital Cardiac Surgery; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust; Leeds UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Atrioventricular canal defects represent a diverse and challenging group of defects. Timing and surgical technique is greatly dependent on morphology of the valve as well as symptoms. Surgical options for repair of these defects are reviewed and presented below.
Collapse
|
21
|
Buratto E, Ye XT, Bullock A, Kelly A, d'Udekem Y, Brizard CP, Konstantinov IE. Long-term outcomes of reoperations following repair of partial atrioventricular septal defect. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 50:293-7. [DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2015] [Accepted: 01/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
22
|
Atrioventricular septal defect: From embryonic development to long-term follow-up. Int J Cardiol 2016; 202:784-95. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.09.081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2015] [Revised: 07/28/2015] [Accepted: 09/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
23
|
Long-term outcomes after surgical repair of complete atrioventricular septal defect. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 150:369-74. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2014] [Revised: 03/31/2015] [Accepted: 05/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
24
|
Bhatt AB, Foster E, Kuehl K, Alpert J, Brabeck S, Crumb S, Davidson WR, Earing MG, Ghoshhajra BB, Karamlou T, Mital S, Ting J, Tseng ZH. Congenital Heart Disease in the Older Adult. Circulation 2015; 131:1884-931. [DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
25
|
Sojak V, Kooij M, Yazdanbakhsh A, Koolbergen DR, Bruggemans EF, Hazekamp MG. A single-centre 37-year experience with reoperation after primary repair of atrioventricular septal defect. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 49:538-44; discussion 544-5. [DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2014] [Accepted: 02/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
26
|
Sughimoto K, d'Udekem Y, Konstantinov IE, Brizard CP. Mid-term outcome with pericardial patch augmentation for redo left atrioventricular valve repair in atrioventricular septal defect†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 49:157-66. [PMID: 25669648 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2014] [Accepted: 01/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Recurrent left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) regurgitation after atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) repair is a difficult technical issue. This study exposes the various techniques successively employed to repair the recurrent LAVV regurgitation and their different outcomes. Emphasis however will be put on the new technique used in our unit called cleft patch augmentation, which has been used continuously since 1998 in the anatomical context of normal papillary muscles (NPMs). METHODS This is a retrospective follow-up study using a Cox regression model for risk analyses from November 1991 to July 2008, including 45 patients who underwent reoperation for LAVV regurgitation after AVSD repair. Of those, 3 patients were lost to follow-up; therefore, 42 patients were included in the study. With regard to the AVSD morphology, there were partial AVSD in 12, complete AVSD in 30. RESULTS Age at the primary valve repair was 1.5 ± 2.1 years and the time span to the reoperation was 7.1 years in median (0.41-12.3 years). Age at the first reoperation was 10.1 ± 6.8 years. Median follow-up after the reoperation was 7.4 years. Three patients died in the follow-up period. Freedom from second reoperation at 10 years was 72.8% [59.5-89.0% of 95% confidence interval (CI)]. Of 37 patients with NPMs, freedom from reoperation at 10 years was 59.4% (37.2-94.7% 95% CI) in cleft closure group whereas, in the cleft patch augmentation group, it was 92.3% (78.9-100% 95% CI) (P = 0.04). Five patients required valve replacement. CONCLUSIONS Surgical result for the redo LAVV repair had good outcomes. In the NPM group, the cleft patch augmentation technique had better results. Various techniques may have to be performed in combination according to the morphological features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koichi Sughimoto
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Yves d'Udekem
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Igor E Konstantinov
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Christian P Brizard
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Charakida M, Pushparajah K, Simpson J. 3D echocardiography in congenital heart disease: a valuable tool for the surgeon. Future Cardiol 2014; 10:497-509. [PMID: 25301313 DOI: 10.2217/fca.14.38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Real-time 3D echocardiography has been used increasingly in the assessment of patients with congenital heart disease. A number of studies have confirmed that this modality can be used as a complementary method to delineate morphology and spatial relationships of simple and more complex congenital heart lesions during surgical planning. Communication between the echocardiographer and surgeon can be simplified as simulation of surgical views can be achieved, thus minimizing the potential for error related to mental reconstruction. This review summarizes the available evidence for the role of real-time 3D echocardiography in congenital heart disease as an imaging modality to assist surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marietta Charakida
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Raisky O, Gerelli S, Murtuza B, Vouhé P. Repair of complete atrioventricular septal defect: close to the moon? From giant leap for the medical community to small steps for our patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 45:618-9. [PMID: 24277766 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
29
|
Pontailler M, Kalfa D, Garcia E, Ly M, Le Bret E, Roussin R, Lambert V, Stos B, Capderou A, Belli E. Reoperations for left atrioventricular valve dysfunction after repair of atrioventricular septal defect. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 45:557-62; discussion 563. [PMID: 23886992 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Postoperative left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) dysfunction is known to be the principal risk factor influencing outcome after repair of all types of atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD). The purpose of the present study was to identify the risk factors for reoperation and to assess the outcomes after reoperation for LAVV dysfunction. METHODS Records of 412 patients who underwent anatomical repair for different types of AVSD from January 2000 to July 2012 were reviewed. The study group (n = 60) included 13 additional patients for whom repair ± LAVV reoperation was performed in a primary institution. Outcomes, independent risk factors, reoperation and death were analysed. RESULTS There were 7 early, (1.7%) and 1 late death. Forty-seven (11.4%) required 64 reoperations for LAVV dysfunction. The median delay for the first LAVV reoperation was 3.5 months (range: 5 days to 10.0 years). Unbalanced ventricles with small left ventricle [odds ratio (OR) = 4.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.58-10.44, P = 0.004], double-orifice LAVV (OR = 5.04, 95% CI: 1.39-18.27, P = 0.014), prior palliative surgery (OR = 3.5, 95% CI: 1.14-10.8, P = 0.029) and discharge echocardiography documenting LAVV regurgitation grade >2 (OR = 21.96, 95% CI: 8.91-54.09, P < 0.001) were found to be independent risk factors for LAVV reoperation. Twelve-year survival and freedom from LAVV reoperation rates were, respectively, 96.1% (95% CI: 94.1-98.1) and 85.8% (95% CI: 81.3-90.3). Survival was significantly worse in patients who underwent LAVV reoperation (P < 0.001) and in those who underwent valve replacement vs valve repair (P = 0.020). CONCLUSION After AVSD repair, LAVV dysfunction appears to be the principal factor that influences outcome. It can usually be managed by repair. Need for multiple reoperations is not uncommon. Long-term outcome in patients with repaired LAVV is favourable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaux Pontailler
- Department of Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease, Marie Lannelongue Hospital/M3C, University Paris-Sud, Le Plessis-Robinson, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Overman DM. Invited commentary. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93:855. [PMID: 22364978 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.10.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2011] [Revised: 10/11/2011] [Accepted: 10/14/2011] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David M Overman
- The Children's Heart Clinic, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota, 2530 Chicago Ave S, Ste 500, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA.
| |
Collapse
|