Induction therapy followed by surgery for T3-T4/N0 non-small cell lung cancer: long-term results

Long-term survival of patients with central or > 7 cm T4 N0/1 M0 non-small-cell lung cancer treated with definitive concurrent radiochemotherapy in comparison to trimodality treatment

Background

To examine long-term-survival of cT4 cN0/1 cM0 non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients undergoing definitive radiochemotherapy (_ccRTx/CTx) in comparison to the trimodality treatment, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by surgery, at a high volume lung cancer center.

Methods

All consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed NSCLC (cT4 cN0/1 cM0) with a curative-intent-to-treat _ccRTx/CTx were included between 01.01.2001 and 01.07.2019. Mediastinal involvement was excluded by systematic EBUS-TBNA or mediastinoscopy. Following updated T4-stage-defining-criteria initial staging was reassessed by an expert-radiologist according to UICC-guidelines [8th edition]. Outcomes were compared with previously reported results from patients of the same institution with identical inclusion criteria, who had been treated with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and resection. Factors for treatment selection were documented. Endpoints were overall-survival (OS), progression-free-survival (PFS), and cumulative incidences of isolated loco-regional failures, distant metastases, secondary tumors as well as non-cancer deaths within the first year.

Results

Altogether 46 consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed NSCLC cT4 cN0/1 cM0 [cN0 in 34 and cN1 in 12 cases] underwent _ccRTx/CTx after induction chemotherapy (_iCTx). Median follow-up was 133 months. OS-rates at 3-, 5-, and 7-years were 74.9%, 57.4%, and 57.4%, respectively. Absolute OS-rate of _ccRTx/CTx at 5 years were within 10% of the trimodality treatment reference group (Log-Rank p = 0.184). The cumulative incidence of loco-regional relapse was higher after _iCTx + _ccRT/CTx (15.2% vs. 0% at 3 years, p = 0.0012, Gray’s test) while non-cancer deaths in the first year were lower than in the trimodality reference group (0% vs 9.1%, p = 0.0360, Gray’s test). None of the multiple recorded prognostic parameters were significantly associated with survival after _iCTx + _ccRT/CTx: Propensity score weighting for adjustment of prognostic factors between _iCTx + _ccRT/CTx and trimodality treatment did not change the results of the comparisons.

Conclusions

Patients with cT4 N0/1 M0 NSCLC have comparable OS with _ccRTx/CTx and trimodality treatment. Loco-regional relapses were higher and non-cancer related deaths lower with _ccRTx/CTx. Definitive radiochemotherapy is an adequate alternative for patients with an increased risk of surgery-related morbidity.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02080-9.

Real-World Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors Analysis of Stages I-III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of ICIs and prognostic factors in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy in the real world.

Methods: A total of 170 consecutive patients were finally selected and divided into two groups: the preoperative chemotherapy group (n = 91) and the chemo-immunotherapy group (n = 79). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints were pathological response, clinical response, pathological nodal disease, and ability of multivariate Cox regression analysis to predict survival. Survival was estimated using Kaplan–Meier method and compared using log-rank test.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference in DFS between the two groups (log-rank test, P = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that maximum tumor diameter (P = 0.016), higher lymph node stage (ypN1, P = 0.016; ypN2, P <0.001), and major pathological response not achieved (non-major pathological response [MPR], P = 0.011) were independent prognostic factors for worse DFS.

Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy yields better effects in pathological and clinical response than chemotherapy alone, which is also associated with longer DFS in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. Moreover, a larger tumor specimen diameter, higher ypN staging, and non-MPR after neoadjuvant therapy were associated with worse prognosis.

Prognostic factors related to postoperative survival in the newly classified clinical T4 lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

T4 lung cancer has become a more heterogeneous group since the 8th edition of tumour, node, metastasis classification. The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors related to post-surgical survival in patients with clinical T4 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), based on the 8th edition of the classification.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with clinical T4 NSCLC who underwent resection between January 2006 and December 2016, to identify factors associated with overall survival.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients were identified. The criteria for clinical T4 disease included tumours larger than 7 cm (n = 54), great vessels or left atrial invasion (n = 22), mediastinal invasion (n = 11), vertebral invasion (n = 3), tracheal or carina invasion (n = 3), diaphragm invasion (n = 1) and ipsilateral different lobe pulmonary metastasis (n = 2). The postoperative nodal status was 0, 1, 2 and 3 in 59, 18, 15 and 1 patient, respectively. R0 resection was achieved in 80 patients, and the 30-day mortality was 0%. The median follow-up time was 37.6 months, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 56.3%. The multivariable analysis revealed that nodal status and R-status were significant prognostic factors for postoperative survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-5.72, P = 0.016 and HR 3.29, 95% CI 1.45-7.44, P = 0.004].

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery provided encouraging survival outcomes for clinical T4 NSCLC based on the 8th edition of classification. The nodal status and R-status were significant prognostic factors for postoperative survival.

Prognostic Factors and Long-Term Survival in Locally Advanced NSCLC with Pathological Complete Response after Surgical Resection Following Neoadjuvant Therapy

Simple Summary

Higher response may be achieved with induction therapy (IT) and better survival results could be expected after complete surgical resection for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Thus, locally advanced (LA)-NSCLC patients with pathological complete response (pCR) are optimal candidates to undergo surgery after IT, achieving good to very good long-term survival. Herein, we performed a retrospective analysis on a large cohort of locally advanced NSCLC patients who achieved pCR after IT and surgery, exploring long-term survival and factors affecting prognosis. We observed a rewarding 5-year overall survival (56%) with baseline N2 single-station disease and adjuvant therapy after surgery associated with better prognosis. These findings may be useful to better define the strategy of care in this highly selected subset of NSCLC patients.

Abstract

Background: Outcomes for locally advanced NSCLC with pathological complete response (pCR), i.e., pT0N0 after induction chemoradiotherapy (IT), have been seldom investigated. Herein, long-term results, in this highly selected group of patients, have been evaluated with the aim to identify prognostic predictive factors. Methods: Patients affected by locally advanced NSCLC (cT1-T4/N0-2/M0) who underwent IT, possibly following surgery, from January 1992 to December 2019, were considered for this retrospective analysis. Survival rates and prognostic factors have been studied with Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank and Cox regression analysis. Results: Three-hundred and forty-three consecutive patients underwent IT in the considered period. Out of them, 279 were addressed to surgery; among them, pCR has been observed in 62 patients (18% of the total and 22% of the operated patients). In the pCR-group, clinical staging was IIb in 3 (5%) patients, IIIa in 28 (45%) patients and IIIb in 31 (50%). Surgery consisted of (bi)lobectomy in the majority of cases (80.7%), followed by pneumonectomy (19.3%). Adjuvant therapy was administered in 33 (53.2%) patients. Five-year overall survival and disease-free survival have been respectively 56.18% and 48.84%. The relative risk of death, observed with the Cox regression analysis, was 4.4 times higher (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.632–11.695, p = 0.03) for patients with N2 multi-station disease, 2.6 times higher (95% CI: 1.066–6.407, p = 0.036) for patients treated with pneumonectomy and 3 times higher (95% CI: 1.302–6.809, p = 0.01) for patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy. Conclusions: Rewarding long-term results could be expected in locally advanced NSCLC patients with pCR after IT followed by surgery. Baseline N2 single-station disease and adjuvant therapy after surgery seem to be associated with better prognosis, while pneumonectomy is associated with poorer outcomes.

Comparison of early tumour-associated versus late deaths in patients with central or >7 cm T4 N0/1 M0 non-small-cell lung-cancer undergoing trimodal treatment: Only few risks left to improve

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung-cancer (NSCLC) cT4 cN0/1 cM0 is still under debate. The purpose of this study was to examine the long-term survival of cT4 cN0/1 cM0 NSCLC patients undergoing induction chemotherapy and concurrent radiochemotherapy before surgery.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with confirmed NSCLC (cT4 cN0/1 cM0) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, concurrent radiochemotherapy (RT/CTx) (45-46 Gy) and surgical resection between 2000 and 2015 were included. According to the UICC guidelines (8th edition), T4 stage was reanalysed by an expert radiologist. The mediastinal staging was performed by systematic EBUS-TBNA or mediastinoscopy. The primary end-point was overall-survival (OS). The power to detect an increase of early tumour-associated mortality (hazard ratio > 3.5) within the first 5 years after treatment in comparison to late deaths beyond 96 months was >80%.

RESULTS

Overall, 67 patients were treated with concurrent RT/CTx. T4 criteria were fulfilled by all patients, and multiple T4 criteria by 53 patients. Seventy percent of patients had an initial PET/CT staging. The median follow-up period was 134 months. OS rates at 2, 5, 10 and 15 years were 83.6 ± 4.5%, 65.4 ± 5.9%, 53.3 ± 6.3% and 36.6 ± 6.8%, respectively. A total of 44.8% of patients achieved a pathologic complete response. In multivariable analysis, ypT category was the most predictive factor. OS at 5 years for ypT0 (n = 31) was 80.5%, and ypT1 (n = 11) was 62.5%. Main sites of failure were brain and pulmonary metastases in seven and three patients, respectively. The intercurrent annual death rate was estimated from the survival curve beyond 96 months and was found to be 4.75% (95% CI 2.40-9.27%). No significant increased mortality was observed during the first 5 years (annual death rate: 8.31% [95% CI 5.60-12.24%], hazard-ratio = 1.72 [95% CI 0.81-3.65]).

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of this trimodality schedule is high in patients with cT4 cN0/1 cM0 NSCLC with excellent local control rates. Considering the annual death rate beyond 8 years of survival as an intercurrent death rate due to comorbidity, this treatment schedule reduces annual mortality to background even in the first 5 years after therapy.

Combined sleeve lobectomy for centrally located primary lung cancer and lung cancer with hilar lymph node metastasis

BACKGROUND

Centrally located lung cancer or metastatic hilar lymph nodes can invade the airway and other hilar structures, and they must be removed to achieve complete resection.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed the clinical course of 47 patients with centrally located lung cancer or metastatic hilar lymph nodes who underwent sleeve lobectomy from January 2010 to December 2017.

RESULTS

The invaded structure other than the airway was the pulmonary artery in 21 patients, chest wall in 3, esophageal muscular wall in 2, vagus nerve in 2, pericardium in 2, left atrium in 1, phrenic nerve in 1 and superior vena cava in 1. Twenty-four patients were treated with sleeve lobectomy alone (simple sleeve lobectomy), and 23 patients were treated with sleeve lobectomy with additional methods (combined sleeve lobectomy). Adverse events occurred in 10 patients (48%) in the simple sleeve lobectomy group and 7 patients (30%) in the combined sleeve lobectomy group. During the follow-up period, 15 patients developed recurrent disease and 12 patients died. Patients in the combined sleeve lobectomy group had significantly shorter overall survival (P = 0.004) and disease-free survival periods (P = 0.013). Combined sleeve lobectomy was a significantly poor prognostic factor in the univariate and multivariate analyses. Patients who underwent sleeve lobectomy with an additional method other than angioplasty had a significantly poorer prognosis. However, no patient developed recurrent disease in the hilar area.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined sleeve lobectomy has acceptable adverse events and good local controllability. However, combined sleeve lobectomy is associated with a significantly poorer prognosis than simple sleeve lobectomy in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival.

Factors Associated With Survival in Complete Pathologic Response Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

There is a strong association with improved survival for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have developed a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy. A national database was used to investigate factors associated with long-term survival in this cohort of patients.

PATIENTS

Retrospective review was completed of the National Cancer Database of patients who obtained pCR and had neoadjuvant therapy for stage I to stage III NSCLC between 2004 and 2014. All patients had neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy.

METHODS

Univariate and multivariable analysis was performed on factors associated with overall survival (OS), including gender, clinical stage, and nodal count. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the Commission on Cancer-recommended median number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined: 0 to 9 LNs and ≥10 LNs. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare patient, hospital, and clinical variables between groups.

RESULTS

Increased age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.03), neoadjuvant radiation therapy (HR 1.48, 95% CI, 1.10-2.00), and pneumonectomy (HR 1.64, 95% CI, 1.22-2.22) were associated with worse survival in the 759-patient cohort. Multivariable regression demonstrated having ≥10 nodes harvested (HR 0.71, 95% CI, 0.56-0.89) was associated with improved survival as was every increase in LN harvest up to 17 LNs. No significant differences in 5-year OS were found between clinical stage I, II, and III, respectively (66.1% vs. 60.9% vs. 58.6%, P = .288).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that younger age, increasing LN harvest, female sex, the absence of neoadjuvant radiation therapy and non-pneumonectomy resections are all associated with improved OS in patients with NSCLC who have developed pCR.

The Outcomes of Induction Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery for Clinical T3-4 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose:

Information on the short- and long-term outcomes of induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for cT3-4 non-small cell lung cancer is limited. We analyzed the short- and long-term outcomes of induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for cT3-4 non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods:

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for cT3-4 non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively reviewed (initial treatment group, n = 31). Their results were compared to those patients who underwent surgery as an initial treatment during the same period (initial surgery group, n = 35).

Results:

Downstaging was achieved in 14 (45%) patients in the initial treatment group. R0 resection was achieved in 28 (90%) patients in the initial treatment group and 31 (88%) patients in the initial surgery group. The 90-day mortality rate was 3% in each group. Postoperative complications occurred in 16 (52%) patients in the initial treatment group and 13 (37%) patients in the initial surgery group. The 5-year overall survival rate of the initial treatment group was significantly higher than that of the initial surgery group (62.6% vs 43.5%, P = .04). The 5-year overall survival rates of the initial treatment N0-1 group and the initial surgery N0-1 group were 88.9% and 49.3%, respectively; the difference was statistically significant (P = .02). Multivariate analysis using 4 factors (age [≤65 vs >65], cN [cN0-1 vs cN2], general condition [chemoradiotherapy fit vs chemoradiotherapy unfit], and treatment mode [induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery vs surgery as an initial treatment]) revealed that treatment mode (induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery) and cN status (cN0-1) were significantly associated with good overall survival and disease-free survival.

Conclusions:

Induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for cT3-4 non-small cell lung cancer could be performed with an acceptable degree of surgical risk. At present, it is thought to be one of the reasonable treatment approaches for selected patients with cT3-4 disease, even those with a cN0-1 status.

Clinical outcome of patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer after trimodality therapy

PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to review the clinical course of patients with recurrence after induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (trimodality therapy) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) and to identify the factors associated with favorable clinical outcome after recurrence.

METHODS

We analyzed the records of 140 patients with LA-NSCLC who were treated with trimodality therapy between 1999 and 2014.

RESULTS

Recurrence developed after trimodality therapy in 48 patients. A yp-N positive status was associated with a high risk of recurrence (HR, 2.05; P = 0.048). Of the 45 of these patients able to be assessed retrospectively, 18 had oligometastatic recurrence and 20 underwent local treatment with curative intent. Local treatment was most frequently given to patients with oligometastatic recurrence (P < 0.001). The median post-recurrence survival (PRS) was 41.4 months, and the 2-year PRS rate was 62%. Patients who received local treatment showed better PRS (P = 0.009). The presence of liver metastasis (P = 0.008), bone metastasis (P = 0.041), or dissemination (P < 0.0001) were associated with worse PRS.

CONCLUSION

The survival of patients who received aggressive local treatment for postoperative recurrence after trimodality therapy for LA-NSCLC was better than that of patients who did not.

Long-term survival in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer invading the great vessels and heart

Background

The aim of this study was to analyze the surgical outcomes of locally advanced lung cancer invading the great vessels or heart, according to the extension of cancer invasion.

Methods

From 1995 to 2015, 59 patients who were surgically treated and pathologically diagnosed with T4N0–1 non‐small cell lung cancer with invasion to the great vessels or heart were enrolled. Surgical outcomes were compared between patient groups with and without intrapericardial invasion.

Results

The median age was 64 years (interquartile range [IQR] 57–68) and 56 patients (95%) were male. In‐hospital mortality was 9% and median overall survival was 30 months (IQR 12–83). One and five‐year overall survival rates were 75% and 44%, respectively. The median overall survival in patients with lung cancer invasion to the intrapericardial space (n = 45) was 27 months (IQR 10–63), while it was 42 months (IQR 18–104) in patients without intrapericardial invasion (n = 14). Median disease‐free survival was significantly poorer in patients with intrapericardial invasion (12 months; IQR 6–55), especially in patients with heart invasion (n = 11, 7 months, IQR 5–27), than in patients without intrapericardial invasion (30 months, IQR 13–103).

Conclusion

Patients with lung cancer invading the intrapericardial space showed worse surgical outcomes in both overall and disease‐free survival. Therefore, surgical management should be carefully considered in patients with intrapericardial invasion.

Induction chemotherapy for T3N0M0 non-small-cell lung cancer increases the rate of complete resection but does not confer improved survival

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of induction therapy prior to an operation in patients with cT3 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with cT3N0M0 NSCLC from 2006 to 2011 in the National Cancer Database who were treated with lobectomy or pneumonectomy were stratified by treatment strategy: an operation first versus induction chemotherapy. Propensity scores were developed and matched cohorts were generated. Short-term outcomes included margin status, 30- and 90-day mortality rates, readmission and length of stay. Survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier methods were performed on both the unadjusted and propensity matched cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 3791 cT3N0M0 patients were identified for inclusion, of which 580 (15%) were treated with induction chemotherapy. Prior to adjustment, patients treated with induction chemotherapy were younger, had a higher comorbidity burden and were more likely to have private insurance (all P  < 0.001). Following matching, patients receiving induction chemotherapy were more likely to subsequently undergo an open procedure (87.3 vs 77.8%, P  = 0.005). These patients were more likely to obtain R0 resection (93.1% vs 90.0%, P  = 0.04) and were thereby less likely to have positive margins at the time of resection (6.9% vs 10.0%, P  = 0.03). Patients who received induction therapy had higher rates of 90-day mortality (6.6% vs 3.4%) but there was no difference in long-term survival between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite yielding increased rates of R0 resection, induction chemotherapy for cT3N0M0 NSCLC is not associated with improved survival and should not be considered routinely. Further studies are warranted to elucidate cohorts that may benefit from induction therapy.

Evaluating the fate of patients who undergo resections of very large, node-negative lung cancers using the National Cancer DataBase

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether there are differences in survival associated with different treatment modalities among patients with lymph node-negative, very large non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs).

METHODS

The National Cancer DataBase was used to identify patients diagnosed with NSCLCs >7 cm (T3) without lymph node involvement (N0) or metastatic disease (M0) from 1999 to 2006. Surgical therapy included surgery alone, neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy or chemotherapy, surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiation therapy or chemotherapy and surgery followed by postoperative radiation therapy (PORT). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons were made using log-rank tests and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Of the 2296 patients identified with cT3N0M0 disease, 45% underwent surgical therapy. The 5-year OS rate was 38%. Across the different treatment regimens, there was a significant difference in 5-year OS. Neither neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy or chemotherapy nor adjuvant chemoradiation therapy was associated with improved 5-year OS. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS relative to surgery alone [hazard ratio (HR) 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-0.91, P = 0.008]. PORT alone was associated with a detrimental effect on 5-year OS relative to surgery alone [HR 2.04; 95% CI 1.38-3.03, P < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Large T3N0 NSCLCs appear to be optimally treated with surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.

Is sleeve lobectomy comparable in terms of short- and long-term results with pneumonectomy after induction therapy? A multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND

Sleeve lobectomy (SL) is considered a valid therapeutic option in untreated, centrally located non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) even in patients "fit" for pneumonectomy (PN). Nevertheless, SL feasibility and long-term results after induction therapy (IT) have been only rarely investigated. We herein report the results of a multicenter retrospective study on NSCLC patients who underwent PN or SL after IT for locally advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

From January 1992 to January 2012, 119 consecutive patients (94 males, 25 females) underwent in three tertiary referral centers either SL (bronchial, arterial, or both) or PN for locally advanced NSCLC after IT (chemotherapy alone or combined chemoradiotherapy). The indication for SL was based on technical feasibility. Clinical and pathologic variables were retrospectively reviewed, and treatment results were assessed and compared in both groups. Survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test as well the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Sleeve lobectomy was performed in 51 patients and PN, in 68 patients. Thirty-day mortality and morbidity rates were 3.9% and 9.8% for SL and 2.9% and 22.1% for PN, respectively. Five-year survival rates were 53.8% after SL and 43.1% after PN, respectively (p = 0.28). Overall recurrence rate was 42.8% after SL and 47.0% after PN (p = 0.34); relapse was locoregional in 22.4% of SL cases and 12.1% after PN, respectively (p = 0.011). The Cox analysis suggested pN status and right side as independent risk factors for death in the SL group (hazard ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.12 to 3.44; p = 0.018; and hazard ratio, 2.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 8.66; p = 0.047, respectively). As well, pN status and right side were a strong predictor of relapse (hazard ratio, 2.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.17 to 4.64; p = 0.016; and hazard ratio, 2.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 8.66; p = 0.046, respectively) in SL patients.

CONCLUSIONS

For locally advanced NSCLC, SL represents a safe and effective surgical option when compared with PN even after IT, with substantially comparable early and long-term results. Nevertheless, further investigations on a large cohort of patients are needed.

Outcomes after treatment of 17,378 patients with locally advanced (T3N0-2) non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Treatment patterns and outcomes in a population-based database were examined to identify patients likely to benefit from surgical resection of locally advanced (T3N0-2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Factors predicting the use of surgery for patients with T3N0-2M0 NSCLC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 1988 to 2010 were assessed using a multivariable logistic regression model. Survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier approach and Cox proportional hazard models. Propensity matching was used to compare outcomes after surgery and outcomes in patients who refused surgery and underwent radiation therapy (RT).

RESULTS

Of 17 378 patients identified for study inclusion [8597 (50%) T3N0, 2304 (13%) T3N1 and 6477 (37%) T3N2], surgery was used in 7120 (41%). Only female sex and being married predicted the use of surgery, while older age, black race and N2 nodal disease predicted non-surgical management. Surgical patients overall had better long-term survival than non-surgical patients [odds ratio (OR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41-0.45, P < 0.001]. After propensity adjustment, patients who refused surgery and instead were treated with RT had significantly worse long-term survival than matched surgery patients (OR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.48-0.89, P = 0.0074). Sublobar resection and pneumonectomy predicted worse survival in patients who had surgery. Nodal disease also predicted worse survival after surgery, but surgery maintained an association with better overall survival compared with non-operative therapy among patients with both N1 (OR 0.53, P < 0.001) and N2 disease (OR 0.50, P < 0.001) in separate analyses stratified by nodal status. Older age also predicted worse survival after surgery, but patients older than 75 who were treated with surgery had significantly better long-term survival than non-operative patients (OR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.45-0.53, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery is used in a minority of patients with locally advanced NSCLC, but is associated with better survival than non-surgical treatment, even for patients older than 75 and patients with nodal disease. Given the very poor outcomes observed with non-operative management, surgical resection should be carefully considered in all patients with locally advanced NSCLC and should not necessarily be denied because of patient age or nodal disease.

Outcome of surgical resection as a first line therapy in T3 non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The T3 category of the 7th Edition of the TNM classification of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has added two factors that do not appear in the 6th Edition, large tumor size (>7 cm) and pulmonary metastasis of the same lobe. These factors are considered to have different biological and clinical features. In the present study we assessed the outcome of surgical resection as a first line therapy for T3 NSCLC.

METHODS

A total of 145 patients who were diagnosed according to the TNM 7th Edition with pathologic T3 NSCLC received surgical resection in our institution as a first line treatment. The outcomes of their treatment were analyzed.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate was 46.9 %. On the basis of the 6th TNM Edition, the 5-year survival rate was 63.1 % for patients diagnosed with T2 disease (large tumor size), 44.3 % for patients diagnosed with T3 disease, and 33.1 % for patients diagnosed with T4 disease (pulmonary metastasis of the same lobe). There were no significant correlations between these categories and overall survival (OS). Nevertheless, 6th Edition T factors were found to be significantly correlated with lymph node status (p < 0.01). The univariate analyses showed that age, lymph node metastasis, and curative resection had significant effects on OS. In addition, the multivariate analysis identified age and N factor as independent prognostic factors in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Indications for surgical resection as a first line therapy in T3 NSCLC should be based on N factors and patient age. Lymph node metastasis, especially N2 disease, was increasingly frequent in patients with 6th Edition T classifications.

Density of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3+ T cells as a response marker for induction chemoradiotherapy and a potential prognostic factor in patients treated with trimodality therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To examine the relationship between the density of tumor-infiltrating T cell subpopulations and the pathological response to induction chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced NSCLC, and to assess the impact of T cell density on patient prognosis.

METHODS

A total of 64 patients with c-stages IIA-IIIB NSCLC who underwent induction CRT followed by R0 surgery were enrolled. Tumor-infiltrating T cells expressing either FOXP3 or CD8 were detected by immunohistochemical staining.

RESULTS

Mean numbers of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3+ T cells were 39.9 for patients with minor pathological responses (n = 9), 18.4 for those with major pathological responses (n = 25), and 12.9 for those with complete pathological responses (n = 30; P &lt;0.001). The number of CD8+ T cells was not associated with pathological responses. Patients with lower FOXP3+ T cell densities showed better survival, although the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that the density of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3+ T cells indicated the degree of response for induction CRT and prognosis in patients treated with trimodality therapy for locally advanced NSCLC, suggesting that FOXP3+ T cells may be target for adjunct immunotherapy.

Factors predicting the surgical outcome in patients with T3/4 lung cancer

PURPOSE

Locally advanced lung cancer, such as T3/4 tumors, is considered to have a significantly worse prognosis than lower-stage disease, and the treatment of these tumors is difficult. Nevertheless, the information regarding the optimal treatment of T3/4 lung cancers after an operation is still limited. This study evaluated the prognostic factors for the postoperative outcome in patients with T3/4 lung cancers.

METHODS

The results of the surgical treatments were retrospectively analyzed for 212 patients with pathological T3 and 197 patients with T4 disease.

RESULTS

The global 5-year survival rate was 30.7% in this series. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate in patients with T3 disease was 36.1%, while that in patients with T4 disease was 24.8%. The prognosis in females, those with N0-1 disease and those who underwent a complete resection was better than that of the other patients in both the T3 and T4 subgroups. The examination of the OS according to a time series showed that the rate was higher in more recent versus less recent years. From the standpoint of pulmonary metastasis (PM), the 5-year OS rates in T4 patients with PM and without PM were 38.6 and 17.4%, respectively. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that female gender, T3 disease, N0-1 disease and postoperative treatment were significant favorable prognostic predictors for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that surgical resection remains an important treatment option, especially in cases having the aforementioned factors.