Completeness of revascularization and survival among octogenarians with triple-vessel disease

Outcomes of quantitative flow ratio-based functional incomplete revascularization after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery

OBJECTIVE

Quantitative flow ratio is a novel functional assessment tool of coronary diseases. Whether quantitative flow ratio could improve the outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting is undetermined. This study aimed to investigate the association between the quantitative flow ratio based functional incomplete revascularization and the outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

METHODS

The quantitative flow ratio assessment was retrospectively performed in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in the PATENCY trial. The anatomic complete revascularization denoted revascularizing each territory with stenosis greater than 50% evaluated by angiography. The functional complete revascularization was defined as grafting all vessels with a quantitative flow ratio 0.80 or less. The primary end point was the 12-month composite major adverse cardiac or cerebral vascular events.

RESULTS

A total of 2024 patients with available quantitative flow ratio values were included. Functional complete revascularization was achieved in 1846 patients (91.2%), and 1600 received anatomic complete revascularization (79.1%). Both the functional incomplete revascularization and anatomic incomplete revascularization groups were associated with significantly increased risks of 12-month major adverse cardiac or cerebral vascular events (functional: hazard ratio, 2.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.56 to 5.43; P = .001; anatomic: hazard ratio, 2.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.54 to 5.16; P = .001). Additionally, for the subgroup of patients (n = 246) receiving anatomic incomplete revascularization but judged as functional complete revascularization by quantitative flow ratio, the risk of the 12-month major adverse cardiac or cerebral vascular events was not significantly increased (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-2.60; P = .35).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the functional incomplete revascularization and anatomic incomplete revascularization were associated with increased risks of 12-month major adverse cardiac or cerebral vascular events after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. The quantitative flow ratio can serve as a supplementary tool for the decision-making of surgical revascularization.

Current indications and surgical strategies for myocardial revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) accounts for more than 60% of congestive heart failure cases and is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Myocardial revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% aims to improve survival and quality of life and reduce complications associated with heart failure and coronary artery disease. The majority of randomized clinical trials have consistently excluded those patients, resulting in evidence primarily derived from observational studies.

MAIN BODY

We performed a scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley methodology in five stages: 1) formulating the research question; 2) locating relevant studies; 3) choosing studies; 4) organizing and extracting data; and 5) compiling, summarizing, and presenting the findings. This literature review covers primary studies and systematic reviews focusing on surgical revascularization strategies in adult patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 35% or lower. Through an extensive search of Medline and the Cochrane Library, a systematic review was conducted to address three questions regarding myocardial revascularization in these patients. These questions outline the current knowledge on this topic, current surgical strategies (off-pump vs. on-pump), and graft options (including hybrid techniques) utilized for revascularization. Three independent reviewers (MAE, DP, and AM) applied the inclusion criteria to all the included studies, obtaining the full texts of the most relevant studies. The reviewers subsequently assessed these articles to make the final decision on their inclusion in the review. Out of the initial 385 references, 156 were chosen for a detailed review. After examining the full articles were examined, 134 were found suitable for scoping review.

CONCLUSION

The literature notes the scarcity of surgical revascularization in LVD patients in randomized studies, with observational data supporting coronary revascularization's benefits. ONCABG is recommended for multivessel disease in LVD with LVEF < 35%, while OPCAB is proposed for older, high-risk patients. Strategies like internal thoracic artery skeletonization harvesting and postoperative glycemic control mitigate risks with BITA in uncontrolled diabetes. Total arterial revascularization maximizes long-term survival, and hybrid revascularization offers advantages like shorter hospital stays and reduced costs for significant LAD lesions.

What does complete revascularization mean in 2021? - Definitions, implications, and biases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Coronary revascularization is known to be an excellent treatment for coronary artery disease. However, whether incomplete myocardial revascularization compromises long-term outcomes, as compared to complete revascularization (CR), remains contentious. Herein, we review the concept of and evidence on CR/incomplete revascularization (ICR) and discuss future perspectives.

RECENT FINDINGS

When possible, achieving CR in coronary artery bypass grafting is desirable; nonetheless, ICR is also a reasonable option to balance the therapeutic benefits against the risks.

SUMMARY

Although angiography-based assessment currently remains the standard of care, fractional flow reserve guidance may reduce the number of lesions requiring revascularization, which may be helpful for an appropriate surgical revascularization strategy. In particular, utilizing this approach may refine hybrid revascularization procedures, especially among high-risk patients.

Complete surgical revascularization: Different definitions, same impact?

BACKGROUND

There are several different definitions of complete revascularization on coronary surgery across the literature. Despite the importance of this definition, there is no agreement on which one has the most impact. The aim of this study was to evaluate which definition of complete surgical revascularization correlates with early and late outcomes.

METHODS

All consecutive patients submitted to isolated CABG from 2012 to 2016 with previous myocardial scintigraphy were evaluated.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

emergent procedures and previous cardiac surgery procedures. The population of 162 patients, follow-up complete in 100% patients; median 5.5; IQR: 4.4-6.9 years. Each and all of the 162 patients were classified as complying or not with the four different definitions: numerical, functional, anatomical conditional, and anatomical unconditional. Perioperative outcome: MACCE; long-term outcomes: survival and repeat revascularization. Univariable and multivariable analyses were developed to detect predictors of outcomes.

RESULTS

Complete functional revascularization was a predictor of increased survival (HR: 0.47; CI 95: 0.226-0.969; p = .041). No other definitions showed effect on follow-up mortality. Age and cardiac dysfunction increased long-term mortality. The definition of complete revascularization did not have an impact on MACCE or the need for revascularization CONCLUSIONS: A uniformly accepted definition of complete coronary revascularization is lacking. This study raises awareness about the importance of viability guidance for CABG.

Current Status of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass

PURPOSE

Off-pump coronary arterial bypass grafting (OPCAB) has become a common practice for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in Japan, with approximately 65% CABG procedures currently being performed using OPCAB. However, it is unclear whether OPCAB is superior in terms of associated mortality, incidence of complications, graft patency rate, and long-term outcomes compared with conventional CABG (CCABG).

METHODS

Literature consideration was performed, mainly based on observational studies involving large samples and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

RESULTS

Many RCTs indicated that the acute-phase and long-term mortality rates were comparable between CCABG and OPCAB or that OPCAB was inferior to CCABG. In contrast, many observational studies indicated that OPCAB was superior to CCABG.

CONCLUSION

CABG is a delicate procedure, the outcomes of which vary in accordance with the patient's condition as well as the level of expertise of the associated institution and surgeon. In the future, we hope that reports will emerge with excellent results, including long-term results, from Japanese institutions experienced in performing OPCAB.

The effect of completeness of revascularization during CABG with single versus multiple arterial grafts

INTRODUCTION

Incomplete coronary revascularization is associated with suboptimal outcomes. We investigated the long-term effects of Incomplete, Complete, and Supra-complete revascularization and whether these effects differed in the setting of single-arterial and multi-arterial coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).

METHODS

We analyzed 15-year mortality in 7157 CABG patients (64.1 ± 10.5 years; 30% women). All patients received a left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending coronary artery graft with additional venous grafts only (single-arterial) or with at least one additional arterial graft (multi-arterial) and were grouped based on a completeness of revascularization index (CRI = number of grafts minus the number of diseased principal coronary arteries): Incomplete (CRI ≤ -1 [N = 320;4.5%]); Complete (CRI = 0 [N = 2882;40.3%]; reference group); and two Supra-complete categories (CRI = +1[N = 3050; 42.6%]; CRI ≥ + 2 [N = 905; 12.6%]). Risk-adjusted mortality hazard ratios (AHR) were calculated using comprehensive propensity score adjustment by Cox regression.

RESULTS

Incomplete revascularization was rare (4.5%) but associated with increased mortality in all patients (AHR [95% confidence interval] = 1.53 [1.29-1.80]), those undergoing single-arterial CABG (AHR = 1.27 [1.04-1.54]) and multi-arterial CABG (AHR = 2.18 [1.60-2.99]), as well as in patients with 3-Vessel (AHR = 1.37 [1.16-1.62]) and, to a lesser degree, with 2-Vessel (AHR = 1.67 [0.53-5.23]) coronary disease. Supra-complete revascularization was generally associated with incrementally decreased mortality in all patients (AHR [CRI = +1] = 0.94 [0.87-1.03]); AHR [CRI ≥ +2] = 0.74 [0.64-0.85]), and was driven by a significantly decreased mortality risk in single-arterial CABG (AHR [CRI = +1] = 0.90 [0.81-0.99]; AHR [CRI ≥ +2] = 0.64 [0.53-0.78]); and 3-Vessel disease patients (AHR [CRI = +1] = 0.94 [0.86-1.04]; and AHR [CRI ≥ +2] = 0.75 [0.63-0.88]) with no impact in multi-arterial CABG (AHR [CRI = +1] = 1.07 [0.91-1.26]; AHR [CRI ≥ +2] = 0.93 [0.73-1.17]).

CONCLUSIONS

Incomplete revascularization is associated with decreased late survival, irrespective of grafting strategy. Alternatively, supra-complete revascularization is associated with improved survival in patients with 3-Vessel CAD, and in single-arterial but not multi-arterial CABG.

Incomplete revascularization and long-term survival after coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

We sought to investigate the impact of incomplete revascularization (IR) on long-term survival after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The possible interaction between IR and off-pump surgery was also explored.

METHODS

A total of 13,701 patients with multivessel disease undergoing CABG were included in the analysis. All patients received left internal thoracic artery (LITA) to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) territory. IR was defined as at least one diseased arterial territory (right coronary artery [RCA] and/or circumflex [CX] artery) incompletely revascularized.

RESULTS

Overall, 3107 (22.7%) patients received IR. After propensity score matching, IR did not increase all-cause death in the overall group (HR 1.09; 95%CI 0.96-1.22; P=0.17). However, when both RCA and CX artery were incompletely revascularized, late survival was significantly lower (HR 2.15; 95%CI 1.57-2.93). IR was associated with a higher risk of death after off-pump (HR 1.26; 95%CI 1.05-1.49) regardless the extent of IR. After on-pump, IR significantly affected survival only when both RCA and CX artery only were incompletely revascularized (HR 2.32; 95%CI 1.27-4.22).

CONCLUSIONS

The present analysis shows that in patients with LITA-LAD graft the impact of IR on survival is marginal when only one coronary territory is left ungrafted. When both the RCA and CX territory remain unrevascularized the survival rate is significantly reduced. IR after off-pump CABG is associated with significantly lower survival and affects long-term outcome even when only one coronary territory is not revascularized.

Complete revascularization reduces adverse outcomes in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease

AIM

To investigate the influence of complete and incomplete revascularization (ICR) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass or percutaneous coronary intervention.

METHODS

We searched PubMed using the keywords “complete revascularization”, “incomplete revascularization”, “coronary artery bypass”, and “percutaneous coronary intervention”. We selected randomized controlled studies (RCT) and observational studies only for review. The main outcomes of interest were mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) and repeat revascularization. We identified further studies by hand searching relevant publications and included those that met with the inclusion criteria in our final analysis and performed a systematic review.

RESULTS

Ten studies were identified, including 13327 patients of whom, 8053 received complete revascularization and 5274 received ICR. Relative to ICR, CR was associated with lower mortality (RR: 0.755, 95%CI: 0.66 to 0.864, P = 0.765, I² = 0.0%), lower rates of MI (RR: 0.759, 95%CI: 0.615 to 0.937, P = 0.091, I² = 45.1%), lower rates of MACCE (RR: 0.731, 95%CI: 0.668 to 0.8, P = 0.453, I² = 0.0%) and reduced rates of repeat coronary revascularization (RR: 0.691, 95%CI: 0.541 to 0.883, P = 0.0, I² = 88.3%).

CONCLUSION

CR is associated with lower rates of adverse outcomes. CR can be used as a standard in the choice of any particular revascularization strategy.

Quantification of Treatment Effect Modification on Both an Additive and Multiplicative Scale

Background

In both observational and randomized studies, associations with overall survival are by and large assessed on a multiplicative scale using the Cox model. However, clinicians and clinical researchers have an ardent interest in assessing absolute benefit associated with treatments. In older patients, some studies have reported lower relative treatment effect, which might translate into similar or even greater absolute treatment effect given their high baseline hazard for clinical events.

Methods

The effect of treatment and the effect modification of treatment were respectively assessed using a multiplicative and an additive hazard model in an analysis adjusted for propensity score in the context of coronary surgery.

Results

The multiplicative model yielded a lower relative hazard reduction with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in older patients (Hazard ratio for interaction/year = 1.03, 95%CI: 1.00 to 1.06, p = 0.05) whereas the additive model reported a similar absolute hazard reduction with increasing age (Delta for interaction/year = 0.10, 95%CI: -0.27 to 0.46, p = 0.61). The number needed to treat derived from the propensity score-adjusted multiplicative model was remarkably similar at the end of the follow-up in patients aged < = 60 and in patients >70.

Conclusions

The present example demonstrates that a lower treatment effect in older patients on a relative scale can conversely translate into a similar treatment effect on an additive scale due to large baseline hazard differences. Importantly, absolute risk reduction, either crude or adjusted, can be calculated from multiplicative survival models. We advocate for a wider use of the absolute scale, especially using additive hazard models, to assess treatment effect and treatment effect modification.

Off-pump surgery: is it beneficial in patients with left ventricular dysfunction?

On-pump coronary artery bypass surgery remains the gold standard for complex multivessel disease. Off-pump revascularization has matured as a technique over the last twenty years, but is used in less than 20% of cases worldwide. The poor uptake has been attributed to the significant learning curve in learning the procedure and conflicting evidence reports, together with concerns over mortality related conversion, graft patency and completeness of revascularization. Given these concerns, patient selection continues to be paramount and the subgroups that benefit most are hotly debated. Patients with left ventricular dysfunction constitute a high-risk subgroup which is enlarging in size. There is some evidence to suggest that avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass in this group may lead to superior results in terms of early mortality, non-cardiac complications and organ dysfunction. Even with the theoretical risk of incomplete revascularization, the technique may be an attractive option in managing high-risk patients.

Arterial grafts balance survival between incomplete and complete revascularization: a series of 1000 consecutive coronary artery bypass graft patients with 98% arterial grafts

OBJECTIVE

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with incomplete revascularization (ICR) is thought to decrease survival. We studied the survival of patients with ICR undergoing total arterial grafting.

METHODS

In a consecutive series of all-comer 1000 patients with isolated CABG, operative and midterm survival were assessed for patients undergoing complete versus ICR, with odds ratios and hazard ratios, adjusted for European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation category, CABG urgency, age, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

In this series of 1000 patients with 98% arterial grafts (2922 arterial, 59 vein grafts), 73% of patients with multivessel disease received bilateral internal mammary artery grafts. ICR occurred in 140 patients (14%). Operative mortality was 3.8% overall, 8.6% for patients with ICR, and 3.2% for patients with complete revascularization (P = .008). For operative mortality using multivariable logistic regression, after controlling for European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation category (P < .001) and CABG urgency (P = .03), there was no evidence of a statistically significant increased risk of death due to ICR (odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-3.77). For midterm follow-up (median, 54 months [interquartile range, 27-85 months]), after controlling for European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation category (P < .001) and comorbidities (P = .017) there was a significant interaction between age ≥ 80 years and ICR (P = .017) in predicting mortality. The adjusted hazard ratio associated with ICR for patients older than age 80 years was 5.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.8-18.0) versus 1.2 (95% confidence interval, 0.7-2.1) for younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to suggest that ICR in patients with mostly arterial grafts is not associated with decreased survival perioperatively and at midterm in patients younger than age 80 years. Arterial grafting, because of longevity, may balance survival between complete revascularization and ICR.

Outcomes after complete versus incomplete revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 89,883 patients enrolled in randomized clinical trials and observational studies

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing complete revascularization (CR) versus incomplete revascularization (IR) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting data regarding the benefits of CR in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

METHODS

We identified observational studies and subgroup analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) published in PubMed from 1970 through September 2012 using the following keywords: "percutaneous coronary intervention" (PCI); "coronary artery bypass graft" (CABG); "complete revascularization"; and "incomplete revascularization." Main outcome measures were total mortality, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization procedures.

RESULTS

We identified 35 studies including 89,883 patients, of whom 45,417 (50.5%) received CR and 44,466 (49.5%) received IR. IR was more common after PCI than after CABG (56% vs. 25%; p < 0.001). Relative to IR, CR was associated with lower long-term mortality (risk ratio [RR]: 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65 to 0.77; p < 0.001), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.90; p = 0.001), and repeat coronary revascularization (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.83; p < 0.001). The mortality benefit associated with CR was consistent across studies irrespective of revascularization modality (CABG: RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.80; p < 0.001; and PCI: RR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.81; p < 0.001) and definition of CR (anatomic definition: RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.67 to 0.79; p < 0.001; and nonanatomic definition: RR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.89; p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

CR is achieved more commonly with CABG than with PCI. Among patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, CR may be the optimal revascularization strategy.

Update on ischemic heart disease and critical care cardiology

This article summarizes the main developments reported during the year 2012 concerning ischemic heart disease, together with the most relevant innovations in the management of acute cardiac patients.