1
|
Mehdiani A, Sorokin VA, Sule J, Smiris K, Stadnik D, Lichtenberg A, Blehm A. Mid-term single-center outcomes of BioIntegral compared to Freestyle aortic conduit implantation. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2019; 61:512-519. [PMID: 31815376 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.19.11098-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Full aortic root replacement with biological conduit has limited options. This non-randomized cohort study aims to compare mid-term clinical and hemodynamic results of the BioIntegral (BI) composite biological versus the stentless Freestyle (FS) conduits in patients undergoing full aortic root replacement. METHODS From February 2013 to July 2017, 265 patients underwent aortic root replacement at a single institution (202 BI, 65 FS). Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative parameters, complications including stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), endocarditis and reoperation were studied. Hemodynamic performance of both conduits was analyzed by echocardiography. Target endpoints were 30-day mortality, two-year survival, two-year freedom from major adverse valve-related and cardiovascular events. RESULTS Wider BI conduits were used (BI 27±2 vs. FS 25±2 mm, P<0.0001). The BI group had shorter cardiopulmonary bypass (BI 165±67 vs. FS 200±78 min, P<0.0001) and cross-clamp (BI 102±36 vs. FS 122±40 min, P=0.001) times. Thirty-day mortality was similar in both groups. There were fewer conduit-related reoperations in the BI group (BI 0% vs. FS 3%, P=0.012) but higher postoperative atrial fibrillation (BI 31% vs. FS 17%, P=0.025). No significant differences were observed for stroke (BI 5% vs. FS 10%, P=0.947), MI (BI 3% vs. FS 4%, P=0.583), or infective endocarditis (BI 0% vs. FS 2%, P=0.077). No significant hemodynamic differences were evident on follow-up echocardiography while an improved overall survival trend was seen in the BI group (P=0.062). CONCLUSIONS FS and BI provide comparable clinical mid-term results and hemodynamic parameters. Simplified implantation technique providing shorter cardiopulmonary bypass and operation times are advantageous for BI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Mehdiani
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Vitaly A Sorokin
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore - .,Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Jai Sule
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Konstantinos Smiris
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Dmytro Stadnik
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Artur Lichtenberg
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Alexander Blehm
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hegazy YY, Rayan A, Bauer S, Keshk N, Bauer K, Ennker I, Ennker J. Current indications for stentless aortic bioprostheses. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2017; 26:19-27. [PMID: 28699388 DOI: 10.1177/0218492317721411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The best aortic prostheses have been debated for decades. The introduction of stentless aortic bioprostheses was aimed at improving hemodynamics and potentially the durability of aortic bioprostheses. Despite the good short- and long-term outcomes after implantation of stentless aortic bioprostheses, their use remains limited owing to the technically demanding implantation techniques. Nevertheless, stentless aortic bioprostheses might be of special benefit in certain indications, where they could be a valuable addition to the surgical armamentarium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasser Y Hegazy
- 1 Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Institute Lahr/Baden, Lahr, Germany.,2 Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Amr Rayan
- 1 Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Institute Lahr/Baden, Lahr, Germany.,2 Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Stefan Bauer
- 1 Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Institute Lahr/Baden, Lahr, Germany
| | - Noha Keshk
- 1 Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Institute Lahr/Baden, Lahr, Germany
| | - Kerstin Bauer
- 1 Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Institute Lahr/Baden, Lahr, Germany
| | - Ina Ennker
- 3 Department of Plastic-, Aesthetic-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jürgen Ennker
- 1 Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Institute Lahr/Baden, Lahr, Germany.,4 Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, University of Witten Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Regeer MV, Versteegh MIM, Ajmone Marsan N, Schalij MJ, Klautz RJM, Bax JJ, Delgado V. Left ventricular reverse remodeling after aortic valve surgery for acute versus chronic aortic regurgitation. Echocardiography 2016; 33:1458-1464. [PMID: 27343211 DOI: 10.1111/echo.13295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Extent of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling after aortic valve repair or replacement (AVR) may differ between patients operated for acute aortic regurgitation (AR) and chronic AR. The aim of this study was to compare changes in LV volumes and function between patients with acute and chronic AR who underwent AVR. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 98 patients (54±15 years, 61% men) with acute (n=21) or chronic AR (n=77) were included in the present retrospective evaluation. LV volumes, LV ejection fraction, and global longitudinal strain indexed for LV end-diastolic volume (GLSi) were assessed preoperatively and after a median follow-up of 28 months (interquartile range: 17-66 months). Patients with acute AR tended to have smaller preoperative LV end-diastolic volume compared with chronic AR (156±15 vs 183±6 mL; P=.070). Both in patients with acute and chronic AR, significant LV reverse remodeling with sustained reduction in LV volumes occurred during follow-up with a significant smaller LV end-diastolic volume in acute AR compared with chronic AR (106±8 vs 128±5 mL; P=.032). Preoperative and postoperative LV ejection fractions were not significantly different between groups. In contrast, GLSi was better in patients with acute AR compared with chronic AR before AVR (-1.34±0.20 vs -0.96±0.07%/10 mL; P=.042) and during follow-up (-1.65±0.16 vs -1.29±0.07%/10 mL; P=.017). CONCLUSIONS After AVR, LV reverse remodeling occurs both in patients with acute and chronic AR. However, LV end-diastolic volume was more reduced and GLSi was more preserved during follow-up in acute AR than in chronic AR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madelien V Regeer
- Heart Lung Center Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michel I M Versteegh
- Heart Lung Center Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nina Ajmone Marsan
- Heart Lung Center Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Martin J Schalij
- Heart Lung Center Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J M Klautz
- Heart Lung Center Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen J Bax
- Heart Lung Center Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Victoria Delgado
- Heart Lung Center Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McCarthy FH, Bavaria JE, McDermott KM, Moeller P, Spragan D, Hoedt A, Dibble T, Savino D, Williams ML, Vallabhajosyula P, Szeto WY, Desai ND. At the Root of the Repair Debate: Outcomes After Elective Aortic Root Replacements for Aortic Insufficiency With Aneurysm. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102:1199-205. [PMID: 27261085 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2016] [Revised: 02/01/2016] [Accepted: 03/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is growing interest in aortic valve-sparing and valve repair operations, but the ideal operation and timing of intervention in these generally younger patients undergoing operations for aortic insufficiency (AI) and dilated ascending aorta remains controversial. METHODS Root replacements at a single institution from 2002 to 2014 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were age younger than 70 and presence of moderate or greater aortic insufficiency (AI), with or without aortic aneurysm. Of 1,425 root replacements, 220 patients were considered in the final analysis. RESULTS Moderate AI was present in 87 patients and severe AI in 133 patients. The 30-day mortality was 0% in moderate AI patients and 2% (n = 3) in severe AI patients (p = 0.3). Freedom from reoperation was 95% at 10 years. Severe preoperative AI was associated with worse long-term survival compared with moderate AI (hazard ratio, 2.6; p = 0.04). Patients undergoing root replacement with moderate AI had similar survival compared with the age- and gender-matched United States population (log-rank p = 0.93), whereas patients with severe AI had significantly worse survival (log-rank p = 0.02). Other multivariable predictors of decreased long-term survival were age (hazard ratio, 1.1; p = 0.01) and preoperative renal failure (hazard ratio, 6.9; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Elective root replacement operations in patients younger than 70 are associated with low rates of mortality and reoperation, which should be considered the benchmark operation for aortic valve-sparing or repair operations in similar patients. Worse survival was associated with severe AI and older age, suggesting earlier intervention may be an appropriate therapeutic strategy in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fenton H McCarthy
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joseph E Bavaria
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Katherine M McDermott
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Patrick Moeller
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Danielle Spragan
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ashley Hoedt
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Taylor Dibble
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Danielle Savino
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew L Williams
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Prashanth Vallabhajosyula
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Wilson Y Szeto
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nimesh D Desai
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sherrah AG, Jeremy RW, Puranik R, Bannon PG, Hendel PN, Bayfield MS, Wilson MK, Brady PW, Marshman D, Mathur MN, Brereton RJ, Edwards JR, Stuklis RG, Worthington M, Vallely MP. Long Term Outcomes Following Freestyle Stentless Aortic Bioprosthesis Implantation: An Australian Experience. Heart Lung Circ 2015; 25:82-8. [PMID: 26146198 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2015] [Revised: 04/30/2015] [Accepted: 05/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis (FSB) has been demonstrated to be a durable prosthesis in the aortic position. We present data following Freestyle implantation for up to 10 years post-operatively and compare this with previously published results. METHODS A retrospective cohort analysis of 237 patients following FSB implantation occurred at five Australian hospitals. Follow-up data included clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. RESULTS The cohort was 81.4% male with age 63.2±13.0 years and was followed for a mean of 2.4±2.3 years (range 0-10.9 years, total 569 patient-years). The FSB was implanted as a full aortic root replacement in 87.8% patients. The 30-day all cause mortality was 4.2% (2.0% for elective surgery). Cumulative survival at one, five and 10 years was 91.7±1.9%, 82.8±3.8% and 56.5±10.5%, respectively. Freedom from re-intervention at one, five and 10 years was 99.5±0.5%, 91.6±3.7% and 72.3±10.5%, respectively. At latest echocardiographic review (mean 2.3±2.1 years post-operatively), 92.6% had trivial or no aortic regurgitation. Predictors of post-operative mortality included active endocarditis, acute aortic dissection and peripheral vascular disease. CONCLUSIONS We report acceptable short and long term outcomes following FSB implantation in a cohort of comparatively younger patients with thoracic aortic disease. The durability of this bioprosthesis in the younger population remains to be confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew G Sherrah
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The Baird Institute for Applied Heart and Lung Surgical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richmond W Jeremy
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The Baird Institute for Applied Heart and Lung Surgical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rajesh Puranik
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul G Bannon
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The Baird Institute for Applied Heart and Lung Surgical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - P Nicholas Hendel
- The Baird Institute for Applied Heart and Lung Surgical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Matthew S Bayfield
- The Baird Institute for Applied Heart and Lung Surgical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael K Wilson
- The Baird Institute for Applied Heart and Lung Surgical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Australian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter W Brady
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David Marshman
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Manu N Mathur
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - R John Brereton
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - James R Edwards
- Darcy Sutherland Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Robert G Stuklis
- Darcy Sutherland Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Michael Worthington
- Darcy Sutherland Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Michael P Vallely
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The Baird Institute for Applied Heart and Lung Surgical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Australian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Urbanski PP, Dinstak W, Rents W, Heinz N, Diegeler A. Long-term results after aortic root replacement using self-assembled valve composite grafts in patients with small aortic annulus. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013; 18:159-63. [PMID: 24179177 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivt447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The study was aimed to evaluate operative and long-term results after complete root replacement using self-assembled valve composite grafts in patients with a small aortic annulus. METHODS Among 547 consecutive patients who received the Bentall procedure between 2000 and 2012, a total of 29 patients (61 ± 10; range 42-79 years) had an annulus of ≤20 mm (mean 19.0 ± 0.9). Patients with a native aortic valve (22) suffered from stenosis, insufficiency or mixed defect in 10, 10 and 2 cases, respectively. Among the remaining 7 patients with an artificial aortic valve, there were 3 symptomatic prosthesis-patient mismatches, 3 valve prosthesis deteriorations (1 structural and 2 none-structural) and 1 paravalvular leak. Indication for aortic root replacement was true or false aneurysm, porcelain aorta and intraoperative aortic wall injury in 17, 6 and 6 patients, respectively. RESULTS The composite graft for complete aortic root replacement was assembled using a mechanical (26) or biological (3) valve prosthesis placed inside a vascular graft with a median size of 24 (range 22-26) mm. The margin of the tube beneath the valve was anastomosed to the aortic annulus, and coronary ostia were implanted in the usual manner. The mean transvalvular gradient at discharge was 10.8 ± 3.9 mmHg and remained virtually unchanged at the follow-up completed for all patients. Early mortality was 0. During the mean follow-up of 95.8 ± 43.7 months, 2 patients died (54 and 146 months after surgery) due to pulmonary embolism and myocardial infarction, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In patients with a small aortic annulus who need complete aortic root replacement, an oversizing of the valve can be easily achieved using modified, self-assembled composite grafts. Offering excellent haemodynamic characteristics, these grafts lead to prevention of prosthesis-patient mismatch and result in very good and durable functional and clinical results.
Collapse
|