The use of "aortic plication" for coronary malperfusions in the arterial switch operation

Significance of Intraoperative Revision During Arterial Switch Operation in the Current Era

BACKGROUND

Arterial switch operation (ASO) is a relatively safe operation nowadays. We hypothesize that intraoperative revision for coronary malperfusion still plays an important role during ASO in the current era.

METHODS

From January 2005 to May 2016, 244 patients underwent ASO. Medical records were reviewed and the details of intraoperative revision were described. Morbidity and mortality were compared in patients with/without intraoperative revision. Factors related to the need for intraoperative revision were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventeen (7%) patients needed intraoperative revision. As a technique for intraoperative revision, revision of a coronary button was performed in eight patients and revision of the main pulmonary artery anastomosis to relieve compression on the coronary artery was performed in five patients. Factors related to intraoperative revision were body weight at surgery ( P = .051), eccentric position of the coronary ostium ( P = .01), single coronary artery system ( P = .03), and intramural coronary artery ( P = .003). The commonest coronary artery origin and branching pattern was not protective against the need for intraoperative revision ( P = .43). Discharge mortality was 2% overall: 2 of 17 with intraoperative revision versus 3 of 238 without it ( P = .04). Patients who underwent intraoperative revision had longer postoperative hospitalization ( P = .003).

CONCLUSION

The need for intraoperative revision was related to eccentric coronary ostium, single coronary artery, and intramural coronary artery. Although the need for intraoperative revision correlated with higher mortality and morbidity, prompt intraoperative revision also likely contributed to our good results after ASO.