De Novo Aortic Regurgitation After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

A fluid-structure interaction simulation on the impact of transcatheter micro ventricular assist devices on aortic valves

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The implantation of ventricular assist devices (VADs) has become an important treatment option for patients with heart failure. Aortic valve insufficiency is a common complication caused by VADs implantation. Currently, there is very little quantitative research on the effects of transcatheter micro VADs or the intervention pumps on the aortic valves.

METHODS

In this study, the multi-component arbitrary Lagrange-Eulerian method is used to perform fluid-structure interaction simulations of the aortic valve model with and without intervention pumps. The effects of intervention pumps implantation on the opening area of the aortic valves, the stress distribution, and the flow characteristics are quantitatively analyzed. Statistical results are consistent with clinical guidelines and experiments.

RESULTS

The implantation of intervention pumps leads to the valve insufficiency and causes weak valve regurgitation. In the short-term treatment, the valve regurgitation is within a controllable range. The distribution and variation of stress on the leaflets are also affected by intervention pumps. The whirling flow in the flow direction affects the closing speed of the aortic valves and optimizes the stress distribution of the valves. In the models with whirling flow, the effects of intervention pumps implantation on valve motion and stress distribution differ from those without whirling flow. However, the valve insufficiency and valve regurgitation caused by intervention pumps still exist in the models with whirling flow. Conventional artificial bioprosthetic valves have limited effectiveness in treating the valve diseases caused by intervention pumps implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study quantitatively investigates the impact of intervention pumps on the aortic valves, and investigates the effect of blood rotation on the valve behavior, which is a gap in previous research. We suggest that in the short-term treatment, the implantation of intervention pumps has limited impact on aortic valves, caution should be exercised against valve regurgitation issues caused by intervention pumps.

Reciprocal interferences of the left ventricular assist device and the aortic valve competence

Patients suffering from end-stage heart failure tend to have high mortality rates. With growing numbers of patients progressing into severe heart failure, the shortage of available donors is a growing concern, with less than 10% of patients undergoing cardiac transplantation (CTx). Fortunately, the use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), a variant of mechanical circulatory support has been on the rise in recent years. The expansion of LVADs has led them to be incorporated into a variety of clinical settings, based on the goals of therapy for patients ailing from heart failure. However, with an increase in the use of LVADs, there are a host of complications that arise with it. One such complication is the development and progression of aortic regurgitation (AR) which is noted to adversely influence patient outcomes and compromise pump benefits leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The underlying mechanisms are likely multifactorial and involve the aortic root-aortic valve (AV) complex, as well as the LVAD device, patient, and other factors, all of them alter the physiological mechanics of the heart resulting in AV dysfunction. Thus, it is imperative to screen patients before LVAD implantation for AR, as moderate or greater AR requires a concurrent intervention at the time of LVADs implantation. No current strict guidelines were identified in the literature search on how to actively manage and limit the development and/or progression of AR, due to the limited information. However, some recommendations include medical management by targeting fluid overload and arterial blood pressure, along with adjusting the settings of the LVADs device itself. Surgical interventions are to be considered depending on patient factors, goals of care, and the underlying pathology. These interventions include the closure of the AV, replacement of the valve, and percutaneous approach via percutaneous occluding device or transcatheter aortic valve implantation. In the present review, we describe the interaction between AV and LVAD placement, in terms of patient management and prognosis. Also it is provided a comprehensive echocardiographic strategy for the precise assessment of AV regurgitation severity.

Aortic valve disorders and left ventricular assist devices

Aortic valve disorders are important considerations in advanced heart failure patients being evaluated for left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) and those on LVAD support. Aortic insufficiency (AI) can be present prior to LVAD implantation or develop de novo during LVAD support. It is usually a progressive disorder and can lead to impaired LVAD effectiveness and heart failure symptoms. Severe AI is associated with worsening hemodynamics, increased hospitalizations, and decreased survival in LVAD patients. Diagnosis is made with echocardiographic, device assessment, and/or catheterization studies. Standard echocardiographic criteria for AI are insufficient for accurate diagnosis of AI severity. Management of pre-existing AI includes aortic repair or replacement at the time of LVAD implant. Management of de novo AI on LVAD support is challenging with increased risks of repeat surgical intervention, and percutaneous techniques including transcatheter aortic valve replacement are assuming greater importance. In this manuscript, we provide a comprehensive approach to contemporary diagnosis and management of aortic valve disorders in the setting of LVAD therapy.

Concomitant or late aortic valve intervention and its efficacy for aortic insufficiency associated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation

Moderate to severe aortic insufficiency (AI) in patients who underwent continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation is a significant complication. According to the INTERMACS registry analysis, at least mild AI occurs in 55% of patients at 6 months after CF-LVAD implantation and moderate to severe AI is significantly associated with higher rates of re-hospitalization and mortality. The clinical implications of these data may underscore consideration of prophylactic aortic valve replacement, or repair, at the time of CF-LVAD implantation, particularly with expected longer duration of support and in patients with preexisting AI that is more than mild. More crucially, even if a native aortic valve is seemingly competent at the time of VAD implantation, we frequently find de novo AI as time goes by, potentially due to commissural fusion in the setting of inconsistent aortic valve opening or persistent valve closure caused by CF-LVAD support, that alters morphological and functional properties of innately competent aortic valves. Therefore, close monitoring of AI is mandatory, as the prognostic nature of its longitudinal progression is still unclear. Clearly, significant AI during VAD support warrants surgical intervention at the appropriate timing, especially in patients of destination therapy. Nonetheless, such an uncertainty in the progression of AI translates to a lack of consensus regarding the management of this untoward complication. In practice, proposed surgical options are aortic valve replacement, repair, closure, and more recently transcatheter aortic valve implantation or closure. Transcatheter approach is of course less invasive, however, its efficacy in terms of long-term outcome is limited. In this review, we summarize the recent evidence related to the pathophysiology and surgical treatment of AI associated with CF-LVAD implantation.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices at the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) can be used as a bridging therapy for myocardial recovery or cardiac transplant, as well as a destination therapy for long-term support in patients with advanced heart failure. Patients with LVADs can present to the emergency department (ED) for acute deterioration and emergency physicians (EPs) must be equipped with the necessary knowledge and skill to treat this unique population.

OBJECTIVE

This review describes the role of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the evaluation of patients with LVADs and illustrates how EPs can incorporate POCUS into the evaluation of these patients in the ED.

DISCUSSION

The clinical applications for which POCUS may be useful in patients with LVADs include hypotension or shock, dyspnea, cardiac failure, dysrhythmia, syncope, and cardiac arrest. The normal features of POCUS in patients with LVADs and the features of POCUS associated with diseased states are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with LVADs have altered anatomy and physiology. Therefore, an understanding of key modifications to standard POCUS views is necessary so that EPs can use POCUS effectively in their evaluation of these patients.

Aortic Insufficiency Causes Symptomatic Heart Failure during Left Ventricular Assist Device Support

De novo aortic insufficiency is often documented during long-term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support, despite the absence of aortic insufficiency at the time of LVAD implantation. However, whether aortic insufficiency affects long-term mortality and symptomatic heart failure in LVAD-supported patients remains controversial. We aimed to examine whether aortic insufficiency development influenced mortality and symptomatic heart failure following LVAD implantation. Fifty-three patients who underwent durable LVAD implantation between January 1, 2008 and April 31, 2017 were retrospectively examined in a single center institute. After discharge, we performed the echocardiographic examination in accordance with the Japanese registry for the mechanically assisted circulatory support protocol. Aortic insufficiency was graded on an interval scale (severe = 4, moderate = 3, mild = 2, trivial or none = 1). Kaplan-Meier estimates for long-term mortality at the follow-up were generated. We used a logistic regression model to identify risk factors for symptomatic heart failure. The overall median duration of LVAD support was 856.3 ± 430.8 days (range, 12-1,744 days). We did not observe a significant difference in long-term mortality in patients with aortic insufficiency ≥ 3 grade compared with patients with aortic insufficiency < 3 grade (P = 0.767; log-rank). Aortic insufficiency was associated with an increased risk for heart failure event after discharge (odds ratio, 4.12; confidence interval, 1.48-16.93; P = 0.005). Aortic insufficiency was an independent risk factor for symptomatic heart failure and was not associated with long-term mortality. Aortic insufficiency progression was associated with symptomatic heart failure.

Variability in Blood Pressure Assessment in Patients Supported with the HeartMate 3TM

Targeted blood pressure (BP) control is a goal of left ventricular assist device medical management, but the interpretation of values obtained from noninvasive instruments is challenging. In the MOMENTUM 3 Continued Access Protocol, paired BP values in HeartMate 3 (HM3) patients were compared from arterial (A)-line and Doppler opening pressure (DOP) (319 readings in 261 patients) and A-line and automated cuff (281 readings in 247 patients). Pearson (R) correlations between A-line mean arterial (MAP) and systolic blood pressures (SBP) were compared with DOP and cuff measures according to the presence (>1 pulse in 5 seconds) or absence of a palpable radial pulse. There were only moderate correlations between A-line and noninvasive measurements of SBP (DOP R = 0.58; cuff R = 0.47) and MAP (DOP R = 0.48; cuff R = 0.37). DOP accuracy for MAP estimation, defined as the % of readings within ± 10 mmHg of A-line MAP, decreased from 80% to 33% for DOP ≤ 90 vs. >90 mmHg, and precision also diminished (mean absolute difference [MAD] increased from 6.3 ± 5.6 to 16.1 ± 11.4 mmHg). Across pulse pressures, cuff MAPs were within ±10 mmHg of A-line 62.9%-68.8% of measures and MADs were negligible. The presence of a palpable pulse reduced the accuracy and precision of the DOP-MAP estimation but did not impact cuff-MAP accuracy or precision. In summary, DOP may overestimate MAP in some patients on HM3 support. Simultaneous use of DOP and automated cuff and radial pulse may be needed to guide antihypertensive medication titration in outpatients on HM3 support.

Can the intermittent low-speed function of left ventricular assist device prevent aortic insufficiency?

Aortic insufficiency (AI) is known to associate with a persistently closed aortic valve during continuous-flow ventricular assist device support. Some devices carry an intermittent low-speed (ILS) function, which facilitates aortic valve opening, but whether this function prevents AI is unknown. In this study, the Jarvik 2000 device, which is programmed to reduce the pump speed each minute for 8 s, was chosen to examine this potential effect. Prospectively collected data of 85 heart transplant-eligible Jarvik 2000 recipients who met the study criteria (no pre-existing AI and aortic valve surgery) were retrospectively analyzed for the incidence, correlating factors, and clinical outcomes of de novo AI. All data were provided by the Japanese Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support. De novo AI occurred in 58 patients, 23 of whom developed at least moderate AI during a median support duration of 23.5 months. Freedom from moderate or greater AI was 84.4%, 66.1% and 60.2% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that progressive AI was correlated with decreased pulse pressure after implantation (hazard ratio 1.060, 95% confidence interval 1.001–1.127, p = 0.045). No correlation was found for mortality or other adverse events, including stroke, bleeding, infection, pump failure, hemolysis, and readmission. The benefit of the Jarvik 2000′s current ILS mode against AI appears to be minimal. However, in this limited cohort where all recipients underwent implantation as a bridge to transplantation, the impact of de novo progressive AI on other clinical adversities was also minimal.

Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Valvular Heart Disease: A Comprehensive Review

Mechanical circulatory support with implantable durable continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) represents an established surgical treatment option for patients with advanced heart failure refractory to guideline-directed medical therapy. CF-LVAD therapy has been demonstrated to offer significant survival, functional, and quality-of-life benefits. However, nearly one-half of patients with advanced heart failure undergoing implantation of a CF-LVAD have important valvular heart disease (VHD) present at the time of device implantation or develop VHD during support that can lead to worsening right or left ventricular dysfunction and result in development of recurrent heart failure, more frequent adverse events, and higher mortality. In this review, we summarize the recent evidence related to the pathophysiology and treatment of VHD in the setting of CF-LAVD support and include a review of the specific valve pathologies of aortic insufficiency (AI), mitral regurgitation (MR), and tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Recent data demonstrate an increasing appreciation and understanding of how VHD may adversely affect the hemodynamic benefits of CF-LVAD support. This is particularly relevant for MR, where increasing evidence now demonstrates that persistent MR after CF-LVAD implantation can contribute to worsening right heart failure and recurrent heart failure symptoms. Standard surgical interventions and novel percutaneous approaches for treatment of VHD in the setting of CF-LVAD support, such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement or transcatheter mitral valve repair, are available, and indications to intervene for VHD in the setting of CF-LVAD support continue to evolve.

The angle of the outflow graft to the aorta can affect recirculation due to aortic insufficiency under left ventricular assist device support

Aortic insufficiency (AI) is a crucial complication during continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. Our previous clinical study suggested that a larger angle between the outflow graft and the aorta (O-A angle) could cause AI progression. This study examined the effect of the O-A angle on the hemodynamics of AI under LVAD support in an acute animal experimental model. An LVAD was installed in seven calves, with the inflow cannula inserted from the LV apex and with the outflow graft sutured at the ascending aorta. The AI model was made using a temporary inferior vena cava filter inserted from the LV apex and placed at the aortic valve. Cardiac dysfunction was induced by continuous beta-blocker infusion. Hemodynamic values and the myocardial oxygen extraction rate (O₂ER) were evaluated at three O-A angles (45°, 90°, and 135°) over three levels of AI (none, Sellers I-II AI, and Sellers III-IV AI). The recirculation rate, defined as the percentage of regurgitation flow to LVAD output, was calculated. Systemic flow tended to decrease with a larger O-A angle. The recirculation rate was significantly increased with a larger O-A angle (22, 23, and 31% at 45°, 90°, and 135° in Sellers III-IV AI, respectively). Coronary artery flow was decreased at a larger O-A angle (86, 76 and 75 mL/min at 45°, 90°, and 135° in Sellers I-II AI, respectively, and 77, 67, and 56 mL/min at 45°, 90°, and 135° in Sellers III-IV AI, respectively). O₂ER tended to increase with a larger O-A angle (40, 43, and 49% at 45°, 90°, and 135° in Sellers III-IV AI, respectively). A larger O-A angle can increase the recirculation due to AI and can be disadvantageous to LVAD-AI hemodynamics and myocardial oxygen metabolism.

Impact of LVAD Implantation Site on Ventricular Blood Stagnation

Treatment of end-stage heart failure includes cardiac transplantation or ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy. Although increasingly prevalent, current VAD therapy has inherent complications, including thrombosis. Studies have demonstrated that VAD implantation alters intracardiac blood flow, creating areas of stagnation that predispose to thrombus formation. Two potential surgical configurations exist for VAD implantation: through the apical or diaphragmatic surfaces of the heart. We hypothesized that diaphragmatic implantation causes more stagnation than apical implantation. We also hypothesized that intermittent aortic valve (AV) opening reduces stagnation of blood inside the left ventricle (LV) when compared with a closed AV. To test these hypotheses, a human LV geometry was recreated in silico and a VAD inflow cannula was virtually implanted in each configuration. A computational indicator-dilution study was conducted where "virtually dyed blood" was washed out of the LV by injecting blood with no dye. Simulations demonstrated a substantial reduction in stagnation with intermittent AV opening. In addition, virtual dye was cleared slightly faster in the apical configuration. Simulations from our study demonstrate the clinical importance of VAD management to allow intermittent opening of the AV to prevent subvalvular stagnation, and also suggests that apical configuration might be more hemodynamically favorable.

Outflow graft anastomosis site design could be correlated to aortic valve regurgitation under left ventricular assist device support

Aortic valve regurgitation (AR) is a critical complication during circulatory support with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). The time-course of AR and related factors, including outflow graft anastomosis site design, were investigated. Twenty-three patients who had continuous-flow LVAD implantation and were supported for more than 6 months were investigated. AR grade (none, 0; trivial, 0.5; mild, 1; mild-moderate, 1.5; moderate, 2; moderate-severe, 2.5; severe, 3) and aortic valve opening were evaluated with echocardiography. Computed tomography was performed to all the patients postoperatively. The angle of the outflow graft to the aorta (O-A angle, parallel 0; tangent 90°, 0-180°), aortic diameter at the anastomosis site, sino-tubular junction (STJ) diameter, distance between the STJ and the anastomosis site, and distance between the anastomosis site and the brachiocephalic artery were measured. The patients' age was 38 ± 11 years. Support duration was 686 ± 354 days. Mean AR grade after continuous-flow LVAD implantation was increased to around mild and was maintained thereafter. No patient needed any intervention to the aortic valve. The aortic valves of 82.6% of patients were closed continuously. The O-A angle (83 ± 14) was positively correlated with maximum AR grade (p = 0.0095). The O-A angle was significantly smaller in patients with maximum AR grade of 1 or less (77 ± 9°) than in those with 1.5 or greater (94 ± 15°, p = 0.021). The other CT measurements had no correlation with AR grade. In conclusion, the O-A angle was correlated with AR grade progression. The O-A angle appears to be one of the important factors related to AR under continuous-flow LVAD support.

Algorithms to guide ambulance clinicians in the management of emergencies in patients with implanted rotary left ventricular assist devices

Advances in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy have resulted in increasing numbers of adult LVAD recipients in the community. However, device failure, stroke, bleeding, LVAD thrombosis and systemic infection can be life-threatening emergencies. Currently, four LVAD systems are implanted in six UK transplant centres, each of which provides device-specific information to local emergency services. This has resulted in inconsistent availability and content of information with the risks of delayed or inappropriate decision-making. In order to improve patient safety, a consortium of UK healthcare professionals with expertise in LVADs developed universally applicable prehospital emergency algorithms. Guidance was framed as closely as possible on the standard ABCDE approach to the assessment of critically ill patients.

A Complex Heart Team's Approach to a Patient With Giant Cell Myocarditis

Giant cell myocarditis is known as a rare and frequently fatal type of myocarditis that is usually characterized by progressive congestive heart failure and frequent ventricular arrhythmias. We report a rare case of giant cell myocarditis in a 64-year-old previously healthy woman. The case was complicated by the rapid development of progressive acute heart failure, which required the comprehensive care of our heart team. Using a broad spectrum of therapeutic approaches, the patient successfully underwent heart transplantation.

Current status of mechanical circulatory support for treatment of advanced end-stage heart failure: successes, shortcomings and needs

INTRODUCTION

Heart failure (HF) remains a major global burden in terms of morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in pharmacological and resynchronization device therapy, many patients worsen to end-stage HF. Although the gold-standard treatment for such patients is heart transplantation, there will always be a shortage of donor hearts. Areas covered: A left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a valuable option for these patients as a bridge measure (to recovery, to candidacy for transplant, or to transplant itself) or as destination therapy. This review describes the current indications for and complications of the most commonly implanted LVADs. In addition, we review the potential and promising new LVADs, including the HeartMate 3, MVAD, and other LVADs. Studies investigating each were identified through a combination of online database and direct extraction of studies cited in previously identified articles. Expert commentary: The goal of LVADs has been to fill the gap between patients with end-stage HF who would likely not benefit from heart transplantation and those who could benefit from a donor heart. As of now, the use of LVADs has been limited to patients with end-stage HF, but next-generation LVAD therapy may improve both survival and quality of life in less sick patients.

Aortic insufficiency in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support patients is common but does not impact long-term mortality

BACKGROUND

Aortic insufficiency (AI) is a significant long-term complication of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. We sought to evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes and mortality in CF-LVAD recipients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 237 patients implanted with HeartMate II CF-LVADs at our institution from June 2005 through June 2013. We evaluated recipients' baseline characteristics and annual echocardiograms, grading AI severity as either none, trace, mild, moderate or severe. Only moderate or severe AI was considered clinically significant. Recipients who underwent concomitant aortic valve surgery or who had undergone previous prosthetic aortic valve implantation were excluded.

RESULTS

Moderate or severe AI occurred in 32 (15.2%) patients. Risk factors that significantly affected the development of AI included older age at the time of implantation, female gender, longer duration of LVAD support and destination therapy designation. Freedom from moderate or severe AI was 94%, 76% and 65% of patients at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Overall cohort survival based on Kaplan-Meier analysis was 78%, 59% and 42% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. There was no difference in survival between recipients who developed significant AI and those who did not (log-rank test, p = 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, single-institution study, the overall rate of AI was low, but increased in frequency with longer duration of LVAD support. Although AI development remains a concern for patients on long-term CF-LVAD support, AI development does not appear to impact long-term mortality.

Mechanical circulatory assist devices: a primer for critical care and emergency physicians

Mechanical circulatory assist devices are now commonly used in the treatment of severe heart failure as bridges to cardiac transplant, as destination therapy for patients who are not transplant candidates, and as bridges to recovery and “decision-making”. These devices, which can be used to support the left or right ventricles or both, restore circulation to the tissues, thereby improving organ function. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are the most common support devices. To care for patients with these devices, health care providers in emergency departments (EDs) and intensive care units (ICUs) need to understand the physiology of the devices, the vocabulary of mechanical support, the types of complications patients may have, diagnostic techniques, and decision-making regarding treatment. Patients with LVADs who come to the ED or are admitted to the ICU usually have nonspecific clinical symptoms, most commonly shortness of breath, hypotension, anemia, chest pain, syncope, hemoptysis, gastrointestinal bleeding, jaundice, fever, oliguria and hematuria, altered mental status, headache, seizure, and back pain. Other patients are seen for cardiac arrest, psychiatric issues, sequelae of noncardiac surgery, and trauma. Although most patients have LVADs, some may have biventricular support devices or total artificial hearts. Involving a team of cardiac surgeons, perfusion experts, and heart-failure physicians, as well as ED and ICU physicians and nurses, is critical for managing treatment for these patients and for successful outcomes. This review is designed for critical care providers who may be the first to see these patients in the ED or ICU.

Aortic Valve Pathology in Patients Supported by Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device

BACKGROUND

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVAD) may induce pathological changes to the aortic wall and aortic valve. We assessed histological changes in the relevant anatomic structures exposed to continuous flow over time and compared the histological results with clinical features in patients supported with CF-LVAD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective histological analysis was performed of 38 explanted hearts supported with CF-LVAD from patients who received heart transplantation between July 2003 and February 2014. Sections of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue showing the continuity of aortic wall and left-sided valves were examined histologically. Thickness of aorta, aortic root and aortic valve as well as 3 layers of the aortic cusps were measured individually on Elastica van Gieson-stained slides using specific software. Clinical parameters concerning aortic valve dysfunction were evaluated and validated against the histology. The aortic valve spongiosa and fibrosa layers showed no significant differences in thickness with regard to support duration or occurrence of aortic insufficiency. Longer CF-LVAD support duration correlated with a thinner aortic valve ventricularis layer (rS=-0.496).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term CF-LVAD support appears to cause involution of the ventricularis layer of the aortic valve cusp, consistent with more pronounced degenerative change with longer LVAD exposure, which may be explained by continuous coaptation of the cusps. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1371-1377).