Multiinstitutional analysis of single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection for primary lung cancer

Safety and feasibility of preferential manual bronchoplasty in 2-3 cm single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study aimed to compare preferential manual bronchoplasty (PMB) and mechanical stapler closure (MSC) of the bronchial stump after 2-3 cm single-port (SP) video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy in patients with pathological T1 (pT1) stage lung cancer.

METHODS

Between January 2019 and March 2022, patients with pulmonary neoplasms who underwent 2-3 cm SP VATS lobectomy were retrospectively screened. After propensity-matched analysis, we compared perioperative outcomes and analyzed the safety and feasibility of PMB and MSC of the bronchial stump while performing VATS lobectomy.

RESULTS

In this study, 280 and 832 patients were enrolled in the PMB and MSC groups, respectively. Propensity score matching produced 280 pairs. The operation time was shorter in the PMB group, whereas the average number of lymph nodes dissected was higher in the PMB group. The conversion rate was significantly lower in the PMB group. The following were similar between the PMB and MSC groups, respectively: average blood loss volume, postoperative hospital stay, and chest tube removal time. Postoperatively, the incidence of atelectasis was significantly higher in the MSC group. As per subgroup analyses, PMB was associated with a shorter operation time in left and right upper lobectomies. Particularly in left upper lobectomy, PMB had more lymph node dissections and less conversion to open and postoperative atelectasis.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with MSC of the bronchial stump, PMB showed better safety and feasibility in 2-3 cm SP VATS left and right superior lobectomies in patients with pT1 stage lung cancer.

Uniportal video-assisted anatomical segmentectomy: an analysis of the learning curve

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to demonstrate the learning curve of anatomical segmentectomy performed by uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS).

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective study of U-VATS segmentectomies performed by the same surgeon between September 2019 and August 2022. The learning curve was demonstrated using risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) analysis in terms of perioperative complications, which reflected surgical quality and technique proficiency. The surgical outcomes were also compared between different phases.

RESULT

The complication-based learning curve of U-VATS segmentectomy could be divided into two phases based on RA-CUSUM analysis: phase I, the initial learning phase (cases 1-50) and phase II, the proficiency phase (cases 51-141). Significantly higher complication rates (24.0 vs. 8.8%, p=0.013), longer surgical times (119.8±31.9 vs. 106.2±23.8 min, p=0.005), and more blood loss (20 [IQR, 20-30] vs. 20 [IQR, 10-20] ml, p=0.003) were observed in phase I than in phase II.

CONCLUSION

The learning curve of U-VATS segmentectomy consists of two phases, and at least 50 cases were required to gain technique proficiency and achieve high-quality surgical outcomes.

Single- versus multi-port video-assisted thoracic surgery for pulmonary aspergilloma: a propensity-matched study

OBJECTIVES

The utilization of single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery for pulmonary aspergilloma (PA) has not been well studied. The study was performed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of it for PA compared with multi-port video thoracic-assisted surgery.

METHODS

From August 2007 to December 2019, consecutive PA patients receiving surgeries at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital were enrolled retrospectively. Propensity score matching based on preoperative clinical variables was utilized to compare perioperative and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

In all 358 patients, a total of 63 patients underwent single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery, and 63 out of 145 patients for multi-port surgeries were paired with the single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery recipients. The median follow-up period was 40 months (range, 2-140 months). Patients receiving single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery showed a similar operation time, intraoperative blood loss, drainage duration and drainage volume to those of multi-port video-assisted thoracic surgery recipients (P > 0.05). Patients undergoing lobectomy by single-port approach experienced a shorter postoperative hospital stay {4.9 [standard deviation (SD): 2.0] vs 5.9 (SD: 2.3), P = 0.014}. The average postoperative pain scores [day 0: 2.6 (SD: 0.7) vs 3.1 (SD: 0.8), day 3: 4.0 (SD: 0.9) vs 4.8 (SD: 3.9), day 7: 2.2 (SD: 0.5) vs 3.1 (SD: 0.8), P < 0.001] and the number of days that patients required analgesic agents [3.0 (SD: 2.2) vs 4.8 (SD: 2.1), P < 0.001] were also decreased in the single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery group.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery is a safe and feasible alternative to multi-port video-assisted thoracic surgery for simple PA and selected complex ones, with a potential advantage of reduced postoperative pain.

Perioperative Effect of Single-Port Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy and Three-Port Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy in the Treatment of Early Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Background

Clinically, there were few reports on single-hole thoracoscopic segmental resection in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and no report on the comparison of single-hole and three-hole thoracoscopic segmental resection. Hence, the purpose of the study was to explore the perioperative role of single-port thoracoscopic segmentectomy and three-port thoracoscopic segmentectomy for early-stage NSCLC.

Methods

The clinical data of 80 patients with early-stage NSCLC who were treated in our hospital from January 2021 to June 2022 were selected as the retrospective research subjects and divided into a comparison/research group with 40 cases in each group according to different surgical methods. Among them, the comparison group was received three-port thoracoscopic segmentectomy, and the research group was received single-port thoracoscopic segmentectomy. The surgical indicators, immune and tumor marker levels, as well as prognostic complications between two groups were compared.

Results

There was no remarkable diversity between the two groups in terms of operation time and the number of lymph nodes dissected during the operation (P > 0.05). The surgical blood loss in research group was lower than comparison group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the levels of CYFRA21-1, CA125, as well as VGEF in the research group were markedly lower than comparison group (P < 0.05). The differences in CD4+, CD3+, and CD4+/CD8+ after treatment were prominent, and the research group was higher than comparison group (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Single-hole thoracoscopic lobectomy has obvious advantages in the treatment of NSCLC, which can reduce intraoperative bleeding, enhance the recovery of patients' immune function, and promote postoperative recovery.

Laparoscopic gastric dissociation using a two-port approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

A new approach for laparoscopic gastric dissociation in minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was attempted. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes, safety, and efficacy of two-port laparoscopy using the McKeown procedure.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 206 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent a modified two-port laparoscopic or the traditional five-port McKeown procedure at our institution from August 2019 to August 2021. Surgical outcomes of the two methods were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 206 patients, 106 (51.46%) underwent the modified two-port procedure, whereas 100 (48.54%) underwent the traditional five-port procedure. Subsequently, 182 propensity score-matched patients were compared. No significant differences were observed in laparoscopic operative time, blood loss during laparoscopic surgery, number of dissected lymph nodes, and pain score on postoperative day 1 between the two groups. The rate of complication and postoperative length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the two groups. The total hospitalization cost also did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.325). No postoperative deaths occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that laparoscopic gastric dissociation using the two-port approach in MIE is a safe and effective procedure, with short-term outcomes comparable to those of the traditional five-port procedure in patients with esophageal cancer. Larger studies with longer follow-up duration are warranted.

The learning curve for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to evaluate the time course and caseload required to achieve proficiency by plotting the learning curve of uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the first 238 and 159 cases of uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy performed by two surgeons (A and B). The learning curves were assessed using cumulative sum analysis. Perioperative outcomes were evaluated as the learning curve developed. Two subtypes of this surgical approach, simple and complex segmentectomy, were separately analyzed.

RESULTS

Based on the learning curve, the inflection points occurred at 64 and 90 cases for surgeon A, 71 and 100 cases for surgeon B. Significantly longer operative time (p = .013), length of stay (p = .002), and drainage duration (p = .039) were observed between phase I and phase II compared to phase III for surgeon A. Operative times (p = .001) were significantly reduced for surgeon B. Furthermore, 26-28 and 52-56 cases were necessary to master the simple and complex segmentectomy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A total 64-71 cases were required to master uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy and 90-100 cases were necessary to achieve proficiency.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for the treatment of lung cancer: a consensus report from Chinese Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (CSTCVS) and Chinese Association of Thoracic Surgeons (CATS)

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UniVATS) has been widely adopted in China, where several ultra-high volume thoracic surgical and training centers are located. The objective of this consensus from Chinese experts was to summarize the current application and give reference for the future development of UniVATS in the treatment of lung cancer. A panel of 41 experts from 21 Chinese hospitals was invited to join this project. The Delphi method was used in this consensus consisting of two rounds of voting. The questionnaire was based on the current clinical evidence. Forty (97.6%) experts completed the 2 rounds of questionnaires. The experts’ experience was relatively similar. We defined the UniVATS as monitor-dependent surgery, no use of rib-spreading and single incision less than 4 cm. Tumor with stage of T1–T3 and N0–N2 is considered amenable to UniVATS. Other consensus was reached on several points outlining the safety and feasibility, surgical skills, learning curve, short-term and long-term outcomes for lung cancer, and current application of subxiphoid and nonintubated UniVATS approach. This consensus statement represents a collective agreement among Chinese experts to suggest that UniVATS is an effective alternative to multi-portal approach, although high-level evidence is expected in the future. Some agreements can be referred in the training of young surgeons.

The Feasibility and Advantages of Subxiphoid Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Pulmonary Lobectomy

BACKGROUND

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy has emerged as a promising and exciting approach for minimally invasive thoracic surgeries. However, nearly all reported uniportal VATS lobectomies are performed via an intercostal route, and chest wall trauma remains an issue. Here, we report the use of a novel uniportal VATS technique involving a subxiphoid route for pulmonary lobectomies.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed perioperative data for patients who underwent subxiphoid uniportal and traditional three-port VATS lobectomies from January 2016 to January 2017 at our hospital.

RESULTS

During the study period, 37 patients successively underwent subxiphoid uniportal VATS lobectomies, including three synchronous bilateral pulmonectomies; 68 patients underwent traditional three-port VATS. There were no surgical or 30-day postoperative mortalities, and no significant between-group differences were found in the number of retrieved lymph nodes, number of explored nodal stations, blood loss, drainage time, postoperative complications, or length of hospital stay. Operative time was longer in the subxiphoid uniportal VATS group than in the traditional three-port VATS group (P < 0.001). Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores after surgery were significantly lower in the subxiphoid uniportal VATS group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Subxiphoid uniportal VATS lobectomy is a safe and feasible surgical procedure associated with reduced surgical trauma and postoperative pain as well as improved cosmetic results compared with traditional VATS. Moreover, this procedure is better suited for patients receiving synchronous bilateral pulmonectomy. Further long-term follow-up analyses involving more patients are ongoing.

TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03051438.

Feasibility and safety of reduced-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using a needle scope for pulmonary lobectomy- retrospective study

Background

This study aimed to determine the usefulness and limitations of videoassisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy using one-window and puncture method (1WPM).

Methods

This study involved 14 patients who underwent lobectomy using the 1WPM at our institute from 2008 to 2017.

Results

The study patients comprised of 3 men and 11 women with a median age of 10.5 years (range, 0-72 years). There were eight cases in children younger than 18 years old and the youngest patient was 9 days old. The diagnoses were congenital pulmonary cystic disease (n = 7), primary lung cancer (n = 4), metastatic lung tumor (n = 1), and others (n = 2). The 1WPM was successful in 9 of 14 patients (64.3%) and, in 5 cases (35.7%), needed conversion to either two-window method (TWM) using additional port (n = 3) or open thoracotomy (n = 2). The causes for conversion were need for additional bronchoplasty or lymph node dissection (n = 3), failure of one-lung ventilation (n = 1), and presence of a small thoracic cavity that made the procedure extremely difficult (n = 1). In the group that was successfully treated with 1WPM, the median values were as follows: operation time, 193 min (range, 112-480 min); blood loss, 0 ml (range, 0-90 ml); drainage duration, 1 day (range, 1-4 days); and postoperative hospital stay, 7 days (range, 4-13 days).

Conclusions

Lobectomy by 1WPM can be safely performed and has good postoperative course and this procedure can be applicable and effective in small infants.

•

This study describes the novel VATS lobectomy method: the one-window and puncture method (1WPM).

•

1WPM is performed using 2–3 cm single incisions and a needle scope for intrathoracic access from other points.

•

This retrospective study involved 14 patients who underwent lobectomy using the 1WPM.

•

VATS lobectomy using 1WPM can be safely applied from adult cases to new born cases.

Three-port single-intercostal versus multiple-intercostal thoracoscopic lobectomy for the treatment of lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis

Background

In this retrospective study, we aimed to demonstrated that three-port single-intercostal (SIC) thoracoscopic lobectomy is an effective choice for lung cancer by comparing the perioperative outcomes of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with three-port SIC and conventional multiple-intercostal (MIC) thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Methods

From January 2013 to January 2018, 642 non-small-cell lung cancer patients underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy via a three-port SIC or MIC technique. Propensity-matched analysis incorporating preoperative clinical variables was used to compare the perioperative outcomes between the two groups.

Results

The first 20 patients were excluded to account for the learning curve effect in the SIC group. Propensity matching yielded 186 patients in each group. A small percentage of patients had major morbidity, including 4.8% in the SIC group and 6.5% in the MIC group; there was no significant difference between the two groups. Although the total number of lymph nodes harvested (25.3 vs. 23.8, p = 0.160) and stations removed (6.5 vs. 6.7, p = 0.368) were similar between the two groups, more subcarinal lymph nodes were removed (6.9 vs. 5.2, p < 0.001) in the SIC group than in the MIC group. Furthermore, other perioperative outcomes in the SIC group were not fewer than those in the MIC group.

Conclusions

Both techniques are acceptable for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Three-port SIC VATS lobectomy can provide an alternative procedure in thoracoscopic surgery.

Uniportal Lung Cancer Surgery: State of the Evidence

BACKGROUND

Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has generated much attention in recent years, but questions remain regarding the adequacy of evidence to support its use in lung cancer surgery. This review aims to explore what the currently published literature suggests the role of the uniportal approach may be and to critically appraise that literature.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using the Ovid Medline database to identify articles related to uniportal VATS. Articles were selected for review on the basis of ability to provide original clinical data on the role of uniportal VATS for lung cancer surgery.

RESULTS

The literature search revealed that only some publications on uniportal VATS provided original clinical data. Twenty-two articles were selected for review, including 9 case series and 13 comparative studies. No concerns about the safety of the uniportal VATS were noted. Some but not all comparative studies provided data suggesting that uniportal VATS may hold advantages over multiportal VATS in some simple clinical outcomes (such as reduced lengths of stay and postoperative pain). However, the quantity and quality of evidence thus far are limited.

CONCLUSIONS

It remains premature to declare superiority for uniportal VATS in lung cancer surgery. A higher level of evidence is needed, especially in investigating objective benefits and treatment efficacy of the single-incision approach.

Predictive factors of postoperative complications in single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection: Two center experience

The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for adverse events during single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic (SPVATS) anatomical resections.We retrospectively reviewed patients who had undergone SPVATS anatomic resections between January 2014 and February 2017 in Coruña University Hospital's Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery Unit (CHUAC, Spain) and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH, Taiwan). Four hundred forty-two patients (male: 306, female: 136) were enrolled in this study. Logistic regression analysis was performed on variables for postoperative complications.Postoperative complications with a 30-day mortality occurred in 94 patients (21.3%) and with a 90-day mortality in 3 patients (0.7%) while the major complication rate was 3.9%. Prolonged air leak (PAL > 5 days) was the most common complication and came by postoperative arrhythmia. Logistic regression indicated that pleural symphysis (odds ratio (OR), 1.91; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14-3.18; P = .014), computed tomography (CT) pulmonary emphysema (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.41-4.76; P = .002), well-developed pulmonary CT fissure line (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.29-0.84; P = .009), and tumor size (≥3 cm) (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.30-3.57; P = .003) were predictors of postoperative complications.Our preliminary results revealed that SPVATS anatomic resection achieves acceptable 30- and 90-day surgery related mortality (0.7%) and major complications rate (3.9%). Prolonged Air leak (PAL > 5 days) was the most common postoperative complication. Pleural symphysis, pulmonary emphysema, well-developed pulmonary CT fissure line and tumor size (≥3 cm) were predictors of adverse events during SPVATS anatomic resection.

Management of intra-operative major bleeding during single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomic resection: two-center experience

BACKGROUND

Our objective is to report on two centers' experience of intra-operative management of major vascular injury during single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic (SPVATS) anatomic resections, including bleeding control techniques, incidence, results, and risk factor analysis.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (n = 442) who received SPVATS anatomic lung resections in two centers were enrolled. The different clinical parameters studied included age, previous thoracic surgery, obesity (BMI > 30), tumor location, neoadjuvant therapy, and pleural symphysis. In addition, peri-operative outcomes were compared between the groups, with or without vessel injury.

RESULTS

There were no intra-operative deaths in our study. Overall major bleeding incidence was 4.5%, whereby 70% of major bleeding episodes could be managed with SPVATS techniques. In order to determine risk factors possibly related to intra-operative bleeding, we used case control matching to homogenize our study population. After case control matching, pleural symphysis was significantly related in the univariate (p = 0.005, Odds ratio 4.415, 95% CI 1.424-13.685) and multivariate analysis (p = 0.006, Odds ratio 4.926, 95% CI 1.577-15.384). Operative time (p < 0.001), blood loss (p < 0.001), and post-operative hospital stay (p = 0.012) were longer in patients with major vascular injury. There were no differences in 30-day mortality and 90-day morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, major intra-operative bleeding episodes during SPVATS anatomic lung resections are acceptable and most such bleeding episodes can be safely managed with SPVATS techniques.

Comparison of survival between lung cancer patients receiving single or multiple-incision thoracoscopic surgery

Background

The effect of single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer on long-term survival is unknown and no studies have investigated whether there are differences in survival between single and multiple incision approaches. We aimed to compare long-term overall survival and disease-free survival of patients who underwent single-incision thoracoscopic surgery with those who received multiple-incision thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 532 patients with lung cancer who underwent either single-incision (n=150) or multiple-incision thoracoscopic resection (n=382) during the period January 2000 to December 2014. Patients were matched on propensity score at a 1:2 ratio to estimate the effect of treatment on long-term and disease-free survival. Overall survival and disease-free survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, the log-rank test and Cox proportional-hazards regression.

Results

Propensity matching resulted in 138 patients in the single-incision group and 276 patients in the multiple-incision group. The matched patients in the single-incision group had a significantly better 5-year overall survival than those in the multiple-incision group (P=0.027). Disease-free survival was similar between the two groups before and after matching. The number of chest wall incisions did not influence overall survival or disease-free survival.

Conclusions

The long-term outcomes of single-incision thoracoscopic surgery are comparable to those of multiple-incision thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer.

Uniportal video assisted thoracic surgery with 2 cm skin incision for right middle lobectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy

Today, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) was very popular and more and more common, which could be carried out at all levels of medical centers, most of which used multiple-ports VATS techniques. However, uniportal VATS was more difficult technique compared with multiple-ports VATS, and was not yet completely universal. Uniportal port VATS with 2 cm incision was more difficult surgery, and asked the surgeon to master more surgical techniques and good collaborations with each other, however, which not only could reduce the postoperative pain and skin numbness but supply cosmetology and psychological comfort for patients. To reduce unnecessary damage to patients, we minimized the incision to 2 cm. Therefore, we called it precise uniportal port VATS technique in our surgical center and introduced it here.

Recent advances in the management of non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the number one cause of cancer-related death in both men and women. However, over the last few years, we have witnessed improved outcomes that are largely attributable to early detection, increased efforts in tobacco control, improved surgical approaches, and the development of novel targeted therapies. Currently, there are several novel therapies in clinical practice, including those targeting actionable mutations and more recently immunotherapeutic agents. Immunotherapy represents the most significant step forward in eradicating this deadly disease. Given the ever-changing landscape of lung cancer management, here we present an overview of the most recent advances in the management of non-small cell lung cancer.

Nonintubated uniportal thoracoscopic wedge resection for early lung cancer

Background

Minimal invasive surgery is current choice of treatment for lung cancer. Combined nonintubated anesthesia with uniportal thoracoscopic surgery is not well understood. Here, we report the experience of nonintubated uniportal thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

From January 2014 to December 2015, we retrospectively reviewed 131 consecutive patients with primary NSCLC who underwent nonintubated uniportal thoracoscopic wedge resection and mediastinal lymph node dissection at a single medical center.

Results

Of the 131 patients, 110 (84%) received preoperative computed tomography-guided dye localization. Most of them were diagnosed with early stage invasive adenocarcinoma (N=112, 85.5%; pathological stage IA: 84.7%, N=111), and the mean size of the nodule was small (diameter: 0.85±0.40 cm). All section margins were free of malignancy. In total, 7 of the 131 patients (5.3%) had their treatment converted from uniportal to multi-portal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), and 1 (0.8%) had his treatment converted to endotracheal intubation with general anesthesia. The mean operation time was 91.1±32.6 minutes, and the postoperative complications included pneumonia (0.8%), prolonged air leaks (0.8%), and subcutaneous emphysema (1.5%).

Conclusions

Overall, nonintubated uniportal VATS is a feasible, effective and safe procedure for the treatment of early primary lung cancer.

Anterior fissureless uniport vs. posterior intra-fissure triple-port thoracoscopic right upper lobectomy: a propensity-matched study

Background

This study aimed to assess the efficiency of anterior fissureless uniport (AFU) thoracoscopic lobectomy for early stage right upper non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Between June 2014 and Dec 2016, 162 consecutive NSCLC patients who underwent thoracoscopic right upper lobectomy (RUL) by AFU approach (AFU group, n=65) or posterior intra-fissure triple-port dissection (PIFT group, n=97) were enrolled. A propensity-matched analysis was used to compare perioperative outcomes, safety and efficiency between the two groups.

Results

Propensity matching produced 40 pairs in this retrospective study. During the operation, lobectomy took less time in the AFU group compared with the PIFT group, while no statistical differences in mediastinal lymphadenectomy time, intraoperative blood loss, and total of lymph nodes harvested were found between the two groups. Postoperatively, length of hospital stay (LOS) and time of postoperative air leak were significantly reduced in AFU group than in PIFT group. However, the overall complication rate and volume of pleural effusion drainage within 48 h were similar. Compared with the PIFT group, visual analogue scale (VAS) of 3 postoperative days in AFU group was slighter.

Conclusions

In RUL, AFU thoracoscopic approach is safe, efficient and easily maneuverable, which would reduce the duration of lobectomy, LOS and time of postoperative air leak. Postoperative pain is also mild.

Different dissecting orders of the pulmonary bronchus and vessels during right upper lobectomy are associated with surgical feasibility and postoperative recovery for lung cancer patients

Background

Right upper lobectomy (RUL) for lung cancer with different dissecting orders involves the most variable anatomical structures, but no studies have analyzed its effects on postoperative recovery. This study compared the conventional surgical approach, VAB (dissecting pulmonary vessels first, followed by the bronchus), and the alternative surgical approach, aBVA (dissecting the posterior ascending arterial branch first, followed by the bronchus and vessels) on improving surgical feasibility and postoperative recovery for lung cancer patients.

Methods

According to the surgical approach, consecutive lung cancer patients undergoing RUL were grouped into aBVA and VAB cohorts. Their clinical, pathologic, and perioperative characteristics were collected to compare perioperative outcomes.

Results

Three hundred one patients were selected (109 in the aBVA cohort and 192 in the VAB cohort). The mean operation time was shorter in the aBVA cohort than in the VAB cohort (164 vs. 221 min, P < 0.001), and less blood loss occurred in the aBVA cohort (92 vs. 141 mL, P < 0.001). The rate of conversion to thoracotomy was lower in the aBVA cohort than in the VAB cohort (0% vs. 11.5%, P < 0.001). The mean duration of postoperative chest drainage was shorter in the aBVA cohort than in the VAB cohort (3.6 vs. 4.5 days, P = 0.001). The rates of postoperative complications were comparable (P = 0.629). The median overall survival was not arrived in both cohorts (P > 0.05). The median disease-free survival was comparable for all patients in the two cohorts (not arrived vs. 41.97 months) and for patients with disease recurrences (13.25 vs. 9.44 months) (both P > 0.05). The recurrence models in two cohorts were also comparable for patients with local recurrences (6.4% vs. 7.8%), distant metastases (10.1% vs. 8.3%), and both (1.8% vs. 1.6%) (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Dissecting the right upper bronchus before turning over the lobe repeatedly and dissecting veins via the aBVA approach during RUL would promote surgical feasibility and achieve comparable postoperative recovery for lung cancer patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40880-017-0220-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery left upper lobectomy and systematic lymph node dissection with fused fissure

As surgical proficiency and the development of medical techniques have improved, uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative in the surgical management of lung cancer. The spectrum of uniportal VATS indications is now almost equal to that of conventional VATS. Recent decades have witnessed the emergence of numerous uniportal VATS techniques. A significant proportion of these have to be converted into a multiport approach and even open thoracotomy due to the difficulty of managing the upper lobe vein and bronchus, particularly for the technically challenging left upper lobectomy. Although many successfully uniportal VATS left upper lobectomies have been reported, their procedures were modularized without describing refined techniques or operative improvements. This report describes a patient who was clinically diagnosed with stage IB (T2aN0M0) primary lung cancer of the left upper lobe (LUL), and who underwent left upper lobectomy and systematic lymph node dissection. During the operation, the placement of a single incision was readjusted to obtain optimal angulation; the versatile electrocautery hook and curved suction tube were used in conjunction with each other; accessible, cost-effective modified instruments were used; and new operative tricks were created; in addition, the operative sequence was alternated and the nerves were preserved to ensure a smooth procedure, improve efficiency, embody tumor-free operation and ensure safety. These are all good ideas that are worth disseminating.

Feasibility and Safety of Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Primary Lung Cancer

Background

The feasibility of single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery (SPVATS) for primary lung cancer is not well understood. In this study, we compared SP and multi-port (MP) VATS for the surgical treatment of patients with primary lung cancer.

Methods

Surgical treatment was performed in 181 patients with primary lung cancer at Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital between June 2012 and December 2015. A propensity-matched analysis was used to compare the postoperative outcomes and to evaluate the comparative feasibility and safety of SPVATS and MPVATS.

Results

There were 37 patients in the SPVATS group and 67 patients in the MPVATS group. Propensity matching produced 32 pairs. The operation time (210 minutes versus 200 minutes, p=0.11), volume of the estimated blood loss (170 mL versus 160 mL, p=0.19), duration of chest tube drainage (5 days versus 6 days, p=0.66), and length of hospital stay (9 days versus 10 days, p=0.89) were similar between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

In our study, SPVATS for primary lung cancer was safe and feasible in well selected patients. A prospective, randomized study with a large group and long-term follow-up is necessary to evaluate the clinical feasibility and the advantages of SPVATS for primary lung cancer.

Modular Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy and Lymphadenectomy: A Novel Pattern of Endoscopic Lung Cancer Resection

BACKGROUND

Since the development of the uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) technique, the use of uniportal VATS has become increasingly popular for the surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of this study is to introduce a novel modularly designed surgical pattern for uniportal VATS for lung cancer resection and to investigate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of this novel method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical data of NSCLC patients who underwent a curative uniportal VATS lobectomy between March 2015 and April 2016, including via the modular pattern (MP) and the conventional pattern (CP), were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Perioperative and postoperative parameters, including the operation duration, estimated intraoperative blood loss, rate of conversion to thoracotomy, lymph node dissection number, and postoperative complications, were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 321 patients were identified, among whom 221 underwent MP uniportal VATS lobectomy and 100 were treated via CP uniportal VATS lobectomy. Patients in the MP group experienced a shorter operation duration (135.58 ± 47.16 minutes versus 148.86 ± 42.53 minutes, P = .017) and less estimated intraoperative blood loss (75.20 ± 37.99 mL versus 89.50 ± 41.11 mL, P = .003) than patients in the CP group. No significant difference was observed in the intraoperative conversion rate (2.7% versus 5.0%, P = .477), total number of lymph nodes dissected (24.67 ± 7.73 versus 25.34 ± 7.62, P = .471), postoperative drainage duration (4.86 ± 1.96 days versus 4.78 ± 2.10 days, P = .755), length of stay (9.60 ± 2.93 days versus 9.97 ± 2.80 days, P = .286), or incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. No postoperative deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

MP uniportal VATS lobectomy combined with mediastinal lymphadenectomy appears to be a safe and feasible technique for the treatment of NSCLC. The use of this technique can reduce the operation duration and intraoperative blood loss.

The feasibility and advantage of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in pulmonary lobectomy

Background

Ongoing improvements in technique and instruments for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) have made minimally-invasive uniportal VATS lobectomy a reality. However, the outcomes of the procedure are still under investigation, and at present, uniportal VATS lobectomy is performed infrequently at most hospitals. We have therefore reviewed our outcomes with this procedure in an attempt to validate its safety, efficacy, and feasibility.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed and compared perioperative data for patients who underwent uniportal, two-port, and traditional three-port VATS lobectomy between January 2015 and December 2015 at our hospital.

Results

Among 257 patients who had successful VATS lobectomy during the study period, 73 underwent uniportal VATS, 86 underwent two-port VATS, and 98 underwent traditional three-port VATS. There were no surgical or 30-day postoperative mortalities, and no significant differences in operative times, blood loss, number of lymph nodes retrieved and nodal stations explored, drainage times, length of hospital stay, or postoperative complications among the three groups. The visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were significantly lower in the uniportal VATS group after surgery (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Uniportal VATS lobectomy is a safe and feasible surgical procedure that is associated with decreased surgical trauma and less postoperative pain compared to traditional VATS. Further long term follow-up analyses in large numbers of patients are ongoing.

Comparison of single- and multi-incision minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for treating esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the perioperative outcome of minimally invasive (MIE) esophagectomy performed with a single- or a multi-incision in treating esophageal cancer.

METHOD

Patients with esophageal cancer who underwent MIE from 2006 to 2016 were evaluated. A 3-4-cm incision was created in both the thoracoscopic and the laparoscopic phases during the single-incision MIE procedures. A propensity-matched comparison was made between the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

We analyzed a total of 48 pairs of patients with propensity-matched from the cohort of 360 patients undergoing MIE during 2006-2015. There is no statistical difference in terms of postoperative ICU and hospital stay, number of dissected lymph nodes and presence of major surgical complications (anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications) between the two groups of patients. The pain score one week after surgery was significantly lower in the single-incision group (p < 0.05). There was no surgical mortality in the single-incision MIE group.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with a single-incision approach is feasible for treating patients with esophageal cancer, with a comparable perioperative outcome with that of multi-incision approaches. The postoperative pain one week after surgery was significantly reduced in patients undergoing single-incision MIE.

Asian perspectives in thoracic surgery: clinical innovation in Taiwan

The development of minimally-invasive surgery of the thorax began in the 1990s, but not until the recent decade did we see dramatic improvements in patient care and refinement of technique. The current generation has witnessed the evolution from traditional thoracotomy, to a single-port, non-intubated thoracoscopic approach. The investigation of subxiphoid single-port, transumbilical approach, and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in animal model are also undergoing. In Taiwan, several talented young surgeons have vigorously devoted their ideas and innovations to this field, making the Taiwan surgical society vivid and prosperous. The desire to improve, and willingness to change are the foundation of those surgeons. Providing better patient care is their impetus to strive for improvement. This article provides an account of how minimally-invasive thoracic surgery has evolved in recent years, and what clinical innovations have been developed by the Taiwan surgical society.

A propensity matched comparison of effects between video assisted thoracoscopic single-port, two-port and three-port pulmonary resection on lung cancer

BACKGROUND

To summarize our experiences of single-port, two-port vs. three-port VATS pulmonary resection for lung cancer patients.

METHODS

Data of consecutive 1,553 patients who underwent video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pulmonary resection for lung cancer in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College between November 2014 and January 2016 were prospectively collected and analyzed. A propensity-matched analysis was used to compare the short-term outcomes of lung cancer patients who received VATS single-port, two-port and three-port pulmonary resection.

RESULTS

There were 716 males and 837 females. The mean age was 58.90 years (range, 25-82 years) and the conversion rate was 2.7% (42/1,553) in this cohort. After propensity score matching, there were 207 patients in single-port and two-port group, and 680 patients in three-port group. Propensity-matched analysis demonstrated that there were no significant differences in duration of operation (129 vs. 131 min, P=0.689), intra-operative blood loss (63 vs. 70 mL, P=0.175), number of dissected lymph nodes (12 vs. 13, P=0.074), total hospital expense (﹩9,928 vs. ﹩9,956, P=0.884) and cost of operation (﹩536 vs. ﹩535, P=0.879) between VATS single-port, two-port and conventional three-port pulmonary resection groups. There was no significant difference in the complication rate between two groups (5.3% vs. 4.7%, P=0.220). However, compared with three-port group, patients who underwent single port and two-port experienced shorter postoperative length of stay (6.24 vs. 5.61 d, P=0.033), shorter duration of chest tube (4.92 vs. 4.25 d, P=0.008), and decreased volume of drainage (926 vs. 791 d, P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The short term outcomes between VATS single-port, two-port and conventional three-port groups for the surgical treatment of lung cancer were comparable. However, compared with three-port VATS pulmonary resection, single-port and two-port were associated with shorter postoperative length of stay, shorter duration of chest tube, and decreased volume of drainage.

Recent developments in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for pulmonary nodule management

In the modern era when screening and early surveillance of pulmonary nodules is increasing in importance, the management of the pulmonary nodule represents a different challenge to thoracic surgeons. The difficulty lies in the merging of sound surgical and oncological principles with more minimally invasive and appropriate lung sparing surgery. Furthermore, the intra-operative identification and surgical management of small and sometimes multi-focal pulmonary lesions remain challenging. There have been many developments and innovations in the field of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) to cater for the demands from increasing incidence of pulmonary nodules with associated paradigm shift in their surgical management. Recently, uniportal VATS and non-intubated VATS represent an even less invasive alternative to the conventional multiport VATS. The emergence of image guided VATS, hybrid operating theatre and fluorescence thoracoscopy have all contributed to improved precision of VATS lung resection, and are becoming important adjuncts to lung sparing surgery. In this chapter, some of these recent developments in VATS with emphasize on their importance in surgical management of the pulmonary nodule will be discussed.

Right upper lobectomy performed as dividing posterior ascending artery-bronchus-pulmonary vessels is alternative to primary indolent scar carcinomas

We describe a case of pulmonary indolent malignancy requiring a strategic surgery and introduce an alternative technique of right upper lobectomy via video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for primary lung cancer patients. A 42-year-old male non-smoker was referred to the hospital following the detection of an opacity with a cystic airspace in the right upper lobe during a routine physical examination. During a regular follow-up over 3.5 years, the solid component enlarged and the cystic wall thickened. Based on a suspicion of indolent scar carcinoma, a right upper lobectomy was performed using VATS. The preoperative diagnosis was clinical T1bN0M0, stage Ia primary lung cancer. Our surgical procedure, posterior single-direction aBVA, consists of dividing the posterior ascending artery branch and then the right upper bronchus, followed by the right upper pulmonary vessels. By efficiently reducing the operation time and blood loss, our method is potentially superior to conventional right upper lobectomy.

Management of post-operative pain by placement of an intraoperative intercostal catheter after single port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a propensity-score matched study

BACKGROUND

The establishment of a golden standard for post-operative analgesia after thoracic surgery remains an unresolved issue. Benefiting from the rapid development of single port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), a good candidate for the alleviation of patients' pain is the placement of an intercostal catheter (ICC) safely after uniport VATS. We hypothesized that continual infusion through ICC could provide effective analgesia for patients with only one wound and we evaluate its postoperative analgesic function in uniport VATS patients with or without intercostal nerve blockade.

METHODS

Since March 2014, 235 patients received various kinds of single port VATS. We identified 50 patients who received single port VATS with intercostal nerve blockade and retrospectively compared them with a group of patients who had received single port VATS without intercostal nerve blockade. The operative time, post operation day 0, 1, 2, 3 and discharge day pain score, narcotic requirements, drainage duration and post-operative hospital stay were collected. In order to establish a well-balanced cohort study, we also used propensity scores matching (1:1) to compare the short term clinical outcome in two groups.

RESULTS

No operative deaths occurred in this study. The uniport VATS with intercostal nerve blockade group was associated with less post operation day 0 and day 1 pain score, and narcotic requirements in our cohort study (P<0.001, <0.001, and 0.003). After propensity scores matching, there were 50 patients in each group. Mean day 0 and day 1, day 2, day 3 pain score, drainage duration, post-operative hospital stay, and narcotic requirements were smaller in uniport VATS with intercostal nerve blockade (P<0.001, <0.001, 0.038, 0.007, 0.02, 0.042, and 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, in patients post single port VATS, continual intercostal nerve block with levobupivacaine infusion appears to be a safe, effective and promising technique in our study, associated with a shorter hospital stay and less post-operative pain. Further prospective trials are needed to determine the long term outcomes.

Transition from multiple port to single port video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomic pulmonary resection: early experience and comparison of perioperative outcomes

BACKGROUND

Single port thoracoscopy is an approach aimed at minimizing trauma to the chest wall during lung resection. The objectives of this study were to describe early experience in the transition from multiple port video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) to single port surgery (S-VATS) and to compare perioperative outcomes between approaches.

METHODS

Consecutive anatomic lung resections using S-VATS were reviewed and compared to a historical, prospective cohort of multiple port VATS cases. Outcomes analysis was focused on the use of operating room resources and postoperative recovery.

RESULTS

Over 12 months, 50 S-VATS procedures were completed by one surgeon and compared to an equal number of VATS patients. The groups were similar in age, gender, BMI, comorbidity, tumor size and pulmonary function. There was no statistically significant difference in operative time. All tumors were completely resected (R0) and the median number of lymph nodes evaluated pathologically was equivalent {S-VATS=7 [4-10]; VATS=7 [4-10]; P=0.92}. There was no significant difference in conversion rate {S-VATS=2 (4%); VATS=1 (2%); P=0.56}. The median length of stay was similar in both groups {S-VATS=4 [3-7]; VATS=4 [3-7]; P=0.99}. There was no mortality and no significant difference in the rate of major complications {S-VATS=10/50 [20%]; VATS=5/50 [10%]; P=0.26}. There was no difference in patient reported pain as measured by a visual analog scale at 24 hours {S-VATS=4 [2-5]; VATS=4 [3-5]; P=0.63}.

CONCLUSIONS

Early experience in the transition from multiple port VATS to S-VATS lung resection indicates that safety, efficiency and surgical quality are preserved. More long-term data are required. Alternative approaches to perform thoracoscopic lung resection should be carefully evaluated and compared to established minimally invasive techniques.

Single port VATS: recent developments in Asia

Single port video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is the most recent evolution in minimally invasive thoracic surgery. With increasing global popularity, the single port VATS approach has been adopted by experienced thoracic surgeons in many Asian countries. From initial experience of single port VATS lobectomy to the more complex sleeve resection procedures now forming part of daily practice in some Asia institutes, the region has been the proving ground for single port VATS approaches' feasibility and safety. In addition, certain technical refinements in single port VATS lung resection and lymph node dissection have also sprung from Asia. Novel equipment designed to facilitate single port VATS allowing further reduce access trauma are being realized by the partnership between surgeons and the industries. Advanced thoracoscopes and staplers that are narrower and more maneuverable are particularly important in the smaller habitus of patients from Asia. These and similar new generation equipment are being applied to single port VATS in novel ways. As dedicated thoracic surgeons in the region continue to striving for excellence, innovative ideas in single incision access including subxiphoid and embryonic natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (e-NOTES) have been explored. Adjunct techniques and technology used in association with single port VATS such as non-intubated surgery, hybrid operating room image guidance and electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy are all in rapid development in Asia.

Global development and current evidence of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery

In the era of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), uniportal and single incision thoracoscopic surgeries are gaining popularity. The spectrum of uniportal VATS indications is now almost equal to that of conventional VATS. For example, successful uniportal sleeve lobectomy, rib segmental resection, and management of intraoperative bleeding have all been reported. According to published data in the English-language literature, more than 9,545 uniportal VATS have been performed to date, including 1,293 lobectomies, 1,024 procedures for pneumothorax, and 6,845 sympathectomies. Of the 192 articles discussing this topic, 35 were conducted in Spain, and there were an increasing number of publications from China, Korea, and other Asian countries. There were 41 technical and review articles, all of which provided an excellent foundation of surgical concept and skill learning. The benefits of uniportal VATS include better surgical geometry and cosmetics. Regarding postoperative outcomes, thirteen out of the 15 articles reviewed showed that uniportal VATS has similar or superior outcomes to conventional VATS. Most studies demonstrated that uniportal VATS produced less postoperative pain and paresthesia. In conclusion, uniportal VATS can produce excellent operative outcome, which is becoming a mature surgical approach in thoracic disease, supported by fast-accumulating and abundant experience.

Comparing the postoperative outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy using a multi-port technique versus a single-port technique for primary lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has attracted much attention recently; however, it is still very challenging to perform especially on more technically demanding sublobar anatomic resection procedures such as segmentectomy. Therefore we conducted a retrospective study on the perioperative results of single-port segmentectomy using a propensity-matched method for comparison with multi-port segmentectomy in patients with primary lung cancer.

METHODS

For procedures of anatomic segmentectomy performed between May 2006 and March 2014, we retrieved data on patients' demographic information, medical history, cancer information, and postoperative outcomes from our surgical database of thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery. Outcome variables included the number of lymph nodes retrieved during the surgery, the amount of blood loss, the duration of hospitalization, the length of the wound, the operation duration in minutes, and incidence and types of complication. The t-test and Chi-squared test were used to compare demographic and clinical variables between single- and multi-port approaches.

RESULTS

A total of 98 consecutive patients who underwent VATS segmentectomy for lung cancer treatment were identified in our database: 52 (53.1%) underwent a single-port segmentectomy and 46 (46.9%) had a multi-port segmentectomy. After propensity score matching, the differences in patients' age, pulmonary function tests, tumor size, and operating surgeons were no longer significant between the two sample groups. The length of the wound was the only surgical outcome for which single-port segmentectomy had a significantly better outcome than multi-port segmentectomy (P value <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that single-port VATS segmentectomy yielded comparable surgical outcomes to multi-port segmentectomy despite technique difficulties and smaller wound in our setting.

Uniportal video assisted thoracic surgery: summary of experience, mini-review and perspectives

The uniportal-video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) technique comprises operations which can be performed with skin incisions ranging from 2 to 8 cm and the manifest result of the introduction of the uniportal lobectomy had made possible to increase rapidly the number of published papers on this subject. Many of the large ensuing literature report incomplete historical information on uniportal VATS, and doubts exist about the indication of uniportal VATS for some thoracic oncologic pathologies. Known limitations have been overcome. On the other hand, the modern thoracic surgical team includes one surgeon, one assistant and a scrub nurse, and it is clear that the new generation of thoracic surgeons need to use the "less" used hand. The new technology which permitted the introduction of the uniportal VATS could influence the future need of thoracic surgeons worldwide.