Pulmonary Resection for Lung Cancer in Patients With Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia

Prognostic impact of interstitial lung disease on pulmonary high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma

Pulmonary high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (HGNECs) have poor prognoses and require multimodal treatment, and interstitial lung disease (ILD) restricts sufficient treatment of patients with lung cancer. We aimed to clarify ILD's prognostic impact on pulmonary HGNEC, which has previously gone unreported. We retrospectively analyzed 53 patients with HGNEC who underwent resections at our department between 2006 and 2021 and evaluated the clinicopathological prognostic features, including ILD. The patients' mean age was 70 years; 46 (87%) were male, and all were smokers. Large-cell neuroendocrine and small-cell lung carcinomas were diagnosed in 36 (68%) and 17 (32%) patients, respectively. The pathological stages were stage I, II, and III in 31 (58%), 11 (21%), and 11 (21%) patients, respectively. Nine patients (17%) had ILD, which was a significant overall survival prognostic factor in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (p = 0.048), along with lymph node metastasis (p = 0.004) and non-administration of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.003). The 5 year survival rate of the ILD patients was 0%, significantly worse than that of patients without ILD (58.7%; p = 0.003). Patients with HGNEC and ILD had a poor prognosis owing to adjuvant therapy's limited availability for recurrence and the development of acute exacerbations associated with ILD.

Safety and efficacy of CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in patients with comorbid idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted in patients with clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent CT-guided MWA from Nov 2016 to Oct 2021. The patients were divided into the IPF group and the non-IPF group. The primary endpoints were 90-day adverse events and hospital length of stay (HLOS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients (27 with IPF and 80 without IPF) were finally included for analysis. No procedure-related acute exacerbation of IPF or death occurred post-MWA. The rates of adverse events were similar between the groups (48.6% vs. 47.7%; p = 0.998). The incidence of grade 3 adverse events in the IPF group was higher than that in the non-IPF group without a significant difference (13.5% vs. 4.6%; p = 0.123). Median HLOS was 5 days in both groups without a significant difference (p = 0.078). The 1-year and 3-year OS were 85.2%/51.6% in the IPF group, and 97.5%/86.4% in the non-IPF group. The survival of patients with IPF was significantly poorer than the survival of patients without IPF (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference for PFS (p = 0.271).

CONCLUSION

MWA was feasible in the treatment of stage I NSCLC in patients with IPF. IPF had an adverse effect on the survival of stage I NSCLC treated with MWA.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

CT-guided microwave ablation is a well-tolerated and effective potential alternative treatment for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

KEY POINTS

• Microwave ablation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer was well-tolerated without procedure-related acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and death in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. • No differences were observed in the incidence of adverse events between patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and those without idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis after microwave ablation (48.6% vs. 47.7%; p = 0.998). • The 1-year and 3-year overall survival rates (85.2%/51.6%) in the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis group were worse than those in the non- idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis group (97.5%/86.4%) (p < 0.001).

Treatment Strategies for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Comorbid Respiratory Disease; Interstitial Pneumonia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Tuberculosis

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are often complicated by other respiratory diseases, including interstitial pneumonia (IP), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and pulmonary tuberculosis (TB), and the management of which can be problematic. NSCLC patients with IP sometimes develop fatal acute exacerbation induced by pharmacotherapy, and the establishment of a safe treatment strategy is desirable. For advanced NSCLC with IP, carboplatin plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel is a relatively safe and effective first-line treatment option. Although the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for these populations remains controversial, ICIs have the potential to provide long-term survival. The severity of COPD is an important prognostic factor in NSCLC patients. Although COPD complications do not necessarily limit treatment options, it is important to select drugs with fewer side effects on the heart and blood vessels as well as the lungs. Active TB is complicated by 2-5% of NSCLC cases during their disease course. Since pharmacotherapy, especially ICIs, reportedly induces the development of TB, the possibility of developing TB should always be kept in mind during NSCLC treatment. To date, there is no coherent review article on NSCLC with these pulmonary complications. This review article summarizes the current evidence and discusses future prospects for treatment strategies for NSCLC patients complicated with IP, severe COPD, and TB.

Efficacy and safety of local ablative therapy for patients with NSCLC and coexisting interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

The effective therapeutic approach is still an unmet need for patients diagnosed with both lung cancer and interstitial lung disease (ILD). This is primarily due to the possible risk of ILD exacerbation caused by surgery or radiotherapy. The current study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of local ablative therapy (LAT) for this specific population.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and ILD who received LAT between January 2018 and August 2022 were enrolled, and propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to match the non-ILD group. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), adverse events (AEs) and hospital length of stay (HLOS).

RESULTS

The PSM algorithm yielded matched pairs in the ILD group (n = 25) and non-ILD group (n = 72) at a ratio of 1:3. There were no statistically significant differences in RFS (median 16.4 vs. 18 months; HR = 1.452, p = 0.259) and OS (median: not reached vs. 47.9 months; HR = 1.096, p = 0.884) between the two groups. Meanwhile, no acute exacerbation of ILD was observed in the ILD group. However, the incidence of pneumothorax, especially pneumothorax requiring chest tube drainage, was significantly higher (36.0% vs. 11.2%, p = 0.005) among patients with NSCLC and co-existing ILD, which resulted in longer HLOS (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

Although ILD was associated with a higher incidence of pneumothorax, the efficacy of LAT for NSCLC patients with ILD was comparable to those without ILD, suggesting that LAT might be a reliable and effective treatment option for this population, particularly in the early stage.

KRASG12C Inhibitor as a Treatment Option for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Comorbid Interstitial Pneumonia

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with comorbid interstitial pneumonia (IP) is a population with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. Patients with comorbid IP are at high risk of developing fatal drug-induced pneumonitis, and data on the safety and efficacy of molecularly targeted therapies are lacking. KRAS mutations have been frequently detected in patients with NSCLC with comorbid IP. However, the low detection rate of common driver gene mutations, such as epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase, in patients with comorbid IP frequently results in inadequate screening for driver mutations, and KRAS mutations may be overlooked. Recently, sotorasib and adagrasib were approved as treatment options for advanced NSCLC with KRASG12C mutations. Although patients with comorbid IP were not excluded from clinical trials of these KRASG12C inhibitors, the incidence of drug-induced pneumonitis was low. Therefore, KRASG12C inhibitors may be a safe and effective treatment option for NSCLC with comorbid IP. This review article discusses the promise and prospects of molecular-targeted therapies, especially KRASG12C inhibitors, for NSCLC with comorbid IP, along with our own clinical experience.

Current pharmacotherapies for advanced lung cancer with pre-existing interstitial lung disease : A literature review and future perspectives

Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, are at increased risk of developing lung cancer (LC). Pharmacotherapy for advanced LC has dramatically progressed in recent years;however, management of LC with pre-existing ILD (LC-ILD) is challenging due to serious concerns about the risk of acute exacerbation of ILD (AE-ILD). As patients with LC-ILD have been excluded from most prospective clinical trials of advanced LC, optimal pharmacotherapy remains to be elucidated. Although the antitumor activity of first-line platinum-based cytotoxic chemotherapy appears to be similar in advanced LC patients with or without ILD, its impact on the survival of patients with LC-ILD is limited. Immune checkpoint inhibitors may hold promise for long-term survival, but many challenges remain, including safety and appropriate patient selection. Further understanding the predictive factors for AE-ILD after receiving pharmacotherapy in LC-ILD may lead to appropriate patient selection and lower treatment risk. The aim of this review was to summarize the current evidence related to pharmacotherapy for advanced LC-ILD and discuss emerging areas of research. J. Med. Invest. 71 : 9-22, February, 2024.

A quantitative analysis of long-term follow-up computed tomography of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: the correlation with the progression and prognosis

BACKGROUND

Quantitative analyses of computed tomography (CT) images using computer-aided detection (CAD) are correlated with visual assessments and pulmonary function test findings and might be useful for predicting the prognosis of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between the quantitative analysis of long-term follow-up CT of IPF and the progression and prognosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 48 patients with IPF who received over one year of follow-up CT were included in this study. The results of quantitative analyses (emphysema, ground-glass attenuation [GGA], consolidation, reticulation, and honeycombing) using a CAD software program of initial and follow-up CT findings were evaluated, and the association with the progression of the total lesion of IPF and prognosis using Spearman's rank correlation and Cox regression analyses was considered.

RESULTS

Results of quantitative analyses of consolidation, reticulation, honeycombing, and the total lesion on initial CT were correlated with progressive changes in the total lesion of IPF per year (r = 0.4375, 0.4128, 0.4649, and 0.4095, respectively). The results of quantitative analyses of honeycombing (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.89, P = 0.0314) and GGA (HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.72-0.99, P = 0.0384) at initial CT were prognostic factors according to a multivariate Cox regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

The quantitative analysis of honeycombing using a CAD software program of CT findings may be useful for predicting the progression and prognosis of patients with IPF.

Risk of pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer patients with preexisting interstitial lung diseases treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a nationwide retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with preexisting interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) increases the risk of developing pneumonitis. However, the association between pneumonitis and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and related factors remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide inpatient database. We included patients (aged ≥ 20 years) newly diagnosed with ILD and NSCLC and who started chemotherapy (ICIs or conventional chemotherapy) between January 2016 and December 2019. The primary endpoint was the onset of pneumonitis. We estimated the cumulative incidence function of pneumonitis and compared it with patients taking ICIs and patients receiving conventional chemotherapy using Gray's test. We calculated the subdistribution hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the incidence of pneumonitis using Fine and Gray's model to adjust for sex, age, smoking status, histology of NSCLC, surgical history, and medical histories, considering death as the competing risk.

RESULTS

We identified 1177 patients (mean age 72 years, 13.8% female), of which 328 and 849 were in the ICI and conventional chemotherapy groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence function of pneumonitis between the two groups (p = 0.868). The adjusted subdistribution HR for the incidence of pneumonitis was 1.08 (95% CI: 0.74-1.57). Age (≥ 65 years) (HR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.11-3.10) and smoking history (HR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.02-4.11) were associated with developing pneumonitis.

CONCLUSION

The risk of developing pneumonitis with ICIs for NSCLC patients with preexisting ILD was similar to that with conventional chemotherapy.

Clinical Outcomes and Prognosis of Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease Undergoing Lung Cancer Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) may have a poor prognosis after lung cancer surgery because of respiratory complications and increased recurrence rates due to limited resection. Few studies have investigated prognosis after surgery by matching clinical variables between patients with and without ILD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of patients who underwent lung cancer surgery between January 2010 and August 2020 at a referral hospital in South Korea were reviewed. Patients with ILD were identified based on preoperative computed tomography findings. Through propensity score matching, the clinical outcomes and prognoses of patients with (ILD group) and without ILD (control group) were compared.

RESULTS

Of 1629 patients, 113 (6.9%) patients with ILD were identified, of whom 104 patients were matched. Before matching, patients with ILD had higher mean age, proportion of men, and rates of sublobar resection and squamous cell carcinoma than those without ILD. After matching, there was no significant difference in postoperative mortality rates between the control and ILD groups. The 5-year survival rate was significantly lower in the ILD group (66%) than in the control group (78.8%; P= .007). The 5-year survival rate of the ILD-GAP (Gender, Age, Physiology) stage III group (12.6%) was significantly lower than that of the ILD-GAP stage I (73.5%) and II groups (72.6%; P< .0001). Multivariable Cox analysis demonstrated that idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, higher clinical stage, and recurrence were independent prognostic factors for mortality.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant ILD negatively affects long-term prognosis after lung cancer surgery, and ILD subtype and physiological severity assessment help predict prognosis after surgery.

Clinical outcomes and risk factor of immune checkpoint inhibitors-related pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

OBJECTIVES

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the most common co-morbidity associated with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors related pneumonitis (CIP) is a common immune-related adverse event that can be life-threatening. The study aims to evaluate the association of COPD with the incidence and outcome of CIP in NSCLC patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 122 patients diagnosed with NSCLC and treated with ICIs in our department. Baseline pulmonary function was performed in the whole cohort. The incidence, risk factors, treatment and outcome of CIP patients were evaluated. Furthermore, the efficacy of ICIs in patients with COPD was analyzed.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (15.5%, 19/122) developed CIP during ICIs treatment, most patients with CIP were grade 1-2, and the incidence of CIP was comparable in patients with COPD and those without COPD (18.0% vs. 13.1%, P = 0.618). In addition, an increasing trend in the incidence of CIP among patients with pulmonary fibrosis on baseline chest CT scans (27.3% vs. 13.0%, P = 0.093). There is a longer progression-free survival in COPD patients than the non-COPD patients.

CONCLUSION

Coexisting COPD did not predict the higher risk of CIP in NSCLC treated with ICIs therapy. Nevertheless, pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis on CT scan may increase the risk of CIP, close monitoring is advised in these patients during ICIs.

The safety and efficacy of durvalumab consolidation therapy in the management of patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer and preexisting interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Some lung cancer patients have preexisting interstitial lung disease (ILD), which is considered a risk factor for lung cancer treatment. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of durvalumab consolidation therapy for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and preexisting ILD.

METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients who were judged to be tolerable to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for stage III NSCLC were enrolled. Differences in the incidence rate of radiation pneumonitis (RP) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed in patients with or without ILD of which CT showed non-usual interstitial pneumonia pattern between the durvalumab consolidation group and chemotherapy (combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel [CP]) consolidation group.

RESULTS

The incidence of RP was higher in patients with preexisting ILD (40% and 20% in the durvalumab and CP groups, respectively) than in those without ILD (26% and 8% in the durvalumab and CP groups, respectively). Univariate analysis showed that durvalumab therapy tended to increase the incidence of RP; however, preexisting ILD did not significantly increase the incidence of RP. The condition of all patients who developed RP improved with the administration of oral prednisolone. Among patients without ILD, the median PFS was 17 and 16 months in the durvalumab and CP groups, respectively. Among patients with preexisting ILD, median PFS was not achieved in the durvalumab group and was 8 months in the CP group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although durvalumab consolidation therapy tended to increase the incidence of RP, it might be tolerable in stage III NSCLC patients with preexisting ILD.

Risk factors for acute exacerbation in lung cancer complicated by interstitial lung disease with slight reticular shadows

BACKGROUND

The risk of cancer treatment-related acute exacerbation (AE) in patients with lung cancer and mild interstitial lung disease (ILD) on imaging, classified as indeterminate for usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), has not previously been clarified.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 27 patients with lung cancer and ILD who were diagnosed and treated from April 2016 to March 2021.

RESULTS

Among the 27 patients, 21 were classified as indeterminate for UIP and six as UIP/probable UIP; furthermore, 10 (46.6%) and three (50%) patients from each group, respectively, developed treatment-related AEs. No significant difference was observed regarding the incidence of AEs between the two groups. However, significantly more patients in the AE group received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared to the non-AE group (p = 0.021). Multivariate analysis revealed that the use of ICIs was a significant independent risk factor for treatment-related AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung cancer patients with mild ILD suggestive of indeterminate for UIP and UIP patterns are at an increased risk for treatment-related AEs. Furthermore, ICI use is an independent risk factor for AEs in patients with lung cancer complicated by ILD, and ICIs should be used with great caution.

Can acute exacerbations occurring late after surgery with interstitial lung diseases be predicted?

BACKGROUND

The incidence of acute exacerbation (AE) 31 days after surgery in lung cancer (LC) patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) has not yet been elucidated. This study aimed to identify the AE incidence rate, mortality rate, and risk factors in patients with late-stage LC with ILD.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on 410 patients with ILD on preoperative computed tomography among 3939 patients with LC who underwent their first surgery between August 2008 and July 2019. We divided the patients into Group A (early AE; 18cases), Group B (late AE; 40 cases), and Group C (no AE; 352 cases).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the clinical background between Groups A and B. The AE incidence rates were 0.56 case per person-years at ≤ 30 days, 0.24 at 90 days, 0.14 at 180 days, 0.10 at 1 year, 0.078 at 2 years, 0.086 at 3 years, 0.064 at 4 years, and 0.059 at 5 years after surgery. The mortality rates of the first AE were 10/18 (56%), 3/5 (60%), 7/13 (54%), and 7/22 (32%) at onset ≤ 30 days, 31-90 days, 91-365 days, and 366-1825 days after surgery, respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional analysis showed that adjuvant chemotherapy and a usual IP (UIP) pattern on CT + KL-6 ≥ 1000 (hazard ratio 3.647, 2.631) were predictors of late AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with adjuvant chemotherapy and a usual IP (UIP) pattern on CT + KL-6 ≥ 1000 are likely to develop later AEs. Therefore, early intervention with antifibrotic therapy is recommended.

Survival analysis in lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease

OBJECTIVE

Lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) are prone for higher morbidity and mortality and their treatment is challenging. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the survival of lung cancer patients is affected by the presence of ILD documented on CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

146 patients with ILD at initial chest CT were retrospectively included in the study. 146 lung cancer controls without ILD were selected. Chest CTs were evaluated for the presence of pulmonary fibrosis which was classified in 4 categories. Presence and type of emphysema, extent of ILD and emphysema, location and histologic type of cancer, clinical staging and treatment were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression models were used to assess survival probability and hazard of death of different groups. P value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

5-year survival for the study group was 41% versus 48% for the control group (log-rank test p = 0.0092). No significant difference in survival rate was found between the four different categories of ILD (log-rank test, p = 0.195) and the different histologic types (log-rank test, p = 0.4005). A cox proportional hazard model was used including presence of ILD, clinical stage and age. The hazard of death among patients with ILD was 1.522 times that among patients without ILD (95%CI, p = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

Patients with lung cancer and CT evidence of ILD have a significantly shorter survival compared to patients with lung cancer only. Documenting the type and grading the severity of ILD in lung cancer patients will significantly contribute to their challenging management.

Pre-existing interstitial lung disease is associated with onset of nivolumab-induced pneumonitis in patients with solid tumors: a retrospective analysis

Background

Nivolumab, an anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody, has shown survival benefit in clinical trials of various malignant tumors. Nivolumab-induced pneumonitis is major immune-related adverse event (irAE) that is occasionally serious and life-threatening. The aim of this study was to examine the association between pre-existing interstitial lung disease (ILD) on chest computed tomography (CT) and nivolumab-induced pneumonitis among different types of solid tumors.

Methods

We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 311 patients who were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), head and neck cancer (HNC), or gastric cancer (GC), and treated with nivolumab monotherapy. Patients who underwent chest CT immediately before starting nivolumab without previous thoracic radiotherapy or other immune checkpoint inhibitors were eligible. We collected baseline patient characteristics and assessed pre-existing ILD on baseline chest CT.

Results

Finally, 188 patients were included in the analysis: 96 patients with NSCLC, 43 patients with HNC, and 49 patients with GC. NSCLC patients had a significantly higher rate of pre-existing ILD compared with HNC/GC patients (P = 0.047). Nivolumab-induced pneumonitis occurred in 11.7% (22 of 188), including 14.6% (14 of 96) of NSCLC, and 8.7% (8 of 92) of HNC/GC. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that pre-existing ILD (odds ratio, 5.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.07–18.54, P = 0.0008) and male sex (odds ratio, 5.58; 95% CI, 1.01–104.40, P = 0.049) significantly increased the risk of nivolumab-induced pneumonitis.

Conclusion

Our results indicated that pre-existing ILD and male sex are risk factors for nivolumab-induced pneumonitis in solid tumors.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08661-3.

Current Treatment Strategies for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Comorbid Interstitial Pneumonia

Of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 5-10% have interstitial pneumonia (IP) at the time of diagnosis. To avoid fatal acute exacerbations of pre-existing IP, appropriate patient selection and low-risk treatment choices are warranted. Risk factors for acute exacerbation of pre-existing IP with cytotoxic drugs include honeycomb lungs on computed tomography (CT) and low forced vital capacity, but risk factors with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have not been fully investigated. For advanced or recurrent NSCLC with comorbid IP, carboplatin plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel is the standard of care for first-line treatment, but second-line or later treatment has not been established. ICI holds great promise for long-term survival, but many challenges remain, including safety and appropriate patient selection. Since the indications for pharmacotherapy and radiotherapy for NSCLC with comorbid IP are quite limited, surgical resection should be considered as much as possible for patients with operable stages. A scoring system has been reported to predict the risk of postoperative acute exacerbation of pre-existing IP, but perioperative treatment has not been established. In the future, it is necessary to accumulate more cases and conduct further research, not only in Japan but also worldwide.

[Research Progress in the Pathogenesis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis with Lung Cancer]

特发性肺纤维化（idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, IPF）是一种原因不明，以弥漫性肺泡炎和肺泡结构紊乱最终导致肺间质纤维化为特征的疾病。针对IPF尚无有效的治疗手段，主要以延缓疾病进展、改善患者生活质量为主。而目前IPF合并肺癌（IPF with lung cancer, IPF-LC）的发病率越来越高，致使患者死亡率明显增加、生活质量显著下降。IPF-LC多见于男性、高龄和吸烟者，是一种临床表现缺乏特异性、无明确治疗方案、中位生存期短、预后较差的致死性疾病。目前IPF-LC发病机制及治疗方案尚不明确。本文就目前IPF-LC的危险因素、发病机制、临床特征和治疗的相关研究进展作简要综述。

Role of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products in postoperative fibrotic lung injury

BACKGROUND

In lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease, postoperative acute exacerbation can be fatal. However, the predictive biomarkers for postoperative exacerbation of interstitial lung disease have not been fully elucidated. The soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products is a lung-derived anti-inflammatory protein, which can prevent acute lung injury. This study aimed to elucidate its role in this fatal complication, especially focusing on the predictive potential of serum levels of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 152 patients with lung cancer and interstitial lung disease who underwent lung resection and had blood samples collected before surgery. Independent predictors of postoperative acute exacerbation were evaluated in all patients and in subgroups based on the surgical procedure. Additionally, serial changes in soluble receptor levels in these subgroups were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventeen (11.2%) patients developed postoperative acute exacerbation. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed 547.4 pg/mL as the optimal soluble receptor level cut-off value. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed a significant association between soluble receptor serum levels (≤547.4 pg/mL) and postoperative acute exacerbation. In the subgroup analysis, this independent association was observed only in the lobectomy group. Additionally, lobectomy caused a significant reduction in postoperative soluble receptor levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased baseline levels of circulatory soluble receptor might be a potential risk factor for postoperative acute exacerbation in patients with lung cancer and interstitial lung disease. Besides, additional reduction in the levels of this anti-inflammatory protein occurs owing to the lung resection.

Glasgow prognostic score for prediction of chemotherapy-triggered acute exacerbation interstitial lung disease in patients with small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Predicting the incidence of chemotherapy-triggered acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) in patients with lung cancer is important because AE-ILD confers a poor prognosis. The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), which is an inflammation-based index composed of serum levels of C-reactive protein and albumin, predicts prognosis in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) without ILD. In this study, we investigated AE-ILD and survival outcome based on the GPS in patients with ILD associated with SCLC who were receiving chemotherapy.

METHODS

Medical records of patients who received platinum-based first-line chemotherapy between June 2010 and May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed to compare the incidence of AE-ILD and overall survival (OS) between GPS 0, 1, and 2.

RESULTS

Among our cohort of 31 patients, six (19.3%) experienced chemotherapy-triggered AE-ILD. The AE-ILD incidence increased from 9.5% to 25.0% and 50.0% with increase in GPS of 0, 1, and 2, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed remarkable associations between GPS 2 and both AE-ILD (odds ratio for GPS 2, 18.69; p = 0.046) and prognosis (hazard ratio of GPS 2, 13.52; p = 0.002). Furthermore, median OS in the GPS 0, 1, and 2 groups was 16.2, 9.8, and 7.1 months, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that GPS 2 is both a predictor of risk of chemotherapy-triggered AE-ILD and a prognostic indicator in patients with ILD associated with SCLC. We propose that GPS may be used as a guide to distinguish chemotherapy-tolerant patients from those at high risk of AE-ILD.

Management and Prognosis of Interstitial Lung Disease With Lung Cancer (ILD-LC): A Real-World Cohort From Three Medical Centers in China

Background and Objective

Interstitial lung disease with lung cancer (ILD-LC) is rare and its management has not been fully described. This study aimed to investigate the management and prognosis of ILD-LC patients in China.

Methods

The present analysis is a retrospective real-world cohort study. Clinical data of ILD-LC patients were obtained from 3 hospitals in China. The overall survival (OS) of patients was analyzed. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed.

Results

One hundred eighty-four ILD-LC patients included were biased toward male (85.3%), smokers (75.5%), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (58.2%) patients with comorbidities (67.9%) and ECOG-PS score of 1 (65.2%). Most patients were advanced peripheral non-small cell lung cancer. The initial anti-cancer regimen for ILD-LC is mainly chemotherapy, and patients with early-stage LC prefer surgery. In the anti-cancer cohort, the number of ILD-LC patients who underwent the 2nd and 3rd or more anti-cancer regimens were 78 (55.7%) and 32 (22.8%), respectively. In the non-anticancer cohort, the median OS was 3.5 months. In the early-stage cohort, the median OS was 14.2 months in the systematic therapy group; however, the median OS was not reached in the surgery group. In the advanced-stage cohort with systematic therapy, the median OS was 7.2 months. Interstitial pneumonia (IIP) and anti-angiogenesis were associated with OS in the univariate analysis, whereas anti-angiogenesis was an independent protective factor for advanced LC with ILD.

Conclusion

Patients with ILD-LC have very poor prognosis. Appropriate anti-tumor treatment can prolong the survival time of patients who can tolerate it. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy are alternative treatments for LC patients with mild ILD. For ILD patients with advanced LC, antiangiogenic regimens significantly improve the prognosis of the disease.

Overview of checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis: incidence and associated risk factors

Introduction: The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been a breakthrough in the treatment of several types of cancer. With the widespread use of ICIs in clinical practice, checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is expected to increase and its management will pose a challenge for clinicians.Areas covered: In this article, we review the incidence, associated risk factors, radiological patterns, clinical features, and management of CIP.Expert opinion: Several clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of combination treatments with various drugs and ICIs have been conducted. From the results of these trials, CIP is thought to be an acceptable side effect because the frequency of its development was slightly higher during combination therapies than during ICI monotherapies. However, the risk of developing CIP associated with combinations of chemotherapy and ICIs may be higher in the real world than in clinical trials. Because combinations of chemotherapy and ICIs are associated with increased toxicity, the proper management of immune-related adverse events is necessary to maximize the efficacy of the treatment.

"Fit for Surgery? What's New in Preoperative Assessment of the High-Risk Patient Undergoing Pulmonary Resection"

Advances in perioperative assessment and diagnostics, together with developments in anesthetic and surgical techniques, have considerably expanded the pool of patients who may be suitable for pulmonary resection. Thoracic surgical patients frequently are perceived to be at high perioperative risk due to advanced age, level of comorbidity, and the risks associated with pulmonary resection, which predispose them to a significantly increased risk of perioperative complications, increased healthcare resource use, and costs. The definition of what is considered "fit for surgery" in thoracic surgery continually is being challenged. However, no internationally standardized definition of prohibitive risk exists. Perioperative assessment traditionally concentrates on the "three-legged stool" of pulmonary mechanical function, parenchymal function, and cardiopulmonary reserve. However, no single criterion should exclude a patient from surgery, and there are other perioperative factors in addition to the tripartite assessment that need to be considered in order to more accurately assess functional capacity and predict individual perioperative risk. In this review, the authors aim to address some of the more erudite concepts that are important in preoperative risk assessment of the patient at potentially prohibitive risk undergoing pulmonary resection for malignancy.

Is operation safe for lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease on computed tomography?

Aims:

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is associated with the incidence of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with ILD are at risk of acute exacerbation (AE) after pulmonary resection. However, there have been no recognized treatment guidelines for NSCLC patients with ILD on computed tomography (CT).

Methods:

We reviewed the medical records of 156 consecutive patients with ILD on high-resolution CT who have undergone pulmonary resection and between 2014 and 2018. Data regarding general information, imaging features, perioperative indicators, and long-term prognosis of patients were compared.

Results:

The mean patient age was 67.24 ± 6.80 years. Postoperative AE occurred in seven (4.5%) patients; five (71.4%) of the seven patients who had an AE died within 30 days. The incidence of postoperative AE was 5.3% among patients who underwent lobectomy (n = 6). Overall survivals (OS) was significantly poorer in patients with possible usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)/UIP [hazard ratio (HR) 2.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11–4.95, p = 0.026] and severe postoperative complications (Grade ⩾3) (versus no complication: HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.11–6.02, p = 0.028; versus mild complications: HR 6.05, 95% CI 2.69–13.6, p < 0.001). Age (HR 1.071, 95% CI 1.006–1.137, p = 0.030) and ILD patterns (HR 2.420, 95% CI 1.024–5.716, p = 0.044) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Forced vital capacity (FVC) (odds ratio 0.351, 95% CI 0.145–0.850, p = 0.020) was an independent prognostic factor for patients who needed postoperative intensive care unit intervention.

Conclusion:

Pulmonary resection for NSCLC Patients with ILD on CT is a safe procedure. However, surgical indications for lobectomy need to be more carefully for these patients, especially for possible UIP/UIP patients and patients with lower FVC.

The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Outcomes of Older Patients with Pulmonary Fibrosis and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Rationale: Characteristics and outcomes of lung cancer in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in the United States remain understudied.Objectives: To determine the tumor characteristics and survival of patients with IPF with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using U.S. population-based data.Methods: We selected Medicare beneficiaries from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry with histologically confirmed NSCLC diagnosed between 2007 and 2011. IPF was identified using two validated claims-based algorithms. We compared tumor characteristics and used logistic and Cox regression to compare rates of stage-appropriate therapy and of overall and lung cancer-specific survival in those with IPF and without IPF.Results: A total of 54,453 patients with NSCLC were included. Those with IPF were more likely to be diagnosed at an earlier stage (P < 0.01) and to have squamous histology (46% vs. 35%; P < 0.01) and lower-lobe tumors (38% vs. 28%; P < 0.01) than those without IPF. Patients with IPF and stages I-II disease had odds of receiving stage-appropriate therapy similar to patients without IPF who had stages I-II disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-1.43); however, those with advanced disease were less likely to be treated (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.99). Overall and lung cancer-specific survival were worse in patients with IPF (respectively, hazard ratio [HR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.26-1.45; and HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.10-1.32).Conclusions: NSCLC has a unique presentation in patients with IPF and is associated with poorer prognosis. Further research is needed to identify optimal treatment strategies in this population.

The Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Lung cancer is a well-known comorbidity of interstitial lung disease (ILD), and the actual efficacy and safety of chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease (NSCLC-ILD) have not been determined. We conducted this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy for patients with NSCLC-ILD.

Methods: We searched related studies from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase. The endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), 1-year overall survival rate (1-yOS rate), and first-line chemotherapy-related acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease rate (AE-ILD rate).

Results: We included 21 studies involving 684 patients in our analysis. The pooled ORR was 43% (95% CI: 38.0–49.0%), and the pooled DCR was 80.0% (95% CI: 75.7–83.9%). The modified overall 1-yOS rate was 33.0% (95% CI: 29.0–37.0%). The pooled AE-ILD rate was 8.07% (95% CI: 6.12–10.26%). Subgroup analysis revealed a trend for lower AE-ILD rate (4.98%; 95% CI: 2.44–8.37%) in patients with carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel. Lung function and AE-ILD may be associated with the prognosis of patients with NSCLC-ILD.

Conclusions: First-line chemotherapy is effective in patients with NSCLC-ILD, and the AE-ILD rate is acceptable, but the prognosis is limited. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to explore more appropriate treatment regimens to improve the prognosis of patients with NSCLC-ILD.

Serum high-mobility group box 1 as a predictive marker for cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced lung injury in patients with lung cancer and interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is a pro-inflammatory protein, that is associated with tumorigenesis, interstitial lung disease (ILD), and acute lung injury. Chemotherapy-induced lung injury is a common and serious adverse event in patients with lung cancer and ILD, but its pathogenesis and predictive biomarkers are not known. This study aimed to investigate the predictive potential of serum HMGB1 levels for cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced lung injury in these patients.

METHODS

From 743 patients with advanced lung cancer, we enrolled 83 consecutive patients with ILD and background-matched 83 patients without ILD. Additionally, 83 healthy subjects were included. After measuring baseline levels of serum HMGB1 in three groups, we evaluated the predictive values of baseline HMGB1 levels for cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced lung injury in patients with lung cancer and ILD.

RESULTS

Higher levels of serum HMGB1 were independently associated with higher tumor burden, as assessed by total tumor size, and the presence of ILD. Twenty-five (30.1%) of patients with lung cancer and ILD experienced cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced lung injury within one year. Univariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that higher levels of HMGB1 and higher tumor burden were associated with disease onset. Moreover, multivariate analysis revealed that only HMGB1 was independently associated with this severe complication in patients with lung cancer and ILD.

CONCLUSIONS

HMGB1 is a potential predictive blood biomarker for cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced lung injury in patients with lung cancer and ILD. This study also suggests a potential pathogenesis of this serious adverse event that tumor- and ILD-derived HMGB1 accelerates lung injury.

[A Review of Drug Therapy of Lung Cancer with Interstitial Lung Disease]

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a risk factor for lung cancer. Patients with lung cancer associated with ILD (LC-ILD) often appear clinically. During the treatment of LC-ILD, there is a risk of causing acute exacerbation or even death in the treatment of lung cancer. At the same time, combining ILD has become the exclusion criteria for prospective clinical trials of most lung cancers. Therefore, when lung cancer is combined with ILD, it often becomes a difficult point for the treatment of lung cancer. Because LC-ILD patients have a certain proportion in the clinic, it is necessary to explore the best treatment options. Here we review the results of existing clinical studies for reference.

PD-1 inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer patients with special issues: Real-world evidence

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have provided new therapeutic options for non‐small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) patients. However, due to concerning increases in immune‐related adverse events, clinical trials usually exclude patients with special issues such as viral hepatitis, tuberculosis (Tbc), interstitial lung disease (ILD) and autoimmune disease.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of NSCLC patients who received ICIs, and analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients with special issues.

Results

Between January 2015 and October 2018, 237 patients received ICIs. Of these patients, 26% (61/237) had special issues: 32 had hepatitis B viral (HBV) infections, 20 Tbc, six ILD, one HIV infection, one Behçet's disease and a past HBV infection, and one rheumatoid arthritis. The incidence of hepatitis tended to be higher in patients with HBV infections than in those without (18.8% vs 8.91%, P = .082). Severe hepatitis (grade 3 or higher) was more common in HBV‐infected patients (12.5% vs 1.9%, P = .0021), but the AEs were well‐managed. During ICI treatment, three of the 20 patients with a history of pulmonary Tbc developed active pulmonary Tbc, considered reactivations. No aggravation of ILD was noted. One RA patient experienced a disease flare and was treated with a low‐dose steroid. There was no significant difference in the overall response rate or progression‐free survival between patients with and without special issues.

Conclusion

Given the relatively low incidence of immune‐related AEs and the comparability of clinical outcomes, ICIs can be treatment option of NSCLC patients with special issues.

Association of immune-related pneumonitis with the presence of preexisting interstitial lung disease in patients with non-small lung cancer receiving anti-programmed cell death 1 antibody

The safety of anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody for patients with preexisting interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dependence of preexisting ILD on anti-PD-1 antibody-induced pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We retrospectively reviewed the association of preexisting ILD with the incidence, radiographic pattern, and outcome of pneumonitis in NSCLC patients receiving anti-PD-1 antibody. A total of 331 patients were included in this study. Of these patients, 17 had preexisting ILD. The incidence of pneumonitis was higher among the patients with preexisting ILD than among those without preexisting ILD (29% vs. 10%, P = 0.027). The distributions of the CT appearances at the onset of anti-PD-1 antibody-induced pneumonitis were as follows: for the patients with preexisting ILD, two patients (40%) had diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), one patient each with organizing pneumonia-like (OP), hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), and other patterns (20% each); for the patients without preexisting ILD, 19 patients (61%) had OP, 8 (26%) had HP, 3 (10%) had DAD, and 1 (3.2%) had other patterns. The median onset time from the initiation of anti-PD-1 antibody treatment until the development of pneumonitis was 1.3 months (range 0.3-2.1 months) for the patients with preexisting ILD and 2.3 months (range 0.2-14.6 months) for the patients without preexisting ILD. Careful attention to the development of pneumonitis is needed, especially within the first 3 months after the start of anti-PD-1 antibody treatment, when using anti-PD-1 antibody to treat patients with preexisting ILD.

The utility of ground-glass attenuation score for anticancer treatment-related acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease among lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Acute exacerbation (AE) of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a fatal adverse event in the treatment of lung cancer patients with ILD. The value of pre-treatment radiological findings obtained by high-resolution computed tomography for the detection of anticancer treatment-related AE of ILD has not been established.

METHODS

Two medical record-based retrospective studies were performed. The chemotherapy cohort included 105 lung cancer patients with ILD who received chemotherapy at Tokyo Medical and Dental University between October 2008 and December 2017. The immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) cohort included 48 advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with ILD treated with ICIs at nine institutions between January 2016 and September 2018. Variables were compared between AE-positive and -negative groups. Candidate variables were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Anticancer treatment-related AE of ILD occurred in 12 patients (11.4%) in the chemotherapy cohort and seven patients (14.5%) in the ICI cohort. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, ground-glass attenuation (GGA) score was the only factor significantly associated with the development of AE of ILD in both cohorts (P = 0.037 and 0.01 in the chemotherapy and ICI cohorts, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of GGA may help predict anticancer treatment-related AE of ILD.

Real world data of combined lung cancer and interstitial lung disease

Background

Research patients with combined lung cancer (LC) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) is insufficient. The objective of the study was to identify the frequency of such patients and treatments, including best supportive care (BSC), in the real world.

Methods

All patients with LC who were admitted to our hospital over a 5-year period from 2013 to 2017 were retrospectively analysed.

Results

In this study, 698 patients with LC were enrolled. A total of 148 (21.2%) suffered from LC and ILD. Seventy-one LC-ILD patients received chemotherapy, and 20 LC-ILD patients received BSC only. Eleven BSC patients whom physicians thought could receive therapy declined treatment. The median survival time of patients who received chemotherapy was 14.3 months (95% confidence interval, 8.5-19.4 months). The median survival time of BSC patients who declined treatment was 7.2 months and that was shorter than that of patients who received chemotherapy.

Conclusions

This study suggests that patients with combined LC and ILD are common (21.2%) in the real world, and there is the possibility that therapy for LC-ILD patients is beneficial.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer after surgical resection

Background The outcomes of patients with both lung cancer and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are unfavorable. Therapeutic interventions for lung cancer such as surgery can cause acute exacerbation of IPF (aeIPF). This study aimed to assess the frequency of IPF in a group of patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to report clinical characteristics and outcomes of this cohort of patients. Patients and methods This observational cohort retrospective study analyzed 641 pathological records of patients after surgical resection of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at University Clinic Golnik from May 2010 to April 2017. Pathological records of NSCLC with coexisting IPF were reviewed. CT scans and biopsy specimens for this group of patients were analyzed by a thoracic radiologist and pathologist, independently. We searched radiological and pathological features of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern in this group of patients. We report the clinical characteristics and outcome of this cohort of patients. Results Out of 641 patients with early-stage NSCLC, only 13 (2.0%) had histologically and radiologically proven coexisting UIP/IPF. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common type of lung cancer (7/13 patients). The majority of tumors were small size (all being pT1 or pT2), stage I-II (11/13 patients), located in the lower lung lobes (11/13 patients). Almost all patients were current or ex-smokers (11/13 patients). There were two pathologically confirmed fatal cases (15.4%) due to aeIPF in the first two months after radical treatment, one after adjuvant radiotherapy and the other after surgery. Out of 13 patients, one patient had a lung cancer relapse. Conclusions Frequency of UIP/IPF in surgically treated early stage NSCLC is rather low. Our observational study shows that radical treatment of lung cancer can cause aeIPF with dismal outcome in this group of patients. The standard of care in these mostly elderly patients still remains unresolved.

Summary of the Japanese Respiratory Society statement for the treatment of lung cancer with comorbid interstitial pneumonia

Dramatic progress in targeted therapy and immunotherapy has been changing clinical practices in lung cancer. With the accumulation of clinical practice, it has become clear that pre-existing interstitial pneumonia (IP) could be a risk factor for drug-induced lung injury, which has enhanced awareness regarding the difficulty in treating lung cancer with comorbid IP. Unfortunately, there is only low-grade evidence in the field of lung cancer with comorbid IP, because almost all clinical trials exclude such patients. There have been very few specialized clinical trials for patients with lung cancer and underlying IPs thus far. Therefore, it is necessary to treat such cases empirically or to give up on the treatment itself. Considering these circumstances, establishing how to treat lung cancer with comorbid IP is an urgent issue. This paper is a summary of the official statement reported by the Diffuse Lung Disease/Thoracic Oncology Assembly and the Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) in 2017, which attempts to approach lung cancer with comorbid IP systematically.

Diagnosing complications and co-morbidities of fibrotic interstitial lung disease

Introduction: Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) represent a heterogeneous group of rare disorders that include more than 200 entities, mostly associated with high mortality. In recent years, the progress regarding the understanding of the pathogenesis of these diseases led to the approval of specific treatments. In ILDs, the presence of comorbidities has a significant impact on the quality of life and the survival of patients and, therefore, their diagnosis and treatment has a pivotal role in management and could improve overall outcome. Areas covered: We discuss key diagnostic issues with regard to the most frequent comorbidities in ILDs. Treatment options are also discussed as the decision to investigate more definitively in order to identify specific comorbidities (including lung cancer, pulmonary hypertension, GE reflux, and obstructive sleep apnoea) is critically dependent upon whether comorbidity-specific treatments are likely to be helpful in individual patients, judged on a case by case basis. Expert opinion: The extent to which clinicians proactively pursue the identification of comorbidities depends on realistic treatment goals in individual patients.

Nivolumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with mild idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: A multicenter, open-label single-arm phase II trial

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy of nivolumab against metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been demonstrated; however, pneumonitis is relatively common and is a potentially life-threatening immune-related adverse event. Patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) have a higher risk of pneumonitis and are generally excluded from clinical trials. Additionally, to date, a multicenter prospective trial for previously-treated NSCLC patients with IIP has not been performed. To fulfill this unmet medical need, we conducted a multicenter, open-label single-arm phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in NSCLC patients with mild IIP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had previously-treated, inoperable NSCLC with mild IIPs. Mild IIP was defined as a predicted vital capacity of at least 80% and possible usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) or inconsistent with UIP pattern by chest high-resolution computed tomography. Primary end point was the 6 months PFS rate and secondary end point was the safety of this therapy.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were enrolled in this trial. Six months PFS rate was 56%, response rate was 39%, and disease control rate was 72%. There were no treatment-related deaths. One drug-related grade 3/4 nonhematologic event (grade 3 neurotoxicity) was observed. Two patients had grade 2 pneumonitis which improved by corticosteroid therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab could be an effective therapy for NSCLC patients with mild IIPs.

Real-World Evidence of Safety and Efficacy of Carboplatin plus Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Preexisting Interstitial Lung Disease: A Retrospective Study

Background

Standard chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with preexisting interstitial lung disease (ILD) has not yet been established. Although a combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is most frequently used for patients with advanced NSCLC and ILD, the safety and efficacy of carboplatin plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) are yet to be elucidated.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel for advanced NSCLC with ILD.

Methods

This retrospective study included nine patients with advanced NSCLC and ILD who received carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy at the National Hospital Organization Kanazawa Medical Center between April 2013 and December 2017. The ILD-GAP index was used to evaluate mortality risk of baseline ILD.

Results

A usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern of ILD was observed in five (55.6%) patients on their baseline high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans. The median ILD-GAP index was 4 (range, 1–5), and six (66.7%) patients had ILD-GAP index ≥4. We observed no ILD exacerbations or chemotherapy-related deaths. The overall response and disease control rates were 77.8% (95% CI, 40.0–97.2) and 88.9% (95% CI, 51.8–97.2), respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.8 months (95% CI, 2.1–7.7) and 8.0 months (95% CI, 2.6–16.8), respectively.

Conclusions

Carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel showed favorable safety and efficacy in patients who had advanced NSCLC and ILD with a high risk of mortality. Prospective studies are required to further confirm these results.

Efficacy and risk of cytotoxic chemotherapy in extensive disease-small cell lung cancer patients with interstitial pneumonia

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by a high propensity for metastases and a poor prognosis irrespective of high sensitivity for initial chemotherapy. Although interstitial pneumonia (IP) is one of risk factors for lung cancer, efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy for patients with SCLC with IP remains unclear. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy and assess risk of acute exacerbation (AE)-IP with cytotoxic drugs for extensive disease (ED)-SCLC patients with IP.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of 192 consecutive ED-SCLC patients with IP (n = 40) and without IP (n = 152) between 2008 and 2016.

Result

31 of 40 ED-SCLC patients with IP and 130 of 152 patients without IP received systemic chemotherapy. The efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with IP was not inferior to that in patients without IP (overall survival [OS], 7.1 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2–14.0] vs. 10.0 [95% CI: 8.2–11.8] months, P = 0.57). Pretreatment serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; 651.7 ± 481.0 vs. 301.4 ± 110.7 U/mL, P = 0.01) and C-reactive protein (CRP; 8.9 ± 9.6 vs. 1.8 ± 1.8 U/mL, P = 0.008) were correlated with developed AE-IP in the ED-SCLC patients with IP.

Conclusion

Systemic chemotherapy was effective even in ED-SCLC patients with IP. However, the risk of developed AE-IP that was high in patients with IP and should be evaluated using serum LDH and CRP levels before initial chemotherapy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5367-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Long-term survival after complete resection of non-small-cell lung cancer in patients with interstitial lung disease

OBJECTIVES

Patients with lung cancer and interstitial lung disease (ILD), usual interstitial pneumonia in particular, are known to have a poor outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of ILD in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

A total of 2054 consecutive patients underwent complete resection of Stage IA-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer in our institution between January 2002 and March 2013. The presence of ILD was diagnosed and categorized based on high-resolution computed tomography images. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the prognostic factors.

RESULTS

There were 106 (5%) patients with ILD. There were significantly more patients who developed severe complications (P < 0.01) in the ILD group, with 4 (4%) patients developing acute exacerbation. Although the difference in postoperative mortality rate was marginal between the groups (P = 0.07), the 5-year overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates of the ILD patients were significantly worse than those of the non-ILD group (overall survival: 40.4% vs 72.0%, P < 0.01; cancer-specific survival 55.4% vs 78.6%, P < 0.01). The results of multivariate analysis showed that coexistence of ILD (hazard ratio 1.45; P = 0.01) was an independent, unfavourable prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of ILD led to a much poorer survival after complete resection of non-small-cell lung cancer.

High preoperative C-reactive protein level is a risk factor for acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease after non-pulmonary surgery

Several studies have investigated the incidence of and risk factors for acute exacerbation (AE) in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) after lung resection surgery. However, the incidence and risk factors for AE-ILD after non-pulmonary surgery are not known. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for AE-ILD after non-pulmonary surgery.Eighty patients who were diagnosed with ILD on preoperative chest computed tomography (CT) imaging and underwent non-pulmonary surgery under general anesthesia at Hiroshima University Hospital between September 2011 and September 2017 were enrolled. We retrospectively compared the preoperative patient characteristics, laboratory findings, and factors associated with anesthetic management between the patients who developed AE-ILD and those who did not.The incidence of AE-ILD after non-pulmonary surgery was 6.3% and the mortality rate was 80%. Univariate logistic analysis showed that a usual interstitial pneumonia pattern on computed tomography, a high C-reactive protein (CRP) level, a long operating time, high blood loss, and blood transfusion during surgery were significant risk factors for AE-ILD. In multivariate analysis, only a high CRP level (odds ratio 2.556, 95% confidence interval 1.110-5.889, P = .028) was identified as an independent risk factor for AE-ILD after non-pulmonary surgery.The risk of AE-ILD should be kept in mind in patients with ILD and a high CRP level before non-pulmonary surgery. These patients should also be monitored carefully for development of AE-ILD after surgery.

Pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis is a risk factor for anti-PD-1-related pneumonitis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVES

Pneumonitis related to the use of anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibodies is a common immune-related adverse event that can be life-threatening. However, the relationship between pulmonary fibrosis/emphysema and the incidence of anti-PD-1-related pneumonitis is unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from 123 patients who were diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer and treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) at the Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Japan, between December 17, 2015, and November 30, 2017. Patients who previously received thoracic radiotherapy to the primary lesion, mediastinum, spinal, or rib metastases were excluded from the analysis. Fibrosis score (0-5) and emphysema score (0-4) on baseline chest computed tomography (CT) were determined by two diagnostic radiologists.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (14.6%) experienced anti-PD-1-related pneumonitis, of which four (3.3%) were grade ≥3. The median onset time of pneumonitis after starting anti-PD-1 therapy was 60 days (range, 6-634 days). According to the analysis of fibrosis score, pneumonitis occurred in 13 (35.1%) of the 37 patients with a fibrosis score ≥1 and in 5 (5.8%) of 86 patients with a fibrosis score of 0. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that fibrosis score ≥1 was the only risk factor for anti-PD-1-related pneumonitis (p = 0.0008).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis significantly increases the risk of anti-PD-1-related pneumonitis. Further studies are needed to identify predictive factors of anti-PD-1-related pneumonitis in patients with fibrotic changes on CT findings.

Comorbidities of IPF: How do they impact on prognosis

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) is a severe parenchymal lung disease characterized by an intense deposition of collagen in the interstitial spaces. The introduction of anti-fibrotic drugs increased patients' life expectancy highlighting the role of comorbidities in patients' management and prognosis. IPF is frequently associated with other diseases mainly because of its onset during middle age and sometimes because of the presence of common pathogenic pathways such as in the case of lung cancer. Comorbidities may differently influence prognosis of IPF patients. However, except for major impacting ones as LC, PH and cardiovascular diseases, data exploring their impact on prognosis are still few and sometimes conflicting highlighting the need of new large and targeted studies. In this review we discuss the current knowledge on the most common comorbidities associated with IPF (cardiovascular diseases, pulmonary hypertension, lung cancer, emphysema, gastro-oesophageal reflux and depression), focusing on their prognostic role.

Measuring Surgery Outcomes of Lung Cancer Patients with Concomitant Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Review of the Literature

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the most common form of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias, often progresses to restrictive respiratory disturbance and mortality, typically within 10 years. IPF frequently coexists with lung cancer, and the combination of these two disease entities is far more difficult to treat than either lung cancer or IPF alone. In particular, surgery for lung cancer with IPF in the background increases postoperative morbidity and mortality by exacerbating pre-existing IPF, i.e., acute exacerbation of IPF (AEIPF). Furthermore, the long-term outcome after lung cancer surgery is considerably worsened by the presence of IPF. We present here a comprehensive review of AEIPF and the long-term outcomes after surgery.

Lung cancer and interstitial lung disease: a literature review

The association between lung cancer (LC) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) can be explained by the shared risk factors like smoking and physiopathology of fibrogenesis and cancerogenesis. The relative LC risk is shown to be 3.5- to 7.3-times higher in ILD, with LC occurrence estimated at 10-20% in ILD, with >15% of ILD patients likely to die from LC. ILD incidence upon LC diagnosis varied from 2.4-10.9%. Primary radiological presentations consist of peripheral lesions, mostly in the inferior pulmonary lobes, either close to or within the ILD areas. There is a trend towards inverted proportion of adenocarcinomas and squamous-cell carcinomas, with EGFR mutations very rarely found. ILD negatively impacted LC prognosis, with surgery associated with increased morbidity-mortality, particularly due to acute exacerbation (AE) of ILD. Limited resection reduced this risk, whilst increasing that of cancer mortality. Studies on radiotherapy that can induce AE-ILD are scarce. Chemotherapy was associated with similar response rates to those in LC patients without ILD, yet worse survival. This difference may be accounted for by ILD patients' poorer health and higher risk of drug-induced pneumonitis. Further studies are warranted to better understand cancer physiopathology within the fibrotic areas, along with the therapeutic strategies required.

Anticancer drug treatment for advanced lung cancer with interstitial lung disease

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a risk factor for lung cancer development and is frequently observed in patients with lung cancer. Individuals with ILD have been excluded from most prospective clinical trials of lung cancer therapies because of the risk of ILD acute exacerbation. Thus, the optimal anticancer drug treatment for such patients has yet to be established. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are avoided for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ILD because of the concern of acute exacerbation, and information on the effects of immune-checkpoint inhibitors is limited in these patients. Only three prospective single-arm studies of cytotoxic chemotherapies for advanced lung cancer with ILD have been reported. Based on the results of these studies and those of retrospective analyses, carboplatin and either paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel are often selected in daily clinical practice for patients with NSCLC and ILD, whereas platinum plus etoposide is selected for those with small cell lung cancer and ILD. Although the antitumor activity of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy appears similar in advanced lung cancer patients with and without ILD, its impact on overall survival of the former patients is limited. The risks and benefits of chemotherapy must therefore be carefully explained before treatment initiation, and careful follow-up is necessary for such patients, especially those with the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern, a risk factor for chemotherapy-related exacerbation. Prospective clinical studies with large patient populations are still required to establish the appropriate treatments for advanced lung cancer with ILD.

Severe idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: what can be done?

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains a challenging disease to manage. Two drugs are now available that can slow disease progression in patients with mild-to-moderate IPF. This means that early diagnosis is mandatory, because there are no proven effective therapies for severe IPF. This lack of proven therapies may be at least partially due to the fact that severe IPF patients are usually not enrolled in randomised, prospective, multicentre, international trials. Clinical observation experiences and preliminary results of long-term, open-label extensions of clinical trials suggest that both pirfenidone and nintedanib may also slow or decrease progression in patients with severe IPF. However, data are sparse and obtained from a relatively small number of patients. Lung transplantation should be taken into account early and discussed with patients, when indicated. Rehabilitative strategies are important and effective supportive therapies. The needs of patients with severe IPF are similar to those of patients with an advanced neoplastic disease. Palliative care and psychological support play an important role in the relief of symptoms of anxiety and depression. Accordingly, these therapeutic approaches should start early in IPF patients.