Outcomes After Surgery in High-Risk Patients With Early Stage Lung Cancer

Impact of the amount of preoperative erector spinae muscle in stage I non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Erector spinae muscle (ESM) is an antigravity muscle group that can be evaluated as an index of muscle loss on chest computed tomography. The amount of ESM has been reported to be related to the prognosis of several respiratory diseases. However, few studies clarify the impact on postoperative non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated the relationship between ESM and postoperative prognosis in patients with early-stage NSCLC.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 534 patients with stage I NSCLC who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy. The ESM was identified by preoperative computed tomography, and the amount was normalized according to height and sex. Overall survival, lung cancer-related deaths and non-lung cancer-related deaths (NLCRD) were analysed using log-rank and Gray's tests. Multivariable analyses were conducted to identify factors that influenced overall survival (OS) and NLCRD.

RESULTS

The amount of ESM normalized according to height and sex was significantly associated with age and body mass index. When the amount was low, OS (5-year OS, 79.6 vs 89.5%; P< 0.001) and NLCRD (5-year cumulative mortality rate, 14.7 vs 6.8%; P< 0.001) were significantly worse, although no difference was found in lung cancer-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The amount of preoperative ESM was strongly related to non-lung cancer-related death and was a significant prognostic factor for stage I NSCLC. Patients with a low amount of the muscle should be treated based on proper risk assessment.

A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 3: systematic review of evidence regarding surgery in compromised patients or specific tumors

Background

Clinical decision-making for patients with stage I lung cancer is complex. It involves multiple options [lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), thermal ablation], weighing multiple outcomes (e.g., short-, intermediate-, long-term) and multiple aspects of each (e.g., magnitude of a difference, the degree of confidence in the evidence, and the applicability to the patient and setting at hand). A structure is needed to summarize the relevant evidence for an individual patient and to identify which outcomes have the greatest impact on the decision-making.

Methods

A PubMed systematic review from 2000-2021 of outcomes after lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection in older patients, patients with limited pulmonary reserve and favorable tumors is the focus of this paper. Evidence was abstracted from randomized trials and non-randomized comparisons (NRCs) with adjustment for confounders. The analysis involved careful assessment, including characteristics of patients, settings, residual confounding etc. to expose degrees of uncertainty and applicability to individual patients. Evidence is summarized that provides an at-a-glance overall impression as well as the ability to delve into layers of details of the patients, settings and treatments involved.

Results

In older patients, perioperative mortality is minimally altered by resection extent and only slightly affected by increasing age; sublobar resection may slightly decrease morbidity. Long-term outcomes are worse after lesser resection; the difference is slightly attenuated with increasing age. Reported short-term outcomes are quite acceptable in (selected) patients with severely limited pulmonary reserve, not clearly altered by resection extent but substantially improved by a minimally invasive approach. Quality-of-life (QOL) and impact on pulmonary function hasn't been well studied, but there appears to be little difference by resection extent in older or compromised patients. Patient selection is paramount but not well defined. Ground-glass and screen-detected tumors exhibit favorable long-term outcomes regardless of resection extent; however solid tumors <1 cm are not a reliably favorable group.

Conclusions

A systematic, comprehensive summary of evidence regarding resection extent in compromised patients and favorable tumors with attention to aspects of applicability, uncertainty and effect modifiers provides a foundation for a framework for individualized decision-making.

The Value of Residual Volume/Total Lung Capacity as an Indicator for Predicting Postoperative Lung Function in Non-Small Lung Cancer

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most frequently occurring concomitant diseases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is characterized by small airways and the hyperinflation of the lung. Patients with hyperinflated lung tend to have more reserved lung function than conventionally predicted after lung cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to identify other indicators in predicting postoperative lung function after lung resection for lung cancer. Patients with NSCLC who underwent curative lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection from 2017 to 2019 were included. Predicted postoperative FEV₁ (ppoFEV₁) was calculated using the formula: preoperative FEV₁ × (19 segments-the number of segments to be removed) ÷ 19. The difference between the measured postoperative FEV₁ and ppoFEV₁ was defined as an outcome. Patients were categorized into two groups: preserved FEV₁ if the difference was positive and non-preserved FEV₁, if otherwise. In total, 238 patients were included: 74 (31.1%) in the FEV₁ non-preserved group and 164 (68.9%) in the FEV₁ preserved group. The proportion of preoperative residual volume (RV)/total lung capacity (TLC) ≥ 40% in the FEV₁ non-preserved group (21.4%) was lower than in the preserved group (36.1%) (p = 0.03). In logistic regression analysis, preoperative RV/TLC ≥ 40% was related to postoperative FEV1 preservation. (adjusted OR, 2.02, p = 0.041). Linear regression analysis suggested that preoperative RV/TLC was positively correlated with a significant difference. (p = 0.004) Preoperative RV/TLC ≥ 40% was an independent predictor of preserved lung function in patients undergoing curative lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection. Preoperative RV/TLC is positively correlated with postoperative lung function.

Lung Cancer Screening in a Surgical Lung Cancer Population: Analysis of a Rural, Quaternary, Academic Experience

BACKGROUND

Rural populations face many health disadvantages including higher rates of tobacco use and lung cancer than more populated areas. Given this, we specifically sought to understand the current screening landscape in a cohort of patients with resected lung cancer to help direct improvements in the screening process.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our prospective database at a rural, quaternary, academic institution from January 2015 to June 2018. All patients who underwent resection for primary lung cancer were studied to assess the frequency of preoperative low-dose chest computed tomography per accepted guidelines. The intent was to evaluate participant demographics, clinical stage, frequency, and distribution of Lung-RADS reporting.

RESULTS

About 446 patients underwent primary resection, of which 252 were deemed screening-eligible. About 57 (22.6%) underwent low-dose chest computed tomography screening and 195 (77.4%) did not. No significant demographic differences were identified between groups. However, 82.5% (47/57) of the screened patients presented with clinical stage IA disease, compared with 67.1% (131/195) of the nonscreened patients (P = 0.03). Among those screened, 36.8% (21/57) did not have a Lung-RADS score documented despite 52.3% (11/21) of those coming from accredited programs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our screening completion rate was only 22.6% of eligible patients and 36.8% of those patients did not have a documented Lung-RADS score. These findings, in combination with the increased rate of diagnosis of stage IA disease, provide compelling reasons to further investigate factors designed to improve access and screening practices at rural institutions.

Outcome of thoracoscopic anatomical sublobar resection under 3-dimensional computed tomography simulation

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported the feasibility and efficacy of thoracoscopic anatomical sublobar resection under three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) simulation; however, its long-term outcomes have not been clearly established in primary lung cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of this technique.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from 112 consecutive patients with selected clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent thoracoscopic anatomical sublobar resection from 2004 to 2014. This procedure was planned using preoperative 3DCT simulation to ensure sufficient surgical margins and enabled tailor-made surgery for each patient. Patients who had predominantly ground glass opacity lung cancers underwent anatomical sublobar resection as a curative-intent resection. Other patients who were high-risk candidates for lobectomy underwent anatomical sublobar resection as a compromised limited resection.

RESULTS

Of the 112 cases, 82 had a curative-intent resection, while 30 had a compromised limited resection. Recurrence occurred in only 2 cases (1.8%), both of which were in the compromised limited group. A second primary lung cancer was observed in 5 cases (4.5%). Of the 5 patients, 4 underwent surgery for a second cancer and had no recurrence. The 5-year overall survival, lung cancer-specific overall survival, and recurrence-free survival rates were 92.5%, 100%, and 98.2%, respectively, for all cases; 97.6%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, in the curative-intent group; and 75.8%, 100% and 92.6%, respectively, in the compromised limited group.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracoscopic anatomical sublobar resection under 3DCT simulation may be an acceptable alternative treatment in selected patients with NSCLC.

TRIAL AND CLINICAL REGISTRY

Clinical registration number: IRB No. 2020-98 (Dated: 2020.6.30).

Correlation between perioperative outcomes and long-term survival for non-small lung cancer treated at major centers

BACKGROUND

The public is placing increased emphasis on specialty specific rankings, thereby affecting patients' choices of clinical care programs. In the spirit of transparency, public reporting initiatives are underway or being considered by various surgical specialties whose databases rank programs based on short-term outcomes. Of concern, short-term risk avoidance excludes important comparative cases from surgical database participation and may adversely affect overall long-term oncologic treatment team results. To assess the validity of comparing short-term perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of all patients treated at major centers, we studied the correlations between these variables.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) between 2008 and 2012, yielding 5-year follow-up data for all patients at centers treating at least 100 patients annually. Mortality (30- and 90-day), unplanned 30-day readmissions, and hospital length of stay were modeled using logistic regression with sex, race, age, Charlson-Deyo combined comorbidity, extent of surgery, income, insurance status, histology, grade, and analytic stage as predictors, all with 2-way interaction terms. The differences between the predicted rates and observed rates were calculated for each short-term outcome, and the average of these was used to create a short-term metric (STM). A similar approach was used to create a long-term metric (LTM) that used overall survival as a single dependent variable. Centers were ranked into deciles based on these metrics. Visual plotting as well as correlation coefficients were used to judge correlation between STM and LTM.

RESULTS

A total of 298,175 patients from 541 centers were included in this analysis, of whom 102,860 underwent surgical resection for NSCLC. The correlation between STM and LTM was negative using parametric estimates (Pearson correlation coefficient = -0.09 [P = .03] and -0.22 [P < .01]) and nonparametric estimates (Spearman rank correlation coefficient = -0.09 [P = .02] and -0.22 [P < .01]) for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term perioperative outcome rankings correlate poorly with long-term survival outcome rankings when cancer treatment centers are compared. Factors explaining this discrepancy merit further study. Rankings based on short-term outcomes alone may be incomplete for public reporting.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for empirically treated hypermetabolic lung lesions: a single-institutional experience identifying the Charlson score as a key prognostic factor

Background

Though pathologic evidence for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is preferred, many patients do not receive a biopsy prior to treatment with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This study seeks to analyze the overall survival (OS), local control, and toxicity rates for such patients.

Methods

This retrospective review included patients empirically treated with SBRT for presumed non-metastatic NSCLC at a single institution. Inclusion criteria included a hypermetabolic pulmonary lesion noted on positron emission tomography (PET) imaging but no pathological evidence of NSCLC. Patients with another known metastatic tumor were excluded. Statistical analysis was conducted with Cox proportional hazards analysis, univariate analysis, and the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Ninety-one treatments in 90 unique patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were a median 77.9 years at the start of treatment and had a median Charlson score of 7. Pre-treatment standardized uptake value (SUV) was a median 4.5 and 1.5 after treatment. At a median follow-up of 12.9 months, 36-month local control of 91.3% was achieved. Twenty-four-month OS and progression-free survival were 65.4% and 44.8%, respectively. On univariate analysis, biologically effective dose (BED) ≥120 Gy was predictive of improved OS (P=0.001), with 36-month OS of 50.5% for patients with BED ≥120 Gy and only 31.6% for patients with BED <120 Gy. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, Charlson score ≥9 was predictive of decreased OS (P=0.04), and BED ≥120 Gy trended towards improved OS (P=0.08). Thirty-two cases of grade <3 toxicity were reported, and only two cases of grade 3 morbidity (fatigue) were noted.

Conclusions

Local control rates for empiric SBRT treatment for hypermetabolic, non-metastatic NSCLC are similar to those for biopsied NSCLC. OS is primarily dependent on a patient’s overall health status, which can be accurately assessed with the Charlson score. BED ≥120 Gy may also contribute to improved OS.

Preoperative Lung Function Is Associated With Patient-Reported Outcomes After Lung Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND

Patient quality of life (QOL) is a critical outcomes measure in lung cancer surgery. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide valuable insight into the patient experience and allow measurement of preoperative and postoperative QOL. Our objective was to determine which clinical factors predict differences in QOL, as measured by patient-reported physical function and pain intensity among patients undergoing minimally invasive lung cancer surgery.

METHODS

PRO surveys assessing physical function and pain intensity were conducted using instruments from the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. PRO surveys were administered to patients undergoing minimally invasive lung cancer resections at preoperative, 1-month, and 6-month postoperative time points, in an academic institution. Linear mixed-effects regression models were constructed to assess the association between clinical variables on PRO scores over time.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients underwent a thoracoscopic lung resection for cancer. Mean age of the cohort was 67 ± 9.6 years, 43% were male, and 80% were White. When comparing clinical variables with PRO scores after surgery, lower diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (Dlco) was associated with significantly worse physical function (P < .01) and greater pain intensity scores (P < .01) at 6 months, with no differences identified at 1 month. No other studied clinical factor was associated with significant differences in PRO scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Low preoperative Dlco was associated with significant decreases in PRO after minimally invasive lung cancer surgery. Dlco may be of utility in identifying patients who experience greater decline in QOL after surgery and for guiding surgical decision making.

Oncologic Outcomes of Surgery Versus SBRT for Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma is subject to debate. The aim of this study was to compare overall survival and oncologic outcomes of lobar resection (LR), sublobar resection (SR), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes of propensity matched comparative and noncomparative cohort studies was performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival and disease-free survival. The inverse variance method and the random-effects method for meta-analysis were utilized to assess the pooled estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 100 studies with patients treated for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma were included. Long-term overall and disease-free survival after LR was superior over SBRT in all comparisons, and for most comparisons, SR was superior to SBRT. Noncomparative studies showed superior long-term overall and disease-free survival for both LR and SR over SBRT. Although the papers were heterogeneous and of low quality, results remained essentially the same throughout a large number of stratifications and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that LR has superior outcomes compared to SBRT for cI non-small-cell lung carcinoma. New trials are underway evaluating long-term results of SBRT in potentially operable patients.

Uptake of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Resections Within the Veterans Affairs for Known or Suspected Lung Cancer

Importance

Minimally invasive lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer has become more prevalent. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has lower rates of morbidity, better long-term survival, and equivalent oncologic outcomes compared with thoracotomy. However, little has been published on the use and outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery within Veterans Affairs. There is a public assumption that the the Veterans Affairs is slow to adopt new procedures and technologies.

Objective

To determine the uptake of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery within the Veterans Affairs for patients with known or suspected lung cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this retrospective cohort study of national Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse data from January 2002 to December 2015, a total of 11 004 veterans underwent lung resection for known or suspected lung cancer. Data were analyzed from March to November 2018.

Exposures

Open or video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy or wedge resection.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Patient demographic characteristics and procedure and diagnosis International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were abstracted from Corporate Data Warehouse data.

Results

Of the 11 004 included veterans, 10 587 (96.2%) were male, and the median (interquartile range) age was 66.0 (61.0-72.0) years. Of 11 004 included procedures, 8526 (77.5%) were lobectomies and 2478 (22.5%) were wedge resections. The proportion of video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resections increased steadily from 15.6% in 2002 to 50.6% in 2015. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery use by Veterans Integrated Service Networks ranged from 0% to 81.7%, and higher Veterans Integrated Service Network volume was correlated with higher video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery use (Pearson r = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.52; P < .001). Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery use and rate of uptake varied widely across Veteran Affairs regions (P < .001 by Wilcoxon signed rank test).

Conclusions and Relevance

Paralleling academic hospitals, most lung resections are now performed in the Veterans Affairs using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. More research is needed to identify reasons behind the heterogeneous uptake of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery across Veterans Affairs regions.

Surgeons' preference sublobar resection for stage I NSCLC less than 3 cm

Background

This study aimed to compare survival between standard lobectomy and surgeons' preference sublobar resection among patients with stage I non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Medical records of patients undergoing pulmonary resection between 2006 and 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Differences in disease‐free survival (DFS) and DFS‐associated factors between patients receiving lobectomy and surgeons' preference sublobar resection were analyzed after 1‐1 propensity score‐matching (n = 119 per group).

Results

In total, 1064 pathological stage I NSCLC patients were identified, including 816 (76.7%) who underwent lobectomy, 111 (10.4%) who underwent sublobar resection as a compromised procedure (medically unfit), and 137 (12.9%) who underwent surgeons' preference sublobar resection. Rates of five‐year DFS for patients undergoing lobectomy, medically unfit, and surgeons' preference sublobar resection were 88.7%, 71.0%, and 93.4%, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that radiological solid‐appearance (adjusted hazard [aHR] = 2.908, P = 0.003), PL2 invasion (aHR = 1.970, P = 0.024), and angiolymphatic invasion (aHR = 2.202, P = 0.005) were significantly associated with lower DFS after adjusting for surgeons' preference sublobar resection (aH = 1.031, P = 0.939). Subgroup analysis of all 403 solid‐dominant patients demonstrated equivalent five‐year DFS between surgeons' preference sublobar resection and lobectomy (87.7% and 84.1%, respectively, P = 0.721). Propensity‐matched analysis showed no differences in five‐year DFS in stage I NSCLC patients undergoing lobectomy or surgeons' preference sublobar resection (90.5% vs. 93.4% P = 0.510), and DFS for surgeons' preference sublobar resection remained an insignificant factor (aHR = 0.894, P = 0.834).

Conclusions

Carefully selected patients who have undergone surgeons' preference sublobar resection have comparable outcomes to those receiving lobectomy for stage I NSCLC <3 cm.

Key points

Significant findings of the study Intended sublobar resection has a good outcome. What this study adds Sublobar resection is applicable for stage I NSCLC <3 cm.

Risk factors for the development of complications after surgical treatment for bronchopulmonary carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The most suitable treatment in most early-stage lung cancer patients is surgical resection. Despite previously assessing each patient's status being relevant to detect possible complications inherent to surgery, no consensus has been reached on which factors are "high risk" in such patients. Our study aimed to analyse the morbidity and the mortality incidence associated with this surgery in our setting with a multicentre study and to detect risk parameters.

METHODS

A prospective analysis study with 3,307 patients operated for bronchopulmonary carcinoma in 24 hospitals. Study variables were age, TNM, gender, stage, smoking habit, surgery approach, surgical resection, ECOG, neoadjuvant therapy, comorbidity, spirometric values, and intraoperative and postoperative morbidity and mortality. A multivariate logistic regression analysis of the morbidity and mortality predictor factors was done.

RESULTS

We recorded 34.2% postoperative morbidity and 2.1% postoperative mortality. Gender, myocardial infarction, angina, ECOG ≥1, COPD, DLCO <60%, clinical pathological status, surgical resection and surgery approach were shown as morbidity and mortality predictor factors in lung cancer surgery in our series.

CONCLUSIONS

The main variables to consider when assessing the lung cancer patients to undergo surgery are gender, myocardial infarction, angina, ECOG, COPD, DLCO, clinical pathological status, surgical resection and surgery approach.

Retrospective Observational Study into the Early Causes of Death Following Surgery for NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Respiratory failure has historically been the major cause of mortality after elective lung resections. With improved intubation using fiber-optic scopes, better preoperative respiratory risk assessment, more advanced anesthetic single lung ventilation, and minimally invasive surgical technique, this may have changed. Our objective was to assess the main causes of mortality over the past 10 years in patients undergoing elective lung surgery in a major UK center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective unit data search was made for all deaths during the 10-year period between January 2007 and December 2016 inclusive. All inpatient deaths within 30 days of an elective anatomical lung resection for lung malignancies were included.

RESULTS

Three-thousand three-hundred sixteen lung resections for malignancy were performed in the 10-year period. There were 44 (1.3%) deaths during this period, 27 (61.4%) after open lobectomies, 8 (18.2%) after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomies, 5 (11.4%) after sleeve lobectomies, and 4 (9%) after pneumonectomies. Causes of death included 24 (54.5%) respiratory failure, 10 (22.7%) ischemic bowel, 4 (9%) coronary events, 2 (4.5%) strokes, 2 (4.5%) on table hemorrhage, 1 (2.3%) massive pulmonary embolus, and 1 (2.3%) postoperative hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Although respiratory failure is still a major cause of mortality in the postoperative patient, bowel ischemia has been found to be the second greatest cause of death. This study highlights the need to identify those at risk of this fatal complication during preoperative assessment and their postoperative management.

Robotic lobectomy has the greatest benefit in patients with marginal pulmonary function

Background

Patients with limited pulmonary function have a high risk for pulmonary complications following lobectomy. Robotic approach is currently the least invasive approach. We hypothesized that robotic lobectomy may be of particular benefit in high-risk patients.

Methods

We reviewed our institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) data on lobectomy patients from 2012 to 2017. Postoperative outcomes were compared between robotic and open lobectomy groups. High-risk patients were identified by pulmonary function test. Risk of pulmonary complication was assessed by binary logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 599 patients underwent lobectomy by robotic (n = 287), or by open (n = 312) approach, including 189 high-risk patients. Robotic lobectomy patients had a lower rate of prolonged air leak (6% vs. 10%, p = 0.047), less atelectasis requiring bronchoscopy (6% vs. 16%, p = 0.02), pneumonia (3% vs. 8%, p = 0.01), and shorter length of stay (4 vs. 6 days, p = 0.001). Overall pulmonary complication rate was significantly lower after robotic lobectomy in high-risk patients (28% vs. 45%, p = 0.02), less in intermediate or low risk patients. No significant difference was seen relative to major complication rate (12% vs. 17%, p = 0.09). After multivariate analysis, when adjusting for age, gender, smoking history, FEV1, DLCO, cardiopulmonary comorbidities, and prior chest surgery, the robotic approach remained independently associated with decreased pulmonary complications (odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval [0.34–0.85], p = 0.008).

Conclusions

Robotic lobectomy has the potential to decrease the risk of postoperative pulmonary complication as compared with traditional open thoracotomy. In particular, patients with limited pulmonary function derive the most benefit from a robotic approach.

Predictive value of pulmonary function measures for short-term outcomes following lung resection: analysis of a single high-volume institution

Despite the importance of preoperative risk-stratification, there is a lack of consensus on how to identify high-risk patients for pulmonary resection. Enrollment criteria for national trials propose one definition based on preoperative pulmonary function tests. We sought to examine the value of preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) to predict short-term outcomes following pulmonary resection. Using our institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database we identified 419 consecutive lung cancer patients who presented to our institution for pulmonary resection between 2012 and 2016. We identified patients as "high risk" based on the national trial criteria of FEV1 or DLCO ≤50%. Our primary outcome was any postoperative complication within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included cardiac and pulmonary complications, 30-day readmission, and discharge disposition. DLCO ≤50% was associated with any postoperative complication (P=0.03), but not predictive of cardiac events, pulmonary complications, or 30-day readmission. There were no significant differences in any of these short-term outcomes for patients with FEV1 ≤50%. On multivariable analysis, neither FEV1 nor DLCO ≤50% were significantly associated with occurrence of postoperative complication (OR =1.67, 95% CI: 0.60-4.63; OR =1.66, 95% CI: 0.96-2.86, respectively). Notably, DLCO ≤50%-but not FEV1-was associated with discharge to a skilled facility on univariate (P=0.01) and multivariable analysis (OR =2.54; 95% CI: 1.08-5.99; P=0.03). This association between DLCO and discharge to a skilled facility persisted when DLCO was used as a continuous variable. For all-comers presenting to our institution for lung cancer resection, classification based on FEV1 or DLCO ≤50% may not reliably identify those at highest risk for short-term postoperative complications. While our findings suggest caution when using pulmonary parameters in isolation, the potential value of DLCO as a proxy for underlying comorbidity warrants further investigation.

Appropriate surgical modalities for stages T2a and T2b in the eighth TNM classification of lung cancer

Patients with tumors of 3 to 5 cm were divided into stages T2a (3 to 4 cm) and T2b (4 to 5 cm) based on the 8^th tumor-node-metastasis staging system for lung cancer. The objective of our study was to explore appropriate surgical modalities for the new stages, T2a and T2b. We selected 6,996 node-negative non-small-cell lung cancer patients with tumor sizes of 3 to 5 cm, diagnosed between 2009 and 2013, from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. The Pearson \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\chi }^{2}$$\end{document}χ2. statistic test and Kaplan–Meier curve were used to analyze patient data. The prognosis of patients with stage T2a was significantly better than that of patients with stage T2b, both in overall survival (p = 0.018) and lung cancer specific survival (p = 0.001). For patients with stage T2a, lobectomy had a significantly better outcome. For patients with stage T2b, surgical modalities including pneumonectomy, segmental resection and lobectomy, had similar outcomes in terms of survival. Consequently, lobectomy was the most appropriate surgical treatment modality for new stage T2a patients, whereas, for new T2b patients, treatment outcome did not vary significantly with the choice of surgical modality.

All grades of severity of postoperative adverse events are associated with prolonged length of stay after lung cancer resection

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether all grades of severity of postoperative adverse events are associated with prolonged length of stay in patients undergoing pulmonary cancer resection.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent pulmonary resection with curative intent for malignancy at The Ottawa Hospital, Division of Thoracic Surgery (January 2008 to July 2015). Postoperative adverse events were collected prospectively with the Thoracic Morbidity & Mortality System, based on the Clavien-Dindo severity classification. Patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative investigations, cardiopulmonary assessment, pathologic staging, operative characteristics, and length of stay were retrospectively reviewed. Prolonged hospital stay was defined as >75th percentile for each procedure performed (wedge resection 6 days, segmentectomy 6 days, lobectomy 7 days, extended lobectomy 8 days, pneumonectomy 10 days). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with prolonged hospital stay.

RESULTS

Of 1041 patients, 579 (55.6%) were female, 610 (58.1%) were >65 years old, 232 (22.3%) experienced prolonged hospital stay, and 416 (40.0%) patients had ≥1 postoperative adverse event. Multivariable analyses identified significant (P < .05) factors associated with prolonged hospital stay to be (odds ratio; 95% confidence interval): lower diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (0.99; 0.98-0.99), surgical approach: open thoracotomy (1.8; 1.3-2.5), and presence of any postoperative adverse event: Grade I (5.8; 3.3-10.2), Grade II (6.0; 4.0-8.9), Grade III (11.4; 7.0-18.7), and Grade IV (19.40; 7.1-55.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, open thoracotomy approach, and the development of any postoperative adverse event, including minor events that required no additional therapy, were factors associated with prolonged hospital stay.

Assessing the Generalizability of the National Lung Screening Trial: Comparison of Patients with Stage 1 Disease

RATIONALE

The findings of the NLST (National Lung Screening Trial) are the basis for screening high-risk individuals according to age and smoking history. Although screening is covered for eligible Medicare beneficiaries, the generalizability of the NLST in the elderly population has been questioned.

OBJECTIVES

Compare outcomes of patients diagnosed with stage 1 non-small cell lung cancer in the NLST to a nationally representative cohort of elderly patients Methods: Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare and NLST datasets for patients with stage 1 disease aged 65 to 74 years.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Lung cancer-specific mortality, all-cause mortality, and 30-, 60-, and 90-day treatment mortality were measured. When compared with the NLST group undergoing surgery for stage 1 non-small cell lung cancer, those in the SEER-Medicare NLST eligible cohort had no difference in adjusted odds ratios for 30-, 60-, and 90-day surgical mortality (P values = 0.97, 0.65, and 0.46, respectively). Although the 5-year cancer-specific survival did not differ between cohorts (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84 NLST vs. SEER-Medicare NLST eligible; P = 0.21), the adjusted HR estimate for all-cause mortality was better in the NLST cohort (HR, 0.71; P < 0.01). For patients who did not receive surgery for early-stage disease (presumably for curative intent), the outcomes were far worse (13.1, 18.9, 23.9%, for 30-, 60-, and 90-day treatment mortality, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients with minimal comorbid conditions meeting the inclusion criteria of the NLST who underwent surgery had excellent postoperative outcomes and similar lung cancer-specific 5-year survivorship. In those with significant comorbidities or those not undergoing surgery, competing causes of death may diminish the benefit, and there is no evidence to recommend screening in this group.

Surgery and Surgical Consult Rates for Early Stage Lung Cancer in Ontario: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Surgery offers the best chance for survival for early (stage I and II) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but worldwide resection rates range from 49% to 77%. We investigated factors that may play a role in resection rates.

METHODS

Using administrative data, new diagnoses of NSCLC from 2010 through 2012 were captured. The rate of surgical consultation and resection overall and by age group were determined, as well as rates of pulmonary function testing and radiation therapy.

RESULTS

Of 4,309 persons diagnosed with stage I or II NSCLC between 2010 and 2012, 3,487 (80.9%) received surgical consultations, but only 58.9% (2,539) received surgery. Rates of consultation and surgery decreased with increasing patient age: only 60.3% of patients older than 80 received consultations and 29.9% had resections. Of the 1,770 patients who did not receive surgery, 948 (53.6%) received a surgical consultation, and in this group, 688 (72.5%) were treated with radiation. Of the 822 patients who did not see a surgeon, only 476 (57.9%) were treated with radiation. Pulmonary function testing was performed in 799 (84.3%) of patients who had surgical consults but in only 569 (69.2%) of those who did not see a surgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection rates for early lung cancer appear low, which may be partly due to low rates of surgical consultation. Interestingly, patients who are seen by surgeons but who do not receive surgery are more likely to receive radiation than patients who are not referred for surgery. Further research is required to identify factors influencing resection rates.

Lung cancer in elderly patients

There is a worldwide-accepted evidence of a population shift toward older ages. This shift favors an increased risk of developing lung cancer that is primarily a disease of older populations. Decision making is extremely difficult in elderly patients, since this group is under-represented in clinical trials with only 25% of them historically opening to patients older than 65 years. For all these reasons, a "customized" preoperative assessment to identify physiological or pathological frailty should be encouraged since standard tools may be less reliable. The work already done to improve patient selection for lung surgery in the elderly population clearly shows that surgical resection seems the treatment of choice for early stage lung cancer. Further studies are required to improve outcome by reducing postoperative morbidity and mortality.