Extended Recipient Criteria in Lung Transplantation: Impact of Pleural Abnormalities on Primary Graft Dysfunction

Primary graft dysfunction following lung transplantation: From pathogenesis to future frontiers

Lung transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage lung disease. Currently, just under 5000 lung transplants are performed worldwide annually. However, a major scourge leading to 90-d and 1-year mortality remains primary graft dysfunction. It is a spectrum of lung injury ranging from mild to severe depending on the level of hypoxaemia and lung injury post-transplant. This review aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, outcomes, and future frontiers involved in mitigating primary graft dysfunction. The current diagnostic criteria are examined alongside changes from the previous definition. We also highlight the issues surrounding chronic lung allograft dysfunction and identify the novel therapies available for ex-vivo lung perfusion. Although primary graft dysfunction remains a significant contributor to 90-d and 1-year mortality, ongoing research and development abreast with current technological advancements have shed some light on the issue in pursuit of future diagnostic and therapeutic tools.

Primary graft dysfunction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a devastating complication in the acute postoperative lung transplant period, associated with high short-term mortality and chronic rejection. We review its definition, pathophysiology, risk factors, prevention, treatment strategies, and future research directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

New analyses suggest donation after circulatory death and donation after brain death donors have similar PGD rates, whereas donors >55 years are not associated with increased PGD risk. Recipient pretransplant diastolic dysfunction and overweight or obese recipients with predominant abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue have increased PGD risk. Newly identified recipient biomarkers and donor and recipient genes increase PGD risk, but their clinical utility remains unclear. Mixed data still exists regarding cold ischemic time and PGD risk, and increased PGD risk with cardiopulmonary bypass remains confounded by transfusions. Portable ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) may prevent PGD, but its use is limited to a handful of centers. Although updates to current PGD treatment are lacking, future therapies are promising with targeted therapy and the use of EVLP to pharmacologically recondition donor lungs.

SUMMARY

There is significant progress in defining PGD and identifying its several risk factors, but effective prevention and treatment strategies are needed.

Zonal organ allocation system and its impact on long-term outcomes after lung transplantation: a propensity score matched analysis†

OBJECTIVE

Zonal organ allocation system comprises organ procurement by teams within a specific geographical area of each retrieval team. Therefore, in a substantial number of cases organs are retrieved by 'foreign' teams and are sent for transplantation to the implanting centre. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of zonal organ allocation system on early- and long-term outcomes after lung transplantation (LTx).

METHODS

Included were 331 consecutive patients who underwent LTx performed at Harefield Hospital between January 2007 and January 2015. Recipients were divided into two groups depending on the organ retrieval team: 204 (61.6%) patients were transplanted using lungs procured by our institutional team (institutional group), whereas 127 (38.4%) organs were retrieved by other teams (external group) from experienced transplant centres in the UK. To exclude selection bias and other confounders, a 1:1 propensity score-based matching procedure was performed resulting in a total number of 238 donors and recipients who were well matched for baseline characteristics. The primary end-points were overall survival after LTx and freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). Secondary end-points were perioperative clinical characteristics as well as adverse events that occurred over the follow-up.

RESULT

After propensity score matching all donor characteristics and all baseline recipient characteristics were statistically similar between the two groups. In terms of early postoperative results, both groups were statistically comparable. However, there was a trend towards higher incidence of primary graft dysfunction in the external group (P = 0.054). Regarding long-term results with up to 7 years of follow-up, the overall survival also appeared to be poorer in the external group; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. The freedom from BOS over the long-term follow was significantly poorer in the external group (P = 0.040).

CONCLUSION

Despite excellent early outcomes the zonal allocation system might be associated with significantly poorer long-term outcomes in terms of freedom from BOS after bilateral LTx. Further research is needed to find the underlying factors leading to these results.