The Impact of Pleural Lavage Cytology Both Before and After Lung Resection on Recurrence of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the Classification of Residual Tumor After Resection for the Forthcoming (Ninth) Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The goal of surgical resection is to completely remove a cancer; it is useful to have a system to describe how well this was accomplished. This is captured by the residual tumor (R) classification, which is separate from the TNM classification that describes the anatomic extent of a cancer independent of treatment. The traditional R-classification designates as R0 a complete resection, as R1 a macroscopically complete resection but with microscopic tumor at the surgical margin, and as R2 a resection that leaves gross tumor behind. For lung cancer, an additional category encompasses situations in which the presence of residual tumor is uncertain.

METHODS

This paper represents a comprehensive review of evidence regarding these R categories and the descriptors thereof, focusing on studies published after the year 2000 and with adjustment for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Consistent discrimination between complete, uncertain, and incomplete resection is revealed with respect to overall survival. Evidence regarding specific descriptors is generally somewhat limited and only partially consistent; nevertheless, the data suggest retaining all descriptors but with clarifications to address ambiguities.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of this review, the R-classification for the ninth edition of stage classification of lung cancer is proposed to retain the same overall framework and descriptors, with more precise definitions of descriptors. These refinements should facilitate application and further research.

Intraoperative rapid diagnosis of pleural lavage cytology in non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Positive pleural lavage cytology (PLC +) is a poor prognostic factor for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on the impact of intraoperative rapid diagnosis of PLC (rPLC) are lacking. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of rPLC before resection during surgery.

METHODS

A total of 1,838 patients who underwent rPLC for NSCLC between September 2002 and December 2014 were studied retrospectively. We assessed the clinicopathological factors between rPLC findings and the impact on survival of patients with curative resection.

RESULTS

The rPLC + status was observed in 96 (5.3%) among 1,838 patients. The rPLC + group had more unsuspected N2 (30%) than the rPLC- group (p < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent lobectomy or more extensive resection with rPLC + , negative rPLC (rPLC-), and microscopic pleural dissemination (PD) and/or malignant pleural effusion (PE) were 67.3, 81.3, and 11.0%, respectively. In the rPLC + group, the prognosis of patients with pN2 was equal to that of pN0-1 (5-year OS: 77.9% vs. 63.4%, p = 0.263). Undetectable dissemination in the first evaluation immediately after starting surgery was found in 9% of rPLC + patients by additional evaluation of the thoracic cavity.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with rPLC + have more favorable survival than those with microscopic PD/PE after surgery. Curative resection should be performed in patients with rPLC + , even if N2 is detected during surgery. However, the rPLC + group often has N2 upstaging; therefore, systematic nodal dissection should be performed in rPLC + patients for exact staging. rPLC may contribute to preventing oversight PD by re-evaluation during surgery.

Impact of Positive Pleural Lavage Cytology for Each Stage of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Positive preresection pleural lavage cytology (PLC⁺) is a poor prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study evaluated the prognostic value of PLC⁺ for the different pathologic stages (p-stages) of NSCLC.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of all 1293 staged patients who underwent curative resection in the Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan, for NSCLC to evaluate the impact of PLC⁺ on survival, specifically in patients with p-stage I NSCLC. The survival rate between patients with and without PLC⁺ was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test for comparison.

RESULTS

PLC⁺ was identified in 50 of the 1293 patients (3.9%) and was correlated with lymph node metastasis (P < .001), a pathologic tumor size larger than 3 cm (P = .033), the presence of pleural invasion (P < .001), and adenocarcinoma (P = .038). In patients with PLC⁺, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 31.1%, compared with 75.7% for patients with a negative PLC (PLC^-) (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, the PLC⁺ status was an independent prognostic factor of DFS (hazard ratio 1.70; P = .013). Among the 818 patients with p-stage I NSCLC, PLC⁺ was identified in 22, with a 5-year DFS of 40.4%. The prognosis in patients with p-stage I NSCLC with PLC⁺ was equal to that in patients with p-stage IIIA NSCLC with PLC^- (5-year DFS, 40.4% and 39.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

PLC is an independent prognostic factor in early-stage NSCLC. Therefore, it may be appropriate to up-stage an NSCLC diagnosis in the presence of PLC⁺, especially for patients with p stage I.

Comparison of the clinical benefits for non-small cell lung cancer patients between different volume of pleural lavage fluid following video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Pleural lavage is regularly performed before closing the chest wall in pulmonary surgeries to prevent pleural implantation of tumor cells and postoperative infection. However, scant data could be found in the literature regarding the optimal regimen for performing pleural lavage. To establish a proper volume of pleural lavage, we herein designed a protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Methods

A total of 400 participants with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: group A (500 mL pleural lavage fluid) and group B (3000 mL pleural lavage fluid). The primary outcomes include the levels of leukocytes, neutrophils, and inflammatory factors on the first postoperative day. The secondary outcomes include (i) the levels of leukocytes, neutrophils, and inflammatory factors on the second and third postoperative days; (ii) the incidence of postoperative fever on the first, second, and third postoperative days; (iii) the volumes of chest drainage within the first 3 operative days, the duration of drainage, and postoperative hospitalization; and (iv) the incidence of postoperative complications (incision infection, pain, atelectasis, hemorrhage, etc.) and the incidence of pleural effusion requiring thoracic puncture or drainage within 30 days after surgery. The main content of the analysis includes effectiveness and safety analysis. We will perform subgroup analyses to identify potential influence factors.

Discussion

As far as we know, this will be the first randomized controlled trial to compare the clinical outcomes between different volumes of pleural lavage fluid following VATS and MLND. Findings from this trial will determine the appropriate amount of pleural lavage before chest wall closure.

Trial registration

This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( on 17 March 2019. ChiCTR 1900021950).

Clinicopathological features of intraoperative pleural lavage cytology for non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

The significance of clinicopathological features of pre- and post-resection pleural lavage cytology (PLC) for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) currently remains unknown.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and December 2012, pre- and post-resection PLC were performed for NSCLC in 565 patients at Tohoku University, Miyagi Cancer Center, or Sendai Medical Center. The relationship between the clinicopathological features and patient outcomes was analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (3.9%) had positive findings from pre- or post-resection PLC. Both PLC were correlated with pT and pl factors, while only post-resection PLC was correlated with pN factor (p < 0.005). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of the positive pre-resection PLC was significantly poorer than that of negative (26.7% vs. 76.9%, p < 0.0001). In addition, the 5-year DFS of the positive post-resection PLC was also poorer than that of negative (14.3% vs. 76.0%, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analyses revealed that both PLC were not independent prognostic factors in our study.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant association of post-resection PLC with N factor is considered to be characteristics of post-resection PLC different from pre-resection PLC. A prognostic impact of post-resection PLC and its detailed difference from pre-resection PLC should be clarified by further investigations.

[Latest Progress of Intraoperative Pleural Lavage Cytology in Lung Cancer Surgery]

非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC）根治术中胸腔冲洗液细胞学检查是一种常用的检测肿瘤进展并评估患者预后的诊断技术。长期以来大量研究者致力于阐明术中胸腔冲洗液细胞学检查结果与肺癌患者术后生存及肿瘤复发转移的关系。由于不同研究间存在明显异质性，其结论也各有不同。但能肯定的是，胸腔冲洗液肿瘤细胞检查阳性已被证实为手术患者的不良预后因素之一。本文尝试从临床意义、影响因素及可能发生机制等角度就近年来术中胸膜腔冲洗的研究进展作一综述。

Lung cancer staging: a concise update

Diagnosis and clinical staging of lung cancer are fundamental to planning therapy. The techniques for clinical staging, i.e anatomic and metabolic imaging, endoscopies and minimally invasive surgical procedures, should be performed sequentially and with an increasing degree of invasiveness. Intraoperative staging, assessing the magnitude of the primary tumour, the involved structures, and the loco-regional lymphatic spread by means of systematic nodal dissection, is essential in order to achieve a complete resection. In resected tumours, pathological staging, with the systematic study of the resected specimens, is the strongest prognostic indicator and is essential to make further decisions on therapy. In the present decade, the guidelines on lung cancer staging of the American College of Chest Physicians and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons are based on the best available evidence and are widely followed. Recent advances in the classification of the adenocarcinoma of the lung, with the definition of adenocarcinoma in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma and lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma, and the publication of the eighth edition of the tumour, node and metastasis classification of lung cancer, have to be integrated into the staging process. The present review complements the latest guidelines on lung cancer staging by providing an update of all these issues.

Pleural lavage cytology after lung resection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and the feasibility of 20 mL saline solution

BACKGROUND

There are two issues to be discussed in pleural lavage cytology (PLC) for resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whether it should be performed before (pre-PLC) or after (post-PLC) the lung resection and the dose of saline varies widely among the institutions.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 466 consecutive patients who underwent a curative resection for NSCLC and received both a pre- and post- PLC using 20 mL of saline from January 2001 to December 2011.

RESULTS

There were 24/28 of positive pre- and post-PLC and 442/438 negative pre- and post-PLCs, respectively. Patients with a positive pre- or post-PLCs had significantly worse 5-year survival rates than those with negative results (pre-PLC positive/negative; 32.6%/69.9%, p = 0.001, post-PLC positive/negative; 21.4%/71.1%, p < 0.001, respectively). The post-PLC (p = 0.01) was an independent prognostic factor for the overall survival by a multivariate analysis, whereas the pre-PLC was not (p = 0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

The post-PLC was a more significant prognostic factor than the pre-PLC. Further, 20 mL of saline seemed feasible because of the consistent results compared to the past reports using a greater dose of saline for regarding the positive rates of the PLC and its prognostic significance.

EFHD2 promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and correlates with postsurgical recurrence of stage I lung adenocarcinoma

Surgery is the only curative treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, approximately one-third of these patients develop recurrence, which remains the main cause of mortality in the postsurgical treatment of NSCLC. Many molecular markers have been proposed to predict recurrence of early-stage disease, but no marker has demonstrated sufficient reliability for clinical application. In the present study, the novel protein EF-hand domain-containing protein D2 (EFHD2) was identified as expressed in highly metastatic tumor cells. EFHD2 increased the formation of protrusive invadopodia structures and cell migration and invasion abilities and promoted the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) character of lung adenocarcinoma cells. We demonstrated that the mechanism of EFHD2 in enhancing EMT occurs partly through inhibition of caveolin-1 (CAV1) for cancer progression. The expression of EFHD2 was significantly correlated with postsurgical recurrence of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma in the Kaplan-Meier-plotter cancer database search and our retrospective cohort study (HR, 6.14; 95% CI, 2.40-15.74; P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that EFHD2 expression was an independent clinical predictor for this disease. We conclude that EFHD2 expression is associated with increased metastasis and EMT and could serve as an independent marker to predict postsurgical recurrence of patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma.