Pulmonary Resection for Synchronous M1b-cStage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Exploring the Role of Preoperative Systemic Therapy and Primary Resection in NSCLC With Extrathoracic Metastases: Identifying the Optimal Candidates

BACKGROUND

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), patients with extrathoracic metastases typically have a poor prognosis, with systemic chemotherapy being the standard care. The full potential of primary resection therapy (PRT) in these patients, especially during the immunotherapy era, is not fully established. Additionally, the effectiveness of systemic preoperative therapy in this context is unclear.

METHODS

This retrospective study identified NSCLC patients with extrathoracic metastases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2019. We compared the survival rates of those treated with just chemotherapy vs those receiving both chemotherapy and PRT.

RESULTS

In a study of 41 909 patients with extrathoracic metastatic NSCLC receiving chemotherapy, we found that adding PRT significantly increased overall survival (median OS post-PSM: 18 months vs 11 months, P < 0.001). However, in the immunotherapy era, its effectiveness was less pronounced (HR: 0.56 vs 0.7, P for interaction = 0.011). For patients who have metastases to multiple distant organs, combined distant organ and distant lymph node metastases, or lung metastases, no additional survival benefit from PRT was observed (all P > 0.05). Patients receiving systemic preoperative therapy before PRT had significantly better outcomes than those who did not (HR = 0.69, P < 0.001). A predictive nomogram was developed and validated, showing AUCs of 0.751 and 0.766 in the training and test sets.

CONCLUSION

In both pre- and post-immunotherapy eras, patients with extrathoracic metastatic NSCLC benefit more from adding primary tumor resection to chemotherapy, especially those with preoperative systemic therapy. We created a precise nomogram to identify the best candidates for PRT among patients with extrathoracic NSCLC metastases.

Association of Brain Metastases With Survival in Patients With Limited or Stable Extracranial Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Intracranial metastatic disease (IMD) is a severe complication of cancer with profound prognostic implications. Patients with IMD in the setting of limited or stable extracranial disease (IMD-SE) may represent a unique and understudied subset of patients with IMD with superior prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and intracranial PFS (iPFS) in patients with IMD-SE secondary to any primary cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Records were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and gray literature sources from inception to June 21, 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies in English reporting OS, PFS, or iPFS in patients with IMD-SE (defined as IMD and ≤2 extracranial metastatic sites) and no prior second-line chemotherapy or brain-directed therapy were selected.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Author, year of publication, type of study, type of primary cancer, and outcome measures were extracted. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate effect sizes, and subgroup meta-analysis and metaregression were conducted to measure between-study differences in February 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was OS described as hazard ratios (HRs) and medians for comparative and single-group studies, respectively. Secondary end points were PFS and iPFS.

RESULTS

Overall, 68 studies (5325 patients) were included. IMD-SE was associated with longer OS (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.39-0.70) and iPFS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52-0.76) compared with IMD in the setting of progressive extracranial disease. The weighted median OS estimate for patients with IMD-SE was 17.9 months (95% CI, 16.4-22.0 months), and for patients with IMD-PE it was 8.0 months (95% CI, 7.2-12.8 months). Pooled median OS for all patients with IMD-SE was 20.9 months (95% CI, 16.35-25.98 months); for the subgroup with breast cancer it was 20.2 months (95% CI, 10.43-38.20 months), and for non-small cell lung cancer it was 27.5 months (95% CI, 18.27-49.66 months). Between-study heterogeneity for OS and iPFS were moderate (I2 = 56.5%) and low (I2 = 0%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with IMD-SE, limited systemic disease was associated with improved OS and iPFS. Future prospective trials should aim to collect granular information on the extent of extracranial disease to identify drivers of mortality and optimal treatment strategies in patients with brain metastases.

Operative versus Nonoperative Treatment in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Recommended for Surgery

Background

There is currently limited evidence for a correlation between the recommended operation and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

NSCLC patients with stages III and IV, recommended for operation, were identified in the US National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER).We used propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to ensure the robustness of our findings. The cumulative rates of death were compared between patients with and without recommended operations using the Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results

Operation was recommended for 3331 patients but was not performed in 912 (27.4%) patients (then on-operative group). After PSM, 553 pairs matched. Compared to the nonoperative group, the hazard ratios (HRs) in the operative group were 0.46 (95% CI 0.23-0.95 and p=0.037) in stage IIIA and 0.54 (95% CI 0.42-0.68 and p < 0.001) in stage IVA. However, in stages IIIB, IIIC, and IVB, the recommended operative group was not associated with better OS. The OS was not different in stage IIIA-N2, stage IVA-N1, and stage IVA-N3 patients between groups (p=0.28, p=0.14, and p=0.79, respectively). Moreover, the recommended operative group had better OS than the nonoperative group in stage IIIA-N0 (p=0.00085), stage IIIA-N1 (p=0.009), stage IVA-N0 (p < 0.001), and stage IVA-N2 (p=0.034).

Conclusion

Compared to the nonoperative group, recommended operation improved survival in NSCLC patients with stage IIIA-N0, stage IIIA-N1, stage IVA-N0, and stage IVA-N2. However, in stages IIIA-N2, IIIB, IIIC, IVA-N1, IVA-N3, and IVB, recommended operation did not lead to significantly improved survival time.

Surgical Survival Benefits With Different Metastatic Patterns for Stage IV Extrathoracic Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A SEER-Based Study

Background:

With the knowledge of oligometastases, primary surgery plays an increasingly vital role in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. We aimed to evaluate the survival benefit of primary surgery based on metastatic patterns.

Materials and Methods:

The selected patients with stage IV extrathoracic metastatic (m1b) non-small cell lung cancer between 2010 and 2015 were included in a retrospective cohort study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Multiple imputation was used for the missing data. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether surgery was performed. After covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) weighting, multivariate Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier survival curve were built to identify the survival benefit of different metastatic patterns.

Results:

Surgery can potentially increase the overall survival (OS) (adjusted HR: 0.68, P < 0.001) of non-small cell lung cancer. The weighted 3-year OS in the surgical group was 16.9%, compared with 7.8% in the nonsurgical group. For single organ metastasis, surgery could improve the survival of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Meanwhile, no significant survival improvements in surgical group were observed in patients with multiple organ metastases.

Conclusion:

The surgical survival benefits for extrathoracic metastatic non-small cell lung cancer could be divided by metastatic pattern.

Surgical outcomes of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center experience

Background

Increasing evidence has shown the effectiveness of surgery for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Present study aims to summarize the experience of our institution in dealing with advanced NSCLC in the context of multimodality therapy including lung surgery.

Methods

Patients underwent surgical resection for stage IV NSCLC diagnosed before or during surgery from January 2014 to June 2017 at Tangdu Hospital were included in this study.

Results

There were 88 stage IV NSCLC patients enrolled in this study. Among them, 35 patients with pleural metastases, 18 with brain oligometastases, 25 with extra-brain oligometastases and 10 with multiple metastatic sites or organs. For primary lung tumor, almost all (86/88) were resected with R0. For metastatic lesions, 53 patients received curative local treatment and 9 patients with partial treatment. There were 62 patients received adjuvant treatment, 10 patients received no adjuvant treatment and 16 patients with missing data of adjuvant treatment. The median overall survival of patients was 31.72 months. The estimated 3-year OS was 42.2%. Patients with pleural metastases and brain oligometastases got better outcomes than the ones with extra-brain oligometastases and multiple metastases (P<0.001). Patients with adjuvant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment had significantly better OS compared with those with adjuvant chemotherapy treatment (P=0.015). Besides, age <60 and cT1-2 were also associated with better survival.

Conclusions

Surgery may be a considerable choice for stage IV NSCLC in the context of multimodality therapy.

Patient outcomes post-pulmonary resection for synchronous bone-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The efficacy of curative-intent pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with certain types of oligometastases, particularly brain and adrenal metastases, has previously been described. We investigated the outcomes of curative-intent pulmonary resection for NSCLC patients with synchronous isolated bone metastases, which have been less clear to date.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and pathological records of 41 patients with NSCLC and synchronous isolated bone metastases who underwent radical treatments (surgery and/or chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy) for both their primary tumors and bone metastases at the National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Cancer Center, between 2008 and 2013.

Results

Nine of the 41 patients underwent pulmonary primary tumor resection; the rate of clinical N0-1 disease among these 9 patients (100%) was significantly higher than that among the 32 patients who did not undergo resection (34.4%). The five-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) rates of the nine patients who underwent pulmonary resection were 66.7%, 55.6%, and 44.4%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the predictors of longer OS among all 41 patients were primary site resection [hazard ratio (HR) =4.18, 95% CI, 1.20-14.6, P=0.025] and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation (HR =3.30, 95% CI, 1.08-10.1, P=0.036). The former was also a predictor of longer PFS (HR =3.75, 95% CI, 1.27-11.0, P=0.016).

Conclusions

Patients with clinical N0-1 NSCLC and synchronous isolated bone metastases may achieve longer survival rates following primary lung tumor resection.

Lung Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: An Analysis of Patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) Database

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, clinicopathologic characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment outcomes in lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC).

Material/Methods

Patients diagnosed with lung LCNEC between 2000 and 2013 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results database. Kaplan–Meier methods and univariate and multivariate analyses were used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 2097 patients were identified. The total age-adjusted incidence rate of lung LCNEC was 0.3/100 000, with a rise in incidence over the study period. The 5-year lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) were 20.7% and 16.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that age ≥65 years, male sex, advanced tumor stage, advanced nodal stage, not undergoing surgery. and not undergoing chemotherapy were independent adverse indicators for survival outcomes. After stratification by tumor stage, undergoing surgery was associated with more favorable LCSS and OS compared with those without surgery, regardless of tumor stage.

Conclusions

LCNEC is a rare lung cancer subtype with a dismal prognosis. Primary surgical treatment has significant survival benefits, even for stage IV patients. The optimal treatment strategies for lung LCNEC require further investigation.

Operation and Chemotherapy: Prognostic Factors for Lung Cancer With One Synchronous Metastasis

BACKGROUND

Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is considered incurable; however, some patients with only few metastases may benefit from treatment with a curative intent. We aimed to identify the prognostic factors for stage IV NSCLC with synchronous solitary M1.

METHODS

A database constructed from our weekly multidisciplinary thoracic oncology meetings was retrospectively screened from 1993 to 2012. Consecutive patients with NSCLC stages I to IV were included.

RESULTS

Of the 6,760 patients found, 4,832 patients were studied. Among the 1,592 patients (33%) with stage IV NSCLC, 109 (7%) had a synchronous solitary M1. Metastasis involved the brain in 64% of patients. Median overall survival was significantly longer in synchronous solitary M1 than in other stage IV (18.9 months, interquartile range [IQR]: 9.9 to 34.6 months versus 6.1 months, IQR: 2.3 to 13.7 months], respectively, p < 10^-4). Among patients with synchronous solitary M1, 90 (83%) received a local treatment with curative intent at the primary and metastatic sites. Factors independently associated with survival were age older than 63 years (hazard ratio [HR] 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 2.63), Performance status of 3 or 4 (HR 7.91, 95% CI: 2.23 to 28.03), use of chemotherapy (HR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.64), and operation conducted at both sites (HR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Synchronous solitary M1 treated with chemotherapy and operation at both sites resulted in better survival. Survival of NSCLC with synchronous solitary M1 was more similar to stage III than other stage IV NSCLCs. The eighth TNM classification takes this into account by distinguishing between stages M1b and M1c.

Recent advances in the management of non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the number one cause of cancer-related death in both men and women. However, over the last few years, we have witnessed improved outcomes that are largely attributable to early detection, increased efforts in tobacco control, improved surgical approaches, and the development of novel targeted therapies. Currently, there are several novel therapies in clinical practice, including those targeting actionable mutations and more recently immunotherapeutic agents. Immunotherapy represents the most significant step forward in eradicating this deadly disease. Given the ever-changing landscape of lung cancer management, here we present an overview of the most recent advances in the management of non-small cell lung cancer.

The role of laparoscopic resection of metastases to adrenal glands

BACKGROUND

The potential role of the laparoscopic approach for metastases to the adrenal gland is debated. We review here a series of patients consecutively submitted to laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for suspected adrenal metastasis (AM).

METHODS

Retrospective study (consecutive series) of LA for AM. We measured parameters associated to primary tumor and metastasis. Statistical analysis: stepwise regression model.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven LA were performed on 36 patients. The mean age was 62.1 yrs. The side was right in 13 cases. Primary tumor was in the lung (n=22), breast (n=4), colon-rectum (n=4), kidney (n=3), thyroid, melanoma and ovary (n=1 each). Thirty-three out of 37 were confirmed to be AM (mean diameter 50 mm). Twenty-five were single metastasis. One LA was converted due to cava vein infiltration. Mean operative time was 142 min', median p.o. hospital stay was 3 days. After a mean follow-up of 33 months, 9 patients (25%) were alive free of disease, 6 (17%) were alive with disease. Mean post-adrenalectomy DFI was 19 months (range, 0-97 months), and it was the most predictive variable for survival (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The dimensions and absence of invasion on imaging, the evolutive status of the disease and the performance status of the patient are key factors for LA, which is associated with adequate oncologic results, a quicker postoperative recovery, and potential survival benefits.