Spasm and Reopening of the Right Gastroepiploic Artery Conduit After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Reopening of the occluded saphenous vein composite grafts after coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

We have observed reopening of the occluded "no-touch" saphenous vein (NT SV) composite grafts on follow-up angiograms in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graftings (CABGs).

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2018, 1283 patients received NT SV conduits without or with surrounding pedicle tissue as composite grafts based on the in situ left internal thoracic artery (ITA) for CABG and underwent early postoperative angiographies. Among the 1283 patients, 53 patients showed 55 occluded SV conduit anastomoses, and 46 patients who had 48 occluded SV anastomoses were re-evaluated by 1-year postoperative angiographies.

RESULTS

Early postoperative angiographies in 1283 patients demonstrated overall occlusion rates of 1.2% (56/4518); occlusion rates of the ITA and SV were 0.08% (1/1259) and 1.7% (55/3260), respectively. One-year angiograms demonstrated that 14 occluded SV anastomoses (29.2% [14/48 occluded SV]) of 14 patients became patent. Reopening of occluded SV conduits occurred more frequently in NT SV with pedicle tissue than in NT SV without pedicle tissue (45.0% [9/20] vs. 17.9% [5/28]; p = .057). When we examined the preoperative and 1-year postoperative angiograms, reopening of the occluded SV conduits was not related with progression (p = .258) or preoperative reversibility score (p = .115) of native target coronary artery disease.

CONCLUSIONS

More than a quarter of the occluded SV composite grafts on early postoperative angiograms were patent in the 1-year angiograms. The reopening rates were higher in patients who had received NT SV conduits with pedicle tissue than those who had received NT SV conduits without pedicle tissue.

Long-term Outcome 10 Years After Free Gastroepiploic Artery Graft for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

BACKGROUND

The long-term benefits of "free" gastroepiploic artery (GEA) grafts remain unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the long-term patency and clinical results of en bloc free GEA grafts.

METHODS

Of the 1478 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery at our institution between January 1997 and December 2009, 137 patients underwent en bloc free GEA grafting. Graft patency, late survival, and freedom from major adverse cardiovascular events were examined. Propensity score matching was used to compare the patency of free GEA grafts with the saphenous vein grafts, and 134 matched pairs were generated.

RESULTS

The early patency rate of free GEA grafts was 98.6%. The long-term patency rates of the free GEA grafts was 96.5% at 5 years, 95% at 10 years, and 86.6% at 15 years. In the 134 matched pairs, the long-term patency rates of free GEA grafts anastomosed to the right coronary artery were significantly higher than those of saphenous vein grafts to the right coronary artery (97% vs 91.8% at 5 years; 95.3% vs 79.6% at 10 years; 85.9% vs 61.7% at 15 years; P < .001). Survival was 94% at 5 years, 86.6% at 10 years, and 66.8% at 15 years; and freedom from major adverse cardiovascular events was 93.2% at 5 years, 91.3% at 10 years, and 73.1% at 15 years.

CONCLUSIONS

En bloc free GEA grafts had favorable long-term performance and can be considered as an effective option for patients who need to receive as many arterial grafts as possible.

Clinical Validation of a Coronary Surgery Technique That Minimizes Aortic Manipulation

BACKGROUND

To minimize aortic manipulation and maximize use of arterial conduits are aims of modern coronary surgery.

METHODS

From March 2012 to October 2016, 890 consecutive patients with multivessel coronary disease underwent isolated coronary operations using both internal thoracic arteries (ITAs). In 205 (23%; mean age, 67.6 ± 9.2 years), the right ITA was proximally transected and used as a free graft, while its in situ stump was elongated with a saphenous vein graft. The new arteriovenous I conduit was directed to the inferolateral cardiac wall. Operative data and early outcomes of these patients (I group) were compared with the remaining 685 patients (control [C] group). Early and late outcomes were also compared in 184 pairs identified with propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Between the I and C groups there was no significant difference in expected operative risk (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II, p = 0.28), although diseased ascending aorta (p < 0.0001) and critical preoperative state (p = 0.027) were more frequent in the I group. Despite a higher number of coronary anastomoses (mean, 4 ± 0.9 vs 3.7 ± 1, p < 0.0001), cardiopulmonary bypass time was shorter in the I group both in overall (86.7 ± 23.7 vs 105.7 ± 34.2 minutes, p < 0.0001) and matched series (86.8 ± 24.1 vs 108.8 ± 31.9 minutes, p < 0.0001). In-hospital mortality (1% vs 1.9%, p = 0.54) and the rates of postoperative complications were similar. During the follow-up period, no intergroup difference was found in matched patients in the nonparametric estimates of freedom from all-cause death (p = 0.39) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (p = 0.44).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery using this arteriovenous I conduit is safe, minimizes aortic manipulation, shortens cardiopulmonary bypass time, and aids complete revascularization.