Aborted Sudden Cardiac Death After Unroofing of Anomalous Left Coronary Artery

Anomalous Aortic Origin of a Coronary Artery

BACKGROUND

Although anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) is associated with risk of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), there is a spectrum of disease, with the appropriate management for many remaining unclear. Increasing data warrant review for an updated perspective on management.

METHODS

A panel of congenital cardiac surgeons, cardiologists, and imaging practitioners reviewed the current literature related to AAOCA and its management. Survey of relevant publications from 2010 to the present in PubMed was performed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of AAOCA is 0.4% to 0.8%. Anomalous left coronary artery is 3 to 8 times less common than anomalous right coronary, but carries a much higher risk of SCA. Nevertheless, anomalous right coronary is not completely benign; 10% demonstrate ischemia, and it remains an important cause of SCA. Decision-making regarding which patients should be recommended for surgical intervention includes determining anatomic features associated with ischemia, evidence of ischemia on provocative testing, and concerning cardiovascular symptoms. Ischemia testing continues to prove challenging with low sensitivity and specificity, but the utility of new modalities is an active area of research. Surgical interventions focus on creating an unobstructed path for blood flow and choosing the appropriate surgical technique given the anatomy to accomplish this. Nontrivial morbidity has been reported with surgery, including new-onset ischemia.

CONCLUSIONS

A proportion of patients with AAOCA demonstrate features and ischemia that warrant surgical intervention. Continued work remains to improve the ability to detect inducible ischemia, to risk stratify these patients, and to provide guidance in terms of which patients warrant surgical intervention.

Myocardial bridges in a pediatric population: Outcomes following a standardized approach

OBJECTIVE

To describe clinical, functional, surgical, and outcomes data in pediatric patients with a myocardial bridge (MB) evaluated and managed following a standardized approach.

METHODS

Prospective observational study included patients evaluated in the Coronary Artery Anomalies Program. Anatomy was determined by computed tomography angiography, myocardial perfusion by stress perfusion imaging, and coronary hemodynamic assessment by cardiac catheterization.

RESULTS

In total, 39 of 42 patients with a complete evaluation for MB were included (December 2012 to June 2022) at a median age of 14.1 years (interquartile range, 12.2-16.4). Sudden cardiac arrest occurred in 3 of 39 (8%), exertional symptoms in 14 (36%), and no/nonspecific symptoms in 7 (18%) patients. Exercise stress test was abnormal in 3 of 34 (9%), stress perfusion imaging in 8 of 34 (24%), and resting instantaneous wave-free ratio ≤0.89 or diastolic dobutamine fractional flow reserve ≤0.80 in 11 of 21 (52%) patients. As a result, 15 of 39 (38%) patients were determined to have hemodynamically significant MB, 1 of 15 patients started beta-blocker, and 14 of 15 were referred for surgery. Myotomy (n = 11) and coronary bypass (n = 1) were performed successfully, resulting in improved symptoms and stress testing results. One patient required pericardiocentesis postoperatively, and all were discharged without other complications. At median follow-up time of 2.9 (1.8-5.8) years, all (except 2 pending surgery) were doing well without exercise restriction.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric patients with MB can present with myocardial ischemia and sudden cardiac arrest. Provocative stress test and intracoronary hemodynamic tests helped risk-stratify symptomatic patients with MB and concern for ischemia. Surgical repair was safe and effective in mitigating exertional symptoms and stress test results, allowing patients to return to exercise without restriction.

Trends in surgical management of anomalous aortic origin of the coronary artery over 2 decades

Objective

To evaluate outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for anomalous aortic origin of the coronary artery (AAOCA) at a tertiary care center and determine the influences of a coronary artery program on management strategies and outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective review of consecutive surgical patients who had isolated AAOCA at a tertiary care center between August 1, 1999, and October 31, 2022, compared patient characteristics, interventional timing, and surgical strategies before and after program inception in 2018. Comparisons between time periods and anatomical subgroups were performed using Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

Results

Of 149 surgical AAOCA patients, 102 (69%) had AAO of the right coronary artery. Compared with AAO of the left coronary artery (AAOLCA), AAO of the right coronary artery (AAORCA) was associated with greater athletic participation (intramural, varsity, and college-level) (74% vs 43%; P < .001) and preoperative functional imaging (72% vs 49%; P = .01), but were less likely to have ischemic changes on functional imaging (5% vs 23%; P = .03) or any postoperative complications (7% vs 19%; P = .04). Moderate or greater aortic insufficiency occurred postoperatively in 1 (1%) of AAORCA and 1 (3%) of AAOLCA patients. After the coronary artery program inception, there was an increase among patients with AAOCA undergoing preoperative computed tomography angiography (pre-2018: 39 out of 98 [40%] vs post-2018: 48 out of 51 [94%]; P < .001) and a decrease in isolated AAOCA unroofing procedures performed (30 [31%] vs 5 [10%]; P = .004).

Conclusions

Surgical management of AAOCA evolved over time, and can be achieved with low instance of postoperative aortic insufficiency. Establishment of a coronary artery program has streamlined care.

Management of Adults With Anomalous Aortic Origin of the Coronary Arteries: State-of-the-Art Review

As a result of increasing adoption of imaging screening, the number of adult patients with a diagnosis of anomalous aortic origin of the coronary arteries (AAOCA) has grown in recent years. Existing guidelines provide a framework for management and treatment, but patients with AAOCA present with a wide range of anomalies and symptoms that make general recommendations of limited applicability. In particular, a large spectrum of interventions can be used for treatment, and there is no consensus on the optimal approach to be used. In this paper, a multidisciplinary group of clinical and interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons performed a systematic review and critical evaluation of the available evidence on the interventional treatment of AAOCA in adult patients. Using a structured Delphi process, the group agreed on expert recommendations that are intended to complement existing clinical practice guidelines.

Management of Adults With Anomalous Aortic Origin of the Coronary Arteries: State-of-the-Art Review

As a result of increasing adoption of imaging screening, the number of adult patients with a diagnosis of anomalous aortic origin of the coronary arteries (AAOCA) has grown in recent years. Existing guidelines provide a framework for management and treatment, but patients with AAOCA present with a wide range of anomalies and symptoms that make general recommendations of limited applicability. In particular, a large spectrum of interventions can be used for treatment, and there is no consensus on the optimal approach to be used. In this paper, a multidisciplinary group of clinical and interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons performed a systematic review and critical evaluation of the available evidence on the interventional treatment of AAOCA in adult patients. Using a structured Delphi process, the group agreed on expert recommendations that are intended to complement existing clinical practice guidelines.

Anomalous Aortic Origin of Coronary Arteries in Children: Postoperative High-risk Anatomic Features

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess postoperative presumed high-risk anatomic features (HRAFs) by using computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in patients with anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) after surgical unroofing vs transection and reimplantation (TAR) if unroofing was thought to provide unsatisfactory results.

METHODS

The study included 62 children with postoperative CTA performed at a median of 3 months (interquartile range, 3-4 months) after unroofing (n = 45) and TAR (n = 17). HRAFs included slitlike ostium, intramural course, acute angle takeoff (<45^o), interarterial course, proximal stenosis >50%, or course through a thickened intercoronary pillar.

RESULTS

Median age at surgery was 13.8 years (interquartile range, 10.5-15.8 years). None of the patients had a slitlike ostium or an intramural course on postoperative CTA. Acute takeoff was seen in 100% after unroofing and in 2 of 17 (12%) after TAR (P < .001). After unroofing, the interarterial course improved to 35 of 45 (78%) from 43 of 45 (96%) (P = .003), and a thickened intercoronary pillar improved to 10 of 45 (22%) from 22 of 45 (49%) (P = .0001), compared with none seen after TAR. Preoperative intramural length <5 mm was associated with a postoperative thickened intercoronary pillar in right AAOCA after unroofing (P = .0004). Severe coronary stenosis occurred in 2 of 17 (12%) after TAR, and both patients needed urgent revision procedures. All patients except 2 (97%) returned to exercise activities at a median follow-up of 4.9 years (range, 0.6-9.2 years).

CONCLUSIONS

The slitlike ostium and intramural course resolved in all patients. Residual acute angle takeoff, an interarterial course, and mild coronary narrowing related to a thickened intercoronary pillar were common after unroofing. TAR allows resolution of all HRAFs, although severe narrowing requiring surgical revision happened only in TAR. Long-term studies are needed to understand the clinical significance of these residual presumed HRAFs.

Decision making in anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery

INTRODUCTION

There are many uncertainties surrounding anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) including the pathophysiology of sudden cardiac death, how to best risk stratify patients, how to best evaluate patients, who would benefit from exercise restriction, who should undergo surgical intervention, and which operation to perform.

AREAS COVERED

The goal of this review is to provide a comprehensive but succinct overview of AAOCA to help clinicians with the difficult task of navigating optimal evaluation and treatment of an individual patient with AAOCA.

EXPERT OPINION

Beginning in year 2012, some of our authors proposed an integrated, multi-disciplinary working group which has become the standard management strategy for patients diagnosed with AAOCA. A multi-disciplinary team with a focus on shared decision-making with the patients/families is likely necessary to optimize outcomes. Long-term follow-up and research are needed to improve our understanding of AAOCA.

Outcomes of a protocolized approach for surgical unroofing of intramural anomalous aortic origin of coronary artery in children and adults

OBJECTIVE

Management of anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries has been variable, and limited data are available on early and late outcomes.

METHODS

We report a single institution's experience with a protocolized approach to 148 consecutive patients who underwent surgical unroofing of intramural anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries (June 2003 to December 2020). The management algorithm included preoperative and postoperative cross-sectional and echocardiographic imaging, exercise testing, and a standardized operative technique.

RESULTS

The median age of the cohort was 44.4 years (range, 4 months to 83 years); 130 patients had an anomalous right coronary artery, and 19 patients had an anomalous left coronary artery. Surgical unroofing was an isolated procedure in 118 patients (80%) and a concomitant procedure in 30 patients (20.3%). There were 2 (1%) early deaths; both were reoperations for aortic root or valve replacement. Over a median follow-up of 9.5 (interquartile range, 5-12.3) years, there were 5 late deaths, 3 due to noncardiac causes and 2 due to unknown cause. Late survival after anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries repair at 10 and 15 years was 94.5% and 94.5%, respectively. There were no early or late deaths in the pediatric cohort with a median follow-up of 10.9 years (interquartile range, 6.9-12.1). At a median clinical follow-up of 3.9 years (interquartile range, 1.1-9.5), 36 patients had chest pain but none with evidence of ischemia related to the unroofing.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical unroofing of anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries can be performed safely with low early mortality, even in the setting of concomitant procedures. Late survival is excellent, with the vast majority being symptom free.

Surgical approach for anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery: A comparison of two techniques

BACKGROUND

Un-roofing is the most common technique utilized for repair of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA). There are very few publications directly comparing un-roofing to another surgical technique, like reimplantation.

METHODS

The prospectively collected Children's Memorial Hermann Heart Institute Society of Thoracic Surgeon's Database was retrospectively reviewed from 2007 to 2021. Surgical patients were included if they underwent un-roofing or reimplantation of the AAOCA. The primary outcomes of this study were operative characteristics and postoperative outcomes. Secondary outcomes included angiographic outcomes, aortic regurgitation incidence, ventricular function, and symptom relief.

RESULTS

From 2007 to 2021, there were 12 patients who underwent either a reimplantation (n = 9, 73%) or un-roofing (n = 3, 27%) for an AAOCA. The hospital length of stay was a median of 1.8 days longer for reimplantation compared to un-roofing. The last follow-up echocardiogram was a median of 52.2 days later in the reimplantation group. There was one patient (11%) in the reimplantation group that had more than or equal to mild aortic regurgitation and mild systolic ventricular dysfunction. Outpatient follow-up was incomplete and there was no postoperative computed tomographic angiography in the un-roofing cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary artery reimplantation is a valuable alternative surgical technique to un-roofing for the repair of AAOCA. There are still some concerns with the creation of aortic regurgitation or incomplete symptom relief with any surgical technique. Longer-term follow-up and prospective studies will be needed to show an effective reduction of myocardial ischemia and risk of sudden cardiac death.

Outcomes in anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery after surgical reimplantation

OBJECTIVE

Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) can be associated with myocardial ischemia and sudden cardiac arrest. We compared outcomes data of patients who underwent transection and reimplantation (TAR) and patients who underwent an unroofing.

METHODS

Patients who presented to the Coronary Artery Anomalies Program were evaluated and managed following a standardized approach. Anatomy was determined using computed tomography angiography, myocardial perfusion using advanced stress imaging, and surgical intervention according to anatomic features.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients underwent surgical repair of AAOCA between 2012 and 2019: 16 (26%) patients underwent TAR of the anomalous coronary without an aortic button and 45 (74%) patients underwent coronary unroofing. Compared with patients who underwent an unroofing, patients who underwent TAR had similar intramural length (5 mm with interquartile range of 4-7.7 vs 6 mm with interquartile range of 5-7; P = .6). One patient with an anomalous right coronary underwent coronary artery bypass grafting after TAR because of persistent postoperative ischemic changes. One patient with unroofing of an anomalous left coronary artery presented with recurrent aborted sudden cardiac death and underwent subsequent TAR, without further events. At last follow-up, 15 of 16 patients (94%) who underwent TAR and 42 of 45 (93%) patients who underwent an unroofing were released to unrestricted exercise activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary artery TAR is a useful surgical alternative for AAOCA when there is a course below the commissure, when unroofing does not relocate the ostium to the appropriate sinus, or when unroofing results in compression by the intercoronary pillar.

Anomalous Aortic Origin of the Coronary Arteries - State of the Art Management and Surgical Techniques

Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) can be associated with myocardial ischemia and sudden cardiac arrest. We describe and compare the management and surgical techniques for patients with AAOCA. Patients presenting to the Coronary Artery Anomalies Program are evaluated and managed following a standardized approach. Our approach and data were compared to other single-center and multi-institutional data and results. Patients with AAOCA present as an incidental finding approximately 50% of the time. Advanced axial imaging is essential to define the anatomic characteristics of this lesion. Preoperative and postoperative assessment of myocardial perfusion with provocative testing is feasible and contributes to risk stratification. The surgical techniques for AAOCA repair include coronary unroofing, transection and reimplantation, and neo-ostium creation, among others. In general, surgical repair of AAOCA can mitigate the risk of ischemia with low mortality. The specific morbidities and complications of each different technique should be considered during the surgical planning. Surgical repair of AAOCA can mitigate the risk of ischemia with a low associated mortality but with clinically relevant morbidities. Long-term follow-up is necessary to accurately balance the risks of repaired and unrepaired AAOCA.

Anomalous Aortic Origin of a Coronary Artery

Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) is the second leading cause of sudden cardiac death in young athletes. The pathophysiology leading to sudden cardiac death, the specific risks associated with the different varieties of AAOCA, and the effects of different management strategies on the risk of sudden cardiac death are all unknown. This article describes the current knowledge of AAOCA, a proposed nomenclature for the different anatomic subtypes, the different modalities used to diagnose and characterize the disease, the available management strategies, and an algorithm used by the authors to diagnose and manage these patients.

Myocardial bridge-related coronary heart disease: Independent influencing factors and their predicting value

BACKGROUND

Myocardial bridge (MB) will compress the mural coronary artery (MCA) during the systole and cause myocardial ischemia. In the diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CHD), because the structure of MB is difficult to be observed by coronary angiography (CAG), the clinical study of the influence of MB on CHD is lacking. With the advancement of computed tomography coronary angiography technology, detailed observations of the MB anatomy have realized.

AIM

To explore the main influencing factors of MB-related CHD and to find potential indicators for predicting MB-related CHD.

METHODS

A total of 1718 patients with suspected CHD due to the symptoms of myocardial ischemia were enrolled as subjects. Patients diagnosed with CHD were included in a CHD group, and patients with no significant abnormalities were included in a control group. In the CHD group, patients were divided into an MB-CHD subgroup if MB-related CHD was found. In the control group, patients were divided into a simple MB subgroup if MB was found. The patient's clinical data and MB-related indicators, including the branch of MB, MB type (superficial/deep type), MB length, MB thickness, systolic and diastolic compression of the MCA, and MCA systolic stenosis rate were recorded and compared. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the independent influencing factors of MD-related CHD. ROC curve was used to analyze the diagnostic efficacy of potential indicators for MB-related CHD.

RESULTS

There were 1060 cases in the CHD group and 658 cases in the control group, and there were 236 cases in the MB-CHD subgroup and 52 cases in the simple MB subgroup. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the combined MB had a significant effect on the occurrence of CHD (P < 0.05). MB thickness, systolic compression, diastolic compression, and MCA systolic stenosis rate had significant effects on the occurrence of MB-related CHD (P < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of the combination of these influencing factors for the diagnosis of MB-related CHD was 0.959, which was significantly higher than the AUCs of the four indicators separately (P < 0.05). The sensitivity was 97.06% and the specificity was 87.63%.

CONCLUSION

MB thickness, systolic compression, diastolic compression, and MCA systolic stenosis are independent influencing factors for MB-related CHD. The combination of these factors has potential diagnostic value for MB-related CHD.

Complete unroofing of the intramural coronary artery for anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery: The role of commissural resuspension?

OBJECTIVES

Although surgical repair of an anomalous aortic origin of the coronary artery has low operative mortality, longer-term risk of ischemia and aortic regurgitation remains concerning. We routinely perform aortic commissure resuspension after unroofing and sought to evaluate the outcomes with regard to aortic valve competence, symptoms, and signs of ischemia with this approach.

METHODS

Twenty-six consecutive patients who received the unroofing procedure for anomalous aortic origin of the coronary artery (10 left; 16 right) between 2004 and 2016 were reviewed. In addition to complete unroofing of the intramural coronary, patients early in the cohort (n = 9) received unroofing only, and aortic commissural resuspension was performed routinely in the subsequent patients (n = 17). Outcomes between commissural resuspension versus no commissural resuspension were compared. The occurrence of mild and greater aortic regurgitation was assessed using a time-to-event analysis after varying lengths of time. Commissural resuspension was considered as the predictor, and the groups were compared using a log-rank test.

RESULTS

There was no operative mortality. One patient in the no commissural resuspension group died 10 years later of prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis (aortic valve replacement 7 years after unroofing). The follow-up duration was 6.9 years (4.9-9.1) and 3.7 years (2.1-4.3) in the no commissural resuspension and commissural resuspension groups, respectively (P = .001). Available postoperative exercise stress test data (n = 14) revealed that 50% had an endurance level at the 25th percentile or greater for age. After a median follow-up of 1.9 years (3 months to 10.6 years), no patient in the commissural resuspension group had aortic regurgitation, whereas 6 of 9 patients (67%) in the no commissural resuspension group had stable but mild or greater aortic regurgitation. Time-to-event analysis with the primary event of occurrence of mild or greater aortic regurgitation showed significantly higher freedom from the occurrence of aortic regurgitation in the commissural resuspension group (P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical repair of an anomalous aortic origin of the coronary artery can be performed with excellent early and midterm outcomes. Routine commissural resuspension of the aortic valve may lead to a lower rate of aortic valve regurgitation without increasing the risk of ischemia.