Alfieri Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair for All Seasons?

Exploring the Operative Strategy for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review

Background

Mitral valve disease surgery is an evolving field with multiple possible interventions. There is an increasing body of evidence regarding the optimal strategy in secondary mitral regurgitation where the pathology lies within the ventricle. We conducted a systematic review to identify the benefits and limitations of each surgical option.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify pertinent randomized controlled trials (RCTs), propensity-matched observational series, and meta-analyses which were considered initially and followed by unmatched observational series using the MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane Library.

Results

We identified 6 different strategies for treating secondary mitral valve regurgitation: mitral valve replacement, restrictive mitral annuloplasty, surgical revascularization (with and without mitral annuloplasty), subvalvular procedures (papillary muscle approximation, papillary muscle relocation, ring and string procedure), and procedures directly targeting the mitral valve (edge-to-edge repair and anterior leaflet enlargement) alongside transcatheter heart valve therapy. We also highlighted the role of left ventricular assist devices in the management of this condition. The benefits and limitations of each intervention are highlighted.

Conclusion

There is currently no unanimous and shared strategy for the optimal treatment of patients with secondary IMR. The management of patients with secondary mitral regurgitation must be entrusted to a multidisciplinary Heart Team to ensure ideal intervention and patient matching for the best outcomes.

Long-term results of the edge-to-edge repair for failed mitral valve repair as a bailout option

OBJECTIVE

We evaluate the long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of edge-to-edge (E2E) repair combined with mitral annuloplasty in our institute with degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) up to 10 years.

METHODS

Twenty-six consecutive patients undergoing E2E mitral repair after failure of other conventional mitral repair technique. There were 16 (61.5%) male and the mean age was 52.2 ± 10.4 years. Mitral regurgitation was due to anterior leaflet prolapse in 12 (46.2%) patients, bileaflet prolapse in 9 (34.6%), and multiple segment posterior leaflet prolapse in 5 (19.2%).

RESULTS

There were no perioperative deaths. Follow-up was 100% complete. The mean length of follow-up was 8.7 ± 0.9 years (median 8.4 years, 6.8-10.1 years). Two patients required reoperation of the MV. The freedom from reoperation and ≥ Moderate MR at 10 years was 69.9 ± 11.7%. The freedom from reoperation, ≥ Moderate MR and mitral stenosis (MS) at 10 years was (59.6 ± 10.0) %. The mean transmitral pressure gradient (TMPG) was 6.1 ± 2.5 mmHg, which was significantly elevated compared with preoperative TTE (P = 0.004). The freedom from ≥ Moderate MS at 10 years was 76.9 ± 8.3%. There were no differences between patients with and without MS at follow-up regarding the echocardiographic parameters and clinical status.

CONCLUSION

There is a slowly progressive elevation of TMPG after E2E mitral repair, while mildly elevated TMPG can be tolerated in most patients. In appropriate patients, the E2E repair combined with annuloplasty provides an effective "bailout" choice.

Mitral regurgitation: lessons learned from COAPT and MITRA-Fr

Recent studies about percutaneous treatment of secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) underlined the importance of left ventricular geometry and features of mitral valve as determinants of procedural and long-term success. Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), transcatheter mitral valve treatment (TMVT) and surgical procedures (mitral valve replacement, mitral valve repair at level of the annulus or subvalvular apparatus) have been extensively evaluated but not adequately compared in current clinical studies. A detailed analysis of the results of the study about transcatheter mitral valve repair would allow to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of such procedure and would provide potential indications for improving the quality of percutaneous and surgical repair in patients with moderate-to-severe secondary MR. Patients with proportionate MR (i.e., MR severity is proportional to the amount of left ventricular dilatation) are prone to respond to the optimization of medical therapy, while patients with disproportionate MR (i.e., MR severity is disproportionately higher than predicted by left ventricular dilatation, with high EROA and small left ventricle) are likely to benefit from additional repair. The identification of specific subpopulation of "high responders", based on the anatomic characteristics of the mitral valve and the relative dimensions of the annulus, the regurgitation and the left ventricle, can also apply to medical therapy. However, some pivotal component of MR (such as the symmetry of tethering and the differences in biomechanical features of leaflets) are not adequately investigated in current studies and warrant further evaluation.