Lobectomy Versus Sublobectomy in Metachronous Second Primary Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score Study

Diagnosis and management of multiple primary lung cancer

Multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC), can be categorized as synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (sMPLC) and metachronous multiple primary lung cancer (mMPLC), which are becoming increasingly common in clinical practice. A precise differential diagnosis between MPLC and intrapulmonary metastases (IPM) is essential for determining the appropriate management strategy. MPLC is primarily diagnosed through histology, imaging, and molecular methods. Imaging serves as an essential foundation for preoperative diagnosis, while histology is a critical tool for establishing a definitive diagnosis. As molecular biology advances, the diagnosis of MPLC has stepped into the era of molecular precision. Surgery is the preferred treatment approach, with stereotactic radiotherapy and ablation being viable options for unresectable lesions. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy can be considered for specific patients. A multidisciplinary team approach to evaluation and the application of combination therapy can benefit more patients. Looking ahead, the development of more authoritative guidelines will be instrumental in streamlining the diagnosis and management of MPLC.

Real-World Survival Comparisons Between Radiotherapy and Surgery for Metachronous Second Primary Lung Cancer and Predictions of Lung Cancer-Specific Outcomes Using Machine Learning: Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Metachronous second primary lung cancer (MSPLC) is not that rare but is seldom studied.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to compare real-world survival outcomes between different surgery strategies and radiotherapy for MSPLC.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data collected from patients with MSPLC between 1988 and 2012 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) analyses and machine learning were performed to compare variables between patients with MSPLC. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using log-rank tests.

RESULTS

A total of 2451 MSPLC patients were categorized into the following treatment groups: 864 (35.3%) received radiotherapy, 759 (31%) underwent surgery, 89 (3.6%) had surgery plus radiotherapy, and 739 (30.2%) had neither treatment. After PSM, 470 pairs each for radiotherapy and surgery were generated. The surgery group had significantly better survival than the radiotherapy group (P<.001) and the untreated group (563 pairs; P<.001). Further analysis revealed that both wedge resection (85 pairs; P=.004) and lobectomy (71 pairs; P=.002) outperformed radiotherapy in overall survival for MSPLC patients. Machine learning models (extreme gradient boosting, random forest classifier, adaptive boosting) demonstrated high predictive performance based on area under the curve (AUC) values. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis identified 9 significant variables impacting cancer-specific survival, emphasizing surgery's consistent influence across 1 year to 10 years. These variables encompassed age at diagnosis, sex, year of diagnosis, radiotherapy of initial primary lung cancer (IPLC), primary site, histology, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy of MPSLC. Competing risk analysis highlighted lower mortality for female MPSLC patients (hazard ratio [HR]=0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.87) and recent IPLC diagnoses (HR=0.79, 95% CI 0.73-0.85), while radiotherapy for IPLC increased mortality (HR=1.31, 95% CI 1.16-1.50). Surgery alone had the lowest cancer-specific mortality (HR=0.83, 95% CI 0.81-0.85), with sublevel resection having the lowest mortality rate among the surgical approaches (HR=0.26, 95% CI 0.21-0.31). The findings provide valuable insights into the factors that influence cumulative cancer-specific mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resections such as wedge resection and lobectomy confer better survival than radiation therapy for MSPLC, but radiation can be a valid alternative for the treatment of MSPLC.

Enhanced Survival with Lymphadenectomy in Early-Stage Metachronous Second Primary Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Lymphadenectomy is a cornerstone in the surgical management of resectable primary lung cancer. However, its prognostic significance in early-stage metachronous second primary lung cancer (MSPLC) remains poorly understood. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy in these patients using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the SEER Database for patients surgically treated for stage I MSPLC between 2004 and 2015. Propensity score-matching was employed to create comparable cohorts, and the Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival after lymphadenectomy compared to non-lymphadenectomy. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Among 920 identified patients with MSPLC, 574 (62.4%) underwent lymphadenectomy. Propensity score-matching yielded 255 patients in both the lymphadenectomy and non-lymphadenectomy groups. Over a median follow-up of 38 months, the 5-year overall survival probability after a diagnosis of MSPLC was 58.7% in the lymphadenectomy group and 43.9% in the non-lymphadenectomy group (HR: 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.90; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

In this population-based study, lymphadenectomy is associated with prolonged overall survival in patients with stage I MSPLC. These findings suggest the potential benefit of incorporating lymphadenectomy into the surgical management of MSPLC, providing valuable guidance for thoracic surgeons in clinical decision-making.

Favourable surgical outcomes for either second primary lung cancer or intrapulmonary metastasis after resection of non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Metachronous lung cancer arising after resection of non-small-cell lung cancer is either a second primary lung cancer (SPLC) or intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) of the initial lung cancer; however, differential diagnosis is difficult. We evaluated the surgical outcomes of metachronous lung cancer in a combined population of patients with SPLC and IPM.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 3534 consecutive patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer between 1992 and 2016 was conducted at 4 institutions.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients (66 males; median age, 70 years) who underwent a second pulmonary resection for metachronous lung cancer were included. Most patients (81%) underwent sublobar resection, and there was no 30-day mortality. All metachronous lung cancers were cN0, 5 were pN1-2. The postoperative comprehensive histologic assessment revealed SPLC (n = 77) and IPM (n = 28). The 5-year overall survival rate after the second resection was 70.6% (median follow-up: 69.7 months). A multivariable analysis showed that age >70 years at the second resection (P = 0.013), male sex (P = 0.003), lymph node involvement in metachronous cancer (P < 0.001), pathological invasive size of metachronous cancer >15 mm (P < 0.001) and overlapping squamous cell carcinoma histology of the initial and metachronous cancers (P = 0.003) were significant prognostic factors for poor survival after the second resection, whereas histological IPM was not (P = 0.065).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery for cN0 metachronous lung cancer is safe and shows good outcomes. There were no statistically significant differences in the SPLC and IPM results. Caution should be exercised when operating on patients with overlapping squamous cell carcinoma.

Outcomes of Surgery for Metachronous Second Primary Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The optimal surgical approach for second primary metachronous lung cancer (MPLC) remains unclear. Our aim is to evaluate the morbidity and prognostic value based on the extent of surgical resection in MPLC.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 84 patients with a history of anatomical resection for lung cancer and MPLC surgically treated between January 2010 and December 2020.

RESULTS

The interval between the initial primary tumor and the second was 50.38±32.89 months. The second resection was contralateral in 43 patients (51.2%) and ipsilateral in 41 (48.8%). Thirty-six patients (42.9%) underwent a second anatomical resection, and in 48 patients (57.1%), it was non-anatomical. Postoperative complications were observed in 29 patients (34.5%) after the second lung resection. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, 95.2% were mild (Clavien-Dindo I-II), and a single patient died (1.2%) in the postoperative period (Grade V). Prolonged air leak (p=0.037), postoperative arrhythmias (p=0.019) and hospital stay showed significant differences depending on the extent of surgery in ipsilateral resections. The main histological type was adenocarcinoma (47.6%) and the median tumor size was 17.74±11.74mm. The overall survival was 58.07 months (95% CI 49.29-66.85) for patients undergoing anatomical resection and 50.97 months (95% CI 43.31-58.63) for non-anatomical without significant differences (p=0.144). The disease-free survival after the second surgery was 53.75 months (95% CI 45.28-62.23) for anatomical resection and 41.34 months (95% CI 33.04-49.65) for non-anatomical group.

CONCLUSION

Second anatomical resections provide good long-term outcomes and have been shown to provide better disease-free survival compared to non-anatomical resections in properly selected patients.

The clinical-histologic and prognostic characteristics in patients with a second primary non-small-cell lung cancer after a lobectomy

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to investigate whether an operation can offer survival benefits for patients with a second primary non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after a lobectomy for a first primary NSCLC and to analyse the characteristics affecting the survival of those patients.

METHODS

We performed survival analyses of patients with a second primary NSCLC based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program and used propensity score matching to reduce the potential bias and analyse the data. In addition, the primary observational end point was overall survival (OS), and the secondary observational end point was histologic migration.

RESULTS

The data from 944 patients were used to perform the main analysis. A total of 36.2% of patients experienced a shift in tumour histologic type between 2 diagnoses of primary NSCLC, and this shift significantly affected OS (P = 0.0065). The median survival time in patients with surgical resection and those without an operation was 52.0 months versus 33.0 months, respectively. Patients with surgical resection at the secondary diagnosis had better survival than those without surgery (5-year OS rate: 48.0% vs 34.0%, P < 0.001). In addition, compared with a pneumonectomy and a sublobar resection, a lobectomy was the optimal surgical procedure for patients diagnosed with a second primary NSCLC after adjusting for other confounders (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.68, P < 0.01). However, in the subgroup analysis, lobar and sublobar resections could provide similar survival benefits for patients with tumour size ≤20 mm (P = 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

The operation, especially a lobectomy, can prolong OS in patients with a second primary NSCLC. Besides, sublobar resection can be performed in selected patients with tumour size ≤20 mm. Moreover, histologic migration may impact the survival of those patients with a secondary primary NSCLC.

Restrictive Ventilatory Impairment as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Patients Who Undergo Surgical Resection for Metachronous Second Primary Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic impact of restrictive ventilatory impairment in patients who undergo pulmonary resection of metachronous second primary lung cancer.

METHODS

The clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of 70 patients with metachronous second primary lung cancer were analyzed.

RESULTS

The surgical procedures consisted of wedge resection in 40 patients, segmentectomy in 17, lobectomy in 12, and completion pneumonectomy in one. Patients who underwent ipsilateral pulmonary resection developed more perioperative complications (p = 0.0339). Three-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 78.2% and 69.2%, respectively. In univariate analysis, sex, restrictive ventilatory impairment, and histology of second primary lung cancer were significantly poor prognostic factors (all p <0.05). Multivariate analysis identified restrictive ventilatory impairment to be an independent predictor of a poor prognosis (p = 0.0193). In the 22 patients who died, the cause of death was lung cancer in 11 and other diseases, including pneumonia and respiratory failure, in 11. Death from another disease was significantly more common in patients with restrictive ventilatory impairment (p = 0.0216).

CONCLUSION

Restrictive ventilatory impairment was an independent predictor of a poor prognosis in patients with a second primary lung cancer. Restrictive ventilatory impairment as a result of repeated thoracic surgery may increase the likelihood of death from another disease.

Prognostic Nomogram and Therapeutic Option of Cancer-Specific Death in the Patients with Metachronous Second Primary Lung Cancer

With the increase of long-term primary lung cancer survivors, studies focused on metachronous second primary lung cancer (SPLC) have become very urgent. This study aimed to develop a prognostic nomogram and determine therapeutic options of cancer-specific death for patients with metachronous SPLC with and without the competing risk of other-specific death. Study population came from the SEER-18 database between 2006 and 2016. According to the clinical practice guideline of SPLC, the interval time of IPLC and metachronous SPLC was set to 4 years. We constructed nomograms with Lasso + Cox regression model and competing risk model to predict the prognosis and identify therapeutic options of metachronous SPLC patients with the assessment of model performance by the C-index, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis. In addition, two subgroup analyses stratified by histology and tumor size were used to better select therapeutic options for a certain population. 1300 patients with metachronous SPLC were incorporated in this study with 50.1% of the 5-year cumulative incidence in cancer-specific death. Compared with Lasso + Cox regression analysis, competing risk analysis harbored a higher C-index (0.811 vs. 0.76) and better net benefit in predicting cancer-specific death of metachronous SPLC. Two statistical analyses suggested that surgery alone was a preferentially therapeutic option of metachronous SPLC, whereas the effect of surgery + radiation in treating metachronous SPLC was similar to radiation alone. Subgroup analyses indicated that patients with metachronous SPLC were considered receiving different therapeutic options in different histology and tumor size but preferred to receive surgical treatment as the first choice. For primary lung cancer survivors, aggressive surgical treatment was the first-line selection of metachronous SPLC, followed by radiation alone, surgery + radiation, and no surgery + radiation.

Shortness of Breath on Day 1 After Surgery Alerting the Presence of Early Respiratory Complications After Surgery in Lung Cancer Patients

PURPOSE

Patient-reported outcome (PRO)-based symptom assessment with a threshold can facilitate the early alert of adverse events. The purpose of this study was to determine whether shortness of breath (SOB) on postoperative day 1 (POD1) can inform postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) for patients after lung cancer (LC) surgery.

METHODS

Data were extracted from a prospective cohort study of patients with LC surgery. Symptoms were assessed by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-lung cancer module (MDASI-LC) before and daily after surgery. Types and grades of complications during hospitalization were recorded. SOB and other symptoms were tested for a possible association with PPCs by logistic regression models. Optimal cutpoints of SOB were derived, using the presence of PPCs as an anchor.

RESULTS

Among 401 patients with complete POD1 MDASI-LC and records on postoperative complications, 46 (11.5%) patients reported Clavien-Dindo grade II-IV PPCs. Logistic regression revealed that higher SOB score on POD1 (odds ratio [OR]=1.13, 95% CI=1.01-1.27), male (OR=2.86, 95% CI=1.32-6.23), open surgery (OR=3.03, 95% CI=1.49-6.14), and lower forced expiratory volume in one second (OR=1.78, 95% CI=1.66-2.96) were significantly associated with PPCs. The optimal cutpoint was 6 (on a 0-10 scale) for SOB. Patients reporting SOB < 6 on POD1 had shorter postoperative length of stay than those reporting 6 or greater SOB (median, 6 vs 7, P =0.007).

CONCLUSION

SOB on POD1 can inform the onset of PPCs in patients after lung cancer surgery. PRO-based symptom assessment with a clinically meaningful threshold could alert clinicians for the early management of PPCs.

Lobectomy Versus Sublobectomy in Stage IIIA/N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Study

Background

The role lobectomy plays in stage IIIA/N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial for a long time. What’s more, no previous study concentrates on whether sublobectomy can improve survival outcome for these patients, so we performed this population-based study to investigate whether stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC can benefit from these two surgery types and compare survival outcomes after lobectomy and sublobectomy.

Methods

A total of 21,638 patients diagnosed with stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database matched our selection criteria. The study cohort included patients who received no surgery (n = 15,951), sublobectomy (n = 628) and lobectomy (n = 5,059). Kaplan–Meier method, Cox regression analyses, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Cox regression were used to illustrate the influence of sublobectomy and lobectomy on overall survival (OS) rates in the study cohort and compare these two surgery types.

Results

Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed sublobectomy [HR: 0.584 (95%CI: 0.531–0.644), P-value <0.001; IPTW-adjusted HR: 0.619 (95%CI: 0.605–0.633), P-value <0.001] and lobectomy [HR: 0.439 (95%CI: 0.420–0.459), P-value <0.001; IPTW-adjusted HR: 0.441 (95%CI: 0.431–0.451), P-value <0.001] were both related to better OS rates compared with no surgery, and lobectomy exhibited better survival than sublobectomy [HR: 0.751 (95%CI: 0.680–0.830), P-value <0.001; IPTW-adjusted HR: 0.713 (95%CI: 0.696–0.731), P-value <0.001]. Moreover, the results in subgroup analyses based on age, tumor size and radiotherapy and chemotherapy strategy in all study cohort were consistent.

Conclusion

Stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients could benefit from sublobectomy or lobectomy, and lobectomy provided better OS rates than sublobectomy.

Guiding Principles in the Management of Synchronous and Metachronous Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Multiple lung cancers can be found simultaneously, with incidence ranging from 1% to 8%. Documentation of more than 1 pulmonary lesion can be challenging, because these solid, ground-glass, or mixed-density tumors may represent multicentric malignant disease or intrapulmonary metastases. If mediastinal nodal and distant deposits are excluded, surgery should be contemplated. After surgical treatment of lung cancer, patients should be followed closely for an undetermined period of time. Good clinical judgment is of outmost importance in deciding which individuals will benefit from those surgical interventions and which are candidates for alternate therapies. Every case should be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting.

Sublobectomy is a safe alternative for localized cavitary pulmonary tuberculosis

OBJECTIVE

Surgical resection plays an essential role in the treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis (PTB). There are few reports comparing lobectomy and sublobectomy for pulmonary TB with cavity. To compare the advantages between lobectomy and sublobectomy for localized cavitory PTB, we performed a single-institution cross sectional cohort study of the surgical patients.

METHODS

We consecutively included 203 patients undergoing lobectomy or sublobectomy surgery for localized cavitary PTB. All patients were followed up, recorded and compared their surgical complication, outcome and associated characteristics.

RESULTS

Both groups had similar outcomes after follow up for 13.1 ± 12.1 months, however, sublobectomy group suffered fewer intraoperative blood losses, shorter length of stay, and fewer operative complications than lobectomy group (P <  0.05). Both groups obtained satisfactory outcome with postoperatively medicated for similar period of time and few relapse (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both sublobectomy and lobectomy resection were effective ways for cavitary PTB with surgical indications. If adequate anti-TB chemotherapy had been guaranteed, sublobectomy is able to be recommended due to more lung parenchyma retain, faster recover, and fewer postoperative complications.

Surgical outcomes of ipsilateral metachronous second primary lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

The optimal surgical approach for metachronous second primary lung cancer (MSPLC), especially ipsilateral MSPLC, remains unclear. This study aimed to review postoperative complications and examine surgical outcomes based on the extent of resection after surgery for ipsilateral MSPLC.

METHODS

Clinical data from 61 consecutive patients who underwent pulmonary resection for ipsilateral MSPLC according to the Martini-Melamed criteria between January 2005 and December 2017 in 3 institutes were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications were identified in 12 patients (19.7%). Regarding the combination of initial and second surgery, intraoperative bleeding was significantly greater in patients with anatomic-anatomic resection than in others (P < 0.001). Operation time was significantly longer in patients with anatomic-anatomic resection than in others (P < 0.001). However, postoperative complications showed no significant differences based on the combination of surgeries. Five-year overall survival rates in patients with anatomic resection and wedge resection after second surgery were 75.8% and 75.8%, respectively (P = 0.738), and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 54.2% and 67.6%, respectively (P = 0.368). Cox multivariate analysis identified ever-smoker status (P = 0.029), poor performance status (P = 0.011) and tumour size >20 mm (P = 0.001) as independent predictors of poor overall survival, while ever-smoker status (P = 0.040) and tumour size >20 mm (P = 0.007) were considered independent predictors of poor recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding postoperative and long-term outcomes for patients with ipsilateral MSPLC, surgical intervention is safe and offers good long-term survival. Wedge resection is an acceptable provided tumours ≤2 cm and ground-glass opacity-predominant as a second surgery for early-stage ipsilateral MSPLC.

Repeated anatomical pulmonary resection for metachronous ipsilateral second non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the surgical outcomes of repeated pulmonary resection for metachronous ipsilateral second non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A retrospective review identified 104 (3.6%) patients who underwent surgical resection for ipsilateral metachronous second NSCLC. Repeated anatomical (reanatomical) resection was defined as a metachronous anatomical surgery for secondary NSCLC after ipsilateral primary major lung resection for NSCLC. Operative morbidity or other clinicopathologic factors were analyzed by a multivariable model. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven (74%) patients were diagnosed as second primary cases. The 3-year OS after metachronous surgery for ipsilateral second NSCLC was 80.1%, and that of reanatomical resection was equivalent to the other procedures (reanatomical: 81.8%, others: 78.2%, P = .816), whereas reanatomical resection (n = 56) was a significant predictor of postoperative severe morbidity after ipsilateral second pulmonary resection (P = .036) that was found in 23 (41%) patients. When this procedure was classified into 2 groups, ie, completion pneumonectomy (CP; n = 26) and other reanatomical resection to avoid CP (non-CP; n = 32), non-CP was significant on the right side (P = .011), whereas intrapericardial procedure was employed frequently for both (CP: 85%, non-CP: 47%). In contrast, the oncologic outcome (3-year OS; 75.8% vs 87.1%, P = .881) and several surgical outcomes including morbidities were similar between CP and non-CP.

CONCLUSIONS

Reanatomical pulmonary resection showed acceptable oncologic outcomes for metachronous ipsilateral second NSCLC. The non-CP procedure was technically challenging; however, both oncologic and surgical results were feasible compared with the CP. This procedure might be a promising novel strategy for properly selected ipsilateral second NSCLC.

Surgical outcomes of second primary lung cancer after the extrapulmonary malignancy

OBJECTIVE

To study the surgical outcomes of patients with a second primary lung cancer after the extrapulmonary malignancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical resection for lung cancers between January 2005 and December 2014 were reviewed. Clinical data, imaging characteristics of tumors, surgical approaches, and outcomes were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 97 months.

RESULTS

Of 1075 patients, 166 (15.4%) had a second primary lung cancer after extrapulmonary malignancy. There were no differences in overall 5-year survival rates (81.8% for the group of lung cancer vs. 72.9% for the second primary lung cancer group, p = 0.069) and 5-year disease-free survival (70.1% for the lung cancer group vs. 70.3% for the second primary lung cancer group, p = 0.863) between the two groups. Gender, performance status, tumor size, and maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) were significantly different between the two groups. After propensity-score matching analysis, patients in the group with lung cancers had better 5-year overall survival (88.1% vs. 72.1% for the group with second primary lung cancers, p = 0.016) and 5-year disease-free survival (80.6% vs. 70.3% for the group with second primary lung cancers; p = 0.054). In the second primary lung cancer group, the patients with preceding breast or thyroid cancers had better prognoses than did those with other extrapulmonary malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Second primary lung cancers following extrapulmonary malignancies were not uncommon. Surgical resection is considered for early stage secondary primary lung cancer after meticulous work up and result in fair outcome.

Outcomes after Contralateral Anatomic Surgical Resection in Multiple Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients treated surgically for lung cancer may present synchronous or metachronous lung cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes after a second contralateral anatomic surgical resection for lung cancer.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective two-center study, based on a prospective indexed database. Included patients were treated surgically by bilateral anatomic surgical resection for a second primary lung cancer. We excluded nonanatomic resections, benign lesions, and ipsilateral second surgical resections.

RESULTS

Between January 2011 and September 2018, 55 patients underwent contralateral anatomic surgical resections for lung cancer, mostly for metachronous cancers. The first surgical resection was a lobectomy in most cases (45 lobectomies: 81.8%, 9 segmentectomies: 16.4%, and 1 bilobectomy: 1.8%), and a video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) procedure was used in 23 cases (41.8%). The mean interval between the operations was 38 months, and lobectomy was less frequent for the second surgical resection (35 lobectomies: 63.6% and 20 segmentectomies: 36.4%), with VATS procedures performed in 41 cases (74.5%). Ninety-day mortality was 10.9% (n = 6), and 3-year survival was 77%. Risk factor analysis identified the number of resected segments during the second intervention or the total number of resected segments, extent of resection (lobectomy vs. segmentectomy), surgical approach (thoracotomy vs. VATS), tumor stage, and nodal involvement as potential prognostic factors for long-term survival.

CONCLUSION

A second contralateral anatomic surgical resection for multiple primary lung cancer is possible, with a higher early mortality rate, but acceptable long-term survival, and should be indicated for carefully selected patients.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of basaloid squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: a population-based analysis

Background

This study analyzed the clinical features and prognosis of basaloid squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (BSC), and constructed a nomogram to predict the prognoses of patients.

Methods

The information of pure BSC patients was obtained in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2015. Then, it was evaluated, and compared with the data of lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), lung large cell carcinoma (LCC) and lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) patients. Subsequently, we used univariate and multivariate analyses to investigate the independent factors related to the prognoses of patients with BSC and constructed a nomogram to verify the prognoses.

Results

A total of 425 patients diagnosed with BSC were enrolled. Compared with patients with SCC, LCC and LAC, the mean survival time of BSC patients was better than all of them. Compared with SCC, there were significant differences between the characteristics of grade (P < 0.001), total stage (P < 0.001), T stage (P < 0.001), N stage (P < 0.001), M stage (P < 0.001), surgery (P < 0.001), radiotherapy (P < 0.001), and chemotherapy (P < 0.001), while BSC also had significantly different clinical characteristics from LCC and LAC. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses showed that age (P < 0.001), T stage (P < 0.001), N stage (P = 0.009), M stage (P < 0.001), and surgery (P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of BSC. The survival of patients undergoing lobectomy was significantly better than sublobar resection, with an OR of 0.389 (0.263-0.578). We constructed a nomogram with a C-index of 0.750 (95% confidence interval) based on the results of multivariate analysis. The calibration curves based on nomogram scores indicated that the nomogram could accurately predict the prognosis of patients.

Conclusions

BSC had unique clinical and prognostic features. T stage, N stage, M stage, age, and surgery were independently associated with overall survival (OS). Lobectomy was a relative ideal choice for patients with BSC. The nomogram effectively predicted the OS at 1-, 3-, and 5-years.

[Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors of Lung Adenosquamous Carcinoma in SEER Database between 2010 and 2015]

背景与目的

肺癌发病率和死亡率均位居所有恶性肿瘤的第一，严重影响人类健康。非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC）中常见病理类型为腺癌和鳞癌，临床研究和关注较多，而肺腺鳞癌是一种较为罕见的肺癌病理类型，其临床特征及预后相关因素尚未完全明确。本研究即对肺腺鳞癌的临床特征及预后进行分析，并构建了列线图来预测患者的预后。

方法

我们纳入了2010年-2015年美国SEER（Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results）数据库中的肺腺鳞癌数据，与同期的肺腺癌和肺鳞癌的临床特征和预后进行了比较。随后我们采用单因素和多因素分析研究了肺腺鳞癌患者预后的独立相关因素，以此构建了列线图并进行了验证。

结果

我们一共入组了肺腺鳞癌患者1, 453例。与同期的肺腺癌和肺鳞癌患者相比较，肺腺鳞癌患者在大多数变量中的分布情况均介于肺腺癌和鳞癌之间，其预后也优于肺鳞癌但差于肺腺癌患者。多因素分析发现，年龄、分化程度、肿瘤-淋巴结-转移（tumor-node-metastasis, TNM）、手术和化疗是患者预后的独立影响因素（P均 < 0.001）。我们以此构建了列线图，其C-index为0.783（0.767-0.799），区分度检验和一致性检验均表明这一列线图可以有效地预测患者预后。

结论

肺腺鳞癌具有独特的临床病理和预后特征。年龄、分化、T、N、M、手术和化疗状况是肺腺鳞癌患者预后的独立预测因素。我们以此构建的列线图可以较好地预测患者预后。