Uniportal Lung Cancer Surgery: State of the Evidence

Uniportal S6 Segmentectomy for Newly Developed Lung Cancer in the Residual Left Lower Lobe Following Left Lingulectomy

Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has gained global popularity as a minimally invasive surgical approach and has been increasingly adopted for various procedures in Japan. The current case report focuses on the uniportal VATS treatment of a 71-year-old female diagnosed with a lesion in the left S6 2 years after undergoing left lingulectomy. The surgery was challenging due to the presence of strong adhesions, particularly in the pulmonary hilum region, thereby increasing the risk of bleeding. Uniportal VATS treatment was conducted to reduce invasiveness and facilitate early ambulation. The patient's postoperative recovery was smooth, and she remained recurrence-free up to approximately 2 years after surgery. This case highlights the challenges of reoperation after anatomical lung resection and emphasizes the importance of surgical adaptability in uniportal VATS treatment for complex cases.

The Uncomfortable Truth: Open Thoracotomy versus Minimally Invasive Surgery in Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

For decades, lung surgery in thoracic cancer has evolved in two ways: saving more parenchyma and being minimally invasive. Saving parenchyma is a fundamental principle of surgery. However, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a matter of approach, so it has to do with advances in surgical techniques and tools. For example, MIS has become possible with the introduction of VATS (video-assisted thoracic surgery), and the development of tools has extended the indication of MIS. Especially, RATS (robot-assisted thoracic surgery) improved the quality of life for patients and the ergonomics of doctors. However, the dichotomous idea that the MIS is new and right but the open thoracotomy is old and useless may be inappropriate. In fact, MIS is exactly the same as a classic thoracotomy in that it removes the mass/parenchyma containing cancer and mediastinal lymph nodes. Therefore, in this study, we compare randomized-controlled trials about open thoracotomy and MIS to find out which surgical method is more helpful.

Two-Centimeter Single-Port Incision Minimizing Intercostal Nerve Damage Applied in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Segmentectomy for Pulmonary Ground Glass Nodules

Purposes: We introduced a novel modified 2-cm single-port incision made by blunt separation minimizing intercostal muscle and nerve damage applied in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy, and compared it with the traditional single-port incision or the novel incision plus a 3-mm tiny port, aiming to explore a more minimally invasive single-port technique for VATS segmentectomy. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 174 pulmonary ground glass nodule patients who received single-port VATS segmentectomy (54 modified 2-cm single port, 67 modified single port plus tiny port, and 53 traditional single port, respectively) in our medical center from May 2020 to December 2022. Three kinds of approaches were compared retrospectively, concerning their safety, feasibility, and postoperative pain. Results: There were no serious complications and mortality in either group. The blood loss, tube duration, and hospitalization time were comparable among the three groups (P > .05). The 2-cm single-port and 2-cm single-port plus tiny-port group were obviously more advantageous in the visual analog scores of postoperative pain, the wound numbness, incision healing and appearance than that in the traditional group (P < .05), while they were comparable. Notably, the operation time of the 2-cm plus tiny-port group was shorter than that of the 2-cm group (P < .05) and similar to the traditional single-port group. Conclusions: The 2-cm modified single-port applied for VATS segmentectomy is feasible and safe, and has obviously advantages in postoperative pain, numbness, and appearance of incision. With addition of tiny port, the convenience of the operation can be significantly increased without increasing pain. Our finding could provide a promising new incision mode for VATS segmentectomy.

A Preclinical Feasibility Study of Single-Port Robotic Subcostal Anatomical Lung Resection and Subxiphoid Thymectomy Using the da Vinci® SP System

Despite the recent introduction of technologically advanced single-port (SP) robotic systems, their use in the field of thoracic surgery has been rarely explored. Here, we report our preclinical experience concerning SP robotic thoracic surgery using the da Vinci^® SP system. The da Vinci^® SP system was used to perform subcostal anatomical lung resection and subxiphoid thymectomy in three cadavers. The operative settings that best met the surgeon's requirements for each resection were also determined. Four subcostal anatomical lung resections and two subxiphoid thymectomies were completed. While both procedures did not require additional incisions, the use of an observation port in the intercostal spaces was strongly recommended to safely create subcostal access. Dissection of hilar structures and mediastinal lymph nodes was feasible. However, due to the current unavailability of a robotic stapler, a handheld stapling instrument was required to perform a transection of vital structures. When the stapling process proved to be difficult, the table surgeon temporarily removed a robotic arm to acquire the necessary space to complete the procedure. Our data represent a promising preclinical step in understanding the feasibility of using the da Vinci^® SP system to perform an SP subcostal anatomical lung resection and a subxiphoid thymectomy.

Uniportal VATS lobectomy versus thoracotomy lobectomy for NSCLC larger than 5 cm: A propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

The performance of uniportal VATS lobectomy (uVATS) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) larger than 5 cm is uncertain due to a lack of evidence. Here, we present a retrospective, propensity-score matched cohort study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of uVATS for patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

The data of patients with NSCLC larger than 5 cm diameter who underwent curative resection via uVATS or thoracotomy lobectomy between January 2015 and December 2020 was collected. Propensity-score matching was utilized to control the observable biases.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients underwent uVATS lobectomy, while 38 received thoracotomy lobectomy. No conversion to open surgery or perioperative death occurred. uVATS lobectomy achieved similar total lymph node dissection counts compared to thoracotomy and even yielded a higher amount of lymph node dissection in pTNM stage II patients. The long-term overall and recurrence-free survival rates were also similar between the two groups. Results from the propensity-score matching generated cohort agreed with those from the full cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

uVATS lobectomy is feasible and effective for curative lobectomy for NSCLC larger than 5 cm in diameter in selected patients. Further validations from well-designed prospective studies are required for uVATS lobectomy for patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

Three-dimensional CT angiography facilitates uniportal thoracoscopic anatomic lung resection for pulmonary sequestration: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Pulmonary sequestration (PS) is a rare lesion with independent blood supply from an anomalous systemic artery. A timely resection is considered as the best treatment for PS. Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography (3D-CTA) has been widely utilized for precise thoracic surgery. This study aimed to investigate the role of preoperative 3D-CTA and resection simulation in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) anatomical lung surgery for PS.

Methods

The data of 20 consecutive PS patents undergoing anatomic lung resection between April 2011 and May 2021 in a single centre were retrospectively reviewed. These patients were divided into the 3D-CTA group (10 patients) and the control group (10 patients) according to the initial surgical planning with or without 3D-CTA. The perioperative parameters regarding safety and fluency such as the incidence of conversion to open thoracotomy, operation time, blood loss, complications and chest tube duration were analyzed.

Results

This cohort included 12 female and 8 male patients, with a mean age of 45 years old (range 24–60 years). Nine cases demonstrated recurrent febrile, cough, or hemoptysis; whereas the other 11 patients were asymptomatic on admission. Eighteen (90.0%) intralobar and 2 extralobar PS were confirmed, whereas 18 (90.0%) lesions were located in the left thorax. The feeding vessels originated from the thoracic aorta in 16 patients (80.0%), the abdominal aorta in 3 (15.0%), and the inferior phrenic artery in 1 patient (5.0%). There was no major bleeding or 30 days mortality. The initial surgical planning included 9 uniportal and 1 two-port VATS in the 3D-CTA group, as compared with 10 two-port VATS in the control group. Thirteen lobectomies, 5 segmentectomies and 2 mass excisions were performed. However, no conversion was needed in the 3D-CTA group; whereas 6 (60.0%) conversions (4 to multiple-port and 2 to thoracotomy) occurred in the control group, indicating a significant difference (P = 0.003). In addition, the operation time in the 3D-CTA group was significantly shorter than those in the control group [(108.5 ± 24.9) min vs. (154.5 ± 39.4) min, P = 0.006]. The other surgery-related outcomes were similar between the two groups.

Conclusion

Preoperative 3D-CTA facilitates the safe and fluent performance of uniportal VATS anatomical lung resection for PS with shortened operation time and lessened surgical conversions.

Splitting the imaging system from the laparoendoscopic single site surgery device in endoscopic uniportal surgery: ZEUS project

The use of a rigid tube endoscope (RTE) through a laparoendoscopic single site surgery device for intracavitary visualization during endoscopic uniportal surgery (EUS) is directly related to the fulcrum effect and physical competition (externally between surgeons and on instrumentation through the single port). These facts may have precluded a wider spread of EUS. In an attempt to separate the imaging system from the laparoendoscopic single site surgery device, a tiered project (3 models) that can help overcome these drawbacks is detailed. ZEUS1, a new non-RTE imaging system device for EUS was successfully tested in EUS surgery in a pig model. Still under investigation, ZEUS2 becomes a wired structure that serves as the basis for an endoscopic microcamera with intracavitary pan-tilt-zoom functions. ZEUS3 uses the inner ring of the surgical wound protector as a microchamber crown. Further studies are needed to materialize the ZEUS2 and ZEUS3 models and confirm their efficacy and safety.

Advances and safe use of energy devices in lung cancer surgery

Objectives

A clear understanding of energy devices would help achieve high effectiveness and safety and guide the selection of devices. The present review aimed to elucidate the efficacy and adverse events of energy devices in lung cancer to guide the selection of appropriate devices depending on the situation.

Methods

Four major databases were searched electronically for relevant articles published until 16 April 2021. The reference lists of the identified papers were examined. We excluded (1) irrelevant studies, (2) manuscripts published in languages other than English and Japanese, (3) duplicates, and (4) studies for which the full text was not available in the databases. The results and key information obtained were summarized by means of a narrative approach.

Results

A total of 78 papers were included in the review and these were categorized according to the main topic of investigation as follows: (1) electrosurgery-related injuries, (2) fundamentals of electrosurgery, (3) monopolar devices, (4) bipolar electrosurgical devices, (5) ultrasonic energy devices, (6) energy devices in lung cancer surgery, (7) operating room fire risks, and (8) basic principles of surgery.

Conclusions

Understanding energy devices could help us use them in a more effective and safer manner. Knowledge of their selection criteria (suitability), merits, risks, and safety precautions relevant to each process of lung cancer surgery could guide appropriate selection.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11748-022-01775-w.

OUP accepted manuscript

Fogging of the thoracoscopic lens affects a surgeon’s ability to maintain a clear operating field. In uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, the thoracoscopic lens tends to fog when the surgeon does not hold a suction instrument. Thus, a suction instrument needs to be held by the surgeon’s nondominant hand to remove surgical smoke, mist, and moisture. Here, we describe a simple, easy and cost-effective surgical smoke ventilation technique for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using a suction catheter to solve the problem. We present this technique and comment on its advantages, including decreased cost and improved surgical visualization.

A multidisciplinary collaborative model based on single-port thoracoscopy for the treatment of giant mediastinal lymph node hyperplasia: a case report

Mediastinal unicentric Castleman disease (UCD) frequently manifests as a hyper-enhancing lymph node mass and is often surgically curable. However, because of excessive vascularisation and adhesion to important surrounding structures, surgery is often associated with severe haemorrhage that is often difficult to control thoracoscopically. Therefore, thoracotomy is often preferred, which increases the trauma to the patient and affects postoperative recovery. Here, we describe the case of a 30-year-old male patient with a large upper mediastinal lymph node (7 × 5 × 4 cm) that was compressing his superior vena cava. The distribution of nutritive arteries of the mass was analysed in detail, and the main branches were embolised prior to surgery. With the assistance of preoperative isovolumetric haemodilution, we achieved complete resection through single-port thoracoscopy, with only minor haemorrhage, which enabled the patient to recover rapidly. This multidisciplinary collaborative model, based on single-port thoracoscopic surgery, may be of wide practical use for the treatment of mediastinal UCD.

Simple lung retraction method for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

In conventional multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, devices such as cotton-tipped applicators are used instead of graspers to avoid injuring the fragile lung tissue while stabilizing the lung and securing the surgical visual field. However, in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, which requires the simultaneous use of multiple instruments, the instruments tend to interfere with each other during the procedure because they share a single incisional port. Here, we describe a simple, easy and cost-effective lung retraction technique using cotton swabs to solve the problem. We present this technique and comment on its advantages, including decreased cost and improved surgical visualization.

Splitting the imaging system from the laparoendoscopic single site surgery device in endoscopic uniportal surgery: ZEUS project

The use of a rigid tube endoscope (RTE) through a laparoendoscopic single site surgery device for intracavitary visualization during endoscopic uniportal surgery (EUS) is directly related to the fulcrum effect and physical competition (externally between surgeons and on instrumentation through the single port). These facts may have precluded a wider spread of EUS. In an attempt to separate the imaging system from the laparoendoscopic single site surgery device, a tiered project (3 models) that can help overcome these drawbacks is detailed. ZEUS1, a new non-RTE imaging system device for EUS was successfully tested in EUS surgery in a pig model. Still under investigation, ZEUS2 becomes a wired structure that serves as the basis for an endoscopic microcamera with intracavitary pan-tilt-zoom functions. ZEUS3 uses the inner ring of the surgical wound protector as a microchamber crown. Further studies are needed to materialize the ZEUS2 and ZEUS3 models and confirm their efficacy and safety.

A prospective comparative study of thoracoscopic transareolar and uniportal approaches for young male patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we introduce a novel approach, thoracoscopic transareolar bullectomy, for treating young male patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). This approach might be less invasive and cosmetically superior to existing methods. We also prospectively compared transareolar and uniportal approaches.

METHODS

Between April 2018 and July 2019, 40 patients were prospectively assigned to transareolar (n = 21) and uniportal (n = 19) groups. We compared patient characteristics and perioperative results. Approximately 1 week or 1 year after the operation, postoperative pain was evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS), and cosmetic satisfaction was graded on a four-point scale.

RESULTS

We found no significant between-group differences in patient characteristics or perioperative results. NRS scores did not differ on postoperative day (POD) 7 (transareolar, 1.8 ± 0.9 vs. uniportal, 1.6 ± 0.9; p = 0.62) or in postoperative month (POM) 12 (transareolar, 1.3 ± 0.5 vs. uniportal, 1.1 ± 0.5; p = 0.18). In terms of cosmetic satisfaction, the transareolar group was more satisfied on POD 7 (transareolar, 3.5 ± 0.6 vs. uniportal, 2.9 ± 0.9; p = 0.02) and in POM 12 (transareolar, 3.8 ± 0.5 vs. uniportal, 3.3 ± 0.9; p = 0.0065).

CONCLUSION

Although the perioperative results of the transareolar and uniportal approaches were similar, the former approach afforded a little better cosmetic satisfaction and might be useful option for young males with PSP.

Should sublobar resection be offered for screening-detected lung nodules?

The increasing use of low-dose CT for screening for lung cancer will inevitably identify many small, asymptomatic lung nodules and ground-glass opacities (GGOs). Current guidelines for the management of screening-detected lesions tend to advise a conservative approach based on serial imaging and intervention only if ‘suspicious’ features emerge. However, more recent developments in thoracic surgery and in the understanding of the screening-detected lesions themselves prompt some pertinent questions over this conservatism. Is CT surveillance sufficiently reliable to exclude malignancy? Is it really necessary to hold back on operative biopsy and resection given modern surgical safety and efficacy? Is the option for early surgical therapy a viable one—especially with the availability of sublobar resection today? Modern data suggests that the risk of inaction for some screening-detected lesions may be higher than expected, whereas the potential harm of surgical intervention may be substantially reduced by sublobar resection and the latest minimally invasive surgical techniques. A more pro-active approach towards offering surgery for screening-detected lesions should now be considered.

Modified technique of closing the port site after multiport thoracoscopic surgery using the shingled suture technique: a single centre experience

Background

Due to improvements in operative techniques and medical equipment, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has become a mainstay of thoracic surgery. Nevertheless, in multiport thoracoscopic surgery, there have been no substantial advances related to the improvement of the esthetics of the site of the chest tube kept for postoperative drainage of intrathoracic fluid and decompression of air leak after thoracoscopic surgery. Leakage of fluid and air around the site of the chest tube can be extremely bothersome to patients.

Methods

From March 2019 to April 2020, we used a modified technique of closing the port site in 67 patients and the traditional method in 51 patients undergoing multiport thoracoscopic surgery due to lung disease or mediastinal disease. We recorded patients’ age, gender, body mass index, surgical method, postoperative drainage time, and postoperative complications.The NRS pain scale was used to score the pain in each patient on the day of extubation.The PSAS and the OSAS were used for the assessment of scars one month after surgery.

Results

In the modified technique group, only one patient (1.49%) had pleural effusion leakage, compared with five patients (9.80%) in the traditional method group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the pain of extubating and wound dehiscence between the two groups. However,the incidence rates of wound dehiscence in the modified technique group were lower than in the traditional method group. There were no post-removal pneumothorax and wound infection in either of the groups. Significant differences in the PSAS and OSAS were observed between the groups,where the modified technique group was superior to the traditional method group.

Conclusions

The modified technique of port site closure is a leak-proof method of fixation of the chest tube after multiport thoracoscopic surgery. Moreover, it is effective and preserves the esthetic appearance of the skin.

The application analysis of 8F ultrafine chest drainage tube for thoracoscopic lobectomy of lung cancer

Background

Currently, thoracoscopic lobectomy is widely used in clinical practice, and postoperative placement of ultrafine drainage tube has advantages of reducing postoperative pain and accelerating postoperative recovery in patients. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of placement of 8F ultrafine chest drainage tube after thoracoscopic lobectomy and its superiority over traditional 24F chest drainage tube.

Methods

A retrospective data analysis was conducted in 169 patients who underwent placement of 8F ultrafine chest drainage tube or 24F chest drainage tube with thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer from January 2018 to December 2019. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias between the experimental group and the control group. After PSM, 134 patients (67 per group) were enrolled. The drainage time, the total drainage volume, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pain score and postoperative complication of both groups were analyzed and compared.

Results

Compared to group B, group A had lower pain scores on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3 (3.72 ± 0.65point vs 3.94 ± 0.67point, P = 0.027; 2.72 ± 0.93point vs 3.13 ± 1.04point, P = 0.016; and 1.87 ± 0.65point vs 2.39 ± 1.22point, P = 0.005), shorter drainage time (4.25 ± 1.79d vs 6.04 ± 1.96d, P = 0.000), fewer drainage volume (1100.42 ± 701.57 ml vs 1369.39 ± 624.25 ml, P = 0.021); and shorter postoperative hospital stay (8.46 ± 2.48d vs 9.37 ± 1.70d, P = 0.014). Postoperative complications such as subcutaneous emphysema, pulmonary infection, atelectasis, chest tube reinsertion and intrathoracic hemorrhage showed no differences between both groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with 24F chest drainage tube, the application of an 8F ultrafine chest drainage tube after thoracoscopic lobectomy has significantly shortened the drainage time, reduced the total drainage volume, reduced the postoperative pain degree, shortened the hospital day, and effectively detected postoperative intrathoracic hemorrhage. So, it is considered as an effective, safe and reliable drainage method.

Utility of preoperative three-dimensional CT bronchography and angiography in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical lobectomy: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis

Background

Personalized three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction can help surgeons to overcome technical challenges and variations of pulmonary anatomic structures in the performance of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UVATS), thus improving the safety and efficacy of the procedure. This study aims to evaluate the utility of preoperative 3D-CT bronchography and angiography (3D-CTBA) with Exoview software in the assessment of anatomical variations of pulmonary vessels, and to analyze short-term surgical outcomes in patients undergoing UVATS lobectomy.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 198 consecutive patients who underwent curative UVATS lobectomy between November 2019 and September 2020. The patients were divided into an “Exoview” group (n=53) and a “non-Exoview” group (n=145). We performed 1:1 propensity score matching and compared intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between the two groups. A subgroup analysis of 74 patients who underwent single-direction uniportal lobectomy was also conducted. Aberrant pulmonary vessel patterns related to the surgery were also examined.

Results

The operative time in the Exoview group was significantly shorter than that in the non-Exoview group, both before (145.7±33.9 vs. 159.5±41.6 minutes, P=0.032) and after (145.7±33.9 vs. 164.2±41.8 minutes, P=0.014) propensity score matching. The number of mediastinal lymph nodes dissected was higher in the Exoview group than in the non-Exoview group (8.19±6.89 vs. 5.78±3.3, P=0.024) after propensity score matching. Intraoperative blood loss showed a statistical difference between the Exoview and non-Exoview groups (60.4±45.4 vs. 100.8±83.9, P=0.009). Four types of arterial variations and 2 types of venous variations related to the surgery were observed among 8 patients (15%), which have rarely been reported before.

Conclusions

Personalized preoperative 3D-CT bronchography and angiography helped to clearly visualize the pulmonary anatomical structures and could contribute to the safe and efficient performance of UVATS anatomical lobectomy.

Next-day discharge following small uniportal thoracoscopic bullectomy assisted with an anchoring suture

Objective

Manipulating the instruments during uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) bullectomy requires a relatively large incision. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of next-day discharge following U-VATS bullectomy using an anchoring suture.

Methods

A stapler and a scope were inserted through a single incision in the anchoring group. The bullae were retracted by the suture, which was inserted from outside of the chest wall into the thorax, and then bullectomy was performed. For those in the control group, resection of the bullae was performed with the assistance of a grasping forceps.

Results

The length of the incision of the patients in the anchoring group ([13.2 ± 2.2] mm) was significantly smaller than in the control group ([26.2 ± 3.9] mm). In addition, the number of staplers used in the anchoring group was significantly less than in the control group ([1.2 ± 0.4] vs. [1.4 ± 0.5]). Furthermore, 36 (92.3%) cases in the anchoring group were uneventfully discharged within 24 hours after bullectomy.

Conclusion

Next-day discharge after U-VATS bullectomy through a small incision assisted with an anchoring suture is safe and feasible.

[Thoracic Surgery: The Era of Minimally Invasive Lobectomy]

The contingent of VATS (video assistend thoracic surgery) lobectomies will continue to increase in the time to come. Thoracic surgery departments that do not integrate this procedure into their routine spectrum will have to justify themselves to referrers and clinic administrations and will have problems with the recruitment of training assistants as well. The advantages of minimally invasive lobectomy are impressive and the long-term oncological results are equivalent to open lobectomy. VATS lobectomies in non-intubated patients will increase significantly in the next few years and further reduce the invasiveness of the operation. The number of clinics that offer RATS (roboter assistend thoracic surgery) lobectomies will also increase as more companies bring robot systems onto the market, making them significantly cheaper. Better screening programs for risk patients for lung cancer, rapid advances in thoracic oncology and further minimization of surgical trauma in lung resections will significantly improve the overall therapy and prognosis for lung cancer patients in the years to come.

Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for the treatment of lung cancer: a consensus report from Chinese Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (CSTCVS) and Chinese Association of Thoracic Surgeons (CATS)

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UniVATS) has been widely adopted in China, where several ultra-high volume thoracic surgical and training centers are located. The objective of this consensus from Chinese experts was to summarize the current application and give reference for the future development of UniVATS in the treatment of lung cancer. A panel of 41 experts from 21 Chinese hospitals was invited to join this project. The Delphi method was used in this consensus consisting of two rounds of voting. The questionnaire was based on the current clinical evidence. Forty (97.6%) experts completed the 2 rounds of questionnaires. The experts’ experience was relatively similar. We defined the UniVATS as monitor-dependent surgery, no use of rib-spreading and single incision less than 4 cm. Tumor with stage of T1–T3 and N0–N2 is considered amenable to UniVATS. Other consensus was reached on several points outlining the safety and feasibility, surgical skills, learning curve, short-term and long-term outcomes for lung cancer, and current application of subxiphoid and nonintubated UniVATS approach. This consensus statement represents a collective agreement among Chinese experts to suggest that UniVATS is an effective alternative to multi-portal approach, although high-level evidence is expected in the future. Some agreements can be referred in the training of young surgeons.

Developing training for uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery: a commentary

OBJECTIVES

Today, thoracic surgeons have many possible pathways to advance their training in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). For uniportal VATS (uVATS) in particular, what are the training options available and does regulating training matter?

METHODS

The relevant literature pertaining to uVATS training is reviewed.

RESULTS

Current options for surgeons looking to train in uVATS range from videos on the internet, through 'experts' demonstrating live surgery, to symposia and hands-on wet labs being held in all regions of the world. All have merits, and the aspiring VATS surgeon can choose from a range of preceptorship and proctorship modules to suit his/her own training needs. However, issues in the formalizing training in uVATS remains unresolved. Is there an ideal pathway through uVATS training? At what point can a trainee be considered to have 'graduated' to become an expert in uVATS? Who indeed trains the trainer, and certifies the competence of a training centre?

CONCLUSIONS

Although a plethora of training options exist, formulation of a robust training curriculum can further bolster the status of uVATS as a sustainable surgical approach that can be delivered with consistent quality.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery as the gold standard for lung cancer surgery

Surgical resection remains the only effective means of cure in the vast majority of patients with early-stage lung cancer. It can be performed via a traditional open approach (particularly thoracotomy) or a minimally invasive approach. VATS is 'keyhole' surgery in the chest, and was first used for lung cancer resection in the early 1990s. Since then, a large volume of evolving clinical evidence has confirmed that VATS lung cancer resection offered proven safety and feasibility, better patient-reported post-operative outcomes, less surgical trauma as quantified by objective outcome measures and equivalent or better survival than open surgery. This has firmly established VATS as the surgical approach of choice for early-stage lung cancer today. Although impressive new non-surgical lung cancer therapies have emerged in recent years, VATS is also being constantly rejuvenated by the development of 'next generation' VATS techniques, the refinement of VATS sublobar resection for selected patients, the utilization of bespoke post-operative recovery programmes for VATS and the synthesis of VATS into multi-modality lung cancer therapy. There is little doubt that VATS will remain as the gold standard for lung cancer surgery for the foreseeable future.

Initial experience with uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for the treatment of lung cancer performed by a surgeon who did not have previous experience performing multiportal thoracoscopic surgery: a single center retrospective study

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcome of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer performed by a surgeon who did not have previous experience performing open thoracotomy and multiportal VATS.

Methods

From January 2017 to December 2018, 85 patients underwent uniportal VATS anatomical pulmonary resection performed by one surgeon. The remaining 269 patients underwent multiportal VATS performed by other experienced surgeons. Clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes of the uniportal VATS and multiportal VATS groups were compared.

Results

The uniportal VATS procedures included 7 segmentectomies, 66 lobectomies, 1 bilobectomy, and 1 pneumonectomy. There was no conversion to multiportal VATS or open thoracotomy. Patients who underwent multiportal VATS surgery were older, more often men, and more often smokers than those who underwent uniportal VATS. Other clinicopathological characteristics were not statistically different between the two groups. The number of dissected lymph nodes was higher in uniportal VATS than in multiportal VATS (16.8 vs. 14.6, P=0.030). Anesthetic time and operative time were shorter in uniportal VATS than in multiportal VATS (both P<0.001). Intraoperative blood loss was also less in the uniportal VATS group than in the multiportal VATS group (P<0.001). There were no statistical between-group differences in chest tube drainage period, hospital stay, postoperative complication rate, and operative mortality rate.

Conclusions

Uniportal VATS for pulmonary anatomical resection of non-small cell lung cancer performed by a surgeon without previous multiportal VATS experience yielded acceptable surgical outcomes.

Modified left subsuperior segmentectomy via 2-cm uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Independent subsuperior segmentectomy (S*) via uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has rarely been reported. We describe our modified technique of performing simplified left subsuperior segmentectomy for a lung nodule, via 2-cm uniportal VATS. The uniportal approach was different from the traditional approach made by blunt separation into the thorax without electrocautery. Our modified technique minimizes damage to the intercostal nerves and muscles. We also simplified the subsuperior segmentectomy procedure according to the findings of three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography angiography and bronchography. Combining these two techniques achieves a new more minimally invasive method for subsuperior segmentectomy.

Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer

Background

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is the recommended surgical approach for patients with stage I lung cancer. Whether a multiportal or a uniportal approach is preferable remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of implementing uniportal VATS lobectomy into the treatment program of lung cancer patients.

Methods

We used the national quality register for general thoracic surgery in Sweden and included all patients who underwent VATS lobectomy for lung cancer at the Karolinska University Hospital between 2016-2018. Early postoperative complications were compared in patients undergoing uniportal (n=122) and multiportal (n=211) VATS lobectomy for lung cancer. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and standardized mean differences were used to limit differences in baseline characteristics and to assess balance after weighting.

Results

The proportion of uniportal VATS lobectomies increased during the study period and the conversion rates declined significantly. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups with the exception of a higher percentage of patients without any comorbidity in the uniportal group (59.8% vs. 44.5%, P=0.010). After inverse probability of treatment weighting the groups were well balanced. Postoperative complications were rare regardless of surgical approach, 94% in both groups had no complications. The 30-day mortality and overall survival at 1 year was 0% and 97% in the uniportal group, and 0.5% and 98% in the multiportal group (P=0.71). Patients undergoing uniportal VATS lobectomy were discharged directly to home to a higher extent than multiportal VATS patients (76.2% vs. 62.1%, P=0.008).

Conclusions

We found that uniportal VATS lobectomy was feasible and safe, and might entail advantages in terms of a faster recovery after surgery as compared to multiportal VATS lobectomy in patients with lung cancer.

Simple continuous suture to strengthen the closure of intra-muscle used in the removal of uni-portal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery thoracic drainage tube

Background

Uni-portal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become a popular type of thoracic surgery. However, improvements to the closure of the single drainage tube hole are still in need.

Methods

From February 2019 to May 2019, we included 50 patients who received uni-portal VATS for lung disease or mediastinal disease and simple continuous suture to strengthen the closure of intra-muscle combined with removal-free stitches on the skin. Follow-up items included incision length, chest tube drainage amount, chest tube drainage time, incision effusion leakage, postoperative subcutaneous emphysema, postoperative pain score.

Results

A total of 50 patients were included in this study, including 23 males and 27 females, with an average age of 60.08±9.73 years old. The mean drainage on the first day after operation was 236.56±141.50 mL, while the mean pain score on the first day after operation was 4.16±1.70. Among 50 patients, only two cases of subcutaneous emphysema occurred.

Conclusions

Applying innovative simple continuous suture to strengthen the closure of intra-muscle combined with removal-free stitches on the skin into the closure of uni-portal VATS is safe and feasible.