Durability of Mitral Valve Bioprostheses: A Meta-Analysis of Long-Term Follow-up Studies

Durability of bovine pericardial mitral bioprosthesis based on Heart Valve Collaboratory echocardiographic criteria

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the very long-term results of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the mitral position, with particular attention to structural valve deterioration based on echocardiographic criteria.

METHODS

From 1984 to 2016, 648 patients (mean age 68.8 years; 53.9% female) underwent mitral valve replacement using the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis. Multiple valve replacements were excluded. Clinical, operative, and follow-up data were prospectively recorded. The mean follow-up was 7.8 ± 5.4 years, for a total of 5043 valve-years. The follow-up data were 98.3% complete (11 patients lost). Structural valve deterioration was determined by strict echocardiographic assessment based on Heart Valve Collaboratory criteria.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 4%. A total of 322 late deaths occurred, for a linearized rate of 6.4%/valve-year. The actuarial survival rate at 15 years was 31.4 ± 2.6%. Age at implantation, male sex, and preoperative New York Heart Association class III or IV were significant risk factors affecting late survival. Actuarial freedoms from complications at 15 years were thromboembolism, 92.5 ± 1.9%; major bleeding, 93.8 ± 1.7%; endocarditis, 93.2 ± 1.3%; and explantation due to structural valve deterioration, 69.3 ± 3.5%. The median survival time for explantation due to structural valve deterioration was 21.7 years for the entire cohort (16.1 years for patients <65 years old). Based on echocardiographic data, actuarial freedom from severe and moderate/severe structural valve deterioration at 15 years were 64.0 ± 3.6% and 52.1 ± 3.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

With low 15-year rates of valve-related events and structural valve deterioration based on Heart Valve Collaboratory echocardiographic criteria, the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis remains a reliable choice for a mitral tissue valve.

Durability of porcine and pericardial prostheses in tricuspid valve replacement

Objective

Biologic valves dominate tricuspid valve replacement, yet data on different valve types are lacking. We compare the survival and durability of porcine and pericardial tricuspid prostheses.

Methods

A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing tricuspid valve replacement with porcine (N = 542) or pericardial (N = 144) prostheses between 1975 and 2022 was performed using a prospectively maintained institutional database. Concurrent procedures were included. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression were performed.

Results

Patients who received the porcine prosthesis, compared with pericardial, were younger (56 ± 17 years vs 63 ± 15 years) and more likely to present urgently (55% porcine, 44% pericardial); however, there were no differences in redo status or concomitant operations. Ten-year survival was not significantly different between the porcine and pericardial groups (35% ± 3% vs 28% ± 4%, respectively, P = .2). The 10-year cumulative incidence of structural valve deterioration (porcine 9% ± 2%, pericardial 11% ± 3%, P = .8), reoperation for structural valve deterioration (porcine 5% ± 1%, pericardial 4% ± 2%, P = .06), and severe regurgitation (porcine 4% ± 1%, pericardial 5% ± 2%, P = .7) were not significantly different between groups. The failure mode was similar, with no difference in severe stenosis (porcine 32/47 [68%], pericardial 11/16 [69%], P = .9) or severe regurgitation (porcine 18/47 [38%], pericardial 7/16 [44%], P = .7). On regression analysis, valve type was not associated with survival (P = .6). Valve type was not associated with structural valve deterioration (P = .1) or reoperation for structural valve deterioration (P = .9).

Conclusions

In our series, there were no differences in survival or durability between porcine and pericardial valves. In most patients undergoing tricuspid valve replacement, the choice of porcine versus pericardial prosthesis is unlikely to affect clinical outcomes.

Late Outcomes of Porcine and Pericardial Bioprostheses After Mitral Valve Replacement in 1162 Patients

BACKGROUND

Debate continues regarding the superiority of porcine vs pericardial bioprostheses, and data relevant to this comparison are scant. This study compared late survival and structural valve deterioration of porcine and pericardial mitral valve prostheses.

METHODS

Adults undergoing mitral valve replacement with 1 first-generation porcine valve model and 1 pericardial valve line were reviewed from a prospectively maintained institutional database between 1976 and 2020. Multivariable regression and Cox proportional hazards analysis were used to compare late outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 1162 consecutive patients, 612 (53%) received porcine valves and 550 (47%) received pericardial valves. At 10 years, patient survival (porcine, 36% ± 2%; pericardial, 38% ± 3%; P = .5) and cumulative incidence of mitral valve structural deterioration (porcine, 18% ± 2%; pericardial, 19% ± 3%; P = .3) were similar. The structural failure mode was more likely severe mitral stenosis in pericardial valves (35 of 50 [70%] vs 38 of 106 [36%]; P < .001), and it was more likely severe mitral regurgitation in porcine valves (80 of 106 [75%] vs 19 of 50 [38%]; P < .0001). After adjustment, structural deterioration was associated with younger patient age (P < .001) but not valve type. At 10 years, porcine valves demonstrated a higher cumulative incidence of mitral reoperation (19% ± 2% vs 9% ± 2%; P < .001) and reoperation for structural deterioration (15% ± 1% vs 6% ± 2%; P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated similar rates of 10-year survival and structural deterioration with porcine and pericardial bioprostheses in mitral valve replacement. The study suggests a lack of major improvement in durability of mitral bioprosthetic valves over time. The failure mode may have a greater influence on surgeon decision making regarding valve choice.

Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedures: Challenges and Future Directions

Aortic valve-in-valve (ViV) procedures are increasingly performed for the treatment of surgical bioprosthetic valve failure in patients at intermediate to high surgical risk. Although ViV procedures offer indisputable benefits in terms of procedural time, in-hospital length of stay, and avoidance of surgical complications, they also present unique challenges. Growing awareness of the technical difficulties and potential threats associated with ViV procedures mandates careful preprocedural planning. This review article offers an overview of the current state-of-the-art ViV procedures, with focus on patient and device selection, procedural planning, potential complications, and long-term outcomes. Finally, it discusses current research efforts and future directions aimed at improving ViV procedural success and patient outcomes.

Mitral valve replacement in young patients: review and current challenges

Mitral valve repair is the ideal intervention for mitral valve disease with excellent long-term survival comparable to the age-matched general population. When the mitral valve is not repairable, mechanical prostheses may be associated with improved survival as compared with biological prostheses. Newer mechanical and biological valve prostheses have the potential to improve outcomes following mitral valve replacement in young patients. Patients presenting for mitral valve surgery after failed transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve have high rates of postoperative mortality and morbidity, exceeding those seen with reoperative mitral valve surgery, which poses issues in young patients who have a higher cumulative incidence of reintervention.

Long-Term Outcomes of Bioprosthetic Valves in the Mitral Position: A Pooled Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Individual Patient Data

Bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement (bMVR) use is increasing; however, data regarding long-term durability are lacking. We sought to perform a reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis from published Kaplan-Meier curves to ascertain survival, freedom from valve degeneration, and reoperation in studies published since 2010. We explored the effects of age and valve type (bovine pericardial or porcine valve) on outcomes. We searched MEDLINE, OVID, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies reporting at least 3 years of follow-up after bMVR and published since 2010. The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used to assess methodologic quality. Kaplan-Meier curves were digitized to extract individual patient data and reconstructed estimates for overall survival, freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD), and freedom from reoperation. A total of 20 studies (16,465 patients) were included. A total of 9 studies reported on porcine valves, 6 reported on bovine, and 7 did not specify the valve type. The overall survival after bMVR at 15 years was 40% (confidence interval 38% to 42%), freedom from reoperation at 15 years was 79% (confidence interval 76% to 82%), and freedom from SVD at 15 years was 64% (58% to 70%). Freedom from SVD was improved in the 70+ years age group (93% up to 25 years, hazard ratio 6.6 [2.5 to 17] for 18 to 59 vs >70 years, p <0.0001). There was no difference in valve durability or survival between bovine pericardial or porcine valves. In this meta-analysis of patients who underwent bMVR using newer generation valves, the inverse relation between age and SVD was reiterated in the 70+ years age group. The prosthesis type made no difference in the outcomes.

Three-year outcomes of surgical valve replacement with Dafodil™ pericardial bioprosthesis: Dafodil™-1 trial

Background

The Dafodil™-1 trial was designed to evaluate the clinical safety and performance of Dafodil™ pericardial bioprosthesis for replacing diseased native or prosthetic aortic or mitral valves in patients with advanced valvular heart disease (VHD).

Methods

The Dafodil™-1 trial was a prospective, multicenter, first-in-human clinical trial. Patients were enrolled if they had advanced VHD requiring aortic valve replacement (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) with or without concomitant valve surgery and having surgical risk scores <4%. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke; and hemodynamics were analyzed.

Results

A total of 136 patients (aortic: 67 and mitral: 69) were enrolled in the trial (with mean age-AVR group: 60.2 ± 8.3 years and MVR group: 49.7 ± 14.4 years). A total of 134 patients (aortic: 66 and mitral: 68) completed the 3-year follow-up (total 300 per 100 patient-years of follow-up). The AVR group demonstrated a significant reduction in the mean pressure gradients from 51.2 ± 24.1 mmHg at baseline to 11.1 ± 6.0 mmHg at the 3-year follow-up (p < 0.0001). The mean effective orifice area (EOA) improved from baseline (0.9 ± 0.6 cm2) to 3-year follow-up (1.8 ± 0.4 cm2) (p < 0.0001). In the MVR group, the mean indexed EOA (iEOA) increased significantly from baseline (0.7 ± 0.4 cm2/m2) to 3-year follow-up (1.1 ± 0.4 cm2/m2) (p < 0.001). There was significant improvement in New York Heart Association functional class and mean SF-12 scores in both groups. At 3-year follow-up, the MACE incidence was 2.3% per 100 patient-years (1.3% strokes per 100 patient-years and 1.3% deaths per 100 patient-years) for AVR group and 4.7% per 100 patient-years (0.6% strokes per 100 patient-years and 4.0% deaths per 100 patient-years) for MVR group. No cases of MI, structural valve deterioration and prosthetic valve endocarditis were reported. The AVR and MVR groups achieved 89.6% and 79.7% MACE-free survival, respectively at 3-year follow-up.

Conclusions

The Dafodil™-1 trial demonstrated satisfactory outcomes of clinical safety, hemodynamic performance, and quality-of-life metrics. Additionally, no incidence of structural valve deterioration and very low rates of valve thrombosis during the 3-year follow-up period of Dafodil™-1 first-in-human trial indicated acceptable valve durability up to three years and similar outcomes are warranted for longer follow-ups as a primary goal.

Clinical Trial Registration Number

https://www.ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/showallp.php?mid1=18377&EncHid=&userName=CTRI/2017/07/009008, CTRI/2017/07/009008.

Surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in low-risk elective patients: Analysis of the Aortic Valve Replacement in Elective Patients From the Aortic Valve Multicenter Registry

OBJECTIVES

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains the preferred strategy for high-risk or elderly individuals with aortic valve (AV) stenosis who are not considered to be optimal surgical candidates. Recent evidence suggests that low-risk patients may benefit from TAVI as well. The current study evaluates midterm survival in low-risk patients undergoing elective surgical AV replacement (SAVR) versus TAVI.

METHODS

The Aortic Valve Replacement in Elective Patients From the Aortic Valve Multicenter Registry (AVALON) compared isolated elective transfemoral TAVI or SAVR with sternotomy or minimally invasive approach in low-risk individuals performed between 2015 and 2019. Propensity score matching was conducted to determine SAVR controls for TAVI group in a 1-to-3 ratio with 0.2 caliper.

RESULTS

A total of 2393 patients undergoing elective surgery (1765 SAVR and 629 TAVI) with median European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II) score 1.81 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.36 to 2.53]) were initially included. Median follow-up was 2.72 years (IQR, 1.32-4.08; max 6.0). Propensity score matching returned 329 TAVI cases and 593 SAVR controls. Thirty-day mortality was 11 out of 329 (3.32%) in TAVI and 18 out of 593 (3.03%) in SAVR (risk ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.52-2.37; P = .801) groups, respectively. At 2 years, survival curves began to diverge in favor of SAVR, which was associated with 30% lower mortality (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.496-0.997; P = .048).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data did not demonstrate a survival difference between TAVI and SAVR during the first 2 postprocedure years. After that time, SAVR is associated with improved survival. Extended observations from randomized trials in low-risk patients undergoing elective surgery are warranted to confirm these findings and draw definitive conclusions.

Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: A Large First-in-Human 13-Year Experience

BACKGROUND

Favourable early outcomes have been reported following valve-in-valve transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). However, reports of long-term outcomes are lacking. We aimed to evaluate early and late outcomes in a large first-in-human valve-in-valve TMVR 13-year experience.

METHODS

All patients undergoing valve-in-valve TMVR in our centre from 2008 to 2021 were included. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes, defined according to the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium, were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients were analysed: mean age 76.8 ± 10.2 years, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 10.7 ± 6.8%, 55.4% female, 63.9% transapical access. Thirty-day mortality was 2.5% for the total population and 0.0% after transseptal TMVR. Maximum follow-up was 13.1 years. During a median follow-up of 3.4 years (interquartile range 1.8-5.3 years), 55 patients (46.2%) died, mainly from noncardiovascular causes. Valve hemodynamics were acceptable at 5 years, with 2.5% structural dysfunction. Patients treated from 2016 on (n = 68; 57.1%), following the advent of routine use of the Sapien 3 valve, CT screening, and transseptal access, were compared with those treated before 2016 (n = 51; 42.9%). Patients from 2016 on had a higher technical success rate (100.0% vs 94.1%; P = 0.04), shorter hospitalisation (P < 0.001), trending lower 30-day mortality (1.5% vs 3.9%; P = 0.4) and better 5-year survival (74.7% vs 41.1%; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Valve-in-valve TMVR can be performed with little morbidity and low mortality. Mid- to long-term survival remains limited owing to advanced age and comorbidities. Structural bioprosthetic valve dysfunction was rare and redo TMVR feasible in selected patients. Outcomes continue to improve, but the role for valve-in-valve TMVR in lower surgical risk patients remains unclear.

Long-term echocardiographic data, mechanisms of failure, and reintervention outcomes of the Epic valve in mitral position-a large observational cohort

OBJECTIVES

Long-term echocardiographic reports on mitral valve (MV) porcine xenograft bioprosthesis (Epic) are lacking, and postreintervention outcomes of failed Epic are unknown. We aimed to assess the mechanisms and independent predictors of Epic failures and to compare short- and mid-term outcomes according to reintervention type.

METHODS

We included consecutive patients (n = 1397; mean age: 72 ± 8 years; 46% female; mean follow-up: 4.8 years) who received the Epic during mitral valve replacement (MVR) at our institution. Clinical, echocardiographic, reintervention, and outcomes data were retrieved from our prospective institution's database or government statistics.

RESULTS

Gradients and effective orifice area of the Epic were stable over 5-years follow-up. A total of 70 (5%) patients had a MV reintervention at median follow-up of 3.0 (0.7-5.4) years due to prosthesis failure, by redo-MVR (n = 38; 54%), valve-in-valve (n = 19; 27%), paravalvular leak (PVL) closure (n = 12; 17%), or thrombectomy (n = 1). Mechanisms of failure were 27 (1.9%) structural valve deterioration (SVD; all leaflet tear); 16 (1.1%) non-SVD (15 PVL, 1 pannus); 24 (1.7%) endocarditis; and 4 (0.3%) thrombosis. Freedom from all-cause and SVD-related MV reintervention at 10 years are 88% and 92%, respectively. Independent predictors of reintervention were age, baseline atrial fibrillation, initial MV etiology, and moderate or greater PVL at discharge (all P ≤ .05). Comparison of redo-MVR and valve-in-valve revealed no significant difference in early outcomes or mid-term mortality (all P ≥ .16).

CONCLUSIONS

The Epic Mitral valve has stable hemodynamics through 5 years and is associated with low incidence of SVD and reintervention, mostly due to endocarditis and leaflet tear without calcification. Reintervention type had no influence on early outcomes and mid-term mortality.

Mid-term outcomes of the COMMENCE trial investigating mitral valve replacement using a bioprosthesis with a novel tissue

Objective

Novel tissue leaflets (RESILIA tissue) may improve durability of bioprosthetic heart valves. The COMMENCE trial is an ongoing prospective study to evaluate valve replacement using RESILIA tissue. This report describes mid-term outcomes in the mitral cohort of COMMENCE.

Methods

Adult patients requiring mitral valve replacement were enrolled in a prospective, single-arm trial at 17 sites in the United States and Canada. An independent clinical events committee adjudicated safety events using definitions from established guidelines, and hemodynamic performance was evaluated by an independent echocardiographic core laboratory.

Results

Eighty-two patients (median age 70 years) successfully underwent mitral valve replacement with the study valve. Five-year event-free probabilities for all-cause mortality, structural valve deterioration, and reoperation were 79.9%, 98.7%, and 97.1%, respectively. Hemodynamic valve function measurements were stable through the 5-year follow-up period; valvular leaks were infrequently observed and primarily clinically insignificant/mild.

Conclusions

Mitral valve replacement patients implanted with a RESILIA tissue bioprosthesis had a good safety profile and clinically stable hemodynamic performance.

Bovine pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic mitral valves: results from a Korean Nationwide Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Comparisons of long-term clinical outcomes of mitral valve replacement (MVR) between bovine pericardial and porcine bioprostheses are conflicting, with limited research in large-scale real-world clinical settings. This study examined clinical outcomes in MVR according to bioprosthesis type using a national administrative claims database.

METHODS

This study included adult patients undergoing bioprosthetic MVR between 2003 and 2018 using administrative health care data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Propensity score matching with competing risk analysis was used to compare the clinical outcomes according to the type of bioprosthesis. The end points were death, cardiac death, and valve-related events, including the incidence of reoperation, endocarditis, systemic thromboembolism, and major bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 3151 patients underwent bioprosthetic MVR with bovine pericardial (n = 1628, 51.7%) or porcine (n = 1523, 48.3%) bioprostheses. After matching, 1170 pairs were included in the final analysis. During follow-up (median 4.49 years, interquartile range 1.87 -8.75 years), death occurred in 1178 patients (6.8%/patient-year), comprising 730 (4.3%/patient-year) cardiac death. No significant differences were noted between the bovine and porcine groups in the cumulative incidences of death from any cause [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87-1.14], cardiac mortality (aHR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.81-1.14), or reoperation (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.72-1.41).

CONCLUSIONS

This study on a nationwide comparison between bovine and porcine bioprostheses in MVR found no significant differences in clinical outcomes including mortality, and valve-related reoperation.

MR-Linac guided adaptive stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for recurrent cardiac sarcoma with mitral valve bioprosthesis - a case report

We present the first case in the literature of a 78-year-old woman with recurrent cardiac sarcoma adjacent to a bioprosthetic mitral valve treated with magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-Linac) guided adaptive stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR). The patient was treated using a 1.5 T Unity MR-Linac system (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). The mean gross tumour volume (GTV) size was 17.9 cm³ (range 16.6-18.9 cm³ ) based on daily contours and the mean dose received by the GTV was 41.4 Gy (range 40.9-41.6 Gy) in five fractions. All fractions were completed as planned and the patient tolerated the treatment well with no acute toxicity reported. Follow-up appointments at 2 and 5 months after the last treatment showed stable disease and good symptomatic relief. Results of transthoracic echocardiogram after radiotherapy showed that the mitral valve prosthesis was normally seated with regular functionality. This study provides evidence that MR-Linac guided adaptive SABR is a safe and viable option for the treatment of recurrent cardiac sarcoma with mitral valve bioprosthesis.

Patch augmentation vs. valve replacement for patients with atrial functional mitral regurgitation and long-standing atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Long-standing atrial fibrillation is associated with atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) with atriogenic tethering. We compared the outcomes of patch augmentation (PA) and valve replacement (VR) for AFMR.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared the data of 16 patients who underwent PA for AFMR with the data of 15 patients who underwent VR between 2008 and 2021. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of <50% were excluded. We also performed atrial plication and left appendage closure if the patients had no weak atrial wall that led to severe bleeding.

RESULTS

The median age was 72.5 and 76.0 years in the PA and VR groups, respectively. The PA group had a longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (206 vs. 172 min, P=0.012). Although there were no differences in hospital morbidity and mortality between the PA and VR groups, one patient underwent reoperation for patch perforation in the PA group. The overall 3-year survival rate was 93.8% and 100% in the PA and VR groups, respectively (P=0.878). The 3-year rate of freedom from major adverse cardiac events was 75.0% and 53.6% in the PA and VR groups, respectively (P=0.181). Three and six patients were readmitted for congestive heart failure in the PA and VR groups, respectively. Two patients in the PA group developed severe recurrent regurgitation, including one patient who required reoperation. No patients in the VR group required reoperation. The postoperative left atrial volume index (LAVI) was associated with thromboembolic events (P=0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

PA may achieve comparable outcomes to those of VR for AFMR. Operative procedures should be chosen based on each patient's background. Atrial reduction could be considered to prevent thromboembolic events.

Mitral Valve Replacement: A Review of Current Practices and Considerations in Low and High-Risk Patients

Mitral Regurgitation (MR) is the most common form of severe valvular disease occurring in developed countries, being caused either primarily on its own or secondary to cardiac disease. Surgical intervention is required for the correction of MR, which could include the replacement or repair of the affected valve. Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement (TMVR) in selected patients is of increasing importance, especially after the success of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). TMVR can be divided into three types i.e., valve-in-valve (ViV) for severe mitral valve disease, valve-in-ring (ViR) for failed surgical repairs, and valve-in-mitral annular calcifications (ViMAC) for mitral valvular disease with severe mitral annular calcifications and poor surgical criteria. The FDA approved Mitral ViV for patients with a high surgical risk in 2017, while ViR and ViMAC are still currently under consideration. The SAPIEN M3 valve is relatively new with a trans-septal system, with a success rate of 86%, and no mortality in a 30-day outcome. The Cardiovalve is a bovine pericardium device that has a dual nitinol frame with a custom surgical design to facilitate TMVR. The AHEAD trial will evaluate whether the device is safe to use in a clinical setting and how effective it is for reducing MR in these patients. The trial consists of 30 patients in which the first 5 patients showed 100% technical success and a reduction of MR. This evolution of modern medicine has assisted in many different countries, including Pakistan where there is a higher prevalence of MR and hence, a greater need to apply TMVR in clinical practice.

Prosthetic cardiac valves: history and review of cardiac prostheses clinically available in Japan

Recently developed prosthetic valves are reliable and essential for the treatment of valvular heart disease. The mechanical valve evolved remarkably following the introduction of pyrolite carbon material, which enabled the creation of a bileaflet form incorporated with a pivot mechanism. The improved durability of the biological valve is attributed mainly to the development of a tissue fixation process and anti-calcification treatments. However, optimal antithrombogenicity and durability have not yet been achieved for either prosthetic valve type. To select the most suitable prosthetic valve for each individual patient from among the many clinically available prosthetic valves, it is necessary to have a thorough understanding of the characteristics of each valve.

Mitral valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring procedures: Midterm outcomes in a French nationwide registry

OBJECTIVES

Report contemporary outcomes in patients included in the Mitragister registry and treated with transcatheter mitral valve implantation for failed surgical annuloplasty rings or deteriorated bioprosthesis.

BACKGROUND

Midterm survival rates have been reported, but little is known about contemporary morbimortality endpoints.

METHODS

The primary safety outcome was the technical success rate. The primary efficacy composite endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalizations.

RESULTS

From 2016 to 2021, 102 patients (median age: 81 [74;84] years, 61% female, Euroscore II 11.0% [7.8;16.0]) undergoing valve-in-valve (ViV; n = 89) or valve-in-ring (ViR; n = 13) procedures were consecutively included. At baseline, ViR group patients had worse left ventricular ejection fraction (50% vs. 60%; p = 0.004) and more frequently severe regurgitation (46% vs. 15%; p = 0.014). The primary safety outcome was 95%: 77% and 98% in the ViR and ViV populations, respectively, (p = 0.014). At intermediate follow-up (6-12 months) clinical improvement was notable, 88% of the patients were in NYHA class ≤ II (vs. 25% at baseline; p < 0.001). At a mean follow-up of 17.1 ± 11.0 months, the primary efficacy composite reached 27%. By multivariate analysis, paravalvular leak (PVL) was the only independent predictor (hazard ratio: 2.39, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-5.29; p = 0.031) while ViR was not found statistically associated (p = 0.456).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the safety and efficacy of the mitral ViV procedure. ViR patients appear at higher risk of procedural complications. The presence of PVL could be associated with markedly worse midterm prognosis. Whatever the intervention, procedural strategies to reduce PVL incidence remain to be assessed to prevent latter adverse outcomes.

Modes of the bioprosthetic valve failure of the porcine and pericardial valves in the mitral position

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to examine the incidence and modes of the bioprosthetic valve failure of the porcine valve in the mitral position and compare them with those of the pericardial valve.

METHODS

This study included 240 patients (116 men [48.3%]; mean age, 74.87 ± 6.61 years) who underwent mitral valve replacement using the St. Jude Medical Epic bioprosthesis (Epic) (N = 125) or Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (CEP) pericardial valve (N = 115) from January 2000 to December 2020.

RESULTS

The median clinical follow-up durations in the Epic and CEP groups were 54.5 months (range, 0-111 months) and 81.5 months (range, 0-194 months), respectively. Structural valve degeneration (SVD) was observed in 9 patients (7.2%) in the Epic group and 11 patients (9.6%) in the CEP group. The rates of freedom from SVD at 3, 5 and 7 years were 97.7%, 90.5% and 75.5% in the Epic group and 100.0%, 96.1% and 90.0% in the CEP group, respectively. SVD reoperation was performed for 7 patients (5.6%) in the Epic group and 6 patients (5.2%) in the CEP group. The rates of freedom from SVD reoperation at 3, 5 and 7 years were 97.7%, 90.5% and 75.5% in the Epic group and 100%, 96.1% and 90.0% in the CEP group, respectively. Epic SVD was predominantly due to leaflet tearing, whereas CEP SVD was predominantly due to leaflet calcification and adhesion to the subvalvular apparatus.

CONCLUSIONS

SVD of the porcine valve was predominantly due to leaflet tearing. The rate of reoperation for SVD was slightly higher for the porcine valve in the mitral position than for the pericardial valve at adjusted survival analysis.

Aortic and mitral bioprosthetic valve dysfunction: surgical or percutaneous solutions?

In the last years, there has been a trend to prefer biological prostheses, especially among young patients, with the aim to avoid anticoagulant treatment. Surgical tissue valves have so far demonstrated their solid long-term durability. However, younger age has been identified as one of the main risk factors for developing structural valve deterioration (SVD). As a consequence, the proportion of subjects at risk for valve dysfunction will constantly rise in the near future. However, while surgical reintervention has always been considered the gold standard for treatment of prosthesis deterioration, the introduction of transcatheter heart valves could offer new therapeutical options, particularly among high-risk patients, aiming a second less invasive chance. The recent standardization of valve durability definitions will soon allow a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanism underlying SVD and guide the choice of prosthesis for patients needing valve replacement.

Comparative analysis of structural valve deterioration and long-term clinical outcomes after bovine pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement

Background

This study aimed to compare long-term outcomes, including durability, after bovine pericardial valve replacement with those after porcine mitral valve replacement (MVR).

Methods

We enrolled 309 patients who underwent MV replacement (mean age: 65.8±11.5 years; 68.9% females) with Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT bovine pericardial valves (bovine MVR group, n=241) or Hancock II porcine bioprosthesis (porcine MVR group, n=68). The mean clinical and echocardiographic follow-up durations were 81.4±60.0 and 57.8±53.3 months, respectively. Structural valve deterioration (SVD) was defined as prosthetic mitral valve (MV) regurgitation or stenosis of greater than moderate degree combined with a motion limitation, tear, or perforation of prosthetic valve leaflet on follow-up echocardiography. Propensity score (PS)-adjusted multivariable analyses were performed.

Results

Thirty-day mortality rate was 6.4% (20/309 patients). SVD occurred in 50 patients (33 and 17 patients in the bovine and porcine MV replacement groups, respectively). Cumulative incidences of SVD at 5, 10, and 15 years were 3.2%, 15.9%, and 32.4%, respectively, in the bovine MVR group and 1.9%, 15.3%, and 41.7%, respectively, in the porcine MVR group. Cumulative incidences of SVD in the two groups were not different in competing risk analysis (P=0.23). Other clinical outcomes including overall survival and cumulative incidences of cardiac death and MV-related events were not statistically significantly different between the groups in PS-adjusted multivariable analyses.

Conclusions

Long-term clinical outcomes including SVD were not different between the bovine and porcine bioprosthesis MVR groups during average 7 years of clinical follow-up after MVR.

Structural valve degeneration in the transcatheter mitral valve implantation era

Structural valve degeneration of biological valves continues to be a persistent problem and has assumed greater importance with the advent of transcatheter valve implantation techniques. Considerable variability exists among different studies in reporting the incidence of structural valve degeneration and differentiation with nonstructural valve degeneration and bio-prosthetic valve failures is important. Moreover, the pathological basis of structural valve degeneration is still not completely understood. Theoretically, trans-catheter implanted valves may be more prone to degeneration compared to surgically implanted biological valves. Measures to reduce structural valve degeneration are imperative, irrespective of the technique of valve implantation.

DURABILITY OF MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH A 3RD GENERATION BIOPROSTHESIS

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the durability of a third-generation porcine bioprosthesis (Epic® valve) in the mitral position, according to patients' age at surgery.

METHODS

A total of 482 mitral valve replacements (MVR) using the Epic® valve at a single center were included (2009-2018). Perioperative and early postoperative data were prospectively collected. A systematic follow-up was performed (99% complete, 1,609.5 patient/years, average: 3.8 ± 2.5 years). Standardized definitions of valve-related events were adopted. Age at MVR was 68.1 ± 10.4 years.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 9.3%. The were 5 early valve-related reoperations, mainly due to recurrent infectious endocarditis. Global survival at 8.8 years was 69.5% ± 5. There were 9 SVD events during the follow-up (3 receiving reoperations, 4 TMVR valve-in-valve, and 2 medical treatment only). The freedom from SVD at 5 and 10 years was 97.4% ± 1.2 and 89.6% ± 4.4 (actuarial), and 97.8% ± 1 and 91.9% ± 3.3, respectively (competing risks). After stratification into subgroups by age at surgery (≤59: 50.8%, 60-69: 32.8%, ≥70: 16.4%) there was no significant intergroup difference in freedom from SVD (log-rank p=0.24). The overall freedom from any reintervention for SVD at 10 years was 90.5% ± 4.4 (actuarial) and 92.7% ± 3.3 (competing risks), with no intergroup difference (log-rank p=0.14). The freedom from any valve-related complication at 8.4 years was 83.2% ± 4.5 (actuarial).

CONCLUSIONS

The Epic® bioprosthesis shows good durability at 5 to 10 years in the mitral position.

Late results after mitral valve replacement with Mosaic bioprosthesis in patients aged 65 years or younger

OBJECTIVES

Although in younger patients indications for biological prosthesis implantation in mitral valve replacement remain controversial, recently bioprostheses use increased considerably. We present late results obtained with the Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis in patients aged 65 years or younger.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2017, 67 mitral Mosaic bioprostheses were implanted in patients aged 65 years or younger (58.5 ± 6.4 years). Follow-up extended up to 13 years. Survival, freedom from structural valve degeneration, endocarditis, thromboembolic events and reoperation were considered as main clinical end points evaluated at 1, 5 and 10 years.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 4.7 ± 2.8 years. Overall mortality rate was 12%. At 1, 5 and 10 years, survival was 94 ± 3%, 89 ± 4% and 77 ± 9%, respectively. Freedom from structural valve degeneration was 100%, 94 ± 4% and 71 ± 21%. Freedom from endocarditis was 95 ± 3%, 90 ± 6% and 84 ± 8%. Freedom from thromboembolic events was 94 ± 3%, 90 ± 5% and 90 ± 5%. Freedom from reoperation was 94 ± 3%, 87 ± 5% and 65 ± 19%.

CONCLUSIONS

Mosaic bioprosthesis appears a valid mitral valve substitute even when employed in ≤65-year-old patients.

Noncalcific Mechanisms of Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Degeneration

Bioprosthetic heart valves (BHVs) largely circumvent the need for long‐term anticoagulation compared with mechanical valves but are increasingly susceptible to deterioration and reduced durability with reoperation rates of ≈10% and 30% at 10 and 15 years, respectively. Structural valve degeneration is a common, unpreventable, and untreatable consequence of BHV implantation and is frequently characterized by leaflet calcification. However, 25% of BHV reoperations attributed to structural valve degeneration occur with minimal leaflet mineralization. This review discusses the noncalcific mechanisms of BHV structural valve degeneration, highlighting the putative roles and pathophysiological relationships between protein infiltration, glycation, oxidative and mechanical stress, and inflammation and the structural consequences for surgical and transcatheter BHVs.

Early Basal Cuspal Tear of a Porcine Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Causing Massive Mitral Regurgitation

Although porcine mitral bioprostheses provide predictably good long-term outcomes, unexpected leaflet tears leading to abrupt haemodynamic changes may occur. Here, we report on a patient who was presented with acute dyspnea due to a cuspal tear of a porcine bioprosthetic mitral valve causing severe mitral regurgitation. Her condition was subsequently complicated by a systemic infection, probably pneumonia, and was successfully managed with an urgent redo-mitral valve replacement.

Outcomes of mitral valve re-replacement for bioprosthetic structural valve deterioration

OBJECTIVES

Reoperation for structural valve deterioration (SVD) of bioprosthetic mitral valves carries a presumed high operative risk, and transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation has emerged as an alternative. However, surgical risk and long-term outcome following mitral valve re-replacement in these patients remain ill-defined. Hence, we sought to evaluate outcomes and long-term survival following surgical mitral valve re-replacement and to identify risk factors for mortality.

METHODS

From January 1990 to January 2017, 525 patients underwent surgical mitral valve re-replacement at Cleveland Clinic for bioprosthetic SVD: 133 (25%) isolated operations and 392 (75%) with concomitant procedures. Surgical complications and modes of death were compiled, long-term mortality assessed, and risk factors identified using a multivariable nonproportional hazards model and random forest analysis.

RESULTS

SVD was characterized by bioprosthetic regurgitation in 81% (425 out of 525) and stenosis in 44% (231 out of 525). One in-hospital death occurred after isolated valve re-replacement (0.75%) and 28 deaths occurred (7.1%; P = .003) after nonisolated re-replacement, 19 (68%) of which were from coagulopathy, vasoplegia, and multisystem organ failure. In the nonisolated group, incremental risk factors for time-related death after re-replacement included New York Heart Association functional class IV symptoms, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time, and transfusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Mitral valve re-replacement for bioprosthetic SVD was associated with low surgical risk and excellent long-term survival. Isolated mitral valve re-replacement for bioprosthetic SVD had near-zero surgical risk. Excessive cardiopulmonary bypass duration and multiple transfusions correlated with increased early mortality in nonisolated procedures, as did preoperative severe heart failure. Optimal surgical plan and timing of surgery are keys to success.