2019 AATS/ACC/SCAI/STS Expert Consensus Systems of Care Document: Operator and Institutional Recommendations and Requirements for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Intervention: A Joint Report of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, the American College of Cardiology, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Failure of Guidelines and Consensus Statements to Recommend Follow-up for Chronic Cardiovascular Conditions

BACKGROUND

Many cardiac conditions require long-term clinical follow-up to monitor progression of disease and tolerance and adherence to therapies. Providers are often unsure as to the frequency of clinical follow-up and who should provide the follow-up. In the absence of formal guidance, patients may be seen more frequently than necessary - thereby limiting clinic space for other patients, or not frequently enough, potentially leading to undetected progression of disease.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the extent to which guidelines (GL)/consensus statements (CS) provide guidance about appropriate follow-up for common cardiovascular conditions.

METHODS

We identified 31 chronic cardiovascular disease conditions for which long-term (beyond 1 year) follow-up is indicated and used PubMed and professional society websites to identify all relevant GL/CS (n = 33) regarding these chronic cardiac conditions.

RESULTS

Of the 31 cardiac conditions reviewed, GL/CS contained no recommendation or vague recommendation for long-term follow-up for 7 of the conditions. Of the 24 conditions with recommendations for follow-up, 3 had recommendations for imaging follow-up only without mention of clinical follow-up. Of the 33 GL/CS reviewed, 17 made any recommendations about long-term follow-up. When recommendations were made regarding follow-up, they were often vague, using terminology such as "as needed".

CONCLUSIONS

Half of GL/CS fail to provide recommendations for clinical follow-up of common cardiovascular conditions. Writing groups for GL/CS should adopt a standard of routinely including recommendations for follow-up including specific advice about level of expertise needed (eg, primary care physician, cardiologist), need for imaging or testing, and frequency of follow-up.

Contemporary Surgical and Transcatheter Management of Mitral Annular Calcification

BACKGROUND

The presence of mitral annular calcification (MAC) in patients with mitral valve (MV) stenosis or regurgitation is a difficult scenario for surgeons and the heart team. Patients with MAC most often have a significant number of comorbidities that exclude them as surgical candidates. This review highlights the various contemporary techniques available to manage MAC during treatment of the MV.

METHODS

This study is a focused review of the anatomy, pathology, and management of MAC. The review describes the surgical and transcatheter techniques with outcomes, where available.

RESULTS

The incidence of MAC is between 5% and 42% in patients with severe MV disease. The pathophysiology underlying MAC is not yet clear, but it most likely is related to processes of inflammation and atherosclerosis. Surgical techniques can be grouped into those in which the MAC is completely resected en bloc and those in which the MAC is incompletely resected or left in situ. Transcatheter therapies are feasible in some patients, but they have been limited by the anatomic constraints of MAC; most importantly left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and paravalvular regurgitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons as part of the heart team now have a range of techniques to manage MAC in those patients with severe MV disease. Transcatheter therapies may increase the options for patients whose surgical risk is too high.