Outcomes After Tricuspid Valve Repair With Ring Versus Suture Bicuspidization Annuloplasty

Impact of prophylactic donor heart tricuspid valve annuloplasty on outcomes in heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Tricuspid regurgitation(TR) following heart transplantation could adversely affect clinical outcomes. In an effort to reduce the incidence of TR, prophylactic donor heart tricuspid valve annuloplasty has been performed during heart transplantation in our institution. We assessed early and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Between August 2011 and August 2021, 349 patients who underwent prophylactic tricuspid valve annuloplasty were included. Tricuspid valve annuloplasty was performed using the DeVega annuloplasty technique. The clinical outcomes of the interests included complete atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker implantation, the occurrence of significant TR(defined as moderate or greater), and survival. Long-term survival was compared in patients with and without significant TR using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards regression with time-dependent covariate analysis was used to see if significant TR affected the long-term survival.

RESULTS

There was one patient(0.3%) who required pacemaker implantation for complete atrioventricular block. No patients developed tricuspid valve stenosis that required intervention. Significant TR developed in 31 patients(8.9%) during the follow-up period. The survival rate of patients who developed significant TR was significantly lower than that of those who did not(log rank < 0.01). Significant TR was associated with the long-term mortality(HR2.92, 95%CI 1.47-5.82, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic donor heart tricuspid valve annuloplasty has the potential to reduce the occurrence of significant TR and can be performed safely. The significant TR that developed in patients with prophylactic annuloplasty negatively affected survival and was an independent predictor of long-term mortality.

The Early Effects on Tricuspid Annulus and Right Chambers Dimensions in Successful Tricuspid Valve Bicuspidization

BACKGROUND

It is unclear to what degree of tricuspid annulus (TA) reduction is necessary to achieve good postoperative results in surgical bicuspidization. The study aimed to evaluate TA and right heart chamber's dimensions before and after heart surgery; and to compare TA parameters assessed by different modalities.

METHODS

Forty patients underwent mitral valve surgery with or without concomitant tricuspid valve (TV) bicuspidization. Preoperative and postoperative measurements of TA dimensions were performed prospectively using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Additionally, preoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) was performed in the operating room prior to surgery.

RESULTS

All patients had no or mild TR immediately after surgery. There was a significant reduction in 2D and 3D parameters of the TV and right chambers in the TV bicuspidization group. However, TV leaflets' tethering parameters did not change significantly. Preoperative 3D TTE measurements were smaller than those obtained through 3D TOE in the operation room, before surgery under general anesthesia. The 2D systolic apical 4Ch diameter and the parasternal short axis diameter mainly represent the 3D minor axis of the TA and are smaller than its 3D major axis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although bicuspidization results in a one-third reduction of the TV area, tethering of the TV leaflets remains unchanged. Moreover, 3D TOE parameters of the TV under general anesthesia are larger than preoperative 3D TTE measurements. Conventional 2D measurements are insufficient for evaluating the maximum diameter of the TA.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention: to repair or to replace?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The burden of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is high in the aging population, almost 4% in the age group over 75 have moderate or more TR. This carries a poor prognosis and an increased incidence of mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and rehospitalization in symptomatic patients with severe TR is observed. Percutaneous tricuspid valve intervention has emerged as a viable therapeutic option, with an increasingly large toolbox of both tricuspid repair and replacement devices. The optimal strategy, timing and patient selection for transcatheter intervention are yet to be determined. This review focuses on the current strengths and limitations of transcatheter tricuspid repair vs. replacement, drawing on lessons learned from surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Early outcome studies have been published in the last 2 years for many of the new percutaneous tricuspid valve devices. We have summarized these results and compared them to surgical tricuspid valve repair and replacement. We found that surgical data shows a tendency to better outcome with tricuspid valve repair compared to replacement. For transcatheter interventions studies comparing repair and replacement are lacking but both interventions show good procedural success rates and are efficient in reducing the grade of tricuspid regurgitation.

SUMMARY

Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions offer a safe and effective alternative to tricuspid surgery or medical therapy. The decision between valve replacement and repair should be based on patient anatomy, operator experience and device availability until head-to-head comparison of different devices are available.

Surgical Correction of Tricuspid Regurgitation

The tricuspid valve is an often forgotten but relevant cause of significant morbidity and mortality. Serious consideration should be given to addressing the valve in patients undergoing left-sided valve surgery who have functional TR, or an enlarged annulus. Tricuspid repair with a ring annuloplasty has shown improved long-term survival and freedom from recurrent TR at as long as 15 years of follow-up compared to suture annuloplasty or other repairs where a prosthetic ring is not used.

Cardiac Surgery 2020 Reviewed

In 2020, nearly 30,000 published references appeared in the PubMed for the search term "cardiac surgery." While SARS-CoV-2 affected the number of surgical procedures, it did not affect outcomes reporting. Using the PRISMA approach, we selected relevant publications and prepared a results-oriented summary. We reviewed primarily the fields of coronary and conventional valve surgery and their overlap with interventional alternatives. The coronary field started with a discussion on trial data value and their interpretation. Registry comparisons of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention confirmed outcomes for severe coronary artery disease and advanced comorbidities with CABG. Multiple arterial grafting was best. In aortic valve surgery, meta-analyses of randomized trials report that transcatheter aortic valve implantation may provide a short-term advantage but long-term survival may be better with classic aortic valve replacement (AVR). Minimally invasive AVR and decellularized homografts emerged as hopeful techniques. In mitral and tricuspid valve surgery, excellent perioperative and long-term outcomes were presented for structural mitral regurgitation. For both, coronary and valve surgery, outcomes are strongly dependent on surgeon expertise. Kidney disease increases perioperative risk, but does not limit the surgical treatment effect. Finally, a cursory look is thrown on aortic, transplant, and assist-device surgery with a glimpse into the current stand of xenotransplantation. As in recent years, this article summarizes publications perceived as important by us. It does not expect to be complete and cannot be free of individual interpretation. We aimed to provide up-to-date information for decision-making and patient information.

Long-term results of tricuspid annuloplasty with 3-dimensional-shaped rings: effective and durable!

OBJECTIVES

3-Dimensional (3D)-shaped rings are largely adopted for tricuspid annuloplasty, but evidence about their long-term results is scanty. The goal of this study was to analyse the long-term results of tricuspid annuloplasty with 3D-shaped rings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database was carried out to identify all patients who underwent tricuspid valve repair with 3D-shaped rings between January 2011 and December 2014. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to analyse long-term survival. Cumulative incidence function using death as the competitive outcome was used to estimate cardiac death.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients were identified. The median age was 66 years. Eighty-two patients (49%) were in advanced New York Heart Association functional class III-IV. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was present in 101 (60%); the median ejection fraction was 60%. In 82 (49%) patients, a Medtronic 3D Contour annuloplasty ring was employed; in the remaining 86 (51%) patients, an Edwards MC3 ring was used. Cumulative incidence function of cardiac death, with non-cardiac death as a competing risk, was 1.9 ± 1.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.51-4.95) at 7 years. The cumulative incidence function of recurrence of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) ≥2+ at 7 years was 14 ± 3.17%, 95% CI (8.49-20.82). Recurrence of TR ≥2+ at 7 years was not significantly different between the Medtronic 3D Contour and the Edwards MC3 rings (P = 0.3). AF was identified as the only independent predictor of recurrence of TR ≥2+.

CONCLUSIONS

3D-shaped rings are effective and durable. TR recurrence was relatively low at 7 years and usually moderate (2+/4+) without a significant difference between the 2 types of rings. The role of AF as a predictor of TR recurrence was confirmed.

Durability of suture versus ring tricuspid annuloplasty: Looking at very long term (18 years)

BACKGROUND

Several papers already reported better outcomes of tricuspid valve repair with ring annuloplasty compared to suture techniques. However, the follow-up is usually limited to 10 years. With this study, we aim to analyze the results of tricuspid valve repair according to the technique employed when the follow-up is extended to more than 15 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of our institutional database was carried on to find all patients who underwent tricuspid valve repair between January 1998 and December 2004. Kaplan-Meier method was employed to estimate survival and log-rank test was used to make intergroup comparison. Cox regression was employed to identify risk factor for mortality. Cumulative incidence function using death as competitive outcome was used to estimate cardiac death. To describe the time course of tricuspid regurgitation, a longitudinal analysis using generalized estimating equations with random intercept for correlated data was performed.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-six patients were identified: 89 in the suture group and 57 in the ring group. No difference in term of long-term survival and cardiac death was evident between the two groups. A significant higher rate of tricuspid regurgitation ≥2+ and ≥3+ recurrence was evident in the suture group during the whole follow-up (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our results corroborate the better results of tricuspid valve repair by means of ring implantation compared to suture techniques also when the follow-up is extended up to 18 years. Ring annuloplasty should be considered the first option for tricuspid valve repair due to a better durability.

Impact of Different Annuloplasty Methods for Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although moderate to severe tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) is an independent risk factor for progressive heart failure and increased mortality, the best method for tricuspid valve repair remains controversial. Therefore, this study conducted a network meta-analysis to compare early and late outcomes for suture, flexible band, and rigid ring as tricuspid annuloplasty (TAP) in patients with TR.

METHODS

Medline and EMBASE were searched through February 15, 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials and observational trials that investigated early and late outcomes after TAP for TR. The outcomes of interest were perioperative mortality, all-cause mortality, and TR recurrence with more than 1-year follow-up. TR recurrence was defined as at least moderate (TR grade 2) on serial echocardiograms.

RESULTS

Two randomized controlled trials and 15 observational trials were identified, including 6138 patients who underwent TAP. The median follow-up period was 1 to 7.4 years. There were no significant differences of perioperative and all-cause mortality among 3 TAP methods. Rigid ring TAP was associated with a significant reduction in TR recurrence compared with suture TAP (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.78; P = .005). There were no significant differences in TR recurrence were observed between flexible band and suture TAP or flexible band and rigid ring TAP.

CONCLUSIONS

This network meta-analysis demonstrated significant reduction in TR recurrence for rigid ring TAP compared with suture TAP, although no significant differences were observed between suture and flexible band TAP or between flexible band and rigid ring TAP. There were no significant mortality differences among suture, flexible band, and rigid ring TAP procedures.