Modified En Bloc Esophagectomy Compared With Standard Resection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation

Modified En Bloc Esophagectomy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The optimal type of esophagectomy and extent of lymphadenectomy for patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma remain controversial. We hypothesized that a more radical resection is associated with better survival.

METHODS

Data of patients who received nCRT followed by resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between 2012 and 2021 were analyzed. Modified en bloc esophagectomy (mEBE) involves total mediastinal lymphadenectomy and resection of all periesophageal node-bearing tissues. Perioperative outcomes and survival rates of mEBE were compared with those of conventional esophagectomy (CE).

RESULTS

A total of 238 patients were included. Compared with CE, mEBE was associated with a longer operative time, higher total number of resected lymph nodes, fewer complications, and less anastomotic leakage; length of stay was similar between the 2 groups. There was no difference in overall survival rates between patients with ypT0 N0 stage in the mEBE and CE groups; however, in patients with non-ypT0 N0 stage in the mEBE and CE groups, the 3-year overall survival rates were 58.5% and 28.5%, respectively (P < .001). On disease-free survival analysis, no difference was observed in patients with ypT0 N0 stage, whereas patients with non-ypT0 N0 stage after nCRT had significantly better disease-free survival after mEBE compared with CE (49.7% vs 27.2%; P = .017).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival after mEBE was significantly better than that after CE. The mEBE did not increase postoperative hospital stay and complication rates.

Skeletonizing En Bloc Esophagectomy Revisited: Oncologic Outcome in Association with the Presence of Thoracic Duct Lymph Nodes

BACKGROUND

Skeletonizing en bloc esophagectomy (SEBE) involves the removal of the esophagus en bloc with locoregional soft tissues and lymph nodes, including the thoracic duct (TD); however, its oncologic benefits remain unclear. We evaluated the impact of SEBE on oncologic outcomes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients undergoing McKeown esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy between 2013 and 2019 were evaluated. Outcomes after SEBE were compared with those after conventional esophagectomy (CE) using propensity score-matched analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 232 patients were identified, including 133 patients with SEBE and 99 patients with CE. Lymph node metastasis along the TD was identified in 7.5% (10/133) of the SEBE group, and the incidence was closely related with the tumor invasion depth (2.2% in pT1 and 19.0% in pT2-3). Based on the propensity score, 180 patients (90 pairs) were analyzed. Tumor recurrence was identified in 24.4% and 12.2% of CE and SEBE cases, respectively (p = 0.036). The observed difference was due to the higher incidence of locoregional recurrence in CE (10.5% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.024), while the incidence of systemic recurrence was similar (18.6% vs. 12.2%; p = 0.240). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 83.6% and 62.4% in the SEBE and CE groups, respectively (p = 0.022). Multivariate analysis revealed that SEBE could significantly reduce the risk of recurrence or death in patients with pT2-3 tumors (hazard ratio 0.173, 95% confidence interval 0.048-0.628; p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

SEBE could identify and eradicate lymphatic metastasis along the TD and positively impact disease-free survival, particularly in patients with pT2-3 tumors.

Outcomes of minimally invasive total mesoesophageal excision: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive total mesoesophageal excision (TME) for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy at our center between January 2011 and June 2017. Among 611 eligible patients, 302 underwent minimally invasive total mesoesophageal excision (the TME group) and 309 underwent non-total mesoesophageal excision (the NME group). Outcomes were compared after 1-to-1 propensity score matching, and subgroup analyses were performed for cases involving pT1-2 or pT3-4a disease.

RESULTS

The propensity score matching produced 249 pairs of patients. The TME group had a shorter operative time (P < 0.001), lower intraoperative bleeding (P < 0.001), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the number of removed lymph nodes, 30-day mortality, or postoperative complications. In addition, both groups had similar 3-year rates of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). However, the 3-year recurrence rate in the esophageal bed was significantly lower in the TME group (P = 0.033). Furthermore, among patients with pT3-4a disease, the TME group had better 3-year rates of OS, DFS, and recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive total mesoesophageal excision appears to be a safe technique that can reduce tumor recurrence in the esophageal bed. Furthermore, this technique provided survival benefits for patients with pT3-4a disease.

Fluorescence Guided Thoracic Duct Dissection in Robotic En-bloc Esophagectomy

En-bloc resection of the thoracic duct compartment enhances adequate lymph node removal and may improve oncological outcomes in esophagectomy for esophageal malignancies. However, it also increases the risk of postoperative chylothorax with a reported incidence of 5-20%. We describe a technique that facilitates intraoperative identification of the thoracic duct as well as proximal and distal ligation during robot-assisted esophagectomy by lymphangiography guided injection of indocyanine green in de right groin in left lateral positioning. This approach can be swiftly applied at any time during any thoracoscopic procedure in lateral position when visualization of the thoracic duct anatomy is needed.