Vocal Fold Mobility Impairment After Cardiovascular Surgery: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Sequela

Longitudinal Examination of Swallowing Safety and Vocal Fold Mobility in Cardiac Surgical Patients

BACKGROUND

Aspiration and vocal fold mobility impairment (VFMI) are frequently reported in adults after cardiac surgery (CS) and impede recovery. Preoperative and postoperative laryngoscopic evaluations have not been undertaken, masking the incidence and evolution of dysphagia and VFMI in CS patients. We therefore sought to determine frequency of unsafe swallowing and VFMI before and after CS.

METHODS

Thirty-five adults undergoing elective CS enrolled. Participants underwent fiberoptic endoscopic evaluations of swallowing and VFMI before and after surgical procedure. Trained raters performed duplicate, blinded ratings with the validated Penetration-Aspiration Scale, and a laryngologist performed blinded ratings of VFMI. Descriptive, Wilcoxon signed rank, and McNemar tests were performed.

RESULTS

Preoperative swallowing safety profiles were 60% safe, 34% penetration, and 6% aspiration. Postoperative swallowing safety profiles were 14% safe, 63% penetration, and 23% aspiration. Significant differences in preoperative to postoperative swallowing outcomes were noted for Penetration-Aspiration Scale scores (P < .0001), unsafe swallowing (40% vs 86%; χ2 = 12.8; P = .0003), and aspiration (6% vs 23%; χ2 =6; P = .01). No differences in VFMI were noted preoperatively to postoperatively (partial VFMI, 9% vs 23%; P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

A 4-fold increase in aspiration was observed in CS patients. No cases of vocal fold paralysis were observed across time points. These data highlight the utility of instrumental laryngoscopic evaluations during the acute postoperative phase.

Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: A Joint Consensus Statement by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Cardiac Society, ERAS International Society, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs have been shown to lessen surgical insult, promote recovery, and improve postoperative clinical outcomes across a number of specialty operations. A core tenet of ERAS involves the provision of protocolized evidence-based perioperative interventions. Given both the growing enthusiasm for applying ERAS principles to cardiac surgery and the broad scope of relevant interventions, an international, multidisciplinary expert panel was assembled to derive a list of potential program elements, review the literature, and provide a statement regarding clinical practice for each topic area. This article summarizes those consensus statements and their accompanying evidence. These results provide the foundation for best practice for the management of the adult patient undergoing cardiac surgery.

Utility of Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Objective Dysphagia following cardiac surgery is common and associated with adverse outcomes. Among patients receiving left ventricular assist devices (LVAD), we evaluated the impact of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) on outcomes. Methods A single-center pilot study was conducted in adults (≥18 years of age) undergoing durable LVAD (February 2019 - January 2020). Six patients were prospectively enrolled, evaluated, and underwent FEES within 72 hours of extubation-they were compared to 12 control patients. Demographic, surgical, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Unpaired two-sided t-tests and Fisher's exact tests were performed. Results Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Intraoperative criteria including duration of transesophageal echo (314 ± 86 min) and surgery (301 ± 74 min) did not differ. The mean time of intubation was comparable (57.3 vs. 68.7 hours, p=0.77). In the entire cohort, 30-day, one-year, two-year, and three-year mortality were 0%, 5.6%, 5.6%, and 16.7%, respectively. Sixty-seven percent of the patients that underwent FEES had inefficient swallowing function. The FEES group trended to a shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) (29.1 vs. 46.6 days, p=0.098), post-implantation LOS (25.3 vs 30.7 days, p=0.46), and lower incidence of postoperative pneumonia (16.7% vs. 50%, p=0.32) and sepsis (0% vs. 33.3%, p=0.25). Conclusion FEES did not impact 30-day, one-year, two-year, or three-year mortality. Though not statistically significant, patients who underwent FEES trended toward shorter LOS and lower postoperative pneumonia and sepsis rates. Additionally, we report a higher incidence of dysphagia among patients undergoing FEES despite comparable baseline risk factors with controls.

Healthcare disparities for the development of airway stenosis from the medical intensive care unit

Objectives/hypothesis

Study design

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Level of evidence