Impact of Obesity on Treatment Approach for Resectable Esophageal Cancer

Thoracoabdominal Esophagectomy: Then and Now

BACKGROUND

Open approaches for esophagectomy are often still useful; of these, left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (TAE) is poorly understood and often criticized. Hence, we examined TAE's worldwide utilization, survival, and present-day use and outcomes at our institution compared with contemporary national averages.

METHODS

The Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration database includes 8854 patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer between 2005 and 2014, a period when TAE was our center's most common approach. Two propensity score-matched models were constructed: worldwide TAE vs worldwide non-TAE (751 matched pairs); and our high-volume center TAE vs worldwide non-TAE (273 matched pairs). All-cause mortality was compared between matched groups. Institutional TAE data from 2017 to 2021 were assessed for present-day use and outcomes.

RESULTS

Worldwide, propensity score-matched patients undergoing TAE had a median of 20 lymph nodes resected vs 17 after non-TAE (P < .0001). Five-year survival was 34% for worldwide TAE vs 42% for worldwide non-TAE groups (P = .04). Three-year matched survival was 52% for high-volume TAE compared with 54% for worldwide non-TAE groups (P = .1). From 2017 to 2021 at our institution, 90 (26%) of 346 esophagectomies were performed by TAE. Pneumonia developed in 5 patients (5.6%), with 88 patients (98%) alive at 30 days, comparable to contemporary averages of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

When it is performed as the primary approach in high volumes, TAE can have comparable outcomes to non-TAE with low morbidity. At present, we find that TAE is most useful in patients with truncal obesity, prior abdominal operations, and locally advanced cardia tumors with potential for variable extent of resection.

Impact of body mass index on perioperative and oncological outcomes in elderly patients undergoing minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

The association between elevated body mass index (BMI) and perioperative and oncological outcomes among elderly patients undergoing minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (MIE) remains unclear.

Methods

We performed a single‐center retrospective analysis of 526 consecutive patients aged 65 years or older who underwent MIE for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) between January 2016 and December 2019. Two groups were stratified by BMI: normal (18.5 ≤ BMI < 24 kg/m²) and elevated groups (BMI ≥ 24 kg/m²). A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes between the two groups.

Results

A total of 480 elderly patients were eventually enrolled, with a mean age of 70.2 years (range: 65–87), and 185 patients were eligible for elevated BMI, with a mean BMI of 26.3 ± 1.9 kg/m². Compared with the normal BMI group, the elevated BMI group had prolonged operation time (261.7 ± 57.2 vs. 278.9 ± 62.7 mins, p = 0.002) and increased incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia (12.2% vs. 21.6%, p = 0.006). The differences in intraoperative estimated blood loss, transfusion, new‐onset arrhythmia, and conversion rates and postoperative outcomes regarding pulmonary and surgical complications, intensive care unit and 30‐day readmissions, the length of hospital stay, and oncological outcomes regarding R0 dissection, and the number of dissected lymph nodes between two groups were comparable. After a 1:1 PSM analysis, there was no significant difference in both perioperative and oncological outcomes between two groups.

Conclusions

Among elderly patients undergoing MIE for esophageal SCC, there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate that elevated BMI could increase perioperative and oncological adverse outcomes.