1
|
Li T, Ke D, Fu X, Dai Y, Lin J, Anker CJ, Bai Z, Li J. Prognosis for local radical treatment in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with low-risk oligometastatic recurrence after curative resection: a retrospective cohort study. J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 15:807-817. [PMID: 38989428 PMCID: PMC11231834 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-24-205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) with recurrent disease have a poor prognosis. A limited numbers of metastases, safely treatable with curative intent, diagnosed after curative esophagectomy may be defined as oligometastatic recurrence (OLR). However, the appropriate number of metastases and metastatic organs involved remains incompletely characterized. And the role of local therapy in OLR after radical esophagectomy remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to more accurately define low-risk OLR in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with radical resection and investigate the role of chemotherapy combined with local treatment (CCLT) in these patients. Methods A total of 83 sequential patients with ESCC who underwent radical esophagectomy, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2, with ability to tolerate chemotherapy (CT) and local treatment, and with newly diagnosed recurrence between January 2010 and May 2019 in our hospital were recruited. Overall survival (OS) curves after recurrence were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and a log-rank test was used to assess the OS differences. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with 2-year OS. Regular follow-up examinations were assessed by thoracic and upper abdominal computed tomography (CT) scanning every 3 months in the first year, every 6 months over the next 2 years, and yearly thereafter. Results Of the 83 patients with ESCC (71 males and 12 females), the median age was 56 years (range, 37-79 years). Thirty-five patients with ESCC with ≤5 metastases safely treatable with curative intent located in a single organ had a favorable OS compared to 48 patients with metastases located in 2-3 organs with or without regional recurrence and/or regional lymph node (LN) metastases. In our study, low-risk OLR was defined as the presence of ≤5 metastases safely treatable with curative intent in a single organ and was compared to patients with 2-3 organs involved. The 2-year OS of patients with low-risk OLR with liver oligometastases was significantly worse than survival in patients with lung oligometastases (0% vs. 61.1%, P=0.009). Patients with ESCC in the low-risk OLR group treated with CCLT had a better 2-year OS after recurrence than those who received CT alone (66.7% vs. 30.4%, P=0.003). The multivariable Cox regression model identified treatment method [hazard ratio (HR) 3.920, P=0.02] as an independent factor affecting OS after recurrence for low-risk OLR. Conclusions Low-risk OLR was defined as ≤5 metastases safely treatable with curative intent in a single organ. Patients with ESCC with low-risk OLR after curative resection treated with CCLT have a favorable OS compared to those treated with CT alone. CCLT is a promising treatment option for patients with ESCC and low-risk OLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
- Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Dongmei Ke
- Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiaobin Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
- Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yaqing Dai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, China
| | - Jules Lin
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Christopher J Anker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Zhigang Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Jiancheng Li
- Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sihag S. Advances in the Surgical Management of Esophageal Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2024; 38:559-568. [PMID: 38582720 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
Radical esophagectomy with two or three-field lymphadenectomy remains the mainstay of curative treatment for localized esophageal cancer, often in combination with systemic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. In this article, we describe notable advances in the surgical management of esophageal cancer over the past decade that have led to an improvement in both surgical and oncologic outcomes. In addition, we discuss new approaches to surgical management currently under investigation that have the potential to offer further benefits to appropriately selected patients. These incremental breakthroughs primarily include advances in endoscopic and minimally invasive techniques, perioperative management protocols, as well as the application of local therapies, including surgery, to oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, C-881, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sugawara K, Oka D, Hara H, Yoshii T, Ushijima H, Kudo S, Fukuda T. Survival outcomes of esophageal cancer patients with recurrence after curative treatments. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1051. [PMID: 37915027 PMCID: PMC10619310 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11568-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about predictive factors for survival outcomes of esophageal carcinoma (EC) patients who developed recurrence after undergoing multimodal therapies. We aimed to investigate long-term outcomes and identify prognostic factors in patients with relapsed EC, focusing especially on those with oligometastasis (OM). METHODS EC patients who developed recurrence after curative treatments (radical esophagectomy or definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT)) between 2010 and 2017 were reviewed. Multivariate Cox hazards models were applied to determine independent predictors of poor post-recurrence survival (PRS). RESULTS In total, 178 patients were included. The median PRS was 12.9 months. Of the 178 patients, 98 had OM and 80 non-OM (NOM) disease. The survival outcomes of patients with OM were significantly better than those of patients with NOM (P < 0.01). Surgical treatments provided significantly better survival outcomes than CRT or chemo-/radiotherapy alone (3-year overall survival (OS); 78.1% vs. 42.5% vs. 28.9%, P < 0.01), mainly due to prolonging survival after the recurrence (3-year PRS 62.9% vs. 16.7% vs. 16.2%, P < 0.01). Multivariable analysis focusing on patients with OM revealed cStage III-IV disease (P < 0.01), high GPS at the time of recurrence (P = 0.02) and non-curative treatments (P < 0.01), to be independently associated with poor PRS. In contrast, in patients with NOM, no independent predictors for poor PRS were identified. CONCLUSIONS The survival outcomes of patients with relapsed EC remain poor. Surgical treatments could provide survival benefits for patients with recurrent EC, especially for patients with OM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kotaro Sugawara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center Hospital, 780 Komuro Inamachi, Kitaadachi-gun, Saitama, 362-0806, Japan.
| | - Daiji Oka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center Hospital, 780 Komuro Inamachi, Kitaadachi-gun, Saitama, 362-0806, Japan
| | - Hiroki Hara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takako Yoshii
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hiroki Ushijima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Shigehiro Kudo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takashi Fukuda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center Hospital, 780 Komuro Inamachi, Kitaadachi-gun, Saitama, 362-0806, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schuring N, Stam WT, Plat VD, Kalff MC, Hulshof MCCM, van Laarhoven HWM, Derks S, van der Peet DL, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Daams F, Gisbertz SS. Patterns of recurrent disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophageal cancer surgery with curative intent in a tertiary referral center. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:106947. [PMID: 37355392 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrence is frequently observed after esophageal cancer surgery, with dismal post-recurrence survival. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy is the gold standard for resectable esophageal tumors in the Netherlands. This study investigated the recurrence patterns and survival after multimodal therapy. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included patients with recurrent disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy for an esophageal adenocarcinoma in the Amsterdam UMC between 01 and 01-2010 and 31-12-2018. Post-recurrence treatment and survival of patients were investigated and grouped by recurrence site (loco-regional, distant, or combined loco-regional and distant). RESULTS In total, 278 of 618 patients (45.0%) developed recurrent disease after a median of 49 weeks. Thirty-one patients had loco-regional (11.2%), 145 distant (52.2%), and 101 combined loco-regional and distant recurrences (36.3%). Post-recurrence survival was superior for patients with loco-regional recurrences (33 weeks, 95%CI 7.3-58.7) compared to distant (12 weeks, 95%CI 6.9-17.1) or combined loco-regional and distant recurrent disease (18 weeks, 95%CI 9.3-26.7). Patients with loco-regional recurrences treated with curative intent had the longest survival (87 weeks, 95%CI 6.9-167.4). CONCLUSION Recurrent disease after potentially curative treatment for esophageal cancer was most frequently located distantly, with dismal prognosis. A subgroup of patients with loco-regional recurrence was treated with curative intent and had prolonged survival. These patients may benefit from intensive surveillance protocols, and more research is needed to identify these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Schuring
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; AGEM Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - W T Stam
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Surgery, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; AGEM Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - V D Plat
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Surgery, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M C Kalff
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M C C M Hulshof
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Radiotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H W M van Laarhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Derks
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - D L van der Peet
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Surgery, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; AGEM Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M I van Berge Henegouwen
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; AGEM Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F Daams
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Surgery, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; AGEM Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S S Gisbertz
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; AGEM Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boerner T, Carr RA, Hsu M, Michel A, Tan KS, Vos E, Sihag S, Bains MS, Ku GY, Wu AJ, Jones DR, Molena D. Incidence and management of esophageal cancer recurrence to regional lymph nodes after curative esophagectomy. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:2109-2122. [PMID: 36573352 PMCID: PMC10006335 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Up to 50% of patients treated with curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer will develop recurrence, contributing to the dismal survival associated with this disease. Regional recurrence may represent disease that is not yet widely metastatic and may therefore be amenable to more-aggressive treatment. We sought to assess all patients treated with curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer who developed regional recurrence. We retrospectively identified all patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma at a single institution from January 2000 to August 2019. In total, 1626 patients were included in the study cohort. As of June 2022, 595 patients had disease recurrence, which was distant or systemic in 435 patients (27%), regional in 125 (7.7%) and local in 35 (2.2%). On multivariable analysis, neoadjuvant chemoradiation with a total radiation dose <45 Gy (hazard ratio [HR], 3.5 [95% CI, 1.7-7.3]; P = .001), pathologic node-positive disease (HR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.3-3.0]; P = .003) and lymphovascular invasion (HR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.0-2.5]; P = .049) were predictors of isolated nodal recurrence, whereas increasing age (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.96-0.99]; P = .001) and increasing number of excised lymph nodes (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.95-1.00]; P = .021) were independently associated with decreased risk of regional recurrence. Patients treated with a combination of local and systemic therapies had better survival outcomes than patients treated with systemic therapy alone (P < .001). In patients with recurrence of esophageal cancer limited to regional lymph nodes, salvage treatment may be possible. Higher radiation doses and more-extensive lymphadenectomy may reduce the risk of regional recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Boerner
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rebecca A. Carr
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Meier Hsu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alexa Michel
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Elvira Vos
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Manjit S. Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Geoffrey Y. Ku
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Abraham J. Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David R. Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fairbairn K, Molena D. Commentary: Closing the curtain on upfront surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 165:899-900. [PMID: 36216598 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.09.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Fairbairn
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yamauchi Y, Nakajima J, Mun M, Shintani Y, Kuroda H, Iwata T, Endo M, Azuma Y, Chida M, Sakao Y, Yoshino I, Ikeda N, Matsuguma H, Funai K, Hashimoto H, Kawamura M. Survival after Lung Metastasectomy from Esophageal Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Database. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051472. [PMID: 36900265 PMCID: PMC10000551 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
To clarify the clinical impact and to identify prognostic predictors of surgical intervention for pulmonary metastasis from esophageal cancer, a registry database analysis was performed. From January 2000 to March 2020, patients who underwent resection of pulmonary metastases from primary esophageal cancer at 18 institutions were registered in a database developed by the Metastatic Lung Tumor Study Group of Japan. An amount of 109 cases were reviewed and examined for the prognostic factors for pulmonary metastasectomy of metastases from esophageal cancer. As a result, five-year overall survival after pulmonary metastasectomy was 34.4% and five-year disease-free survival was 22.1%. The multivariate analysis for overall survival revealed that initial recurrence site, maximum tumor size, and duration from primary tumor treatment to lung surgery were selected as the significant prognostic factors (p = 0.043, p = 0.048, and p = 0.037, respectively). In addition, from the results of the multivariate analysis for disease free survival, number of lung metastases, initial recurrence site, duration from primary tumor treatment to lung surgery, and preoperative chemotherapy for lung metastasis were selected as the significant prognostic factors (p = 0.037, p = 0.008, p = 0.010, and p = 0.020, respectively). In conclusion, eligible patients with pulmonary metastasis from esophageal cancer selected based on the identified prognostic predictors would be good candidates for pulmonary metastasectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshikane Yamauchi
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo 170-8582, Japan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-3-3964-1211
| | - Jun Nakajima
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Mingyon Mun
- Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
| | - Yasushi Shintani
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita 565-0871, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Kuroda
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan
| | - Takekazu Iwata
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Makoto Endo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, Yamagata 990-2292, Japan
| | - Yoko Azuma
- Division of Chest Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo 143-8541, Japan
| | - Masayuki Chida
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu 321-0293, Japan
| | - Yukinori Sakao
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo 170-8582, Japan
| | - Ichiro Yoshino
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
| | - Norihiko Ikeda
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan
| | - Haruhisa Matsuguma
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya 320-0834, Japan
| | - Kazuhito Funai
- First Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Hashimoto
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Saitama 359-8513, Japan
| | - Masafumi Kawamura
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo 170-8582, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kroese TE, Christ SM, van Rossum PSN, Burger MDL, Buijs GS, Mühlematter U, Andratschke N, Ruurda JP, Hüllner M, Gutschow CA, van Hillegersberg R, Guckenberger M. Incidence and survival of patients with oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer: a multicenter cohort study. Radiother Oncol 2022; 173:269-276. [PMID: 35753555 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE /OBJECTIVE This multicenter study assessed the incidence and survival of patients with esophagogastric cancer and oligometastatic disease (OMD) in two tertiary referral cancer centers in The Netherlands and Switzerland. MATERIALS /METHODS Between 2010-2021, patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer were identified. Patients with de-novo OMD were included (first-time diagnosis of ≤5 distant metastases on 18F-FDG-PET/CT). Control of the primary tumor was considered in patients who underwent primary tumor resection or definitive chemoradiotherapy without locoregional recurrence. Treatment of OMD was categorized into 1) systemic therapy, 2) local treatment (stereotactic body radiotherapy or metastasectomy), 3) local plus systemic therapy, or 4) best supportive care. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and independent prognostic factors for OS. Independent prognostic factors for OS were analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS In total, 830 patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer were identified of whom 200 patients with de-novo OMD were included (24%). The majority of included patients had esophageal cancer (73%) with adenocarcinoma histology (79%) and metachronous OMD (52%). The primary tumor was controlled in 68%. Treatment of OMD was systemic therapy (25%), local treatment (43%), local plus systemic therapy (13%), or best supportive care (18%). Median follow-up was 14 months (interquartile range: 7-27). Median OS was 16 months (95% CI: 13-21). Improved OS was independently associated with local plus systemic therapy compared with systemic therapy alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-0.87). Worse OS was independently associated with squamous cell carcinoma (HR 1.70, 95% CI: 1.07-2.74), bone oligometastases (HR 2.44, 95% CI: 1.28-4.68), brain oligometastases (HR 1.98, 95% CI: 1.05-4.69), and two metastatic locations (HR 2.07, 95% CI: 1.04-4.12). Median OS after local plus systemic therapy was 35 months (95% CI: 22-NA) as compared with 13 months (95% CI: 9-21, p<0.001) after systemic therapy alone for OMD. CONCLUSION Patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer present in 25% with de-novo OMD. Local treatment of OMD plus systemic therapy was independently associated with long-term OS and independently improved OS when compared with systemic therapy alone. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiuri E Kroese
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastian M Christ
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Peter S N van Rossum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs D L Burger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - George S Buijs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Urs Mühlematter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Hüllner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian A Gutschow
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tsai PC, Chien HC, Hsu PK, Hung JJ, Huang CS, Hsu WH, Hsu HS. Post-recurrence survival analysis in patients with oligo-recurrence after curative esophagectomy. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:637. [PMID: 35681112 PMCID: PMC9185945 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09739-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recurrent esophageal cancer is associated with dismal prognosis. There is no consensus about the role of surgical treatments in patients with limited recurrences. This study aimed to evaluate the role of surgical resection in patients with resectable recurrences after curative esophagectomy and to identify their prognostic factors. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients with recurrent esophageal cancer after curative esophagectomy between 2004 and 2017 and included those with oligo-recurrence that was amenable for surgical intent. The prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and post-recurrence survival (PRS), as well as the survival impact of surgical resection, were analyzed. Results Among 654 patients after curative esophagectomies reviewed, 284 (43.4%) had disease recurrences. The recurrences were found resectable in 63 (9.6%) patients, and 30 (4.6%) patients received surgery. The significant prognostic factors of PRS with poor outcome included mediastinum lymph node (LN) recurrence and pathologic T3 stage. In patients with and without surgical resection for recurrence cancer, the 3-year OS rates were 65.6 and 47.6% (p = 0.108), while the 3-year PRS rates were 42.9 and 23.5% (p = 0.100). In the subgroup analysis, surgery for resectable recurrence, compared with non-surgery, could achieve better PRS for patients without any comorbidities (hazard ratio 0.36, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.94, p = 0.038). Conclusions Mediastinum LN recurrence or pathologic T3 was associated with worse OS and PRS in patients with oligo-recurrences after curative esophagectomies. No definite survival benefit was noted in patients undergoing surgery for resectable recurrence, except in those without comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping-Chung Tsai
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shih-Pai Road, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Che Chien
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shih-Pai Road, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Po-Kuei Hsu
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shih-Pai Road, Taipei, Taiwan. .,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Jung-Jyh Hung
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shih-Pai Road, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Sheng Huang
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shih-Pai Road, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hu Hsu
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shih-Pai Road, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Han-Shui Hsu
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shih-Pai Road, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kroese TE, Buijs GS, Burger MDL, Ruurda JP, Mook S, Brosens LAA, van Rossum PSN, van Hillegersberg R. Metastasectomy or Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With or Without Systemic Therapy for Oligometastatic Esophagogastric Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:4848-4857. [PMID: 35381938 PMCID: PMC9246791 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11541-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background The primary goal of this study was to determine overall survival (OS) in patients who underwent local treatment (metastasectomy or stereotactic body radiotherapy [SBRT]) or systemic therapy (chemotherapy or targeted therapy) for oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer. The secondary goal was to determine prognostic factors for OS. Methods Patients with synchronous or metachronous oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer who underwent local treatment or systemic therapy were included in this single-center, retrospective cohort study. Oligometastatic disease (OMD) included 1 organ or 1 extraregional lymph node station with ≤ 3 lesions. OS was determined after OMD detection. Treatment for OMD was categorized as (1) local treatment, (2) local plus systemic, (3) systemic therapy. The primary tumor was controlled after resection or definitive chemoradiotherapy. Results In total, 85 patients were included. Treatment for OMD was local treatment (58%), local plus systemic (14%), or systemic therapy (28%). The primary tumor was controlled in 68% of patients. Most patients were diagnosed with distal esophageal cancer (61%), with adenocarcinoma histology (76%), and presented with synchronous OMD (51%). OS after local treatment was 17 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 12–40), after local plus systemic therapy 35 months (95% CI 29–NA), and after systemic therapy 16 months (95% CI 11–NA). Better OS was independently associated with local plus systemic compared with local treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 2.11, 95% CI 1.05–5.07) or systemic therapy (HR 2.28, 95% CI 1.04–6.07). Conclusions Local plus systemic therapy for oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer was independently associated with improved OS and better OS compared with either systemic therapy or local treatment. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-022-11541-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiuri E Kroese
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - George S Buijs
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs D L Burger
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stella Mook
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lodewijk A A Brosens
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter S N van Rossum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|